Cardiac arrest after induction of anesthesia in a 2-month-old infant with undiagnosed Williams syndrome.

A 2-month-old male infant presented for elective repair of inguinal hernias. His preoperative medical history and physical examination were unremarkable. During induction of anesthesia, the infant sustained an adverse cardiac event. The event was characterized by tachycardia, hypotension, and massive ST-segment elevation. Despite vigorous resuscitation, spontaneous hemodynamic stability could not be achieved and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was required. A transthoracic echocardiogram revealed severe hypoplasia of the ascending aorta. As effective cardiac function did not recover and there was evidence of diffuse ischemic brain injury, life support was withdrawn. Genetic testing performed postoperatively was definitive for Williams syndrome.

Complications in Pediatric Regional Anesthesia: An Analysis of More than 100,000 Blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network.

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC: WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: BACKGROUND:: Complications in pediatric regional anesthesia are rare, so a large sample size is necessary to quantify risk. The Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network contains data on more than 100,000 blocks administered at more than 20 children's hospitals. This study analyzed the risk of major complications associated with regional anesthesia in children. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational study of routine clinical practice. Data were collected on every regional block placed by an anesthesiologist at participating institutions and were uploaded to a secure database. The data were audited at multiple points for accuracy. RESULTS: There were no permanent neurologic deficits reported (95% CI, 0 to 0.4:10,000). The risk of transient neurologic deficit was 2.4:10,000 (95% CI, 1.6 to 3.6:10,000) and was not different between peripheral and neuraxial blocks. The risk of severe local anesthetic systemic toxicity was 0.76:10,000 (95% CI, 0.3 to 1.6:10,000); the majority of cases occurred in infants. There was one epidural abscess reported (0.76:10,000, 95% CI, 0 to 4.8:10,000). The incidence of cutaneous infections was 0.5% (53:10,000, 95% CI, 43 to 64:10,000). There were no hematomas associated with neuraxial catheters (95% CI, 0 to 3.5:10,000), but one epidural hematoma occurred with a paravertebral catheter. No additional risk was observed with placing blocks under general anesthesia. The most common adverse events were benign catheter-related failures (4%). CONCLUSIONS: The data from this study demonstrate a level of safety in pediatric regional anesthesia that is comparable to adult practice and confirms the safety of placing blocks under general anesthesia in children.

Comparison of Intraoperative and Early Postoperative Outcomes of Caudal vs Dorsal Penile Nerve Blocks for Outpatient Penile Surgeries.

OBJECTIVE: To compare intraoperative and 1-hour postoperative outcomes in caudal vs dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) patients undergoing penile surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of boys <10 years old undergoing penile procedures (2013-2015) using the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network, Pediatric Health Information System databases, and our medical records. The primary outcome was a maximum Faces Limbs Activity Crying Consolability pain score of >3. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative-postanesthesia care unit (PACU) narcotics, preincision anesthesia time, adjusted operating room charges, and complications. We performed bivariate and multivariable analyses controlling for demographic and procedural characteristics and clustering by surgeon. RESULTS: Of 738 patients (mean age 2.1 years), 74.1% had a caudal block. DPNB patients were more likely to have a maximum pain score of >3 (19.5% vs 8.1%, P <.0001), receive intraoperative (33.0% vs 2.9%, P <.0001) and PACU (15.7% vs 7.5%, P = .0009) narcotics, and had shorter preincision anesthesia times (19.5 vs 27.9 minutes, P <.0001) and lower adjusted operating room charges ($9,402 vs $12,760, P <.0001). In a bivariate logistic regression, DPNB patients had 2.7 times the odds of a maximum pain score of >3 (95% confidence interval 1.7-4.4, P <.0001) and 5.2 times the odds of intraoperative and PACU narcotic administration (95% confidence interval 3.3-8.1, P <.0001). In multivariable analyses, caudal patients had longer preincision anesthesia times (27.9 ± 7.4 vs 19.5 ± 6.6 minutes, P <.0001) and higher adjusted operating room charges ($12,760 ± 4077 vs $9,402 ± 3741, P = .01). CONCLUSION: Caudal blocks may offer a small advantage in the immediate postoperative period, although cost-effectiveness is unproven.

Effect of Octreotide on Colonic Motility in Pediatric Patients With Chronic Recalcitrant Constipation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to study the effect of octreotide on colonic motility in pediatric patients with recalcitrant chronic constipation/encopresis and other suspected colonic motility disorders. METHODS: This was a nonrandomized, single-center, open-label, prospective study evaluating the effect of a single subcutaneous dose of octreotide on colonic motility. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (5 boys) were enrolled in the study. The age range was 4.6 to 16.2 years. Eleven patients (84%) had normal colonic manometry and 2 patients (16%) had colonic neuropathy. Motility Index (MI) (mmHg) for the 15 minutes before and after octreotide infusion was 6.03 ±â€Š1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.35-6.72) and 5.32 ±â€Š1.66 (95% CI 4.42-6.23), respectively, with P value of 0.08. MI for the 30 minutes before and after octreotide infusion was 6.89 ±â€Š1.37 (95% CI 6.14-7.64) and 6.71 ±â€Š1.47 (95% CI 5.91-7.52), respectively, with P value of 0.55. MI for the 45 minutes before and after octreotide infusion was 7.73 ±â€Š1.32 (95% CI 7.01-8.45) and 7.53 ±â€Š1.38 (95% CI 6.78-8.28), respectively, with P value of 0.8. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the administration of octreotide resulted in no significant changes in colonic MI in pediatric patients with chronic recalcitrant constipation.