Bovine milk microbiota: Evaluation of different DNA extraction protocols for challenging samples.

The use of an adequate protocol that accurately extracts microbial DNA from bovine milk samples is of importance for downstream analysis such as 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. Although sequencing platforms such as Illumina are very common, there are reservations concerning reproducibility in challenging samples that combine low bacterial loads with high amounts of host DNA. The objective of this study was to evaluate six different DNA extraction protocols applied to four different prototype milk samples (low/high level of colony-forming units [cfu] and somatic cells). DNA extracts were sequenced on Illumina MiSeq with primers for the hypervariable regions V1V2 and V3V4. Different protocols were evaluated by analyzing the yield and purity of DNA extracts and the number of clean reads after sequencing. Three protocols with the highest median number of clean reads were selected. To assess reproducibility, these extraction replicates were resequenced in triplicates (n = 120). The most reproducible results for α- and ß-diversity were obtained with the modified DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit after a chemical pretreatment plus resuspension of the cream fraction. The unmodified QIAamp DNA Mini kit performed particularly weak in the sample representing unspecific mastitis. These results suggest that pretreatment in combination with the modified DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit is useful in extracting microbial DNA from challenging milk samples. To increase reproducibility, we recommend that duplicates, if not triplicates, should be sequenced. We showed that high counts of somatic cells challenged DNA extraction, which shapes the need to apply modified extraction protocols.

Short communication: Selection of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in dairy calves associated with antibiotic dry cow therapy-A cohort study.

Antimicrobial residues in milk have been discussed as a possible selector for Enterobacteriaceae that produce extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL) in dairy herds. Such residues are found in waste milk after antibiotic treatment of mastitis, but antibiotic dry cow therapy might also lead to antibiotic residues in colostrum and in milk during early lactation. While it is known that feeding of waste milk selects ESBL bacteria in calves, this was not investigated for colostrum yet, which is supposed to contain much lower antibiotic concentrations than waste milk. In this observational prospective case study on 2 farms, we hypothesized that blanket dry cow treatment with ß-lactams would have more selective (here: increasing) effects on ESBL concentrations than selective (here: individually chosen) antibiotic dry cow therapy. Thus, we compared concentrations of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in feces of calves (n = 50) at 2 dairy farms with different management of antibiotic dry cow therapy. Considerably higher concentrations of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli were observed in blanket antibiotic dry cow therapy on d 3 of the calf's life (7.6 vs. 5.3 log cfu/g of calf feces). Both farms used narrow-spectrum penicillin combined with aminoglycosides for drying off, and the majority of ESBL isolates (93%) were co-resistant to aminoglycosides. No waste milk was fed to calves and no calf was treated with ß-lactam antibiotics or aminoglycosides during the first 3 d of life, thus differences were most likely associated with different frequency of antibiotic dry cow therapy on farms (19 of 25 mother cows on farm A, 9 of 25 on farm B). Even though the presumable selection effect of antibiotics used for drying off decreased within the next 3 wk, this result further emphasizes the need for the reduction and prudent use of antibiotic dry cow therapy on farms.