Effects of clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol on hostility among patients with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the specific antiaggressive effects of clozapine with those of olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol. METHODS: A total of 157 inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and a history of suboptimal treatment response were randomly assigned to receive clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, or haloperidol in a double-blind 14-week trial. The trial was divided into two periods: eight weeks during which the dosage was escalated and then fixed, and six weeks during which variable dosages were used. The hostility item of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was the principal outcome measure. Covariates included the items that reflect positive symptoms of schizophrenia (delusions, suspiciousness or feelings of persecution, grandiosity, unusual thought content, conceptual disorganization, and hallucinations) and the sedation item of the Nurses Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation (NOSIE). RESULTS: Patients differed in their treatment response as measured by the hostility item of the PANSS. The scores of patients taking clozapine indicated significantly greater improvement than those of patients taking haloperidol or risperidone. The effect on hostility appeared to be independent of the antipsychotic effect of clozapine on other PANSS items that reflect delusional thinking, a formal thought disorder, or hallucinations and independent of sedation as measured by the NOSIE. Neither risperidone nor olanzapine showed superiority to haloperidol. CONCLUSION: Clozapine has a relative advantage over other antipsychotics as a specific antihostility agent.

Olanzapine for schizophrenia refractory to typical and atypical antipsychotics: an open-label, prospective trial.

The role of olanzapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia is still unresolved. This article presents an open-label, prospective, 14-week trial with olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder selected for unambiguous resistance to either clozapine or risperidone and to typical antipsychotics. Forty-three inpatients (mean age, 41.6 years; mean duration of illness, 21.7 years) were enrolled and treated after cross-titration from their previous antipsychotic treatment with olanzapine 10 to 40 mg daily without any concomitant antipsychotic medication. Patients were evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impressions Scale, and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale. The change with olanzapine treatment was associated with a PANSS total score improvement of 3.7 (SD = 15.6; not significant). There was a significant improvement for the PANSS cognitive and depression/anxiety factors, whereas the PANSS excitement factor worsened. The improvement rate was superior in patients receiving olanzapine doses higher than 20 mg. A total of 16.7% of patients reached response criteria set forth by a previous study. There was a significant decrease in extrapyramidal side effects (t = 2.04; p < 0.05) and statistically significant, yet modest, weight gain. These results indicate that olanzapine is only modestly effective in these severely treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia. However, a trial with olanzapine can be recommended in these patients before moving to augmentation strategies, given the lack of proven alternatives and the observation that 16.7% of patients reached the response criteria.

Effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

OBJECTIVE: The authors conducted a review and meta-analysis of studies that compared the efficacy and tolerability of typical and second-generation antipsychotics for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. METHOD: A systematic search revealed 12 controlled studies (involving 1,916 independent patients), which were included in the review. For the seven studies that compared clozapine to a typical antipsychotic, a meta-analysis was performed to examine clozapine's effects on overall psychopathology, response rate, extrapyramidal symptoms, and tardive dyskinesia. RESULTS: The meta-analysis confirmed that treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients have more favorable outcomes when treated with clozapine rather than a typical antipsychotic, as reflected by Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total score, categorical response rate, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms score, Simpson-Angus Rating Scale score, and compliance rate. Clozapine also conferred benefits on the sickest treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients. Patients treated with olanzapine also had more favorable outcomes with regard to categorical response and compliance rates. CONCLUSIONS: In the aggregate, the results of a meta-analysis indicated that clozapine exhibits superiority over typical antipsychotics in terms of both efficacy (as measured by improvement in overall psychopathology) and safety (in terms of reduced extrapyramidal side effects). However, the magnitude of the clozapine treatment effect was not consistently robust. Efficacy data for other second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of patients with refractory schizophrenia were inconclusive. There is, therefore, a growing need to consider new and different treatment strategies, whether they be adjunctive or monotherapeutic, for schizophrenia that continues to be resistant or only partially responsive to treatment.

IQ scores of treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients before and after the onset of the illness.

In this study we examined the correlations of actual pre-morbid IQ scores (obtained from routine educational assessments) and estimated current IQ scores in 27 treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients. Pre-morbid (mean = 93) and current (mean = 83) IQ scores were significantly correlated (r = 0.807, P < 0.0001), while duration of illness (10-40 years) was unrelated to the magnitude of IQ score decline (r = -0.103, P = 0.575). These data suggest that pre-morbid IQ test scores are highly predictive of post-morbid scores.

Dyskinesias differentiate autistic disorder from catatonia.

Autistic disorder and catatonia are neuropsychiatric syndromes defined by impairments in social interaction, communication, and restricted, stereotypical motor routines. Assessments of children with these disorders are typically restricted in scope by the patients' limited ability to comprehend directions. The authors performed systematic assessments of dyskinesias on six prepubertal boys with autistic disorder and mental retardation and on one adolescent male with catatonia to determine if this type of information could be routinely obtained. The boys with autistic disorder had more stereotypies and tics, a greater degree of akathisia and hyperactivity, and more compulsions than the adolescent with catatonia. Catatonia was associated with catalepsy and dystonic postures. The authors conclude that the diagnostic accuracy and specificity of neuropsychiatric syndromes may be enhanced by the systematic assessment of the dyskinesias associated with each condition.

Neurobiological basis of relapse prediction in stimulant-induced psychosis and schizophrenia: the role of sensitization.

A number of consistent clinical observations provide direction for the hypothesis that pathological sensitization of neuronal systems may be an important factor for relapse or the onset of stimulant-induced psychosis (eg, methamphetamine or amphetamine psychosis, cocaine psychosis and phencyclidine psychosis) and schizophrenia. First, psychotic symptoms can be produced in normal subjects by stimulants. Secondly, a large portion of schizophrenic patients exhibit exacerbation of psychotic symptoms in response to stimulants at doses which would not be psychotogenic in normal subjects. Lastly, the ability of stress to precipitate the onset and relapse of schizophrenia is well documented. In this regard, acute responses to stimulants provide useful information for relapse prediction of schizophrenia and substance abuse. This paper addresses the nature and role of pathological sensitization in relapse of stimulant- and phencyclidine-induced psychosis and schizophrenia, and its relation to pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

Progressive catatonia.

We present the case of a young man with a diagnosis of a childhood-onset pervasive developmental disorder who developed a progressive neurologic deterioration with persistent catatonia and right hemiparesis. On his initial evaluation approximately three years after the onset of mutism, he manifested right hemiparesis and catalepsy. Two years later, although catalepsy had subsided, motor function had deteriorated so that he could not use his hands to feed or dress himself. Oral-facialbuccal dyskinesia manifested by blepharospasm and grimacing were present constantly during waking hours. Quantitative electroencephalography demonstrated markedly decreased amplitude, a finding associated with catatonia. Left sural nerve biopsy indicated large axon cylinder degeneration. Left deltoid biopsy demonstrated perimysial fibrosis and type II fiber predominance. Although magnetic resonance imaging of the head without contrast was normal, positron emission tomography indicated hypometabolism of the right cerebral and the right cerebellar hemispheres. The patient continues to deteriorate despite a course of 25 electroconvulsive treatments. He continues to manifest criteria for catatonia including motoric immobility, mutism, and peculiarities of voluntary movement such as prominent grimacing. We suspect an inherited neurodegenerative disorder. Since catatonia is a treatable condition frequently associated with medical and neurological diseases, examination for the features of catatonia must be included in the assessment of patients with progressive brain degeneration. This report is an attempt to clarify the traits of a serious variant of progressive brain degeneration.

An integrated view of pathophysiological models of schizophrenia.

Pathophysiological processes that underlie the profound neuropsychiatric disturbances in schizophrenia are poorly understood. However, the clinical course of the disease, and a number of clinical and basic science observations, provide direction for formulating pathophysiological models that could be empirically tested. For example, repeated psychostimulant administration to healthy subjects can induce psychotic symptoms, and acute stimulant challenge in schizophrenia patients can precipitate psychosis. Also, NMDA antagonists induce positive, negative, and cognitive schizophrenic-like symptoms in healthy volunteers and precipitate thought disorder and delusions in schizophrenia patients. These human studies provide support for the dopamine and NMDA receptor hypofunction hypotheses of schizophrenia. Well-documented effects of NMDA antagonists on dopamine systems provide a basis to integrate the dopamine and NMDA receptor hypofunction hypotheses. Furthermore, it has become apparent that prominent actions of antipsychotic drugs, especially those with 'atypical' properties, involve antagonism of behavioral, electrophysiological and brain metabolic effects produced by administration of NMDA receptor antagonists. A confluence of clinical and basic science data suggests that an early developmental insult, potentially involving reduced NMDA receptor function, could facilitate sensitization of dopamine systems, leading to the formal onset of schizophrenia in late adolescence and early adulthood. Although clearly speculative, this conceptual model is consistent with existing evidence and suggests lines of future experimental investigation.

Predictors of treatment response from a first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the treatment response of patients with first-episode schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder and potential predictors of response. METHOD: First-episode patients were assessed on measures of psychopathology, cognition, social functioning, and biological parameters and treated according to a standardized algorithm. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients (52% male, mean age 25.2 years) entered the study. The cumulative percentage of patients responding by 1 year was 87%; the median time to response was 9 weeks. The following variables were significantly associated with less likelihood of response to treatment: male sex, obstetric complications, more severe hallucinations and delusions, poorer attention at baseline, and the development of parkinsonism during antipsychotic treatment. Variables not significantly related to treatment response were diagnosis (schizophrenia versus schizoaffective disorder), premorbid functioning, duration of psychotic symptoms prior to study entry, baseline disorganization, negative and depressive symptoms, baseline motor function, akathisia and dystonia during treatment, growth hormone and homovanillic acid measures, psychotic symptom activation to methylphenidate, and magnetic resonance measures. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with first-episode schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder have high rates of response to antipsychotic treatment; there are specific clinical and pathobiologic predictors of response.

Predictors of relapse following response from a first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

BACKGROUND: We examined relapse after response to a first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHODS: Patients with first-episode schizophrenia were assessed on measures of psychopathologic variables, cognition, social functioning, and biological variables and treated according to a standardized algorithm. The sample for the relapse analyses consisted of 104 patients who responded to treatment of their index episode and were at risk for relapse. RESULTS: Five years after initial recovery, the cumulative first relapse rate was 81.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70.6%-93.2%); the second relapse rate was 78.0% (95% CI, 46.5%-100.0%). By 4 years after recovery from a second relapse, the cumulative third relapse rate was 86.2% (95% CI, 61.5%-100.0%). Discontinuing antipsychotic drug therapy increased the risk of relapse by almost 5 times (hazard ratio for an initial relapse, 4.89 [99% CI, 2.49-9.60]; hazard ratio for a second relapse, 4.57 [99% CI, 1.49-14.02]). Subsequent analyses controlling for antipsychotic drug use showed that patients with poor premorbid adaptation to school and premorbid social withdrawal relapsed earlier. Sex, diagnosis, obstetric complications, duration of psychotic illness before treatment, baseline symptoms, neuroendocrine measures, methylphenidate hydrochloride challenge response, neuropsychologic and magnetic resonance imaging measures, time to response of the initial episode, adverse effects during treatment, and presence of residual symptoms after the initial episode were not significantly related to time to relapse. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high rate of relapse within 5 years of recovery from a first episode of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. This risk is diminished by maintenance antipsychotic drug treatment.

The natural history and pathophysiology of treatment resistant schizophrenia.

Defining treatment resistance among schizophrenia patients is problematic since most patients experience persistent morbidity over the course of their illness and full remissions are infrequent. In addition, the level of response to antipsychotic medication is not an immutable feature of the patient's illness that is present at its onset; rather, it can change over the course of the illness (usually unidirectionally with patients becoming less responsive to treatment) and is determined by various modifying factors. Although treatment resistance may be an enduring feature of a patient, present at illness onset and throughout, more commonly it develops over the course of patients' illnesses. Evidence from both retrospective and prospective studies suggests that a longer duration of untreated psychosis in the early stage of schizophrenia is associated with a longer time to remission and a lower level of recovery, a greater likelihood of relapse and a worse overall outcome. The pattern of deterioration observed is analogous to a well replicated neurobiologic phenomenon, termed behavioral sensitization. In sensitized animals a pathologic behavioral process emerges whereby the response to a pharmacologic or stress challenge is progressively increased in proportion to the number of pretreatments. Thus, endogenous neurochemical sensitization resulting from the inability to regulate presynaptic dopamine release in the limbic striatum may be a useful way to conceptualize the continuum of response-refractoriness that is clearly evident in schizophrenia patients. Most importantly, early detection, intervention and optimal maintenance treatment may improve the long term course of schizophrenia.

The development of treatment resistance in patients with schizophrenia: a clinical and pathophysiologic perspective.

The pathophysiologic process and clinical factors that contribute to the development of treatment resistance in schizophrenia are not well defined. This article describes data indicating that treatment resistance may evolve over the course of the patients' illness and maturational development. Data from multiepisode patients suggest that early effective intervention with clozapine can prevent treatment resistance. Early identification of patients with signs of treatment resistance is vital. Treatments must be effective and prevent relapse. At the first indication that a patient may be developing resistance (e.g., the emergence of extrapyramidal symptoms or increases in negative symptomatology) or may not be complying with treatment, clozapine therapy should be considered.

Clinical assessment of adventitious movements.

Many procedures with variable validity and reliability have been developed in research settings to evaluate adventitious movements and related phenomena in specific populations, e.g., people with schizophrenia treated with dopamine antagonists, but these only provide global assessments or rate specific movements. A battery for rating individuals with possible movements disorders in a comprehensive way in clinical settings is needed so a protocol to assess briefly and thoroughly potential movement disorders was videotaped for five prepubertal boys with autistic disorder and severe mental retardation in a clinical trial. Utilizing a Movement Assessment Battery, four raters independently scored videotapes of 10-16 movements assessments of each of the five subjects. Experienced raters attained agreement of 59% to 100% on ratings of tardive dyskinesia and 48% to 100% on tics. Hindrances to reliability included poor quality of some tapes, high activity of subjects, and fatigue of raters.

Neurochemical sensitization in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia: deficits and dysfunction in neuronal regulation and plasticity.

Existing pathophysiological models of schizophrenia are limited in their ability to account for all the clinical dimensions of the disorder. The purpose of this article is to describe a comprehensive hypothesis of the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and specifically how a deficit in neural regulation of developmental origin can lead to a pathologic form of neuroplasticity, i.e., neurochemical sensitization, which causes the onset and psychotic symptoms of the illness. We propose that the symptoms of schizophrenia may be caused by deficits in neural regulation resulting in a pathologic condition of neurochemical sensitization analogous to the preclinical model of pharmacologically-induced behavioral sensitization. This condition, if sustained, can lead to potential neurotoxic effects which produce structural neuronal alterations and persistent morbidity. Several lines of indirect and direct clinical evidence are consistent with this hypothesis. These include the ability of stimulant and psychotomimetic drugs to induce psychosis in normal subjects, the development of apparent sensitization to psychosis-inducing effects of stimulants in chronic stimulant abusers and the increased susceptibility of patients with schizophrenia to the psychotogenic effects of Dopamine (DA) agonists. This hypothesis integrates and extends the work of other investigators and is consistent with specific aspects of the longitudinal course of schizophrenia. The association of longer duration and more episodes of psychosis, with poor treatment response and outcome, are also consistent with this model. Form this hypothesis, specific predictions about the illness course, treatment interventions, and pathophysiologic features of schizophrenia can be derived and tested through clinical investigation.

The evaluation and treatment of first-episode psychosis.

A first episode of psychosis is a traumatic experience for patients and families. At the time of initial evaluation, the differential diagnosis should include a broad range of neurological, general medical, and psychiatric conditions. Methodological advances in operationally defining illness onset, "offset," and remission have allowed more careful studies of treatment response in first-episode patients. These studies strongly support the efficacy of antipsychotic medication as both acute and maintenance treatment for patients with a first episode of psychosis. The optimal duration of maintenance treatment, however, has not been determined, and patients at low risk for relapse following medication withdrawal cannot be identified with specificity. First-episode psychotic patients typically experience 12 to 24 months of psychosis before receiving treatment, and a long duration of untreated psychosis may be associated with a poorer treatment response. Early intervention may improve outcome in first-episode psychosis, and the use of novel antipsychotics with improved efficacy and fewer side effects may improve medication compliance and reduce morbidity associated with repeated relapses.