Assessment of Family Satisfaction with Remote Communication for Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: An Observational Cohort Study.

Background: During the pandemic, traditional family meetings were replaced by remote telecommunications. We assessed the families' satisfaction with these communications using a survey-based questionnaire. Methods: The study involved 20-minute telephonic surveys conducted with the family member who was updated during the hospitalization of the patient. A thematic-based questionnaire with responses on a scale of 5 ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied was used. The responses were dichotomized into bad and good reports for analysis. Results: A total of 196 patients were eligible. Only 154 patients' family representatives consented to the study. The frequency and content of the telephonic updates were satisfactory. The bad report was assigned to 5% of families only. Among features assessing empathy of communication providers, the satisfaction rate was much higher with 3% of families alone providing a bad report. The response was significantly biased against the final outcome of the patient with poor review often provided by relatives of patients who had succumbed to the illness. The dissatisfaction rate was much higher, above 12% for the trust of communication and ICU visitation. However, the final outcome of the patient did not affect the trust in the information conveyed by the physician. Interpretation: This study highlights several drawbacks in the communication strategy during the second surge of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). The final outcome of the patient was the key decisive factor for the response to most of the questionnaire. Sustained faith in communication by the physician despite the final outcome of the patient, re-emphasizes the need for emotional connection and training for breaking bad news. How to cite this article: Varghese MP, Selwyn T, Nair S, Samuel S, Chacko B, Pichamuthu K. Assessment of Family Satisfaction with Remote Communication for Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: An Observational Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(8):537-544.

Study of water supply & sanitation practices in India using geographic information systems: some design & other considerations in a village setting.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Availability of clean water and adequate sanitation facilities are of prime importance for limiting diarrhoeal diseases. We examined the water and sanitation facilities of a village in southern India using geographic information system (GIS) tools. METHODS: Places of residence, water storage and distribution, sewage and places where people in the village defaecated were mapped and drinking water sources were tested for microbial contamination in Nelvoy village, Vellore district, Tamil Nadu. RESULTS: Water in the village was found to be microbiologically unfit for consumption. Analysis using direct observations supplemented by GIS maps revealed poor planning, poor engineering design and lack of policing of the water distribution system causing possible contamination of drinking water from sewage at multiple sites. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Until appropriate engineering designs for water supply and sewage disposal to suit individual village needs are made available, point-of-use water disinfection methods could serve as an interim solution.

Water handling, sanitation and defecation practices in rural southern India: a knowledge, attitudes and practices study.

Diarrhoea and water-borne diseases are leading causes of mortality in developing countries. To understand the socio-cultural factors impacting on water safety, we documented knowledge, attitudes and practices of water handling and usage, sanitation and defecation in rural Tamilnadu, India, using questionnaires and focus group discussions, in a village divided into an upper caste Main village and a lower caste Harijan colony. Our survey showed that all households stored drinking water in wide-mouthed containers. The quantity of water supplied was less in the Harijan colony, than in the Main village (P<0.001). Residents did not associate unsafe water with diarrhoea, attributing it to 'heat', spicy food, ingesting hair, mud or mosquitoes. Among 97 households interviewed, 30 (30.9%) had toilets but only 25 (83.3%) used them. Seventy-two (74.2%) of respondents defecated in fields, and there was no stigma associated with this traditional practice. Hand washing with soap after defecation and before meals was common only in children under 15 years (86.4%). After adjusting for other factors, perception of quantity of water received (P<0.001), stated causation of diarrhoea (P=0.02) and low socio-economic status (P<0.001) were significantly different between the Main village and the Harijan colony. Traditional practices may pose a significant challenge to programmes aimed at toilet usage and better sanitation.