Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Future Oncol ; 12(20): 2297-305, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27402453

RESUMO

AIMS: Could metaphase 1 (M1) and 2 (M2) stages oocytes from in vitro maturation (IVM) cycles and controlled-ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) cycles be frozen at the same time without any adverse effect of vitrification on further survival (SR) and maturation rates (MR)? MATERIALS & METHODS: M1 from cancer patients were prospectively included in IVM/COH groups, and in study or control subgroups if they were vitrified or not. In each study subgroup, SR were compared with that of M2 oocytes vitrified/warmed from egg donors. MR were compared with those of fresh-M1 oocytes from control IVM/COH subgroups. RESULTS: SR were not different between groups. MR compared respectively between survived- and fresh-M1 oocytes were similar when resulting from COH (85.2 vs 81.1%) but significantly lower after IVM (39.1 vs 73.3%). CONCLUSION: Simultaneous freezing of M1/M2 oocytes could be applied to COH but not to IVM during the course of fertility preservation.


Assuntos
Preservação da Fertilidade , Metáfase , Oócitos/citologia , Oócitos/fisiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Diferenciação Celular , Células Cultivadas , Criopreservação/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Neoplasias , Indução da Ovulação , Vitrificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA