RESUMO
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), primarily a respiratory virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, induces a hypercoagulable state. Previous studies comparing the prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and those with influenza pneumonia revealed a higher risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with COVID-19 pneumonia. However, these studies have not adequately accounted for the severity and acuity of the presenting viral pneumonia. Methods: In this retrospective study, we rigorously adjusted for critical illness using a nationally representative dataset to investigate whether COVID-19 pneumonia is independently linked to a higher risk of PE and DVT. Results: After comprehensive multivariate adjustment, our findings demonstrated that patients with COVID-19 pneumonia maintained significantly higher odds of developing acute inpatient PE [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.48; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.16-2.86; P<0.01] and DVT (aOR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.41-1.96; P<0.01) during the early pandemic compared to patients with influenza pneumonia. Furthermore, we identified congenital heart disease and malnutrition as novel risk factors for acute PE in COVID-19 patients. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the higher prevalence of acute inpatient PE over DVT in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia may support a "thrombus in situ" mechanism of SARS-CoV-2-mediated pulmonary thrombosis. Consequently, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for PE, even in the absence of DVT, among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and should follow evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Autonomy during residency is crucial to the training and development of competent surgeons. An essential component of this process is the 'teaching assistant (TA)' case, an indispensable opportunity for residents to gain confidence and hone intraoperative skills. However, high-quality data on the volume and diversity of cases that graduates perform are scarce. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed from publicly collected data of operative case logs from general surgery residents graduating from ACGME-accredited programs from 2006 to 2023. Data on the median overall number of surgeon chief and TA cases were retrieved. Collected data were organized based on sub-specialties. The Mann-Kendall trend test was used to investigate trends in TA cases and surgeon chief operative volume. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2023, the surgeon chief cases gradually increased from 229 to 274 (19.6 â% increase; τ â= â0.610, p â= â0.001). There was a concurrent 72.7 â% increase in TA cases from a median of 22-38 (τ â= â0.574, p â= â0.001). Surgeon chief (283 per resident) and TA cases (43 per resident) peaked in 2018-2019 and 2016-2017. The uptrend in TA cases was associated with the significant increase in colorectal (τ â= â0.559, p â= â0.001), general surgery-other (τ â= â0.404, p â= â0.018), and hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) (τ â= â0.596, p â= â0.001) subspecialties. Trauma and vascular surgery did not change significantly. With respect to total chief cases, general surgery-other (τ â= â0.956, p=<0.001), HPB (τ â= â0.713, p=<0.001) and colorectal (τ â= â0.522, p â= â0.004) volume increased. There was no significant change in trauma and foregut volume, while the volume of endocrine (τ â= â-0.485, p â= â0.006) and vascular surgery (τ â= â0.603, p â= â0.001) dropped significantly. The procedural category with the highest chief and TA volume was 'colorectal tract - large intestine.' Most procedural categories (53.49 â%) retained a median of 0 teaching cases. No chief cases were logged for the specialties generally not considered part of general surgery (genitourinary, nervous system, orthopedics, and gynecology), although a median of 1 surgeon chief genitourinary case was recorded from 2018 to 2023. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past seventeen years, there has been a gradual uptrend in the number of surgeon chief and TA cases. While this is a positive indicator of improved autonomy, further research must focus on strategies to improve resident autonomy to train well-rounded surgeons safely.
RESUMO
Amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia is a rare haematologic disorder characterised by a profound reduction in platelet production due to the near absence of megakaryocytes, leading to severe thrombocytopenia. This report elucidates the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges encountered in managing such rare haematological conditions alongside significant cardiovascular disease. We detail the case of a patient who presented with chest pain and was diagnosed with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Subsequent investigations revealed severe thrombocytopenia and underlying triple vessel disease, complicating immediate surgical intervention. Initial management strategies aimed at treating presumed immune thrombocytopenia proved ineffective. A definitive diagnosis of amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia was established following a bone marrow biopsy. Despite treatment adjustments, including the administration of thrombopoietin agonists and immunosuppression, platelet counts improved but did not reach levels safe for coronary artery bypass grafting. This case underscores the importance of diagnosis and treatment of systemic disorders prior treatment of cardiac disease. It also demonstrates the importance of interdisciplinary cooperation in the treatment of a complex patient case. LEARNING POINTS: Amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia is a rare cause of thrombocytopenia that can co-occur with cardiac conditions.The diagnosis of amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia can be difficult as it can be mistaken for immune mediated thrombocytopenia, but distinction is critical as treatments differ.Modern patient care frequently requires collaboration between different subspecialities.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) represents the most severe form of peripheral artery disease. While previous studies have focused on gender and racial disparities, there is lack of evidence regarding the impact of housing status. The aim of this analysis was to identify disparities in inpatient management and outcomes of CLTI based on housing status. METHODS: In this retrospective, descriptive study, we analyzed patients admitted with CLTI who underwent revascularization, as identified by ICD-10 codes, between 2016-2021, using the National Inpatient Sample database. The patients were stratified by their housing status and a detailed, propensity-matched analysis was conducted to compare the demographics, comorbidities, mortality rates, types of intervention, resource utilization, and inpatient outcomes. RESULTS: During the study, 2,667,294 patients were admitted with CLTI, and 17% (463,435) underwent revascularization. Among these, 0.4% (1,790) were unhoused. Males were overrepresented in the unhoused group (83.5% vs. 62.5%, p<0.001). Unhoused patients were more likely to receive endovascular revascularization (AOR 1.77, 0.45-0.90, p=0.003) but less likely to undergo open surgical intervention (AOR 0.64, 0.45-0.90, p=0.010). They were also more likely to undergo aortoiliac interventions, while housed patients underwent more distal interventions. The mean adjusted length of stay was four days longer and inflation-adjusted costs were $8,501 higher for unhoused patients (p<0.001). Unhoused patients were also more likely to leave against medical advice and be transferred to skilled nursing facilities. CONCLUSION: This study highlights significant disparities in CLTI management and outcomes between housed and unhoused patients, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to address these inequities.
RESUMO
Background: Despite resuscitative efforts, cardiac arrest (CA) continues to result in high mortality and poor prognosis. However, a gap remains in understanding the comparative outcomes of efforts in emergency departments (ED) over recent years. This study evaluated patients with CA during ED visits, with a particular focus on outcomes of mortality and transition of care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) database. The study population included patients aged 18 years or older who visited the ED between January 2016 and December 2020. Statistical analysis of patients and hospital characteristics included chi-squared tests for independence and multivariable logistic regression models to report the associations of factors with mortality in the ED and disposition from the ED. The primary outcome measured was mortality in the ED, and the secondary outcome included transition of care. Results: A total of 699,822,424 ED visits occurred between 2016 and 2020, with 1,414,060 (0.20%) CAs. The survival rate from CA ranged from 24.6% to 28.1%. In 2020, the rate of ED CA increased to 0.27%, with an inpatient mortality rate of 58.8%. There was no significant difference in mortality between sexes (p = 0.690). There was a trend for higher mortality in the ED among patients who were self-paid. Notably, the odds of transfer from the ED to other hospitals were significantly lower in minority groups. Conclusions: Our results showed significant disparities in ED mortality and patient disposition following cardiac arrest, highlighting the need for equitable healthcare resources and policies.
RESUMO
AIMS: Anal cancer, despite its rarity, is a matter of serious concern in the United States, with an uptrend in recent years and marked racial disparities in mortality rates. The aim of this work was to investigate anal cancer mortality trends and sex race disparities in the United States from 1999 to 2020. METHOD: This is a retrospective study using data from the CDC WONDER database (1999-2020). We investigated deaths attributed to anal cancer, identified by the ICD-10 code C21.1, and excluded individuals aged 14 years and under. The Mann-Kendall trend test was used to investigate temporal trends and a t-test was used to compare continuous variables. RESULTS: Both male and female age-adjusted mortality attributed to anal cancer increased significantly during the study period across all subgroups, including race (Black and White), US Census region (Northeast, Midwest, South and West) and age (15-64 and ≥65 years) (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). For each subgroup, women demonstrated significantly higher rates of mortality than men, except in the Black population, where Black men had higher rates than Black women (0.40 vs. 0.29, p < 0.001). Additionally, Black men had significantly higher mean mortality rates than White men (0.40 vs. 0.27, p < 0.001). The highest rates of anal cancer mortality were among geriatric individuals, especially women aged ≥65 years, at 1.18 per 100 000. CONCLUSION: The rise in anal cancer mortality and racial and sex disparities present a significant challenge for healthcare providers and policy makers. Further studies are required to devise evidence-based strategies to effectively tackle this challenge.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) is a severe form of pancreatitis that often necessitates intensive care and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to investigate racial and gender disparities in palliative care (PC) utilization among mechanically-ventilated patients with NP. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020, we investigated 84â 335 patients with NP requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, and the utilization of PC services and their disparities based on gender and race. To adjust for potential confounding factors, we employed multivariable logistic regression, ensuring that our findings account for various influencing variables and provide a robust analysis of the data. RESULTS: Among the patients studied, 15.4% utilized PC consultations. Notably, female patients were 12% more likely to utilize PC than their male counterparts (OR 1.1, 95% CI: 1.003-1.2; P = .008). Racial disparities were pronounced: African Americans (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, P < .001), Hispanic (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, P = .001), and Asian or Pacific Islander patients (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.97; P = .03) had significantly lower odds of utilizing PC compared to White patients. The cohort utilizing PC had a higher in-hospital mortality rate (74.7% vs 24.8%; OR 8.2, 95% CI 7.7-9.2) but a shorter mean hospital stays and lower associated costs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate significant racial and gender disparities in the utilization of PC for intubated patients with NP, with lower utilization among males and minority populations. These findings emphasize the urgent requirement for comprehensive changes in healthcare protocols.
RESUMO
An 83-year-old man with a history of monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance, macrocytic anemia, and cytopenias presented with hemorrhagic bullae on his left hand, alongside intermittent fevers and joint pain. Laboratory findings indicated anemia, elevated mean corpuscular volume, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and a high C-reactive protein level. A biopsy of the bullae showed neutrophilic dermatosis, and computed tomography scans of the thorax revealed lung opacities and mediastinal lymphadenopathy, suggesting neutrophilic alveolitis. Bone marrow examination found hypercellularity with myeloid and histiocytic hyperplasia, vacuolated precursors, and 3% blasts of an immature myelomonocytic lineage. Genetic testing uncovered a UBA1 mutation at an 81% allele frequency, confirming a diagnosis of VEXAS syndrome. Treatment commenced with prednisone, initiated at 60 mg daily and tapered to 10 mg, with tocilizumab considered for future symptom management. This regimen has successfully maintained remission, as observed in follow-up appointments. This case highlights the diagnostic complexity and effective management of VEXAS syndrome, underscoring the importance of genetic testing in guiding treatment decisions.
VEXAS syndrome, initially identified in 2020, is a rare disease characterized by overlapping hematologic and rheumatologic conditions, primarily affecting middle-aged to older men.Our case presents a unique instance of VEXAS syndrome, featuring inflammatory symptoms alongside pancytopenia and a history of monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance, highlighting the diverse clinical spectrum of this condition.The diagnosis was confirmed through bone marrow biopsy revealing vacuoles in myeloid precursors and a UBA1 mutation, reaffirming the diagnostic criteria outlined for VEXAS syndrome.Management challenges persist, with current treatment options limited to glucocorticoids for symptomatic relief, underscoring the need for further research into targeted therapies such as ruxolitinib to improve patient outcomes.
RESUMO
Background: This retrospective study aims to examine the patient demographics, survival rates, and treatment methods for small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of prostate origin while also identifying the main differences between common types of prostate cancer with comparative analysis for survival. Methods: Our analysis utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER), and data was collected from 2000-2020. Cox proportional hazards and chi-squared analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 718 cases of prostate small and large neuroendocrine carcinoma were identified. The median age was 71.5 years, and the median follow-up was 11.0 years (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 9.2-12.8). Most patients were over the age of 80 years (33.8%) and Caucasian (74.4%). The overall 5-year survival was 8.0% (95% CI = 6.8-9.2). The 5-year OS for Caucasians was 7.3% (95% C.I. 6.0-8.3). For Black Americans, the 5-year OS was 11.9% (95% C.I. 7.3-16.5). For Hispanics, the 5-year OS was 12.2% (95% C.I. 7.7-16.7). The 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS) was 16.2% (95% CI = 14.3-18.1). For treatment modality, the five-year survival for each were as follows: chemotherapy, 3.5% (95% CI = 2.1-4.9); surgery, 18.2% (95% CI = 13.6-22.8); multimodality therapy (surgery and chemotherapy), 4.8% (95% CI = 1.7-7.9); and combination (chemoradiation with surgery), 5.0% (95% CI = 1.0-9.0). The prognostic nomogram created to predict patient survivability matched the findings from the statistical analysis with a statistical difference found in race, income, housing, stage, and nodal status. The nomogram also indicated a slight increase in mortality with tumors of greater size. This analysis showed a slight increase in mortality for patients of Asian race. In addition, there was a significant increase in death for patients with stage 3 tumors, as well as patients who underwent surgery and radiation. Furthermore, we performed propensity score matching for survival differences, and no survival difference was found between SCNEC and LCNEC. Conclusions: Asian patients, larger tumor size, and distant disease were associated with worse long-term clinical outcomes. By leveraging insights from registry-based studies, clinicians can better strategize treatment options, improving patient outcomes in this challenging oncology arena.
RESUMO
Patients with cerebral palsy (CP) are particularly vulnerable to respiratory infections, yet comparative outcomes between COVID-19 and influenza in this population remain underexplored. Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2020-2021, we performed a retrospective analysis of hospital data for adults with CP diagnosed with either COVID-19 or influenza. The study aimed to compare the outcomes of these infections to provide insights into their impact on this vulnerable population. We assessed in-hospital mortality, complications, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, and discharge dispositions. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity score matching were used to adjust for confounders, enhancing the analytical rigor of our study. The study cohort comprised 12,025 patients-10,560 with COVID-19 and 1465 with influenza. COVID-19 patients with CP had a higher in-hospital mortality rate (10.8% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.001), with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.2 (95% CI: 1.6-6.4). They also experienced an extended LOS by an average of 2.7 days. COVID-19 substantially increases the health burden for hospitalized CP patients compared to influenza, as evidenced by higher mortality rates, longer hospital stays, and increased costs. These findings highlight the urgent need for tailored strategies to effectively manage and reduce the impact of COVID-19 on this high-risk group.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Paralisia Cerebral , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Influenza Humana , Tempo de Internação , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/complicações , Influenza Humana/mortalidade , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/complicações , Masculino , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paralisia Cerebral/complicações , Paralisia Cerebral/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous pneumothorax (PTX) is more prevalent among COVID-19 patients than other critically ill patients, but studies on this are limited. This study compared clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes among COVID-19 patients with concomitant PTX to provide insight into how PTX affects health care utilization and complications, which informs clinical decisions and healthcare resource allocation. METHODS: The 2020 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used analyze patient demographics and outcomes, including age, race, sex, insurance status, median income, length of hospital stay, mortality rate, hospitalization costs, comorbidities, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor support. Propensity score matching was employed for additional analysis. RESULTS: Among 1,572,815 COVID-19 patients, 1.41% had PTX. These patients incurred significantly higher hospitalization costs ($435,508 vs. $96,668, p < 0.001) and longer stays (23.6 days vs. 8.6 days, p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was substantially elevated for PTX patients (65.8% vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001), with an adjusted odds ratio of 14.3 (95% CI 12.7-16.2). Additionally, these patients were more likely to require vasopressors (16.6% vs. 3.3%), mechanical circulatory support (3.5% vs. 0.3%), hemodialysis (16.6% vs. 5.6%), invasive mechanical ventilation (76.9% vs. 15.1%), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (19.1% vs. 5.8%), tracheostomy (13.3% vs. 1.1%), and chest tube placement (59.8% vs. 0.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the severe impact of PTX on COVID-19 patients, characterized by higher mortality, more complications, and increased resource utilization. Also, being Hispanic, male, or obese increased the risk of developing concomitant PTX with COVID-19.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Pneumotórax , Pontuação de Propensão , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/complicações , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pneumotórax/mortalidade , Pneumotórax/terapia , Adulto , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Respiração Artificial/economia , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Comorbidade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Introduction: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) and sepsis shock (SS) are both severe and life-threatening conditions requiring specialized care, including palliative care (PC), to optimize comfort. However, data on the utilization of PC in this population, including racial and gender differences, are limited. Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020 to extract data on patients with NF and SS as well as PC utilization. Chi-squared tests and multivariate linear regression models were utilized to analyze relationships between categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for various outcomes among various gender and racial groups. Mann-Kendall trend test was used to assess mortality trends over time. Results: Among the 11,260 patients with NF and SS, 2,645 received PC whereas 8,615 did not. Female patients had significantly higher odds of receiving PC versus males (aOR: 1.42, 95% CI 1.27-1.58). No significant racial differences in PC utilization were observed. Patients receiving PC had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR: 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.35). No significant trend in in-hospital deaths was observed over the study period. PC was associated with significantly shorter length-of-stay and lower costs. Conclusion: Our study provides comprehensive insights, and identifies gender differences in PC utilization in NF and SS patients. Further research must aim to refine delivery strategies and address potential differences in PC.
Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Fasciite Necrosante , Cuidados Paliativos , Choque Séptico , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Idoso , Choque Séptico/terapia , Choque Séptico/mortalidade , Fasciite Necrosante/terapia , Fasciite Necrosante/mortalidade , Fasciite Necrosante/etnologia , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Globally, acute appendicitis has an estimated lifetime risk of 7-8%. However, there are numerous controversies surrounding the management of acute appendicitis, and the best treatment approach depends on patient characteristics. Non-operative management (NOM), which involves the utilization of antibiotics and aggressive intravenous hydration, and surgical appendectomy are valid treatment options for healthy adults. NOM is also ideal for poor surgical candidates. Another important consideration is the timing of surgery, i.e., the role of interval appendectomy (IA) and the possibility of delaying surgery for a few hours on index admission. IA refers to surgical removal of the appendix 8-12 weeks after the initial diagnosis of appendicitis. It is ideal in patients with a contained appendiceal perforation on initial presentation, wherein an initial nonoperative approach is preferred. Furthermore, IA can help distinguish malignant and non-malignant causes of acute appendicitis, while reducing the risk of recurrence. On the contrary, a decision to delay appendectomy for a few hours on index admission should be made based on the patients' baseline health status and severity of appendicitis. Post-operatively, surgical drain placement may help reduce postoperative complications; however, it carries an increased risk of drain occlusion, fistula formation, and paralytic ileus. Furthermore, one of the most critical aspects of appendectomy is the closure of the appendiceal stump, which can be achieved with the help of endoclips, sutures, staples, and endoloops. In this review, we discuss different aspects of management of acute appendicitis, current controversies in management, and the potential role of endoscopic appendectomy as a future treatment option.
RESUMO
Background: The available literature indicates a link between SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and a heightened probability of experiencing negative outcomes for both the pregnant patient and the developing fetus. We compared clinical outcomes of pregnant patients with or without COVID-19 hospitalized during delivery. Methods: Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare outcomes and was adjusted for patient-related, hospital-related, and illness severity indicators. Results: We identified a total of 3,447,771 pregnant patients admitted between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020; 1.3% (n = 46,050) had COVID-19. COVID-19-positive patients had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (0.15% vs 0.05%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5-14.25, P < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (0.9% vs 0.05%, aOR 14.2, 95% CI 10.7-18.76, P < 0.001), vasopressor use (0.26% vs 0.14%, aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.07-2.02, P = 0.01), and perinatal maternal complications like preeclampsia (9.66% vs 7.04%, aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.2-1.39, P < 0.001) and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome (0.53% vs 0.26%, aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.43-2.61, P < 0.001) than COVID-19-negative patients. Discussion: Clinicians should be aware of the heightened risk of complications in pregnant patients with COVID-19 and consider strategies to mitigate them.
RESUMO
End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are at increased risk of mortality, particularly due to cardiovascular events such as acute myocardial infarction. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are the two main treatment modalities for ESRD patients. Using data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we conducted a retrospective study involving 25,435 ESRD patients diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) between 2016 and 2020, categorized by their dialysis regimen. Our analysis revealed comparable mortality rates between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients, but lower hospitalization costs and fewer complications among PD recipients. Over five years, we observed a notable decrease in STEMI mortality despite increased STEMI cases among HD patients. Conversely, HD patients experienced increased hospital stays and associated costs over the study period than PD patients, who demonstrated stable trends. This study highlights the implications of dialysis modality selection in managing costs and reducing morbidity among STEMI patients with ESRD.
Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica , Diálise Peritoneal , Diálise Renal , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/mortalidade , Diálise Peritoneal/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Idoso , Resultado do Tratamento , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendênciasRESUMO
Endovascular aortic repair is an emerging novel intervention for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. It is crucial to compare the effectiveness of different access sites, such as transfemoral access (TFA) and upper extremity access (UEA). An electronic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases. The primary endpoint was the incidence of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), while the secondary endpoints included technical success, access-site complications, mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), spinal cord ischemia, among others. Forest plots were constructed for the pooled analysis of data using the random-effects model in Review Manager, version 5.4. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Our findings in 9403 study participants (6228 in the TFA group and 3175 in the UEA group) indicate that TFA is associated with a lower risk of stroke/TIA [RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.40-0.75; p = 0.0002], MI [RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.38-0.69; p < 0.0001], spinal cord ischemia [RR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.32-0.53, p < 0.00001], and shortens fluoroscopy time [SMD: -0.62; 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.24; p = 0.001]. Moreover, TFA required less contrast agent [SMD: -0.33; 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.06; p = 0.02], contributing to its appeal. However, no significant differences emerged in technical success [p = 0.23], 30-day mortality [p = 0.48], ICU stay duration [p = 0.09], or overall hospital stay length [p = 0.22]. Patients with TFA had a lower risk of stroke, MI, and spinal cord ischemia, shorter fluoroscopy time, and lower use of contrast agents. Future large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm and strengthen these findings.
Assuntos
Implante de Prótese Vascular , Cateterismo Periférico , Correção Endovascular de Aneurisma , Artéria Femoral , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Correção Endovascular de Aneurisma/métodos , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Projetos Piloto , Punções , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Extremidade Superior/irrigação sanguíneaRESUMO
Introduction Existing data suggest an association between primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) and cannabis consumption, although evidence remains controversial. Methods This study used the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample Database to examine inpatients with PSP, categorizing them as cannabis users and non-users. Multivariate regression analyzed continuous variables, chi-square assessed categorical variables, and logistic regression models were built. Propensity score matching (PSM) mitigated the confounding bias. Results A total of 399,495 patients with PSP were admitted during the study period (13,415 cannabis users and 386,080 non-cannabis users). Cannabis users were more likely to be younger (p<0.001) and male (p<0.001) with a lower risk of baseline comorbidities than non-users. Cannabis users had a lower risk of sudden cardiac arrest, vasopressor use, the development of acute kidney injury, venous thromboembolism, the requirement for invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and the need for a tracheostomy. Cannabis use was associated with a 3.4 days shorter hospital stay (p<0.001), as confirmed by PSM analysis (2.3 days shorter, p<0.001). Additionally, cannabis users showed a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (p<0.001), a trend maintained in the PSM analysis (p<0.001). Conclusions Our study revealed correlations suggesting that cannabis users with PSP might experience lower in-hospital mortality and fewer complications than non-cannabis users.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Pheochromocytoma is a rare cause of hypertensive emergency. The objective of this analysis was to compare the clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and in-hospital outcomes of patients admitted with hypertensive emergencies with and without co-existing pheochromocytoma. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database from 2016 to 2020 was conducted, encompassing 640,395 patients hospitalized for hypertensive emergencies, including 2535 patients diagnosed with pheochromocytoma. We compared demographics, comorbidities, in-hospital outcomes and resource utilization metrics in patients with and without pheochromocytoma. Propensity-score matching was utilized to account for potential confounders and risk of complications was compared. RESULTS: Among the pheochromocytoma cohort (51.9% female), a significant portion (35.7%) were under 50 years of age, with the majority being Caucasian (47.9%). Comorbid conditions such as obesity, diabetes, and smoking were prevalent, with notable differences in cancer (7.5% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.001) and peripheral vascular disease (17% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001) rates compared to the non-pheochromocytoma cohort. Pheochromocytoma patients had a longer hospital stay (7.5 vs. 6 days, p = 0.002) and higher odds of acute kidney injury (AKI) (1.54, 1.18-2, p=0.001) but lower odds of requiring hemodialysis (0.52, 0.32-0.79, p < 0.001) or experiencing major cardiovascular events (0.5, 0.36-0.69, p < 0.001). No significant difference in inflation-adjusted hospitalization costs was found between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hypertensive emergencies and pheochromocytoma had a higher incidence of AK, certain comorbidities (cancer, peripheral vascular disease), and more complex hospital courses suggested by longer length of stay. However, the overall cost of hospitalization did not significantly differ between the two cohorts.
Assuntos
Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hipertensão , Feocromocitoma , Pontuação de Propensão , Humanos , Feocromocitoma/complicações , Feocromocitoma/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/complicações , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/epidemiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Idoso , Adulto , Comorbidade , Emergências , Crise HipertensivaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastric surgery is a crucial component of general surgery training. However, there is a paucity of high-quality data on operative volume and the diversity of surgical procedures that general surgery residents are exposed to. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of operative case logs of all general surgery residents graduating from the American College of Graduate Medical Education-accredited program from 2009 to 2022. Data on the mean number of gastric procedures, including the mean in each subcategory, were retrieved. A Mann-Kendall trend test was used to investigate trends in operative volume. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2022, the mean overall logged gastric procedures rose significantly (τ = 0.722, P < .001) from 36.2 in 2009 to 49.2 in 2022 (35.9% increase). The most substantial growth was seen in laparoscopic gastric reduction for morbid obesity (mean 1.9 in 2017 to 19 in 2022; τ = 0.670, P = .009). A statistically significant increase was also seen in laparoscopic partial gastric resections, repair of gastric perforation, and "other major stomach procedures" (P < .05 for all comparisons). Open gastrostomy, open partial gastric resections, and open vagotomy all significantly decreased (P < .05 for all comparisons). There was no significant change in the volume of laparoscopic gastrectomy, total gastric resections, and non-laparoscopic gastric reductions for morbid obesity (P > .05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: There has been a substantial increase in the volume of gastric surgery during residency over the past 14 years, driven mainly by an increase in laparoscopic gastric reduction. However, there may still be a need for further gastric surgical training to ensure well-rounded general surgeons.