The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Outcomes and Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Neighborhood Deprivation Indices.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDOH) are important factors in the delivery of orthopaedic care. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and both the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). METHODS: The Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI) database was utilized to identify TKA cases for inclusion. Demographic characteristics and medical history were documented. The SVI, its subthemes, and the ADI were analyzed. Outcome data included length of stay, discharge disposition, postoperative change in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), 90-day incidences of emergency department (ED) visits, readmission, death, deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE), periprosthetic fracture, implant failure, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), and all-cause reoperation. Database cross-referencing was completed to document aseptic and septic revisions beyond 90 days postoperatively. Bivariate quartile-stratified and multivariable analyses were used to associate deprivation metrics with outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 19,321 TKA cases met inclusion criteria. Baseline patient characteristics varied among the SVI and/or ADI quartiles, with patients of non-White race and with a greater number of comorbidities noted in higher deprivation quartiles. Higher SVI and/or ADI quartiles were correlated with an increased rate of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (p < 0.05). A higher SVI and/or ADI quartile was associated with increased incidences of ED visits and readmissions postoperatively (p < 0.05). DVT and/or PE and long-term aseptic revision were the complications most strongly associated with higher deprivation metrics. Upon multivariable analysis, greater length of stay and greater incidences of ED visits, readmissions, DVT and/or PE, and aseptic revision remained significantly associated with greater deprivation based on multiple metrics. CONCLUSIONS: Greater deprivation based on multiple SVI subthemes, the composite SVI, and the ADI was significantly associated with increased length of stay, non-home discharge ED visits, and readmissions. The SVI and the ADI may be important considerations in the perioperative assessment of patients who undergo TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Marital Status, Race, Insurance Type, and Socioeconomic Status-Assessment of Social Predictors for Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of various social determinants of health on outcomes and dispositions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 14,462 consecutive TKA procedures between 2013 and 2021 at a multicenter hospital system. Data abstraction was done by inquiry to the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative. Data points requested included basic demographics, marital status, race, insurance status, socioeconomic status measured by the Area of Deprivation Index, perioperative course, and incidence of emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions within 3 months of surgery. Subsequent multivariate analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Unmarried patients required markedly greater lengths of hospital stay and had an increased rate of discharge to skilled nursing facilities and a higher likelihood of any purpose ED visit within 90 days of surgery compared with married patients, who had a significantly greater rate of same-day discharge ( P < 0.001). Race did not markedly correlate with outcomes. Medicare patients showed a greater rate of same-day discharge, nonhome discharge, and 90-day ED visits compared with privately insured patients ( P < 0.001). Medicaid patients were more likely than privately insured patients to have a 90-day ED visit ( P < 0.001). Socioeconomic status had a minimal clinical effect on all studied outcomes. CONCLUSION: Social factors are important considerations in understanding outcomes after TKA. Additional investigations are indicated in identifying at-risk patients and subsequent optimization of these patients.

Impact of Alignment and Alignment Correction on Outcomes Following Robotic Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively examine the relationship between preoperative and postoperative alignment in robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures. METHODS: A retrospective review of 374 patients who underwent robotic-assisted UKA was conducted. Patient demographics, history, and preoperative and postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) scores were obtained via chart review. Average follow-up period was 2.4 years (range: 0.4 to 4.5 years) to chart review and 9.5 months (range: 6 to 48 months) to latest KOOS-JR. Preoperative and postoperative robotically-measured knee alignment was obtained from operative reports. Incidence of conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was determined by review of a health information exchange tool. RESULTS: Multivariate regressions showed no statistically significant relationship between preoperative alignment, postoperative alignment, or degrees of alignment correction and change in KOOS-JR score or achievement of KOOS-JR minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (P > .05). Patients who had >8 degrees of postoperative varus alignment had on average a 20% lower achievement of KOOS-JR MCID compared to patients who had <8 degrees of postoperative varus alignment; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). There were 3 patients who required conversion to TKA in the follow-up period, with no significant relationship to alignment variables (P > .05). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in KOOS-JR change for those patients who had a larger or smaller degree of deformity correction, and correction did not predict MCID achievement.

The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: Oral Dexamethasone Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous dexamethasone has been shown to reduce pain in total joint arthroplasty. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial investigated the postoperative effects and safety of oral dexamethasone as a potential augment to multimodal pain management in outpatient knee arthroplasty. METHODS: The authors prospectively randomized 109 consecutive patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. Patients assigned to Group A (57 patients) received 4 mg of dexamethasone by mouth twice per day starting postoperative day (POD) 1 for 4 days and those assigned to Group B received placebo capsules. All healthcare professionals and patients were blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome was defined as postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes included 90-day postoperative complications, nausea and vomiting, daily opioid usage, assistance for ambulation, difficulty sleeping, and early patient reported outcomes. Demographics were similar between groups. RESULTS: The patients who received dexamethasone had a statistically significant decrease in VAS scores when averaging POD 1 to 4 (P = .01). The average VAS scores among individual days were significantly lower with dexamethasone on POD 2, 3, and 4. While taking dexamethasone, morning and mid-day VAS scores were significantly lower. There was no difference between the groups with opioid use, nausea or vomiting, 90-day complications, ability to walk with/without assistance, difficulty sleeping, and early patient reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial demonstrated that oral dexamethasone following primary total knee arthroplasty can reduce postoperative pain. This may be a beneficial option in ambulatory surgery where intravenous limitations exist, but larger series are needed to further evaluate the safety profile in this population.

Changes in Patient Reported Outcome Measure Scores From Initial Presentation to Day-of-Surgery in Patients Undergoing Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: It is not well understood how patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) change from initial presentation to day-of-surgery (DOS). This study sought to quantify preoperative PROM changes for hip and knee arthroplasty patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on primary total hip, total knee, and partial knee arthroplasty patients from October 2020 through January 2021. Trends in preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) scores were compared using scores at initial presentation in the ambulatory clinic and at a time near the date-of-surgery. A total of 497 patients possessed 2 preoperative PROMIS-PF (497/497), HOOS-JR (152/497), or KOOS-JR (258/497) surveys. RESULTS: There was no significant statistical difference in mean PROM scores between initial presentation and DOS PROMIS-PF or HOOS-JR scores. Only KOOS-JR demonstrated a significant statistical difference of 2 ± 14 (P = .002) when comparing initial versus preoperative scores. Partial knee arthroplasty patients saw a strong positive correlation (r = 0.77) between initial PROMIS-PF and DOS scores. However, mean absolute value changes on an individual level were 4 ± 4, 11 ± 39, and 11 ± 10 for PROMIS-PF, HOOS-JR, and KOOS-JR, respectively, indicating the presence of meaningful patient-level score changes as based on previously published anchor-based minimal clinically important differences. CONCLUSION: PROMs collected during the preoperative period demonstrated wide variability at an individual level, but not at a population level. Collection at both time points may be necessary in order to understand the clinical impact of surgery on these patients.

Effects of Preoperative Carbohydrate-rich Drinks on Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the effects of preoperative carbohydrate-rich drinks on postoperative outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: We prospectively randomized 153 consecutive patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty at one institution. Patients were assigned to one of three groups: group A (50 patients) received a carbohydrate-rich drink; group B (51 patients) received a placebo drink; and group C (52 patients) did not receive a drink (control). All healthcare personnel and patients were blinded to group allocation. Controlling for demographics, we analyzed the rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting, length of stay, opiate consumption, pain scores, serum glucose, adverse events, and intraoperative and postoperative fluid intake. RESULTS: Demographics and comorbidities were similar among the groups. There were no significant differences in surgical interventions or experience. Surgical fluid intake and total blood loss were similar among the three groups (P = 0.47, P = 0.23). Furthermore, acute postoperative outcomes (ie, pain, episodes of nausea, and length of stay) were similar across all three groups. There were no significant differences in adverse events between the three groups (P = 0.13). There was a significant difference in one-time postoperative bolus between the three groups (P = 0.02), but after multivariate analysis, it did not demonstrate significance. None of the intervention group were readmitted, whereas 5.9% and 11.5% were readmitted in the placebo and control groups, respectively (P = 0.047). The chance of 90-day readmission was reduced in group A compared with group C (odds ratio, 0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.72; P = 0.02). There were no differences in other postoperative outcome measurements. CONCLUSION: This randomized controlled trial demonstrated that preoperative carbohydrate loading does not improve immediate postoperative outcomes, such as nausea and vomiting; however, it demonstrated that consuming fluid preoperatively proved no increased risk of adverse outcomes and there was a trend toward decrease of one-time boluses postoperatively. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: NCT03380754.

Comparison of Postoperative Instability and Acetabular Cup Positioning in Robotic-Assisted Versus Traditional Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (R-THA) affords precision yet uncertain clinical benefits. This study compares dislocation rates and related revisions between R-THA and manual total hip arthroplasty (M-THA). Secondarily we evaluated cup position, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and postoperative complications. METHODS: A three-surgeon cohort study was conducted on 2247 consecutive patients (1724 M-THA and 523 R-THA) who received a primary THA between January 2014 and June 2020 at a single hospital. Demographics, PROMs, emergency department visits, readmissions, and 90-day complications were collected via the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative. Chart review yielded instability occurrence with an average follow-up of 4 years. Multivariate regression analysis was performed, and a sample of 368 radiographs, including all dislocations, were assessed. RESULTS: There were significantly lower rates of dislocation in R-THA (0.6%) vs M-THA (2.5%; Multivariate odds ratio 3.74, P < .046). All cases of unstable R-THA were successfully treated conservatively, whereas 46% of unstable M-THA were revised for recurrent instability. Cup anteversion (25.6° ± 5.4° R-THA vs 20.6° ± 7.6° M-THA) was greater, and cup inclination (42.5° ± 5.3° R-THA vs 47.0° ± 6.7° M-THA) was lower in the R-THA group (P < .05). No significant differences were noted for demographics, PROMs, or other complications (P > .05). CONCLUSION: R-THA resulted in less than one-fourth the dislocation rate compared to M-THA and no revision for instability. It was associated with no difference in PROMs or other early complications. The influence of R-THA on stability goes beyond simply cup positioning and deserves further study.

Multiple Venous Thromboembolism Pharmacologic Agents Are Associated with an Increased Risk for Early Postoperative Complications following a Total Joint Arthroplasty.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect that concurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) medications had on early outcomes following primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). 2653 total knee and hip arthroplasties were reviewed at a tertiary medical center. The study performed a multivariable comparison of outcomes in patients on 2 or more VTE medications, as well as a logistic regression on outcomes following each addition of a VTE medication postoperatively (number of VTE medications was 1-4). Controlling for gender, age, body mass index, and preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists score throughout the analysis, patients who received 2 or more VTE prophylaxis medications had increased LOS (p < 0.001), transfusions (p < 0.001), emergency department visits (p=0.001), readmissions (p < 0.001), 90dPOE (p < 0.001), and PE (p < 0.001). Every additional postoperative VTE medication incrementally increased the risk for longer LOS (p < 0.001), transfusions (p < 0.001), 90dPOE (p < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (p=0.049), PE (p < 0.001), emergency department visits (p=0.005), and readmission (p=0.010). Patients on multiple VTE medications following TJA demonstrate significantly poorer outcomes. The current study's findings caution the use of multiple VTE medications whenever possible immediately following a TJA.

Comparison of Area Deprivation Index, Socioeconomic Parameters, and Preoperative Demographics With Postoperative Emergency Department Visits After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to determine if socioeconomic (SE) parameters, primarily area deprivation index (ADI), relate to postoperative emergency department (ED) visits after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2655 patients who underwent TKA in a health system of 4 hospitals. The primary outcome was an ED visit within 90 days, which was divided into those with and without readmission. SE parameters including ADI as well as preoperative demographics were analyzed. Univariable and multiple logistic regressions were performed determining risk of 90-day postoperative ED visits, as well as once in the ED, risks for readmission. RESULTS: 436 patients (16.4%) presented to the ED within 90 days. ADI was not a risk factor. The multiple logistic regression demonstrated men, Medicare or Medicaid, and preoperative ED visits were consistently risk factors for a postoperative ED visit with and without readmission. Preoperative anticoagulation was only a risk factor for ED visits with readmission. Among patients who visited the ED, if the patient was Caucasian, a lower BMI, or higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, they were likely to be readmitted. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that the percentage of early ED returns after TKA was high and that ADI was not a predictor for 90-day postoperative ED visit. The only SE factor that may contribute to this phenomenon was insurance type. Once in the ED, race, preoperative ED visits, preoperative anticoagulation, BMI, gender, and preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists score contributed to a risk of readmission. The study supports hospitals' mission to provide equal access health care.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Versus Standard Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether robotic total knee arthroplasty (R-TKA) demonstrated evidence of improvement in minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in early (<4 weeks) and intermittent (4-8 month) patient-reported outcomes compared with manual total knee arthroplasty (M-TKA). METHODS: A prospectively collected database was reviewed of 1160 consecutive patients undergoing R-TKA or M-TKA from December 2017 to October 2019. Primary outcomes consisted of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health Measures of Physical Health (PH) and Mental Health (MH). Statistical analysis included MCID via the distribution method. RESULTS: Univariate analysis demonstrated conflicting results for early MCID achievement favoring M-TKA (4-week KOOS-JR, P = .03) for the multisurgeon cohort, but favored R-TKA (4-week Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-PH, P = .04) in the single-surgeon analysis, and the remaining outcome scores were similar. Ultimately, multivariate analysis demonstrated similar 4-week and 6-month MCID achievement in all measures. Lower preoperative scores consistently achieved MCID at a higher rate in M-TKA, although in R-TKA, the higher baseline scores improved at a rate comparable with those with lower scores in all but the short-term postoperative KOOS-JR. CONCLUSION: R-TKA demonstrated comparable MCID achievement to M-TKA across the larger cohort. Single-surgeon comparison did show some early benefit. Confounding variables such as surgical technique, implant fixation, and responsiveness of an outcome measure may be as important as simply what tools are used during surgery. Such granular data should be sought out in future studies.

Effect of Acetylsalicylic Acid Dose and Time Discontinued Preoperatively on Outcomes After Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty.

The purpose of this study was to determine if acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) dose or time discontinued preoperatively affected surgical outcomes in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The authors hypothesized that ASA worsens surgical outcomes in patients receiving higher doses and in those who discontinue ASA closer to the operative date. A total of 2853 TJAs (1802 primary total knee arthroplasties and 1051 total hip arthroplasties) performed at a tertiary medical center were reviewed. Postoperative outcomes of patients receiving ASA prior to TJA, dosing of ASA (81 mg or 325 mg) preoperatively and postoperatively, and the time of preoperative discontinuation (no ASA, <4 days, <7 days, and 7 or more days) were compared. Preoperative ASA was a risk factor for readmission (odds ratio [OR], 1.86; P<.001) and 90-day postoperative events (OR, 1.26; P=.004). Among patients receiving ASA, the dose was not a risk factor for any of the studied outcomes. Discontinuing ASA 7 or more days prior to TJA was protective for hematomas (OR, 0.64; P=.038), emergency department visits (OR, 0.79; P=.006), readmission (OR, 0.65; P<.001), and 90-day postoperative events (OR, 0.72; P<.001). These outcomes had a time effect: the risk was greater for those who discontinued therapy closer to the operative date. Patients who discontinued ASA 7 or more days prior to TJA had a lower incidence of hematomas, emergency department visits, readmissions, and 90-day postoperative events. This study's findings support discontinuing ASA at least 7 days prior to TJA. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(5):286-293].

Origins of eponymous instruments in spine surgery.

Every day, spine surgeons call for instruments named after surgical pioneers. Few know the designers or the histories behind their instruments. In this paper the authors provide a historical perspective on the Penfield dissector, Leksell rongeur, Hibbs retractor, Woodson elevator, Kerrison rongeur, McCulloch retractor, Caspar pin retractor system, and Cloward handheld retractor, and a biographical review of their inventors. Historical data were obtained by searching the HathiTrust Digital Library, PubMed, Google Scholar, Google Books, and Google, and personal communications with relatives, colleagues, and foundations of the surgeon-designers. The authors found that the Penfield dissectors filled a need for delicate tools for manipulating the brain and that the Leksell rongeur increased surgical efficiency during war-related laminectomies. Hibbs' retractor facilitated his spine fusion technique. Woodson was both a dentist and a physician whose instrument was adopted by spine surgeons. Kerrison rongeurs were developed in otology to decompress bone near the facial nerve. The McCulloch, Caspar, and Cloward retractors helped improve exposure during the emergence of new techniques, i.e., microdiscectomy and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. The histories behind these eponymous instruments remind us that innovation sometimes begins in other specialties and demonstrate the role of innovation in improving patient care.