The effect of transarterial embolization and nephrectomy on acute kidney injury in patients with blunt renal trauma: An American College of Surgeons - Trauma Quality Improvement Program analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Transarterial embolization (TAE) or nephrectomy for patients with blunt renal trauma might result in acute kidney injury (AKI). Thus, we analyzed the American College of Surgeons - Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) to validate this. We hypothesized that nephrectomy, and not TAE, would be a risk factor for AKI in patients with blunt renal trauma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult patients with blunt injuries from the TQIP between 2017 and 2019 were eligible for inclusion. The patients were divided into three treatment groups: conservative treatment, TAE, and nephrectomy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to clarify the AKI predictors. RESULTS: The study included 12,843 patients, wherein 12,373 (96.3 %), 229 (1.8 %), and 241 (1.9 %) patients were in the conservative, TAE, and nephrectomy groups, respectively. A total of 269 (2.2 %), 20 (8.7 %), and 29 (12.0 %) patients had AKI in the three groups, respectively. Both TAE (odds ratio [OR], 2.367; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.372-3.900; p = 0.001) and Nephrectomy (OR, 2.745; 95 % CI, 1.629-4.528; p < 0.001) were a statistically significant predictor for AKI in the multivariable logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: TAE and nephrectomy were statistically associated with AKI in patients with blunt renal trauma. This result differs from our previous research findings that nephrectomy, but not TAE, was a risk factor for AKI in patients with blunt renal trauma. Further prospective and well-designed research may be needed.

Feasibility of non-operative management for patients sustained blunt splenic traumas with concomitant aortic injuries.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate the treatment approach for blunt splenic injuries concurrently involving the aorta. We hypothesized that non-operative management failure rates would be higher in such cases, necessitating increased hemorrhage control surgeries. METHODS: Data from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program spanning 2017 to 2019 were utilized. All patients with blunt splenic trauma were considered for inclusion. We conducted comparisons between blunt splenic trauma patients with and without thoracic or abdominal aortic injuries to identify any potential disparities in treatment. RESULTS: Among the 32,051 patients with blunt splenic injuries during the study period, 752 (2.3%) sustained concurrent aortic injuries. Following 2:1 propensity score matching, it was determined that the presence of aortic injuries did not significantly affect the utilization of splenic transarterial angioembolization (TAE) (7.2% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.243) or the necessity for splenectomy or splenorrhaphy (15.3% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.853). Moreover, aortic injuries were not a significant factor contributing to TAE failure, regardless of the location or severity of the injury. Patients with simultaneous splenic and aortic injuries required more red blood cell transfusion within first 4 hours (0 ml [0, 900] vs. 0 ml [0, 650], p = 0.001) and exhibited a higher mortality rate (10.6% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that patients with concurrent aortic and splenic injuries presented with more severe conditions, higher mortality rates, and extended hospital stays. The presence of aortic injuries did not substantially influence the utilization of TAE or the necessity for splenectomy or splenorrhaphy. Patients of this type can be managed in accordance with current treatment guidelines. Nonetheless, given their less favorable prognosis, they necessitate prompt and proactive intervention.