A survey on the knowledge, attitudes and practices of physicians towards pharmacovigilance in Jordanian health centres.

Background: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of health care professionals towards pharmacovigilance are strongly associated with reporting adverse drug reactions, as proven by a number of studies. This study aims to evaluate the levels of knowledge, attitudes and practices towards pharmacovigilance among physicians working at health centres of the Jordanian Ministry of Health. Methods: This took the form of a cross-sectional survey. Questionnaires were distributed by the researcher and research assistant to the physicians. Twenty primary and comprehensive health centres were covered. Results: The study included 106 physicians. Poor knowledge and practices were observed (mean knowledge score of 1.5±1.2 out of five, and mean practice score of 5.5±1.8 out of 15), while a high level of positive attitudes was observed (mean attitude score of 9.3±1.3 out of 10). Half of the physicians were aware that monitoring adverse drug reactions in Jordan is carried out by the Jordan Pharmacovigilance Centre. The majority of physicians (95.2%) mentioned that they rarely or never used the adverse drug reactions reporting form in Jordan. Conclusions: It is clear that there is a need to initiate educational activities and intervention programmes to raise the awareness of health care providers in Jordan regarding pharmacovigilance.

Familiarity, knowledge, and attitudes towards epilepsy among attendees of a family clinic in Amman, Jordan.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the present familiarity, knowledge, and attitudes of Jordanians towards epilepsy. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study that was conducted over a 6-month period, from April 2006 to October 2006 at the family clinic of Jordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan. A face-to-face questionnaire interview was conducted with 600 non-epileptic adults who visited the clinic during the study period. RESULTS: The sample matched the overall Jordanian population for literacy rate, however, included a higher proportion of females, and consequently findings may be taken as being only moderately representative of the Jordanian population. Ninety-eight percent of the respondents had heard about epilepsy, 47.3% knew someone with epilepsy, and 39.7% had witnessed a seizure. The major source of knowledge was word of mouth; knowledge about causes and treatment were far below the results reported in western countries. In addition, negative attitudes were present with regard to marriage and employment of epileptic patients (86.8% objected to marriage and 50.8% objected to employment). Eighty-three percent of respondents admitted that their knowledge of epilepsy was not satisfactory and were willing to learn more about epilepsy. The television was believed to be the most efficient and preferred way to disseminate knowledge about epilepsy. CONCLUSION: Although this study does not represent the whole Jordanian population, however, it demonstrated lack of knowledge and emphasized the extent of negative as well as positive attitudes towards epilepsy in Jordan.