Predicting Food Effects on Oral Extended-Release Drug Products: A Retrospective Evaluation.

Theoretically, the risk of food effects for extended-release (ER) products compared to IR products may be less because: (1) postprandial physiological changes are usually transient and last for 2-3 h only; and (2) the percentage of drug release from an ER product within the first 2-3 h post dose is usually small under both fasted and fed states. The major postprandial physiological changes that can affect oral absorption of ER drugs are delayed gastric emptying and prolonged intestinal transit. Oral absorption of ER drugs under fasted state mainly occurs in large intestine (colon and rectum) while the absorption of ER drugs under fed state occurs in both small and large intestines. We hypothesized that food effects for ER products are mainly caused by intestinal region-dependent absorption and food intake is more likely to increase rather than decrease the exposure of ER products due to a longer transit time and improved absorption in small intestine. For drugs with good absorption from large intestine, food effects on the area under the curve (AUC) of ER products are usually not expected. Our survey of oral drugs approved by the US FDA between 1998-2021 identified 136 oral ER drug products. Among the 136 ER drug products, 31, 6 and 99 products exhibited increased, decreased, and unchanged AUC under fed conditions, respectively. In general, when an ER product exhibits a fasted bioavailability (BA) relative to its corresponding immediate-release (IR) product between 80-125%, regardless the solubility or permeability of drug substances, substantial food effects on the AUC of ER product are generally not expected. If the fasted relative BA data are not available, a high in vitro permeability (i.e., Caco-2 or MDCK cell permeability comparable or higher than that of metoprolol) may inform no food effect on the AUC of an ER product of high-solubility (BCS class I and III) drug.

Combined Oral Contraceptives As Victims of Drug Interactions.

Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) are widely used in women of reproductive age in the United States. Metabolism plays an important role in the elimination of estrogens and progestins contained in COCs. It is unavoidable that a woman using COCs may need to take another drug to treat a disease. If the concurrently used drug induces enzymes responsible for the metabolism of progestins and/or estrogens, unintended pregnancy or irregular bleeding may occur. If the concurrent drug inhibits the metabolism of these exogenous hormones, there may be an increased safety risk such as thrombosis. Therefore, for an investigational drug intended to be used in women with reproductive potential, evaluating its effects on the pharmacokinetics of COCs is important to determine if additional labeling is necessary for managing drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between the concomitant product and the COCs. It is challenging to determine when this clinical drug interaction study is needed, whether an observed exposure change of progestin/estrogen is clinically meaningful, and if the results of a clinical drug interaction study with one COC can predict exposure changes of unstudied COCs to inform labeling. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of metabolic pathways of estrogens and progestins contained in commonly used COCs and known interactions of these COCs as victim drugs and we discuss possible mechanisms of interactions for unexpected results. We also discuss recent advances, knowledge gaps, and future perspectives on this important topic. The review will enhance the understanding of DDIs with COCs and improve the safe and effective use of COCs. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This minireview provides an overview of the metabolic pathways of ethinyl estradiol and progestins contained in commonly used combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and significant drug interactions of these COCs as victims. It also discusses recent advances, knowledge gaps, future perspectives, and potential mechanisms for unexpected results of clinical drug interaction studies of COCs. This minireview will help the reader understand considerations when evaluating the drug interaction potential with COCs for drugs that are expected to be used concurrently.

Leveraging Clinical Pharmacology Data to Assess Biosimilarity and Interchangeability of Insulin Products.

There is over a hundred years of clinical experience with insulin for the treatment of diabetes. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first insulin biosimilar interchangeable product in 2021 for improving glycemic control in adults and pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Several recombinant insulin products are available in the United States, including the recently approved biosimilar insulins. The approval of the biosimilar insulin products was based on comparative analytical characterizations and comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data. The primary objective of this review is to discuss the scientific considerations in the demonstration of biosimilarity of a proposed insulin biosimilar to a reference product and the role of clinical pharmacology studies in the determination of biosimilarity and interchangeability. Euglycemic clamp studies are considered a "gold standard" for insulin PK and PD characterization and have been widely used to determine the time-action profiles of rapid-acting, intermediate-acting, and long-acting insulin products. Clinical pharmacology aspects of study design, including selection of appropriate dose, study population, PK, and PD end points, are presented. Finally, the role of clinical pharmacology studies in the interchangeability assessment of insulin and the regulatory pathways used for insulin and the experience with follow-on insulins and the two recently approved biosimilar insulin products is discussed.

EXOGENOUS Sex Hormones and Sex Hormone Receptor Modulators in COVID-19: Rationale and Clinical Pharmacology Considerations.

Male patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) fare much worse than female patients in COVID-19 severity and mortality according to data from several studies. Because of this sex disparity, researchers hypothesize that the use of exogenous sex hormone therapy and sex hormone receptor modulators might provide therapeutic potential for patients with COVID-19. Repurposing approved drugs or drug candidates at late-stage clinical development could expedite COVID-19 therapy development because their clinical formulation, routes of administration, dosing regimen, clinical pharmacology, and potential adverse events have already been established or characterized in humans. A number of exogenous sex hormones and sex hormone receptor modulators are currently or will be under clinical investigation for COVID-19 therapy. In this review, we discuss the rationale for exogenous sex hormones and sex hormone receptor modulators in COVID-19 treatment, summarize ongoing and planned clinical trials, and discuss some of the clinical pharmacology considerations on clinical study design. To inform clinical study design and facilitate the clinical development of exogenous sex hormones and sex hormone receptor modulators for COVID-19 therapy, clinical investigators should pay attention to clinical pharmacology factors, such as dosing regimen, special populations (i.e., geriatrics, pregnancy, lactation, and renal/hepatic impairment), and drug interactions.

Advancing Estimation of Hepatobiliary Clearances in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models of Rosuvastatin Using Human Hepatic Concentrations.

PURPOSE: To estimate hepatobiliary clearances of rosuvastatin via simultaneously fitting to reported human positron emission tomography (PET) data in the liver and gallbladder. METHODS: A hepatobiliary model incorporating five intrinsic hepatobiliary clearances (active uptake clearance at the sinusoidal membrane, efflux clearance by passive diffusion through the sinusoidal membrane, influx clearance by passive diffusion through sinusoidal membrane, clearance of biliary excretion at the canalicular membrane, and intercompartment clearance from the intrahepatic bile duct to the gallbladder) and three compartments (liver, intrahepatic bile duct, and gallbladder) was developed to simultaneously fit rosuvastatin liver and gallbladder data from a representative subject reported by Billington et al. (1). Two liver blood supply input functions, arterial input function and dual input function (using peripheral venous as an alternative to portal vein), were assessed. Additionally, the predictive performance between the established model and four reported models trained with only systemic exposure data, was evaluated by comparing simulated liver and gallbladder profiles with observations. RESULTS: The established hepatobiliary model well captured the kinetic profiles of rosuvastatin in the liver and gallbladder during the PET scans. Application of dual input function led to a marked underestimation of liver concentrations at the initial stage after i.v. dosing which cannot be offset by altering model parameter values. The simulated hepatobiliary profiles from three of the reported models demonstrated substantial deviation from the observed data. CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights the necessity of using hepatobiliary data to verify and improve the predictive performance of hepatic disposition of rosuvastatin.

Impact of injection sites on clinical pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously administered peptides and proteins.

For most approved subcutaneously (SC) administered drug products in the US, the recommended injection sites (i.e., abdomen, thigh, and upper arm) are usually based on experience from phase 3 trials. Relative bioavailability data directly comparing the pharmacokinetics (PK) of different SC injection sites are often not available and the underlying mechanisms that may affect SC absorption have not been systematically investigated. In this study, we surveyed clinical PK data (AUC, Cmax, and Tmax) for SC administered drug products including therapeutic proteins and peptides based on literature and FDA database. The PK data after abdominal injection was used as a reference to determine the relative bioavailability of SC injections to the arm and thigh. The survey retrieved 19 immunoglobulin G (IgGs), 18 peptides/small proteins (molecular weight < 16 kDa), and 8 non-IgG proteins that had available clinical PK data from multiple SC injection sites. Among these, 5 (26%) IgGs, 9 (50%) peptides/small proteins, and 3 (38%) non-IgG proteins, exhibited injection site-dependent PK (i.e. PK differed by injection sites). Correlation analyses revealed that the PK of peptides/small proteins undergoing rapid SC absorption (Tmax ≤ 2 h), elimination (CL/F ≥ 39 L/h) or low plasma protein binding were more sensitive to injection sites. Similarly, non-IgG proteins (molecular weight ≥ 16 kDa) with high CL/F and low Tmax are associated with high risk of injection site-dependent SC absorption. IgGs with T1/2 < 15 days or Tmax < 5 days are more likely to show injection site-dependent SC absorption. Positive charge of the drug molecule (isoelectric point ≥8) may reduce SC absorption from all three injection sites but is not associated with high risk of injection site-dependent SC absorption. In summary, the results suggested that regional differences in pre-systemic catabolism and local SC blood flow potentially contribute injection site-dependent SC absorption of peptides/small proteins while local lymphatic flow and FcRn binding likely contribute to site-dependent SC absorption of IgGs.

Use of Model-Informed Drug Development to Streamline Development of Long-Acting Products: Can These Successes Be Translated to Long-Acting Hormonal Contraceptives?

Long-acting contraceptives are the most effective reversible contraceptive methods. Increasing patients' access to these contraceptives may translate into fewer unintended pregnancies and lead to substantial individual and public health benefits. However, development of long-acting products can be complex and challenging. This review provides (a) an overview of representative development programs for long-acting antipsychotics as cases for conceptual translation to long-acting contraceptives, (b) several case examples on how modeling and simulation have been used to streamline the development of long-acting products, and (c) examples of challenges andopportunities in developing long-acting contraceptives and information on how exposure-response relationships of commonly used progestins may enable regulators and developers to rely on prior findings of effectiveness and safety from an approved contraceptive to streamline the development of long-acting contraceptives. The US Food and Drug Administration is seeking assistance from stakeholders to provide data from studies in which pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic or clinical outcomes of hormonal contraceptives were evaluated and not previously submitted.

Effects of Sorbitol on the Pharmacokinetics of Lamivudine Solution and the FDA's Decision to Increase the Dose of Lamivudine Solution for Pediatric Patients.

The article by Adkison et al. described sorbitol effects on lamivudine exposures. The results indicate a plausible mechanism for lower lamivudine exposures in pediatric patients receiving the solution formulation with concomitant medications containing sorbitol. In this commentary, we discuss lower lamivudine exposures in pediatric patients receiving the solution formulation, the impact of sorbitol on lamivudine exposures, and the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) decision to increase the dose of the lamivudine solution for all pediatric patients.