RESUMO
Percutaneous testicular varicocele embolisation for symptomatic and subfertile males is often preferred over surgical ligation of the gonadal vein due to its minimally invasive approach and reduced complication rate. Glues, coils, vascular plugs, balloons and sclerosants are used in various combinations to achieve sufficient venous occlusion. Here, we report on the first known case of sclerosant material migration beyond the placement of an embolisation coil for treatment of a varicocele, resulting in a left renal vein thrombus. A man in his 20s presented to the emergency department 2 days following uncomplicated left varicocele embolisation with acute left-sided abdominal pain, found to have sclerosant material causing an ipsilateral non-occlusive left renal vein thrombus with extension towards his inferior vena cava on CT. He was treated with 3 months of anticoagulation and follow-up imaging at 3 months showed resolution of this thrombus without renal impairment.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Veias Renais , Varicocele , Humanos , Masculino , Varicocele/terapia , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Veias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Migração de Corpo Estranho , Soluções Esclerosantes/administração & dosagem , Soluções Esclerosantes/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XAssuntos
Cirurgiões , Parede Torácica , Humanos , Relevância Clínica , Músculo Esquelético , Músculos Peitorais/cirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The clinical outcomes from suspected appendicitis depend on balancing the rate of negative appendicectomy (NA) with perforated appendicitis (PA). An Acute Surgical Model (ASM) was introduced at Geelong Hospital (GH) in 2011 involving a dedicated emergency general surgery theatre list every business day giving greater access to theatre for general surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the ASM at GH on the management of appendicitis, in particular the NA and PA rates. METHODS: Data for 357 patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy was collected prospectively over 1 year (2011) and compared with a historical control group of 351 patients (2010). The data was analysed for patient demographics, preoperative diagnostic radiology and outcomes including NA and PA rates and complications. The negative appendicectomy rates were compared with contemporary studies. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups in rates of negative appendicectomy 21% (ASM; 73/357) versus 21% (Control; 73/351) P = 0.98, or perforated appendicitis 17% (ASM; 61/357) versus 13% (Control; 47/351) P = 0.18. The introduction of the ASM corresponded to a significantly lower proportion of emergency appendicectomies overnight (4% [16/357] versus 12% [44/351] P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the use of preoperative diagnostic radiology or complications. Matched contemporary studies had a NA rate of 26%. CONCLUSION: The introduction of the ASM at GH has not significantly altered the rate of NA or PA. The NA rate at GH is comparable to other published UK and Australian series.