Audiovestibular outcomes in adult patients with cogan syndrome: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To determine factors associated with steroid responsiveness and efficacy of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic (DMARD) use in patients with Cogan Syndrome (CS). METHODS: A systematic search of Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Any study describing audiometric or vestibular data and pharmacologic treatment in patients with CS was included. Due to limited literature, only case reports/case series were included. RESULTS: Seventy case reports or case series studies comprising 79 individual cases of CS were included. A difference in vestibular symptoms with a higher prevalence in the steroid-resistant group than the steroid-responsive group was found (79.5% vs 57.9%, p = 0.04). Eighteen (60.0%) patients treated only with oral steroids had no audiological improvement, while twelve (n = 12; 85.7%) patients treated with biologic DMARD showed audiological improvement. The steroid-responsive group had an overall better response to DMARDs than the steroid-resistant group (62.1% vs 45.0%; 100.0% vs 77.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study synthesized the available literature to better characterize steroid resistance in patients with Cogan syndrome and treatment outcomes. Vestibular symptoms were noted to be more prevalent in patients who were eventually labeled as steroid resistant. There were higher rates of audiological improvement in patients given biologic DMARDs rather than conventional DMARDs or steroids only. Further studies are needed to characterize each individual vestibular symptom and investigate the utility and timing of biologic DMARDs in managing patients with Cogan syndrome.

Testing practices and clinical management of lipoprotein(a) levels: A 5-year retrospective analysis from the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

Objective: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent, genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We evaluated the frequency of testing for elevated Lp(a) and subsequent management at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, a large academic medical center, over a 5-year period. Methods: The Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) electronic medical record was queried to identify patients with an encounter between 2017 and 2021, either with established ASCVD or at increased risk, defined as being on any lipid lowering medication or having LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL. The frequency of Lp(a) testing and of elevated levels were identified for each year. Results: Among 111,350 unique adult patients, 2,785 (2.5 %) had at least one Lp(a) test. Patients with Lp(a) testing, compared to those without testing, were younger (mean age 56 years vs. 66 years), more often female (49 % vs. 44 %), Black (24.7 % vs. 24.6 %) or "other" race/ethnicity (12 % vs 10 %), and had higher LDL-C levels (median 118 vs. 91 mg/dL; p < 0.001). The number and frequency of Lp(a) testing increased from 167 (0.57 %) in 2017 to 1155 (5.67 %) in 2021. Lp(a) levels were abnormal in 43.4 % of patients (moderate [75-125 nmol/L]: 10.3 %, high [126-600 nmol/L]: 32.2 %, severe [>600 nmol/L]: 0.9 %). Among 920 patients with high or severe Lp(a) levels, 200 (22 %) had a subsequent referral to cardiology or lipid specialist, and 180 (20 %) had a new lipid-lowering medication prescribed in the subsequent 18 months. Conclusion: Based on a single-center experience, the frequency of incident Lp(a) testing among increased-risk patients was low but increased significantly over 5-years, likely due to Lipid Clinic referrals with reflex Lp(a) testing and greater awareness about this risk factor. Future work should target appropriate population based Lp(a) testing strategies and clinical decision-making regarding risk management once Lp(a) elevation is diagnosed.

Expanded genetic testing in familial hypercholesterolemia-A single center's experience.

Objective: Assess the yield of genetic testing for pathogenic variants in ABCG5, ABCG8, LIPA, and APOE in individuals with personal and family histories suggestive of familial hypercholesterolemia. Methods: Retrospective review of patients seen in the Advanced Lipid Disorders Clinic at Johns Hopkins. Results: In the lipid clinic at a single center during the years 2015-2023, 607 patients underwent genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia, of which 263 underwent the expanded genetic testing for sitosterolemia. Eighty-eight patients had genetic testing which included APOE, and 22 patients had testing which included LIPA. Among these, one patient was identified to have a pathogenic variant in APOE and another patient with a pathogenic variant in ABCG5 (0.7 % yield). The frequency of a positive result was double that of a variant of uncertain significance. Conclusion: These data suggest in rare cases expanded testing can provide answers for patients and families with a minimal likelihood of a variant of uncertain significance.

Etiological spectrum and diagnostic challenges of short-duration fever in West Bengal (India). A cross-sectional tertiary care study.

INTRODUCTION: The scarcity of epidemiological data on acute febrile illnesses from South Asia impairs evidence-based clinical decision-making. Our study aimed to explore the etiological spectrum of short-duration fever in patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital in West Bengal, India. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study from May 2021 to April 2022 involving 150 adult patients presenting with a fever lasting less than two weeks at Burdwan Medical College and Hospital (West Bengal, India). We performed comprehensive clinical assessments, including microbiological, serological, and other specific investigations, to identify the causes of the fever. RESULTS: The demographic profile predominantly included individuals aged 21-40 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.9:1; 60.7% of participants were from rural areas. The primary etiological agents identified were scrub typhus (25.3%), dengue (15.3%), and enteric fever (13.3%). Notably, 80% of patients presented with non-localizing symptoms, while 14.7% had respiratory symptoms. Blood cultures pinpointed Salmonella typhi and Staphylococcus aureus in a minority of cases (3.3%); malaria, primarily Plasmodium vivax, was diagnosed in 12% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the complexity of diagnosing short-duration fevers, dominated by a wide range of etiological agents, with a notable prevalence of scrub typhus. These results underscore the urgent need for enhanced diagnostic facilities, including the availability of scrub typhus testing at primary healthcare centers. We recommend empirical doxycycline therapy for suspected cases and emphasize the need for further research to develop management guidelines for acute febrile illnesses. This study also highlights the importance of raising both community and clinician awareness to prevent irrational antibiotic use.

Overcoming barriers to implementation: Improving incidental coronary calcium reporting on non-EKG gated chest CT scans.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the reporting of incidental CAC on non-EKG-gated CT scans of the chest. The finding of incidental moderate or severe CAC on non-cardiac non-contrast chest CT correlates with a CAC score ≥ 100 Agatston units, a guideline-based indication for a clinician-patient discussion regarding the initiation of statin therapy. In contemporary practice, whether the presence and severity of incidental CAC are routinely reported on such CT scans of the chest is unknown. METHODS: At a major university hospital, we collected a one-month convenience sample of 297 patients who had chest CT imaging for indications other than lung cancer screening (OICT) and 42 patients who underwent lung cancer chest CT screening (LSCT). We evaluated reporting patterns of incidental CAC in the body and impression of the reports as compared to the overreading of such studies by a board-certified CT chest radiologist. We hypothesized and demonstrated that there was underreporting of incidental CAC on these scans. We then undertook an initiative to educate reporting radiologists on the importance of reporting CAC and implemented a reporting template change to encourage routine reporting. Then we repeated another one-month sample (n= 363 for the OICT and n= 63 for the LSCT groups) to evaluate reporting patterns following our intervention. RESULTS: The presence of incidental moderate and severe CAC was systematically underreported in the OICT group (0 and 4.8 %) and the severity was never mentioned in the impression of reports. In the LSCT group, the presence of incidental moderate and severe CAC was also underreported (66.7 % and 75 %) and the severity of CAC was mentioned 50 % of the time in the impression of the reports. Following the initiation of an educational program and radiology reporting template change, there was a significant increase in reporting of moderate or severe CAC in the OICT group (0 vs. 80.0 %, p < 0.001) and (4.8 vs. 93.5 %, p < 0.001) respectively and a significant increase in the reporting of the severity of incidental CAC for those with severe CAC in the LSCT group (50 vs. 94.1 %, p=0.006). CONCLUSION: Despite guideline recommendations, Incidental CAC was underreported at a large academic center. We implemented a system that significantly improved reporting patterns of incidental CAC. Failure to report incidental CAC represents a missed opportunity to initiate preventive therapies. Hospital systems interested in improving the quality of their radiology reporting procedures should examine their practices to assure that CAC quantification is routinely performed.