Localized laryngeal amyloidosis: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The larynx is the most common site of localized head and neck amyloidosis. Our study aimed to review the clinical features, treatments, and outcomes associated with localized laryngeal amyloidosis (LA). We also compared these features between two different time periods to evaluate the evolution of LA management. METHODS: A literature search using PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Library identified cases of LA published between 1891 and 2021. Biopsy-proven cases of localized LA were included. Non-English studies, animal studies, and reviews were excluded. RESULTS: 282 patients (1891-1999: 142 patients, 2000-2021: 140 patients) from 129 studies were included. Results are reported as 1891-2000 vs. 2000-2021: Mean age was 48.5 years (range, 8-90 years) vs. 46.0 years (range, 9-84 years). The most common presenting symptoms were dysphonia (n = 30, 95 % vs. n = 127, 96 %) and difficulty breathing (n = 37, 27 % vs. n = 35, 27 %). A total of 62 (44 %) vs. 46 (33 %) lesions were found in the true vocal folds and 35 (25 %) vs. 59 (42 %) were found in the false vocal folds. 133 (94 %) vs. 137 (98 %) patients underwent surgical interventions to investigate and/or treat LA. Recurrent LA was reported in 27 (19 %) vs. 33 (24 %) patients with a mean time to recurrence of 25.4 months (range, 0.3-132 months) vs. 34.5 months (range, 0.8-144 months). Of cases reporting survival rate, 104 (97 %) vs. 107 (99 %) were alive at source study endpoints. CONCLUSION: LA typically exhibits an indolent course; therefore, early intervention may address longstanding symptoms. Recurrent disease poses a clinical challenge in patients with LA.

Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictive Tool for Post-Operative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Open Lower Extremity Revascularization Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a marker of systemic inflammation, has been shown to correlate with worse outcomes in patients undergoing vascular surgery. Limited data exists on the association of NLR and outcomes in patients undergoing lower extremity vascular surgery. We sought to investigate whether preoperative NLR correlates with outcomes in patients undergoing open lower extremity revascularization procedures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent open lower extremity revascularization procedures from January 2011 to January 2017 (N = 535). Preoperative NLR was calculated within 6 months of surgery. Primary outcomes were major adverse limb event (MALE) or death. The maximally-ranked statistic method was used to determine the NLR cut-off point. Kaplan-Meier analyses of death and MALE and NLR were used to compare the groups by NLR cut-off point. We conducted a multivariate analysis of the association between NLR and mortality using Cox proportional hazard models, including confounding variables such as age, smoking status, and diabetes. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty four patients undergoing surgery from January 2011 to January 2013 were analyzed. The median NLR was 3.6 interquartile range [IQR 2.5-6.7]. The analysis showed a negative correlation between elevated NLR and mortality (P < 0.001), but not MALE (P = 0.8). Controlling for multiple comorbidities including gender, age, smoking, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and infection, the NLR cut-off point was a significant independent predictor of mortality (P < 0.0001), but not MALE (P = 0.551). Elevated NLR was also correlated with statistically and clinically significant longer hospital stays (6.5 [IQR 3.0-12.8] days vs. 4.0 [IQR 2.0-8.0] days, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that NLR is an independent predictor of mortality and hospital length of stay in patients undergoing open lower extremity revascularizations. Going forward, we plan to expand this study to include more patients and to compare NLR to other risk assessment tools.