RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The optimal management of pediatric type II supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHFs) is debated. We conducted a systematic review comparing outcomes and complications of nonoperative versus operative management to aid decision-making and inform future research. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and CINAHL from their inception until February 7, 2024, including studies on pediatric patients (<18 y) with any type II SCHF, provided they compared operative to nonoperative care and were in English. The quality of articles was evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies Scale. RESULTS: Out of 417 studies reviewed, 7 met the inclusion criteria. These studies involved 1446 patients (mean age: 4.9 y; mean follow-up: 5.0 mo), comparing operative (n = 427) and nonoperative (n = 1019) treatments. Functional outcomes such as carrying angle, Baumann angle, elbow range-of-motion, and patient satisfaction were similar across treatment groups. Nonoperative management showed a higher incidence of residual sagittal deformity (14.1% vs 0.0%; P < 0.0001) and a treatment failure rate of 8.9% to 20.6%, necessitating surgical intervention. Factors prompting operative care included rotational deformity, varus/valgus misalignment, and a shaft-condylar angle below 30 degrees. CONCLUSION: Nonoperative treatment of type II SCHF is linked with higher rates of residual sagittal deformity and a notable failure rate requiring subsequent surgery. Both treatment strategies showed similar functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. Further research should focus on identifying anatomic criteria predictive of nonoperative treatment failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-systematic review.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Elevated serum titanium levels have been found in patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) treated with traditional growing rods (TGR), magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR), and vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR). No studies have investigated whether serum titanium remains persistently elevated and if titanium is excreted. Our purpose was to compare serum titanium levels in patients with EOS with growth-friendly instrumentation to age-matched controls and evaluate urine titanium and serial serum titanium levels in patients with EOS. METHODS: This was a prospective case-control study. Patients with EOS with TGR, MCGR, or VEPTR underwent urine titanium and serial serum titanium collection at a minimum 6-month interval. Control patients did not have a history of metal implant insertion and underwent serum titanium collection before fracture fixation. RESULTS: Twenty patients with EOS (6 TGR, 8 MCGR, and 6 VEPTR) and 12 controls were analyzed. The control group had no detectable serum titanium (0 ng/mL), whereas the patients with EOS had a median serum titanium of 4.0 ng/mL ( P < 0.001). Analysis of variance showed significantly higher median serum titanium levels in the MCGR and VEPTR groups than the TGR group at time point 1 (5.5 vs 6.0 vs 2.0 ng/mL, P = 0.01) and time point 2 (6.5 vs 7.5 vs 2.0 ng/mL, P < 0.001). Binary comparisons showed a significant difference in serum titanium level between TGR and MCGR (time point 1: P = 0.026, time point 2: P = 0.011) and TGR and VEPTR (time point 1: P = 0.035, time point 2: P = 0.003). However, there was no difference between MCGR and VEPTR (time point 1: P = 0.399, time point 2: P = 0.492) even though the VEPTR group had a longer duration of follow-up ( P = 0.001) and a greater number of lengthenings per patient at the first serum collection ( P = 0.016). No patients with EOS had detectable urine titanium. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EOS treated with titanium alloy growth-friendly instrumentation had elevated serum titanium levels compared with age-matched controls that persisted over time with no evidence of renal excretion. Additional studies are necessary to assess for local and systemic accumulation of titanium and the significance of long-term exposure to titanium in growing children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic.
Assuntos
Escoliose , Criança , Humanos , Escoliose/cirurgia , Titânio , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Próteses e Implantes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Background: Though ubiquitously used in orthopaedic trauma, lower extremity splints may have associated iatrogenic risk of morbidity. Although clinicians pad bony prominences to minimize skin pressure, the effect of joint position on skin pressure and, more specifically, changing joint position, is understudied. The purpose of this biomechanical study is to determine the effect of various short-leg splint application techniques on anterior ankle surface pressure in the development of iatrogenic skin pressure ulcers. Methods: Various constructs of lower extremity, short-leg splints were applied to 3 healthy subjects (6 limbs total) with an underlying pressure transducer (Tekscan I-Scan system) on the skin surface centered on the tibialis anterior tendon at the level of the ankle. All subjects underwent anterior ankle surface pressure assessment when padding was applied in maximum plantar flexion and neutral position for conventional short-leg splints application in clinically relevant patient scenarios. Percentage change from initial contact pressure centered on the tibialis anterior with cast padding were calculated. Results: The percentage change in anterior ankle contact pressure when padding was applied in maximum plantar flexion (PF) and then definitively placed in neutral was increased at least 2-fold without the addition of plaster in lower extremity short-leg splints. Removing anterior ankle padding following final splint application in neutral reduced contact forces at the anterior ankle 46% and 59% in splints applied in maximum PF and neutral ankle position, respectively. Conclusion: The present study is the first of its kind to underscore and quantify clinically relevant technical pearls that can be useful in reducing risk of iatrogenic risk of skin breakdown at the anterior ankle when placing short-leg splints, mainly, that it is imperative to apply padding in the intended final splint position and to remove anterior ankle padding following splint application when able. Level of Evidence: Level IV, biomechanical study with clear hypothesis.
RESUMO
CASE: A 13-year-old obese adolescent boy with hypothyroidism developed left femoral head avascular necrosis with collapse after slipped capital femoral epiphysis. We restored the femoral head congruity with the aid of osseoscopy and vascularized free fibular graft (VFFG). Four years after surgery, the patient had painless hip range of motion and femoral head contour was maintained. CONCLUSION: This case highlights a novel use of an arthroscopic camera inside the femoral head to visualize and debride the area of collapse, fill the cavity with cancellous bone graft, and use a VFFG to restore articular support preventing further deterioration of the hip joint.
Assuntos
Obesidade Infantil , Escorregamento das Epífises Proximais do Fêmur , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Escorregamento das Epífises Proximais do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Escorregamento das Epífises Proximais do Fêmur/cirurgia , Cabeça do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Cabeça do Fêmur/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Radiografia , Obesidade Infantil/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have acknowledged the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) as the primary stabilizer of the patella, preventing lateral displacement. MPFL reconstruction (MPFL-R) restores stability and functionality to the patellofemoral joint and has emerged as a preferred treatment option for recurrent lateral patellar instability. PURPOSE: To objectively measure biomechanical characteristics of athletes cleared for return to sport after MPFL-R compared with healthy controls. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A prospective case-control study design was employed on 31 total athletes. Sixteen athletes (6 male, 10 female; mean age, 16.1 ± 2.74 years; 385 ± 189 days after surgery and 235 ± 157 days after return to sport) underwent MPFL-R and were medically cleared to return to sport. This group was matched by age, sex, and activity level to 15 healthy athletes with no history of lower extremity injuries. Athletes and controls completed validated questionnaires as well as hopping, jumping, and cutting tests with 3-dimensional motion analysis and underwent strength, flexibility, laxity, and balance assessments. RESULTS: Participants in the MPFL-R group scored significantly lower (worse) on the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (89.2 ± 7.6 vs 98.1 ± 2.0, respectively; P = .0005) and significantly higher (worse) on the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) (32.4 ± 5.0 vs 25.4 ± 6.5, respectively; P = .006) than those in the control group, but there was no difference in the Kujala score (95.6 ± 5.3 vs 98.8 ± 3.0, respectively; P = .06). Participants in the MPFL-R group demonstrated reduced hip and ankle flexion relative to those in the control group (P < .05). Participants in the MPFL-R group also took significantly longer to complete the 6-m timed hop test relative to those in the control group (P < .05). No statistically significant differences were found in anthropometrics, knee extension or flexion strength, hamstring flexibility, hip abduction strength, or joint laxity between the MPFL-R and control groups. CONCLUSION: The current data indicate that MPFL-R generally restores functional symmetry, while subtle deficits in global power may remain after being released to full activity. Clinicians should ensure that athletes are fully rehabilitated before returning to sport after MPFL-R by emphasizing functional multijoint exercises.