Adverse drugs reactions to paracetamol and ibuprofen in children: a 5-year report from a pediatric poison control center in Italy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze all the patients who contacted the hospital's pediatric poison control center (PPCC) for exposure to ibuprofen and acetaminophen, in order to assess the incidence of any adverse reactions. METHODS: We retrospectively reported the clinical data of children who accessed the PPCC of the Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, from January 1, 2018 to September 30, 2022 due to wrong, accidental or intentional intake of inappropriate doses of acetaminophen and/or ibuprofen. In addition, we compared patients according to the intake of one of the two drugs and reported the trimestral distribution of cases during the study period. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients accessed the PPCC during the study period. The median age was 3.0 years. Most patients were females (57.8%). The most common reason for inappropriate oral intake of paracetamol or ibuprofen was a wrong use or an accidental intake (78.6%), with a fifth of patients taking the drug with suicidal intent (21.1%). According to the PPCC evaluation, most patients were not intoxicated (70.4%). Hospitalization was required for 30.5% of patients. Adverse reactions were reported in 10.5% of cases, with a similar incidence in patients who took paracetamol or ibuprofen. Nausea and vomiting were the most commonly reported adverse reactions. A higher frequency of moderate intoxication was found in patients who took paracetamol compared to ibuprofen (p = 0.001). The likelihood of intoxication was also higher in the paracetamol cohort. A spike of cases was registered at the end of 2021. CONCLUSIONS: We analyze exposures to the two most commonly used pediatric molecules, paracetamol and ibuprofen, to assess the frequency of adverse reactions. We demonstrated that these relatively "safe" drugs may be associated with intoxications and adverse reactions when inappropriately administered.

Unintentional cannabis intoxication in infants and toddlers presenting with neurological impairment in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Recent data show that the rising consumption of cannabis has increased the rate of acute intoxication in pediatric age. Common patterns of pediatric poisoning consist of exploratory ingestions in younger children. A history of poisoning is often not provided; therefore, it could be advisable to use an objective biological marker. The clinical presentation of occult ingestion can range from asymptomatic to critically ill. Neurological involvement is one of the most described presentations. The goal of our study was to examine the presentation of acute cannabis intoxication in a sample of 13 pediatric patients under 3 years. METHODS: A retrospective epidemiological investigation on acute cannabinoid intoxication was conducted on children under 3 years, recruited between 2016 and 2020. All patients were tested for urine drug screening suspecting poisoning as reason for Emergency Department (ED) admission. RESULTS: Thirteen of forty-eight patients tested (27%) were positive for Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Ingestion was the route of intoxication in all of them. Only in five cases the possible accidental intake of cannabinoids was promptly declared. Twelve children accessed on ED due to a neurological symptomatology not attributable to known causes in the medical history. CONCLUSIONS: Differential diagnosis for abuse drugs exposure in young children is broad: the urine drug screening plays a central role for confirmation of the diagnostic suspicion and identification of the specific substance. A positive result combined with a history of potential access to cannabis could prevent unnecessary, invasive, expensive procedures. When identified, the management is predominantly supportive. In this article, we want to emphasize the importance of always considering drug intoxication in children with acute neurological symptoms especially in cases of ambiguous familiar or social context. Further studies will be needed to better characterize the alarm bells for intoxication and to identify a strategy for the prevention of unintentional cannabinoid intoxication.

Hemoadsorption for severe MIS-C in critically ill children, should we consider it as a therapeutic opportunity?

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) is a new severe clinical condition that has emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic. MIS-C affects children and the young usually after a mild or asymptomatic COVID-19 infection. MIS-C has a high tropism for the cardiovascular system with need for inotropes and vasopressor support in 62% of cases. As of today a mortality from 1.5% to 1.9% related to MIS-C is reported. Hemoadsorption via the inflammatory mediator adsorber CytoSorb (CytoSorbents Europe, Berlin Germany) has been used as adjunctive therapy with the aim to restore the host response in septic shock and other hyper-inflammatory syndromes. We present the clinical experience of an adolescent boy with a refractory shock secondary to left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) in the context of MIS-C, treated with hemoadsorption, and continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) in combination with immunomodulatory therapies. The therapeutic strategy resulted in hemodynamic and clinical stabilization as well as control of the hyperinflammatory response. Treatment appeared to be safe and feasible. Our findings are in line with previously published clinical cases on Cytosorb use in MIS-C showing the beneficial role of the hemoperfusion with Cytosorb in severe MIS-C to manage the cytokine storm. We provide an analysis and comparison of recent evidence on the use of hemoadsorption as an adjuvant therapy in critically ill children with severe forms of MIS-C, suggesting this blood purification strategy could be a therapeutic opportunity in severe LVD due to MIS-C, sparing the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygentation (ECMO) and other mechanical cardiocirculatory supports.

Role of Hemoperfusion With CytoSorb Associated With Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy on Renal Outcome in Critically III Children With Septic Shock.

Introduction: Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) represents a relevant cause of mortality and morbidity in critically ill children. Since with the "inflammatory theory" the authors have been witnessed an important role of inflammatory mediators in the pathophysiology and in the prognosis of SA-AKI, making the need of adjunctive therapies in association with kidney replacement therapies mandatory. Hemoperfusion with CytoSorb is a safe and well-tolerated therapy in septic shock: the very high surface area of the absorber means it is able to efficiently remove cytokines and other medium size molecules involved in cytokine storm, thus playing a synergistic effect with Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy (CKRT). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from a cohort of eight critically ill children treated from January 2018 to March 2020 describing the impact of CKRT plus hemoperfusion with CytoSorb on renal outcome in critically ill children with septic shock. Results: We evidenced a significant reduction in interleukin (IL)-6 an IL-10 after hemoperfusion with CytoSorb in our pediatric population. Furthermore, we were able to show a significant improvement of creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) after blood purification and at pediatric intensive care units (PICU) discharge. We have observed a median of 2.5 CKRT days after stop of hemoperfusion (Q1 0.25; Q3 18.75). None of our patients required CKRT 30 days after PICU discharge (PICU-D). None of them developed CKD. Conclusion: Hemoperfusion with CytoSorb is a valuable therapeutic option in combination with CKRT in SA-AKI. More studies are warranted to confirm our results and in particular to define the role of this adjuvant therapy as a preemptive strategy to protect renal function in pediatric septic shock.