Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of the Snyder and Expanded SLAP Classification System: A Video Study.

Background: Superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) tears are a common finding in overhead athletes. The original classification system produced by Snyder in 1990 contained 4 types of SLAP tears and was later expanded to 10 types. The classification has been challenging because of inconsistencies between surgeons making diagnoses and treatments based on the diagnosis. Furthermore, patient factors-such as age and sports played-affect the treatment algorithms, even across similarly classified SLAP tears. Purpose: To (1) assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Snyder and expanded SLAP (ESLAP) classification systems and (2) determine the consistency of treatment for a given SLAP tear depending on different clinical scenarios. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 20 arthroscopic surgical videos and magnetic resonance imaging scans of patients with SLAP tears were sent to 20 orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons at various stages of training. Surgeons were asked to identify the type of SLAP tear using the Snyder and ESLAP classifications. Surgeons were then asked to determine the treatment for a SLAP tear using 4 clinical scenarios: (1) in the throwing arm of an 18-year-old pitcher; (2) in the dominant arm of an 18-year-old overhead athlete; (3) a 35-year-old overhead athlete; (4) or a 50-year-old overhead athlete. Responses were recorded, and the cases were shuffled and sent back 6 weeks after the initial responses. Results were then analyzed using the Fleiss kappa coefficient (κ) to determine interobserver and intraobserver degrees of agreement. Results: There was moderate intraobserver reliability in both the Snyder and ESLAP classifications (κ = 0.52) and fair interobserver reliability for both classification systems (Snyder, κ = 0.31; ESLAP, κ = 0.30; P < .0001) among all surgeons. Additionally, there was only fair agreement (κ = 0.30; P < .0001) for the treatment modalities chosen by the reviewers for each case. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that SLAP tears remain a challenging problem for orthopaedic surgeons in diagnostics and treatment plans. Therefore, care should be taken in the preoperative discussion with the patient to consider all the possible treatment options because this may affect the postoperative recovery period and patient expectations.

A comparison of anterior cruciate ligament graft tunnel orientation: anatomic vs. transtibial.

BACKGROUND: Recent Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction techniques have emphasized reproducing the insertion sites of the native Anterior Cruciate Ligament. Anatomic techniques have shown improvements in biomechanical testing, but their superior results have not been shown clinically. The hypothesis of this study is that more oblique tunnels utilized in anatomic reconstructions cause asymmetric loading across the graft. METHODS: Seven cadaver knees were tested in a knee simulator that performed a gait cycle and an anterior-posterior laxity test. Each knee underwent both reconstructions in random order utilizing the same Anterior Cruciate Ligament bone patellar tendon bone graft. Before reconstruction, the graft was split longitudinally and miniature force probes were inserted in the medial and lateral portions. FINDINGS: During anterior-posterior laxity testing, the transtibial medial bundle averaged 74.8N compared to 87N for the anatomic. The lateral bundles averaged 146.2 and 158N respectively. Both reconstructions exhibited a similar ratio of force distribution between the bundles and there was no statistical difference. The average anterior-posterior motion for the intact knees was 10.8mm compared to 17.0mm after the Anterior Cruciate Ligament was sectioned. Anatomic reconstructions had an average of 14.0mm of laxity compared to 14.9mm for transtibial reconstructions (P<0.038). INTERPRETATION: Greater obliquity did not lead to an increase in asymmetry of graft loading. The failure of anatomic reconstructions to show clinical improvement over transtibial reconstructions is not due to oblique tunnels causing asymmetric graft loading.

Results of laboratory evaluation of acute knee effusion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: what is found in patients with a noninfected, painful postoperative knee?

BACKGROUND: Infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a rare and potentially devastating complication. No normative data have been reported for knee aspiration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the early postoperative period. HYPOTHESIS: Determining normative laboratory data from a retrospective review of noninfected early postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction knee effusions will allow for the calculation of an aspirate white blood cell (WBC) threshold value indicative of infection. STUDY DESIGN: Case series (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A 2-year retrospective chart review of 151 anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients was performed. Thirty-one noninfected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria and 1 infected patient had laboratory data collected, including peripheral blood and knee effusion aspirate analyses. Laboratory data from pertinent published studies of infected knees after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were combined with the data of our 1 infected patient, establishing a historical control group. Data were analyzed and results were then compared. Infected aspirate WBC threshold value statistics were then calculated. RESULTS: Analysis of noninfected knee effusion aspirates revealed a mean WBC count of 9600/uL (standard deviation [SD], 15 200), and a mean of 66% polymorphonuclear (PMN) cells (SD, 34). Aspirate WBC 98% confidence interval (CI) was 2800/uL to 16 200/uL, and the 98% CI for PMN cells was 58% to 84%. Aspirate WBC count >16 200/uL is 86% sensitive, 92% specific, and has a positive likelihood ratio of 10.4 as an indicator of infection. CONCLUSION: Benign effusion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is common and is associated with elevated inflammatory markers. When concerned, knee aspiration after anterior cruciate ligament surgery gives the highest yield to differentiate between a painful effusion and a septic knee in the early postoperative period while awaiting definitive culture results. The authors report confidence intervals defining the range of cell count variables for noninfected patients requiring aspiration, specifically WBC and PMN, and suggest a WBC threshold value of >16 200/uL be used as an indicator of infection. On the basis of comparison with historical control data, the authors believe these data are significant and will be reliable for clinical use.