An Unusual Foreign Object Attached to a Child's Finger: Emergency Department Management and Subsequent Intervention.

ABSTRACT: Strangulation injuries due to foreign objects are uncommon presentations of hand and finger injuries presenting to the emergency department (ED). Ring avulsion and hair tourniquet injuries are more commonly recognized mechanisms of strangulation, and algorithms for subsequent management and emergent treatment exist for these injuries. It is important to distinguish between hand injuries that can be managed in the setting of the ED and those that need emergent surgical management upon patient presentation. Nonemergent presentations of finger injuries include metallic bands or other objects trapped on digits without signs of neurovascular compromise. A 2-year-old girl presented to our ED with her right index finger trapped within a stainless steel salt shaker (2.55 in. H × 3.5 in. W × 4.9 in. D). The distal aspect of the digit was unable to be visualized, and communication with the patient was difficult secondary to distress and young age. Multiple attempts were made to remove the object in the ED by multiple health care providers, when concern for degloving injury prompted the patient to be taken to the operating room for removal with an electric saw by the hand surgeon and orthopedic team.

Single-Bundle vs Double-Bundle (Anatomical) Reconstruction of the Thumb Ulnar Collateral Ligament: Biomechanical Study.

Background: The goal of this study is to compare the biomechanical properties of anatomic (double-bundle) versus single-bundle reconstruction of the thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) in a cadaveric model. Methods: Twelve fresh frozen cadaver hands were randomly assigned to single- or double-bundle reconstruction groups using a palmaris longus autograft and tenodesis screws. Two blinded examiners performed mechanical testing and measurements using fluoroscopic imaging. We evaluated MCP joint congruence and angle in the coronal plane at 0°, 30°, and 60° of flexion with valgus loads of 1.36 and 2.72 kg. Maximum MCP flexion and extension with a 0.45 kg load was also measured. Results: There was no significant difference between single- versus double-bundle reconstruction in ulnar congruence or MCP angle. With varying amounts of flexion, there was no significant difference in MCP valgus angle between the 2 techniques, suggesting comparable joint congruity and coronal MCP angle along the arc of thumb MCP motion. Conclusions: Single- and double-bundle UCL reconstructions of the thumb MCP joint have comparable biomechanical properties in regard to joint congruity under valgus load.

Ulnar Nerve Management with Distal Humerus Fracture Fixation: A Meta-Analysis.

Ulnar nerve dysfunction following distal humerus fractures is a well-recognized phenomenon. There is no consensus regarding optimal handling of the ulnar nerve during surgical management of these fractures between in situ management and transposition. Using an electronic database to identify retrospective studies involving surgical fixation of distal humerus fractures yielded 46 studies, 5 trials meeting the authors' inclusion criteria, totaling 362 patients. An overall incidence of 19.3% for ulnar neuropathy was identified. Of those patients undergoing in situ release, the incidence was 15.3%. Of those who underwent transposition, there was a 23.5% incidence of ulnar neuropathy.

Restoring Isometry in Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To ascertain whether placing the humeral attachment of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) at the humeral center of rotation (hCOR) on the humerus would provide the most isometric reconstruction. METHODS: We analyzed 13 cadaver limbs from mid-humerus to the hand. The morphology of the ligament complex was assessed. The hCOR was then found using radiographic parameters. We chose 7 points on the humerus located at and around the hCOR and 3 points paralleling the supinator crest of the ulna and then calculated distances from these points using a digital caliper at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 130° flexion. Differences in potential ligamentous lengths (termed graft elongation) were then calculated and statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: There was no perfectly isometric point along the humerus or ulna. However, in all specimens the hCOR was the most isometric point for the humeral reconstruction site, with an average graft elongation of 1.1 mm. Differences in humeral tunnel position dramatically affected graft elongation at all 3 ulnar insertions. Overall, ulnar position had a minimal effect on graft elongation. CONCLUSIONS: Although no perfectly isometric points were found, the humeral center of rotation consistently reproduced the most isometry when assessing graft elongation over range of motion. These data may assist surgeons in proper tunnel placement in LUCL reconstruction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In LUCL reconstruction, the humeral tunnel should be placed as close as possible to the center of rotation, whereas placement on the ulna is less critical.