Evaluating the Current State of Epilepsy Care in the Province of Ontario.

There are numerous challenges pertaining to epilepsy care across Ontario, including Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) bed pressures, surgical access and community supports. We sampled the current clinical, community and operational state of Ontario epilepsy centres and community epilepsy agencies post COVID-19 pandemic. A 44-item survey was distributed to all 11 district and regional adult and paediatric Ontario epilepsy centres. Qualitative responses were collected from community epilepsy agencies. Results revealed ongoing gaps in epilepsy care across Ontario, with EMU bed pressures and labour shortages being limiting factors. A clinical network advising the Ontario Ministry of Health will improve access to epilepsy care.

Drug-drug interactions between direct oral anticoagulants and anticonvulsants and clinical outcomes: A systematic review.

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used in patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. However, DOACs have important potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with several classes of drugs. In particular, antiepileptic (AE) drugs may induce cytochrome P450 3A4 or P-glycoprotein. Co-administration of DOACs and AE drugs may result in lower DOAC drug levels and reduced DOAC efficacy. However, the clinical significance of such DDIs is uncertain. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to generate an updated review of these DDIs and their clinical relevance, given the rapidly evolving knowledge relating to DOAC and AE DDIs. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases for studies reporting clinical adverse outcomes (thrombotic events, bleeding events, and all-cause mortality) in patients concomitantly taking DOACs and AE drugs. Results: We retrieved 874 studies of which 15 were deemed eligible for this review, including 4 congress abstracts, 3 case reports, 2 letters to the editor, 5 retrospective cohorts, and 1 prospective cohort study. No randomized clinical trials were found. Most of the included studies reported thrombotic events, 3 studies reported major bleeding, and one study reported all-cause mortality associated with DOAC and AE drug administration. Substantial differences in the study designs did not allow for a meta-analysis to be performed. Conclusion: The current literature assessing these adverse clinical outcomes from DOAC and AE drug co-administration is limited. Although the available data point to a possible increased risk of thrombotic events, they are insufficient to draw definitive conclusions. Well-designed clinical studies are of utmost importance.

Prolonged EEGs in adult patients with a first unprovoked seizure: a prospective pilot study.

Definitions of epilepsy have changed to include a first unprovoked seizure with a high (>60%) risk of recurrence in the next 10 years. A single seizure and an epileptiform discharge on an EEG would suffice for this diagnosis. We hypothesized that an extended six-hour EEG in adult patients presenting with a first unprovoked seizure would demonstrate an increased yield of epileptiform discharges in comparison to a standard 30-minute EEG, and therefore higher rates of epilepsy diagnosis. Thirty-eight patients were recruited at Hamilton Health Sciences over six years and 36 underwent extended six-hour EEGs. Two of seven patients demonstrated epileptiform discharges on their EEG after only the first 30 minutes of recording, observed during sleep for both patients. This correlated to an overall increase of 5.56%, or a yield of 29%. A third more patients could benefit from early diagnosis with extended EEGs. The rate of epilepsy diagnosis based on EEG overall was superior to that of brain imaging (19% versus 6%). Given the limitations due to sample size in this study, a larger trial would be beneficial to confirm these findings.

Epilepsy: Transition from pediatric to adult care. Recommendations of the Ontario epilepsy implementation task force.

The transition from a pediatric to adult health care system is challenging for many youths with epilepsy and their families. Recently, the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care of the Province of Ontario, Canada, created a transition working group (TWG) to develop recommendations for the transition process for patients with epilepsy in the Province of Ontario. Herein we present an executive summary of this work. The TWG was composed of a multidisciplinary group of pediatric and adult epileptologists, psychiatrists, and family doctors from academia and from the community; neurologists from the community; nurses and social workers from pediatric and adult epilepsy programs; adolescent medicine physician specialists; a team of physicians, nurses, and social workers dedicated to patients with complex care needs; a lawyer; an occupational therapist; representatives from community epilepsy agencies; patients with epilepsy; parents of patients with epilepsy and severe intellectual disability; and project managers. Three main areas were addressed: (1) Diagnosis and Management of Seizures; 2) Mental Health and Psychosocial Needs; and 3) Financial, Community, and Legal Supports. Although there are no systematic studies on the outcomes of transition programs, the impressions of the TWG are as follows. Teenagers at risk of poor transition should be identified early. The care coordination between pediatric and adult neurologists and other specialists should begin before the actual transfer. The transition period is the ideal time to rethink the diagnosis and repeat diagnostic testing where indicated (particularly genetic testing, which now can uncover more etiologies than when patients were initially evaluated many years ago). Some screening tests should be repeated after the move to the adult system. The seven steps proposed herein may facilitate transition, thereby promoting uninterrupted and adequate care for youth with epilepsy leaving the pediatric system.

Tolerability and dosing experience of intravenous levetiracetam in children and infants.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use and tolerability of intravenous (IV) levetiracetam (LEV) in a pediatric cohort under 14 years of age. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the use of the IV formulation of LEV was performed for the first 9 months that it was available in our institution. RESULTS: Overall, 118 infusions in 15 patients were performed during the period assessed. No adverse reactions were observed during the infusion phase of the IV formulation. Nine minor adverse reactions were observed during the rest of the hospitalization that were potentially related to the IV formulation. Three of these were decreases in the white cell counts, while the majority of the rest were behavioral adverse effects. The median starting dose in LEV naïve patients was 8.8 mg/kg (range=5.0-50), with a median maintenance dose of 30.4 mg/kg/day for all patients (range=5.0-92). The majority of these infusions (82/118) were in a subgroup of children under 4 years of age where the median maintenance dose was 28 mg/kg/day. CONCLUSION: IV LEV was very well tolerated in this cohort of pediatric patients including a subgroup of children under the age of 4 years.

An evidence-based approach to the first seizure.

Evidence-based care (EBC) is an explicit approach to applying the best evidence to the care of individual patients. We outline the basic principles of EBC and apply them to various clinical questions pertaining to a patient presenting with a first seizure, providing a summary of the best available evidence for each question. Depending on the question at hand, the evidence derives from retrospective, prospective, and randomized controlled studies in children and adults. There is solid evidence that early seizure recurrence is reduced by early initiation of AEDs. A meta-analysis of six randomized trials revealed an average absolute risk reduction of 34% (95% CI 15-52) with AED therapy. However, the prognosis for the development of epilepsy is not altered by early intervention. EEG epileptiform abnormalities, family history of epilepsy, imaging lesions, and remote symptomatic seizures increase the risk of recurrence, and impact the risk-benefit ratio of treatment after a single event. In the end, clinicians must evaluate patients with a first unprovoked seizure on a case-by-case basis to determine the appropriateness of treatment with a given AED.