Comparing an In-Person and Online Continuing Education Intervention to Improve Professional Decision-Making: A Mixed Methods Study.

Purpose: This paper compares two iterations (in-person and online) of a multi-stage continuing education program for improving high-risk decision-making among mental health workers. Methods: The mixed-methods study analyzed the following: (1) physiological and psychological arousal during simulated patient interviews; (2) physiological and psychological arousal recorded during real-time decision-making over four months; and (3) thoughts on the process and outcomes of the intervention raised in reflective interviews. Findings: Quantitatively, there were no statistical differences in stress measures between in-person and online simulated interviews or decision-making logs, suggesting they were effective in eliciting reactions commonly found in challenging clinical situations. Qualitatively, participants in both iterations indicated that the intervention caused them to reflect on practice, consider a wider range of factors related to the decisions, and enact approaches to improve decision-making. Conclusions: A carefully constructed online continuing education experience can result in outcomes for experienced social workers that are equivalent to an in-person iteration.

Implementing a supervision model in community children's mental health: Experiences of supervisors and practitioners.

Supervision of staff in the helping professions is valued and considered important for effective service delivery, with expert consensus that the delivery of high-quality supervision strengthens the social service workforce. The demands of publicly funded settings provide compelling rationale for supervision to protect marginalized clients, while ensuring staff are supported in delivering quality services. As conceptual frameworks, models of supervision are one way to strengthen supervision through intentionally incorporating theory, best practices, and research. Theoretically grounded and integrative, the Stop Now and Plan (SNAP) clinical supervision model incorporates best practices, guidelines, and techniques informed by explanatory and practice theories, and research. This article presents a qualitative study exploring the experiences of supervisors and supervisees in children's mental health settings implementing this model of supervision for an evidence-based intervention. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted using qualitative data collected from participant interviews (N = 20) directly following the completion of a 6-month implementation of the SNAP model of clinical supervision. Identified themes demonstrate the value of a structured model of supervision in supporting practitioner confidence, accountability, and professional development, while allowing supervisors to meet their responsibilities to their team and their organizations. The challenges associated with implementing a supervision model within publicly funded settings are highlighted, with suggestions for over coming these challenges provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Clinical supervision in frontline health care: A survey of social workers in Ontario, Canada.

Researchers have documented diminishing staff supervision in health care settings, while noting the complexity and dynamic nature of health care systems. A secondary data analysis of a survey of the Ontario Association of Social Workers (N=666) explored the contemporary receipt of different types of supervision in frontline health care. Most social worker participants were involved in supervision, receiving administrative and supportive supervision. Only 52% engaged in clinical supervision, even though most spent over 50% of work time with clients with complex needs. Factors related to the receipt of clinical supervision included setting, experience, gender, and availability of clinical practice leaders.

Using Simulation as an Investigative Methodology in Researching Competencies of Clinical Social Work Practice: A Scoping Review.

This article reports a scoping review designed to synthesize current literature that used simulation as an investigative methodology (simulation-based research; SBR) in researching practice competencies in clinical social work. Following Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework, 24 articles were included in this scoping review. The majority of articles reported SBR studies conducted in Canada and the U.S. and were published in the last 10 years, signifying that this is a burgeoning area of research in clinical social work. Areas of clinical competencies included professional decision-making (33%), the role of cognition and emotion (21%), attending to culture and diversity (21%), and others, such as supervision skills (8%). Using qualitative (46%), quantitative (42%), and mixed methods (13%) in research design, more than half of the SBR studies reported in the selected articles used live actors (54%) to simulate a realistic practice situation for research. Selected articles also offered both benefits and limitations of SBR in social work. We offer suggestions for when to use SBR for research on clinical social work practice and strengthening a collaboration between clinicians and researchers in advancing practice-informed research.

Crohn's Colitis Care (CCCare): bespoke cloud-based clinical management software for inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to evidence-based management is variable in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which leads to worse patient outcomes and higher healthcare utilization. Solutions include electronic systems to enhance care, but these have often been limited by lack of clinician design input, poor usability, and low perceived value. A cloud-based IBD-specific clinical management software - 'Crohn's Colitis Care' (CCCare) was developed by Australia and New Zealand Inflammatory Bowel Disease Consortium clinicians and software developers to improve this. METHODS: CCCare captures patient-reported disease activity and medical assessment, medication monitoring, cancer screening, preventative health, and facilitates communication with the IBD team and referring doctor. De-identified longitudinal data are stored separately in a clinical quality registry for research. CCCare was tested for feasibility and usability in routine clinical settings at two large Australian hospitals. Users' experience was evaluated with System Usability Scale (SUS). Value to clinicians and patients was assessed by qualitative feedback. Security was assessed by penetration testing. RESULTS: Users (n = 13; doctors, nurses, patients) reported good usability and learnability (mean SUS score 75 (range 50-95), sub-scores were 77 (50-94) and 68 (38-100), respectively). Patients reported better communication with clinical team and greater ability to track disease. Clinicians highlighted structured management plans, medication adherence, and centralised data repository as positive features. Penetration testing was passed successfully. CONCLUSIONS: Initial evaluation demonstrates CCCare is usable, secure, and valued in clinical use. It is designed to measure outcomes of clinical care, including efficacy, quality, cost, and complications for individuals, and to audit these at hospital and national level.

Social work education and training in mental health, addictions and suicide: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Social workers are among the largest group of professionals in the mental health workforce and play a key role in the assessment of mental health, addictions and suicide. Most social workers provide services to individuals with mental health concerns, yet there are gaps in research on social work education and training programmes. The objective of this scoping review is to examine literature on social work education and training in mental health, addictions and suicide. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using a scoping review framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley, we will search for literature through seven academic databases: PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, CINAHL Plus, Social Sciences Abstracts, Education Source, ERIC and Social Work Abstracts. Two independent reviewers will screen articles utilising a two-stage process. Titles and abstracts will be reviewed in the first stage and full texts will be reviewed in the second stage. Selected articles that meet inclusion criteria will be charted to extract key themes and they will be analysed using a qualitative thematic analysis approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will fill a knowledge gap in social work education and training in mental health, addictions and suicide. Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. Through dissemination in publications and relevant conferences, the results may guide future research and education in social work.