Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Pediatr ; 23(1): 77, 2023 02 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36782170

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The characteristics and incidence of adverse drug events (ADEs) among pediatric cancer patients in developing countries have not been well characterized. ADEs & medication errors associated with cancer chemotherapy in children need to be analyzed on their incidence and severity. The purpose of this study was hence, to assess the incidence of adverse drug events and contributing factors among pediatric cancer patients at Jimma university medical center, Jimma, Ethiopia. METHOD: A prospective observational method was used to study adverse drug events in pediatrics admitted to the pediatric oncology unit of Jimma University medical center between October and December 2020. The ADEs were identified using multifaceted approaches involving daily chart review, interviews of Parents/caregivers (and/or children themselves), attendance at ward rounds, and voluntary staff reports. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess the predictors of the identified ADEs. Those factors that showed association at p-value < 0.25 in the univariate analysis were added to the backward multivariate logistic regression model and the significant association was checked at p-value < 0.05. RESULT: A total of 73 (46 male and 27 female) patients were included in the study. A total of 466 ADEs were identified with an incidence of 638.36 ADEs per 100 patients, 38.35 ADEs per 100 patient days, and 2.34 ADEs per chemotherapy cycle. The most common ADEs were hematologic toxicities (anemia 55(11.8%), neutropenia 52(11.16%) & thrombocytopenia 31(6.65%)), and gastrointestinal effects (nausea 46(9.87%), vomiting 46(9.87%), anorexia 41(8.8%). Out of 466 ADEs, 150 (32.19%) were classified as common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) as Grade 1, 199 (42.70%) as Grade 2, 64(13.73%) as Grade 3, 48(10.30%) as grade 4 and 5(1.07%) as Grade 5. Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is the most common comorbidity present, 20(27.40%) followed by pneumonia, 4(5.50%). Presence of comorbidity (AOR 12.700, CI 1.978-81.549), cancer type (AOR 13.332, CI 3.288-54.059), use of 4 or more chemotherapy drugs (AOR 6.179, CI 1.894-20.165) and length of hospital stay more than 8 days (AOR 5.367, CI 1.167-24.684) were associated with the risk of developing grades 3 and 4 ADEs. CONCLUSION: Adverse drug events were common in the pediatric oncology ward of JUMC. In particular, children with multiple chemotherapy drugs and those with the comorbid condition were at greater risk for adverse drug events.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Criança , Masculino , Feminino , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Epilepsy Behav ; 140: 109089, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36696732

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a major public health problem affecting 70 million people worldwide. 90% of global people with epilepsy were living in developing regions like Ethiopia. Due to the lack of clear guidelines for treatment selection and the difficulty of individualizing care in resource-poor settings, achieving seizure control can be challenging. Seizure control status among epileptic patients is affected by different factors. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess the magnitude of uncontrolled seizures and associated factors among people with epilepsy attending the outpatient clinic of Jimma Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia. METHODS: A hospital-based retrospective chart review and a respective patient interview conducted among people with epilepsy from October 2020 to June 2021. Sociodemographic, behavioral-related factors, medication adherence, and medication belief were obtained through patient interviews. Seizure control status in the last two years before the study period was retrospectively evaluated and recorded from the charts. Data were entered into Epi Data manager version 4.6 and then exported to SPSS version 23.0 for analysis. A backward logistic regression analysis was done to identify factors associated with uncontrolled seizures. RESULTS: From a total of 314 medical charts reviewed, 149(47.5 %) of patients were with uncontrolled seizures. 28.7 %,12.8 %, and 6 % of the patients experienced 1-5,6-10, and >10 seizure episodes during the last two years respectively. Comorbidity [adjusted odds ratio [(AOR): 2.13, 95 % confidence interval (CI):1.26-3.58], nonadherence [AOR: 2.41, 95 %CI: 1.46-3.9], possible adverse drug reaction (ADR) [AOR:1.79, 95 %CI: 1.107-3.01], and drug interaction [AOR: 3.06, 95 %CI: 1.24-7.57] were associated with an uncontrolled seizure. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Our study showed that a substantial proportion of the patients were with uncontrolled seizures. Epileptic patients with comorbidities, nonadherence, adverse drug reactions, and drug interactions were more prone to have uncontrolled seizures. Hence, to overcome these problems, strategies like community-based education, treatment intensification, and routine assessment of adverse drug reactions and drug interaction may help to improve seizure control status.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Epilepsia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Epilepsia/complicações , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Convulsões/epidemiologia , Hospitais de Ensino
3.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 22134, 2022 12 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36550160

RESUMO

Depression is the third-leading cause of disability measured in terms of disability-adjusted life-years. When depression coexists with diabetes mellitus, it is associated with major health consequences and results in poor health outcomes, decreased quality of life, lost productivity and increased risk of death. The current study aimed to assess the magnitude of depression and its associated factors among adult patients with diabetes mellitus attending follow-up at the public hospitals of Buno Bedele zone, Southwest Ethiopia. A multi-centre cross-sectional study was done among people living with diabetes mellitus at an outpatient clinic of Buno Bedele zone hospitals. The study period was from April to May 2021. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select the study participants. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Depression was assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 is a validated tool to assess depression with sensitivity 86% and specificity 67%. The collected data were cleaned, edited, and entered into epi-data version 3.1, and analysed using SPSS version 24. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors associated with depression occurrence. A p value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 310 study participants were included in this study. Among study participants, 41.6% fulfilled the criteria for depression. Variables significantly associated with depression were female gender [AOR: 2.26, 95% CI (1.30, 3.95)], duration of diabetes greater than 5 years [AOR: 2.68, 95% CI (1.57, 4.56)], poor social support [AOR: 2.46, 95% CI (1.10, 5.49)], moderate social support [AOR: 2.63, 95% CI (1.34, 5.16)], current alcohol consumption [AOR: 3.55, 95% CI (1.20, 10.52)] and previous alcohol consumption [AOR = 2.81, 95% CI (1.40, 5.60)]. According to this study, depression is relatively common among diabetic individuals. Being a female, having diabetes for a long time, having poor social support, using alcohol now and in the past were factors that substantially linked to depression. Healthcare professionals should consider screening for depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 or other validated tools in all diabetic patients, especially in those who are at higher risk.


Assuntos
Depressão , Diabetes Mellitus , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Depressão/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Hospitais Públicos
4.
SAGE Open Med ; 10: 20503121221126333, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36187360

RESUMO

Objective: This study aimed to assess uncontrolled blood pressure and contributing factors among patients with hypertension. Methods: Hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted from January to April 2021 at Bedele General Hospital. Data were collected using the semi-structured questionnaire. All patients with hypertension were included using consecutive sampling technique unless ineligible. EpiData 4.4.2 was used for data entry, and SPSS 24.0 was employed for analysis. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with uncontrolled blood pressure. Results: A total of 219 patients with hypertension were included in the study. About 60.3% of participants were male. The mean age of the study participants was 48.54 ± 12.93 years. The prevalence of uncontrolled blood pressure among the study participants was 56.2%. The factors significantly associated with uncontrolled blood pressure were age >60 years (adjusted prevalence ratio = 4.42; 95% confidence interval = (1.71, 11.46); p = 0.002) and the presence of comorbidity (adjusted prevalence ratio = 2.16; 95% confidence interval = (1.22, 3.82); p = 0.008). Conclusion: More than half of the study participants had uncontrolled blood pressure. Older age and comorbidity were the predictors of uncontrolled blood pressure. Attaining controlled blood pressure is important to avoid consequences of high blood pressure. So, healthcare provider should focus on achieving target blood pressure goal.

5.
J Pharm Health Care Sci ; 7(1): 41, 2021 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34776009

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Meningitis is a common infectious cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric age-groups. Acute bacterial meningitis is considered a medical emergency, because it is a life-threatening infection that requires immediate treatment. Therefore the study was aimed to assess the magnitude and predictors of poor treatment outcome among pediatric patients admitted to Bedele General Hospital. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at pediatric wards of Bedele General Hospital from February 12, 2020 to August 11, 2020. Lumbar puncture, in the absence of contraindications, was performed under aseptic conditions for all patients with suspected bacterial meningitis to collect cerebrospinal fluid specimen. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the predictors of poor treatment outcome. RESULT: Of the 196 pediatric patients involved, 112(57.1%) were male and the mean and standard deviation of their age was 6.09 ± 4.46. Regarding to their clinical profile, a total of 101(51.5%) were completely immunized and 115(58.7%) were given corticosteroid during their treatment. In our study the most frequently occurred clinical manifestation of meningitis was fever 164(83.67%), neck rigidity149 (76.02%), and irritability 122(62.24%). Regarding to their pharmacotherapy, the most commonly prescribed antibiotics were Ampicillin 104(24.82%), and Gentamycin 102(24.34%). The magnitude of good treatment outcome was 132(67.35%) whereas 64(32.65%) were poorly controlled. The presence of comorbidity (AOR = 3.64, 95CI%:1.83-7.23,P = < 0.001),corticosteroid use (AOR = 2.37, 95CI%:1.17-4.81,P = 0.017) and oxygen administration (AOR = 3.12, 95CI%: 1.34-7.25, P = 0.008) was a predictor of meningitis treatment outcome. CONCLUSION: The treatment outcome of meningitis was good in of two-third of the patients. It was found that the presence of comorbidity, the administration of oxygen and use of corticosteroid was predictors of the treatment outcomes of bacterial meningitis in children. Therefore, in patients with these factors, appropriate meningitis treatment should be encouraged and locally applicable treatment guidelines should be prepared to improve patient outcome. Finally, the meningitis patients should be given corticosteroid and oxygen as treatment and special attention should be given for patients having co-morbidities.

6.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 903, 2021 Sep 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34479500

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Novel coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) was declared as a global pandemic in 2020. With the spread of the disease, a better understanding of patient outcomes associated with their symptoms in diverse geographic levels is vital. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients by disease symptoms in Ilam province, Iran. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. Data were collected from integrated health system records for all hospitals affiliated with the Ilam University of Medical Sciences between 26-Jan-2020 and 02-May-2020. All patients with a confirmed positive test were included in this study. Descriptive analyses, chi-square test, and binary logistic regression model were performed by using SPSS version 22. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 46.47 ± 18.24 years. Of the 3608 patients, 3477 (96.1%) were discharged, and 129 (3.9%) died. 54.2% of the patients were male and were in the age group of 30-40 years. Cough, sore throat, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, and fever or chills were the most common symptoms. Patients with symptoms of shortness of breath, abnormal radiographic findings of the chest, and chest pain and pressure were relatively more likely to die. According to binary logistic regression results, the probability of death in patients with shortness of breath, abnormal chest radiographic findings, and chest pain was 1.34, 1.24, and 1.32 times higher, respectively, than for those without. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that the presentation of some symptoms significantly impacts outcomes of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Early detection of symptoms and proper management of outcomes can reduce mortality in patients with COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Irã (Geográfico)/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 11784, 2021 06 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34083718

RESUMO

Potential adverse drug event (PADE) is a medication error with the potential to cause associate degree injury however that does not cause any injury, either due to specific circumstances, chance, or as a result of the error being intercepted and corrected. This study aimed to assess the incidence, contributing factors, predictors, severity, and preventability of PADEs among hospitalized adult patients at Jimma Medical Center. A prospective observational study was conducted among hospitalized adult patients at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors predicting PADE occurrence. P-value < 0.05 was considered for statistical significance. A total of 319 patients were included. About 50.5% of them were females. The mean ± SD age of the participants was 43 ± 17.6 years. Ninety-four PADEs were identified. Number of medications (adjusted OR = 5.12; 95% CI: 2.01-13.05; p = 0.001), anticoagulants (adjusted OR = 2.51; 95% CI: 1.22-5.19; p = 0.013), anti-seizures (adjusted OR = 21.96; 95% CI: 6.57-73.39; p < 0.0001), anti-tuberculosis (adjusted OR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.002-4.59, p = 0.049), and Elixhauser comorbidity Index ≤ 15 (adjusted OR = 6.24; 95% CI: 1.48-26.25, p = 0.013) were independent predictors of PADEs occurrence. About one-third of patients admitted to the hospital experienced PADEs.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Gerenciamento Clínico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Curva ROC , Fatores de Risco
8.
J Pharm Policy Pract ; 14(1): 50, 2021 Jun 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34116716

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: People living with diabetes are more vulnerable to drug-related problems due to the presence of multiple diseases. This study aimed to identify drug-related problems and contributing factors among diabetic patients. METHODS: This study used a prospective observational study design. The study was conducted among diabetic patients during follow-up at Mettu Karl Referral Hospital from 15 April to 09 August 2019. The consecutive sampling was utilized to collect data. The identification of drug-related problems was performed using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe version 8.03. Following data collection, data were entered into Epidata manager version 4.4.2 and exported to the SPSS version 24.0 for analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to identify predictors of drug-related problems. RESULTS: A total of 330 people with diabetes were included in the study, among whom 279 (84.5%) had at least one drug-related problem. A total of 455 drug-related problems were identified. Effects of drug treatment not being optimal (52.7%) and untreated symptoms or indications (30.1%) were the most commonly identified drug-related problems. About 865 interventions were provided for identified drug-related problems and 79.8% was accepted. Diabetes duration [Formula: see text] years [AOR = 2.02; 95% CI (1.06, 3.85); p = 0.033] and the presence of comorbidity [AOR: 2.33; 95% CI (1.18, 4.60); p = 0.015] were factors identified as predictors of drug-related problems. CONCLUSION: The present study identified that drug-related problems are common among diabetic patients. Effects of drug treatment not being optimal and untreated symptoms or indications were the most commonly identified drug-related problems. Longer diabetes duration and the presence of comorbidities were predictors of drug-related problems.

9.
Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis ; 2021: 6650469, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34035806

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are controversial suggestions about steroid use to treat patients infected with COVID-19. Conclusive evidence regarding the use of steroids to treat COVID-19 is still lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the mortality and severity associated with corticosteroid therapy compared to noncorticosteroid treatment in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: The information was collected from electronic databases: PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov, and Google scholar through January 30, 2021. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed using random effect models. Endnote citation manager software version X9 for Windows was utilized to collect and organize search outcomes (into relevant and irrelevant studies) and to remove duplicate articles. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies were included in the meta-analysis, including 14,659 COVID-19 patients. No significant differences in mortality between the steroid and nonsteroid treatment groups (RR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.80-1.13; p = 0.57). There was no significant reduction in mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with corticosteroid (RR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.62-1.27; p = 0.52). Significant differences were observed in severe disease conditions between the steroid and nonsteroid treatment groups (RR = 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the steroid and nonsteroid treatment users' of COVID-19 patients. There was no significant reduction of all-cause mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with corticosteroids.

10.
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes ; 13: 4909-4918, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33335412

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Diabetes mellitus complications are responsible for increased disability, morbidity, and mortality. This study aimed to assess prevalence, patterns, and predictors of chronic complications of diabetes among people with diabetes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was conducted using a prospective observational study design which was done on people with diabetes attending the ambulatory clinic of Mettu Karl Referral Hospital. The data were collected using a consecutive type of sampling technique from April 15 to August 9, 2019. The data were entered into Epidata manager version 4.4.2. Logistic regression analysis was done to identify predictors of chronic complications of diabetes. RESULTS: A total of 330 participants were included in this study. The mean age of participants was 49.9±14.2, and 156 (47.3%) were 41 to 60 years old. About 127 (38.5%) had one or more chronic complications. The predictors of chronic diabetes complications were resident in urban areas [AOR: 1.94; 95% CI: (1.17, 3.20); p = 0.010], duration of diabetes 10 years [AOR: 2.05, 95% CI: (1.21, 3.47); p = 0.007], hypertension [AOR: 4.19; 95% CI: (2.54, 6.91); p < 0.001] and poor glycemic control [AOR: 2.82; 95% CI: (1.53, 5.21); p = 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Almost two-fifth of the study participants had chronic complications of diabetes. Residents in urban areas, longer duration of diabetes, hypertension and poor glycemic control were predictors of chronic diabetes complications. It is important to achieve good glycemic control and manage comorbid diseases like hypertension to minimize the risk of chronic diabetes complications.

11.
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp ; 93: 100611, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33296443

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug events (ADEs) are common complications of clinical care resulting in significant morbidity, mortality, and high clinical expenditure. Population-level estimates of inpatient ADEs are limited in Ethiopia. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the incidence, contributing factors, severity, and preventability of ADEs among hospitalized adult patients at Jimma Medical Center, Ethiopia. METHODS: A prospective observational study design was conducted among hospitalized adult patients at tertiary hospital in Ethiopia. A structured data collection tool was prepared from relevant literatures for data collection. Data were analyzed using statistical software. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors contributing to ADE occurrence. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients were included with follow-up period of 5667 person-days. About 50.5% were women. The mean (SD) age of patients was 43 (17.6) years. One hundred sixteen ADEs were identified with the incidence of 36.4 (95% CI, 30.1-43.6) per 100 admissions and 20.5 (95% CI, 16.9-24.6) per 1000 person-days. Antituberculosis agents (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.52; 95% CI, 1.06-5.98; P = 0.036), disease of the circulatory system (aOR = 2.67; 95% CI, 1.46-4.89; P = 0.001), disease of the digestive system (aOR = 2.84; 95% CI, 1.45-5.57; P = 0.002), being on medication during admission (aOR = 3.09; 95% CI, 1.77-5.41; P < 0.001), and hospital stay more than 2 weeks (aOR = 3.93; 95% CI, 1.39-11.12; P = 0.010) were independent predictors of ADE occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: One in every 4 patients admitted to the hospital experienced ADEs during their hospital stay. Most ADEs were moderate in severity. About two-thirds of the ADEs identified were deemed probably or definitely preventable. Therefore, it is high time to reinforce large-scale efforts to redesign safer, higher quality health care systems to adequately tackle the problem.

12.
SAGE Open Med ; 8: 2050312120970721, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33240497

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 is a pandemic disease, requiring persons around the world to take immediate action to reduce the risk of infection. This study was aimed to summarize the patterns and determinants of coronavirus disease 2019 knowledge, attitude, and practice among general populations and health workers. METHODS: A cross-sectional study from PubMed, HINARI, and Scopus were searched from March 16 to July 30, 2020. The review was done in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses-2009. RESULT: We found 56 articles upon the initial search. Finally, 21 studies were filtered to be studied in this systematic review. Overall, the majority of the articles that were previously published had good knowledge about coronavirus disease 2019 that lies in the ranges from 40% to 99.5%. A good attitude lies in the ranges from 70% to 97.1%. Among impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on mental health, only anxiety was reported that ranges from 24.6% to 96.3%. We found the variable practice towards combating coronavirus disease 2019. Several factors were associated with poor knowledge, attitudes, and practice skills regarding the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 such as level of education, occupation, income, gender, age, residence, work experience, religion, having media, marital status, and race. CONCLUSION: The majority of the articles that were previously published had found good knowledge and attitude about coronavirus disease 2019 and variable reports for practice to combat the disease. Most of them were severely worried about the disease. Therefore, the mental effect of the coronavirus disease 2019 should be studied at large, and every country should implement the strategy to combat the disease to increase the level of practice.

13.
Infect Dis (Auckl) ; 13: 1178633720952076, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32973375

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease-19 has been labeled a pandemic by World Health Organization. By virtue of its highly contagious attribution, this virus has spread across over the world and the numbers are still rapidly increasing. Increasing numbers of confirmed cases and mortality rates of coronavirus disease 2019 are occurring in several countries. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize clinical presentations of this newly emerging coronavirus disease. METHODS: A systematic review of published articles was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. A search was conducted on 18 to 25 April 2020. Search terms included "novel coronavirus," "2019 novel coronavirus," "Coronavirus disease 2019," "COVID-19," "severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2." The studies published in the English language and their full texts available were included. The eligible study designs were cross-sectional, case-control, cohort, and case series. RESULTS: Thirty (30) studies which contain 4829 participants were included in this review. From included studies, the age of infected patients were found in range 0.25 to 94 years. The main clinical symptoms of COVID-19 patients were fever (77.6%), cough (64.8%), fatigue (27.2%), dyspnea (21.2%) and sputum production (18.0%). CONCLUSION: This systematic review identified that fever, cough, fatigue, and dyspnea were the most common reported clinical features of coronavirus disease 19. Understanding of the clinical spectrum and impact of this novel disease is important for all individuals, especially for healthcare workers to manage and prevent it.

14.
Diabetes Ther ; 11(8): 1775-1794, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32583174

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The current estimate is that 463 million people worldwide have diabetes. In 2017, an estimated 5 million (9.9%) deaths worldwide among adults were caused by diabetes. The burden of disease associated with uncontrolled diabetes is substantial in terms of mortality and cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to assess glycemic control level and its predictors among adult patients with diabetes. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted among patients with diabetes during follow-up at an ambulatory clinic of Mettu Karl referral hospital from 15 April to 09 August 2019. The consecutive sampling method was used to collect data, following which the data were entered into Epidata manager version 4.4.2 and exported to the SPSS version 24.0 statistical software package for analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of poor glycemic control. Variables whose significance level was < 0.05 (p value) were considered to be predictors of poor glycemic control. RESULTS: A total of 330 diabetic patients were included in the study, among whom 240 (72.7%) had poor glycemic control. The predictors of poor glycemic control in the multivariate logistic regression analysis were overweight [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 4.07; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60, 10.36; p = 0.003], obesity (AOR 4.39; 95% CI 1.59, 12.14; p = 0.004), higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (AOR 2.34; 95% CI 1.23, 4.44; p = 0.010), type 1 diabetes (AOR 3.22; 95% CI 1.58, 6.55; p = 0.001), poor diet adherence (AOR 6.95; 95% CI 3.63, 13.32; p < 0.001) and non-adherence to medications (AOR 5.82; 95% CI 2.77, 12.26; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Almost three-quarters of the study population of diabetic patients had poorly controlled blood sugar. Overweight, obesity, higher eGFR, type 1 diabetics, poor adherence to diet recommendation and non-adherence to medications were independent predictors of poor glycemic control. Educational strategies should focus on improving adherence to the recommended diet and medication(s), achieving weight control and optimizing glycemic control.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA