Evaluation of Patients with COVID-19 Followed Up in Intensive Care Units in the Second Year of the Pandemic: A Multicenter Point Prevalence Study.

OBJECTIVE: A 1-day point prevalence study was planned to obtain country data by determining the clinical characteristics, follow-up and treatment methods of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases that required intensive care unit (ICU) treatment in the second year of the pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients who were hospitalized in the ICUs due to COVID-19 between March 11, 2022, 08.00 am, and March 12, 2022, 08.00 am, were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, intensive care and laboratory data, radiological characteristics, and follow-up results of the patients were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 811 patients from 59 centers were included in the study, 59% of the cases were male, and the mean age was 74 ± 14 years. At least one comorbid disease was present in 94% of the cases, and hypertension was the most common. When ICU weight scores were examined, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II: 19 (15-27) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment: 7 (4-10) were seen. Sepsis was present in 37% (n = 298) of cases. PaO2/FiO2 ratios of the patients were 190 the highest and 150 the lowest and 51% of the cases were followed via invasive mechanical ventilation. On the study day, 73% bilateral involvement was seen on chest x-ray, and ground-glass opacities (52%) were the most common on chest tomography. There was growth in culture in 40% (n = 318) of the cases, and the most common growth was in the tracheal aspirate (42%). CONCLUSION: The clinical course of COVID-19 is variable, and ICU follow-up was required due to advanced age, comorbidity, presence of respiratory symptoms, and widespread radiological involvement. The need for respiratory support and the presence of secondary infection are important issues to be considered in the follow-up. Despite the end of the second year of the pandemic and vaccination, the high severity of the disease as well as the need for follow-up in ICUs has shown that COVID-19 is an important health problem.

Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR in vaginal swab samples of female patients with a diagnosis of severe COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: It is important to determine the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the vaginal fluid samples of reproductive-aged women with severe disease during the acute stage of the disease and to determine the risks of transmission by sexual or vertical transmission. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult women with confirmed severe COVID-19 who were admitted to Ankara City Hospital intensive care unit (ICU) between December 1st, 2020, and January 1st, 2021, were enrolled in the study. Vaginal swab samples were collected within 48 h in the ICU using Dacron or rayon swabs and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT PCR). RESULTS: Thirty women of reproductive age were included in the study, five (16.7%) of whom were pregnant. The mean age was 44.9 (±10.5) years. The most common symptoms were headache (100%), muscle soreness (86.7%), cough (76.7%), fever (60%), and nausea and vomiting (20%). Nineteen (63.3%) patients had underlying medical conditions. The time interval from obtaining vaginal swab samples to admission to the ICU was 48 h. The time between vaginal sampling and PCR positivity ranged from 2 to 18 days. SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in any vaginal samples. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that women with severe COVID-19 did not have SARS-CoV-2 in their vaginal fluids. Investigation of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in vaginal secretions may help in determining the risks of sexual transmission and vertical transmission from mother to baby. Information on this subject is still limited. Larger studies on comprehensive biological samples are needed.

Comparison of two new techniques for the management of malignant central airway obstruction: argon plasma coagulation with mechanical tumor resection versus cryorecanalization.

BACKGROUND: The development of central airway obstruction during malignant diseases is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Endobronchial therapies can decrease the patient's symptoms and improve quality of life. Here, we compare airway recanalization methods: argon plasma coagulation with mechanical tumor resection (APC + MTR) and cryorecanalization (CR efficiency, complications, restenosis rate, and time to restenosis) in patients with malignant exophytic endobronchial airway obstruction. METHODS: A total of 89 patients were included who were admitted to our hospital between 2005 and 2012. The data were analyzed retrospectively. Initially, a CR procedure was performed in 52 patients using rigid bronchoscopy under general anesthesia; the APC + MTR procedure was performed in 37 patients with malignant airway obstruction. RESULTS: The airway patency rate with APC + MTR was 97.3% (n = 36) and CR was 80.8% (n = 42). The APC + MTR procedure was more effective than CR for recanalization of malignant endobronchial exophytic airway obstruction. Additionally, the achievement rate of airway patency with APC + MTR was significantly higher in tumors with distal bronchial involvement. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of complications, restenosis rate, and time to restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: The APC + MTR procedure is preferred over CR to introduce and maintain airway patency in patients with malignancy-related endobronchial exophytic airway obstruction.

How many samples would be optimal for endobronchial cryobiopsy?

BACKGROUND: Cryobiopsy, which provides larger specimens without crush artifact, is a good option for the diagnosis of visible endobronchial tumors. While there are several papers on diagnostic performance, application protocols vary between centers. In this study, we aimed to find the optimal number of cryobiopsies in endobronchial tumors. METHODS: We prospectively involved cases with a visible endobronchial tumor in which conventional diagnostic measures failed and/or a therapeutic interventional bronchoscopy was planned. Endobronchial tumor was visualized, and four cryobiopsies were taken with a dedicated flexible probe. The samples were evaluated by a pathologist who was blinded to the order of the biopsies. The cumulative performances of one to four cryobiopsies were compared, and a complication analysis was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were involved. Four cryobiopsies were taken from 49 patients, and a single biopsy was taken from one case. The sensitivities of one, two, three and four biopsies were 82, 93.9, 93.9 and 95.9 %, respectively. The difference in performance of one and two biopsies was significant (p = 0.031), but the third and fourth biopsies were found to be unnecessary (p = 1.0 for second versus third and p = 1.0 for second versus fourth). Bleeding risk increased when ≥3 cryobiopsies were taken (Odds Ratio 2.758). CONCLUSIONS: When the diagnostic benefits and complication rates were considered, two cryobiopsies were found to be optimal for endobronchial tumors. In patients with non-diagnostic conventional bronchoscopy, endobronchial tumors may be diagnosed by cryobiopsy.

Performance evaluation of MR-proadrenomedullin and other scoring systems in severe sepsis with pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: In sepsis, risk assessment is as crucial as early and accurate diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) with other scoring systems in severe sepsis and septic shock patients due to community acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: Patients were divided into 2 groups as severe sepsis and septic shock due to CAP (group 1, n=31) and only CAP group (group 2, n=26). Serum MR-proADM, procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and d-dimer level were analyzed. Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) were performed for all patients. RESULTS: There was no difference between groups in terms of serum MR-proADM levels (P=0.780). Serum MR-proADM was not found a significant value for the prediction of death within the 4 and 8 weeks in all patients. SOFA score was the most significant to predict mortality in 4 and 8 weeks (P<0.001). The combination of SOFA score and serum MR-proADM was a strong factor to predict death in 4 weeks (specifity 86.8% and sensitivity 66.7%). The combination of MR-proADM, SOFA score, and APACHE II score was found 75.0% sensitive and 71.4% specific to predict mortality within 4 weeks in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: The MR-proADM does not correlate with mortality or disease severity to predict mortality. The combination of SOFA, APACHE II scores, and MR-proADM was efficient to predict prognosis and mortality rate in severe sepsis or septic shock patients.