Long-lasting stable disease with mTOR inhibitor treatment in a patient with a perivascular epithelioid cell tumor: A case report and literature review.

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) of the small intestine is extremely rare, and there is no established treatment at the present time. In 10% of patients with PEComas, genetic alterations of tuberous sclerosis complex have been reported. These genetic alterations activate mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) in AMP-activated protein kinase and Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways, resulting in high mTOR activity. Since 2007, several cases of treatment with mTOR inhibitors in advanced PEComa have been reported. The current study presents the case of a patient with small bowel PEComa that metastasized to the brain and lungs. Following resection of the brain metastasis, the patient was treated with everolimus, a mTOR inhibitor, resulting in improvement if the patient's quality of life and a long period of stable disease. In conclusion, the use of mTOR inhibitors as a first-line treatment option in advanced PEComa patients appears to be reasonable, according to the increasing evidence from data observed from reported cases with this rare malignancy.

[Modeling integrative oncology care program for Arab patients in north Israel: towards quality of life improvement during chemotherapy].

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, a number of integrative oncology programs have been established within leading oncology departments in Israel aiming to provide consultations that address patients' concerns and improve their quality of life (QOL). OBJECTIVE: To identify Arab cancer patients' attitudes, needs and expectations concerning integration of complementary and traditional medicine (CTM) in their supportive oncology care. METHODS: This article presents studies based on both qualitative (including interviews with patients, oncologists and CTM practitioners) and quantitative studies which were designed to evaluate patients' attitudes, needs and expectations regarding CTM integration in supportive oncology care. RESULTS: Of the 313 Arab respondents, 109 reported on the use of herbal medicine for cancer-associated outcomes. Over 78% of respondents considered QOL improvement as their main expectation of integrated CM consultation. Similar expectations were expressed in studies exploring 155 cancer care practitioners in Israel and Arab countries, 27 CTM-trained Arab practitioners, and a sample of 15 Arab patients referred to integrative medicine consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Arab cancer patients support QOL-oriented integrated medicine programs provided in oncology settings. Integrative medicine consultation should provide patients with an evidence-based recommendation on efficacy and safety of herbs commonly used concomitant with chemotherapy. We recommend designing integrative oncology training courses for physicians who will provide evidence-based consultation attuned with Arab patients' needs, concerns and cultural-sensitive orientation.

Integration of complementary medicine in supportive cancer care: survey of health-care providers' perspectives from 16 countries in the Middle East.

INTRODUCTION: In this multinational Middle-Eastern study, we assessed health-care providers' (HCPs) perspectives on their patients' use of complementary and traditional medicine (CTM) and identified the leading barriers to CTM integration in supportive cancer care. METHODS: A 17-item questionnaire was developed and administered to HCPs attending palliative medicine workshops conducted across the Middle East by the Middle East Cancer Consortium. RESULTS: 339 HCPs from 16 countries across the Middle East completed the questionnaire (80.3 % response rate). Respondents perceived their patients' reasons for CTM use primarily in the context of cancer cure (63 %) and quality of life (QOL) improvement (57 %). Expectation regarding CTM's role in cancer cure/survival was more pronounced in Turkey, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, and the Persian Gulf area. In contrast, the expectation that CTM would improve QOL was more emphasized in Israel. A mid-position between the cure/survival and QOL poles was observed in Cyprus, Lebanon, and the North African countries. Leading barriers to CTM integration in supportive cancer care included oncologists' skepticism and a gap between patients' expectations and HCP's objectives. Respondents' leading recommendation to HCPs was to communicate integrative care emphasizing well-being and improved functioning in accordance with their patients' health beliefs. CONCLUSION: CTM integration in supportive cancer care can be facilitated by implementing a platform for Middle Eastern clinical collaborations. HCPs' expectations and experiences with CTM have been positive in the oncology setting. These data need to be corroborated with information of patients' expectations on the provision of CTM over all phases of the oncology treatment.