Individual- and community-level correlates of pediatric central nervous system tumor disparities in the US.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was, through comprehensive, multilevel models of social determinants of health (SDoH) factors, including the Yost Index socioeconomic status (SES) score, to determine whether community- or individual-level SDoH factors quantifiably influence pediatric CNS tumor disparities more in care and prognosis across the US. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study assessing specialized Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data of pediatric patients (≤ 19 years old) with nonmalignant and malignant tumors of the CNS from 2010 to 2018. A census-level Yost Index SES score and rurality/urbanicity measures were incorporated with individual characteristics of age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Chi-square analyses for clinical and demographic descriptions, multivariate Cox proportional hazards logistic regressions for survival, and multivariate logistic regressions for resection, radiation treatment, treatment delay, and advanced staging on preliminary presentation were performed. RESULTS: Across 18,236 patients, age-adjusted analyses showed substantially increased mortality risk among 6 of 11 subtypes (highest hazard ratio [HR] 1.91, 95% CI 1.59-2.28, p < 0.001 for glioma NOS), decreased odds of first-line therapy among 7 of 18 subtypes (lowest OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.11-0.97, p = 0.043 for resection of choroid plexus papilloma), increased odds of treatment delay among 6 of 11 subtypes (highest OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.01-6.49, p = 0.047 for germinoma), increased odds of advanced staging on preliminary presentation among 3 of 10 malignant subtypes (highest OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.27-5.52, p = 0.008 for malignant ependymomas), and increased odds of receipt of radiation therapy among 3 of 10 malignant subtypes (highest OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.87-2.84, p < 0.001) observed across many disease subtypes contributed by certain individual- and community-level SDoH factors. CONCLUSIONS: Through comprehensive analyses combining individual- and community-level SDoH factors, this study identified detrimental interrelated SDoH associations with poorer care and prognosis of pediatric patients with CNS tumors, delineating how both levels differentially contribute to observed disparities across different subtypes.

The impact of digital inequities on salivary gland cancer disparities in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Technology and internet access have become increasingly integrated into healthcare as the primary platform for health-related information and provider-patient communication. Disparities in access to digital resources exist in the United States and have been shown to impact health outcomes in various head and neck malignancies. Our objective is to evaluate the associations of digital inequity on health outcomes in patients with salivary gland cancer (SGC). METHODS: The Digital Inequity Index (DII) was developed using 17 census-tract level variables obtained from the American Community Survey and Federal Communications Commission. Variables were categorized as digital infrastructure or sociodemographic (e.g., non-digital) and scored based on relative rankings across all US counties. Scores were assigned to patients from the Surveillance-Epidemiology-End Results (SEER) database diagnosed with SGC between 2013 and 2017 based on county-of-residence. Regressions were performed between DII score and outcomes of surveillance time, survival time, tumor stage at time of diagnosis, and treatment modality. RESULTS: Among 9306 SGC-patients, increased digital inequity was associated with advanced-staging at presentation (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07, p = 0.033), increased odds of chemotherapy receipt (OR: 1.05, CI: 1.01-1.10, p = 0.010), and decreased odds of surgical intervention (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.91-0.98, p = 0.003) after accounting for traditional sociodemographic factors. Increased digital inequity was also associated with decreased surveillance time and survival periods. CONCLUSIONS: Digital inequity significantly and independently associates with negative health and treatment outcomes in SGC patients, highlighting the importance of directed efforts to address these seldom-investigated drivers of health disparities.

Assessing social vulnerabilities of salivary gland cancer care, prognosis, and treatment in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Salivary gland cancers (SGC)-social determinants of health (SDoH) investigations are limited by narrow scopes of SGC-types and SDoH. This Social Vulnerability Index (SVI)-study hypothesized that socioeconomic status (SES) most contributed to SDoH-associated SGC-disparities. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of 24 775 SGCs assessed SES, minority-language status (ML), household composition (HH), housing-transportation (HT), and composite-SDoH measured by the SVI via regressions with surveillance and survival length, late-staging presentation, and treatment (surgery, radio-, chemotherapy) receipt. RESULTS: Increasing social vulnerability showed decreases in surveillance/survival; increased odds of advanced-presenting-stage (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.17), chemotherapy receipt (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.23); decreased odds of primary surgery (0.89, 0.84, 0.94), radiotherapy (0.91, 0.85, 0.97, p = 0.003) for SGCs. Trends were differentially correlated with SES, ML, HH, and HT-vulnerabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Through quantifying SDoH-derived SGC-disparities, the SVI can guide targeted initiatives against SDoH that elicit the most detrimental associations for specific sociodemographics.

Influence of Social Vulnerability in Treatment and Prognosis of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tongue.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of social determinants of health (SDoH) in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue in the United States and to evaluate the real-world contribution of specific disparities. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: United States. METHODS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and National Cancer Institute-Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database were used to study 62,103 adult tongue squamous cell carcinoma patients from 1975 to 2017. Regression analysis assessed trends in months of follow-up and survival across social vulnerability and 4 subcategories of social vulnerability. RESULTS: As overall SVI score increases (increased social vulnerability), there is a significant decrease in the average length of follow-up (22.95% decrease from 63.99 to 49.31 months; P < .001) across patients from the lowest and highest social vulnerability groups. As overall SVI score increases, there is a significant decrease in the average months of survival (28.00% decrease from 49.20 to 35.43 months; P < .001). There is also a significantly greater odds ratio (OR = 1.05; P < .001) of advanced cancer staging upon presentation at higher SVI scores. Patients with higher SVI scores have a lower OR (0.93; P < .001) of receiving surgery as their primary treatment when compared to patients with lower SVI scores. Patients with higher SVI scores also have a significantly greater OR (OR = 1.05; P < .001) of receiving chemotherapy as their primary treatment when compared to patients with lower SVI scores. CONCLUSION: Increased social vulnerability is shown to have a detrimental impact on the treatment and prognosis of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue.

Assessment of social vulnerability impact in care and prognosis of sinonasal cancers in the United States.

KEY POINT: Social determinants of health interactively influence sinonasal cancer care and prognosis. Housing-transportation and socioeconomic status showed the largest associations with disparities. The social vulnerability index can reveal the social determinants of sinonasal cancers.

Social Vulnerability Association with Thyroid Cancer Disparities in the United States.

Background: As thyroid cancer incidence rises, it is increasingly valuable to recognize disparities in treatment and diagnosis. Prior investigations into social determinants of health (SDoH) are limited to pediatric populations or studies looking at single factors such as race or environmental influences. Utilizing the CDC-social vulnerability index and SEER-patient database to assess the amalgamated, real-world influence of varied SDoH and their quantifiable impact on thyroid cancer disparities across the United States. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, 199,340 adult thyroid cancer patients from 1975 to 2017 were assessed for significant regression trends in months of follow-up/surveillance, survival, late staging, and treatment receipt across thyroid cancer-subtypes with increasing overall social vulnerability, as well as in 15 SDoH variables regarding socioeconomic status, minority-language status, household composition, and housing-transportation across all the U.S. counties while accounting for sociodemographic regional differences. Results: With increasing overall social vulnerability, decreases in months of follow-up were observed with patients with papillary, follicular, medullary, oncocytic, and anaplastic thyroid cancer (p = 0.001). Comparing lowest with highest vulnerability cohorts, relative decreases in months of surveillance ranged from 55.6% (14.5-6.5 months) with anaplastic to 17% (108.6-90.2) with oncocytic. Socioeconomic status vulnerabilities, followed by vulnerabilities in household composition and housing-transportation type, contributed to these overall trends. Similar survival decreases occurred across all thyroid cancer patients, ranging from 55.9% (9.6-4.2) with anaplastic to 28.3% (97-69.5) with oncocytic. Minority-language status vulnerabilities and housing-transportation types largely contributed to these trends. Increasing overall vulnerability was associated with increased odds of advanced staging for papillary (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07 [confidence interval, CI 1.03-1.12]) and decreased odds of indicated treatment via surgery (lowest, medullary: 0.91 [CI 0.84-0.99]), radiation therapy (lowest, anaplastic: 0.88 [CI 0.82-0.93]), and chemotherapy (lowest, oncocytic: 0.81 [CI 0.67-0.98]) were observed. Vulnerabilities in minority-language status and housing-transportation, followed by socioeconomic status vulnerabilities, were differential contributors to these overall vulnerability trends. Conclusions: Our results show significant detriments in thyroid cancer care and prognosis in the United States with increasing overall social vulnerability while identifying which SDoH quantifiably contribute more to disparities in inter-relational, real-world-like contexts.

The Impact of Digital Inequities on Esophageal Cancer Disparities in the US.

BACKGROUND: There is currently no comprehensive tool that quantifiably measures validated factors of modern technology access in the US for digital inequity impact on esophageal cancer care (EC). OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of digital inequities on esophageal cancer disparities while accounting for traditional social determinants. METHODS: 15,656 EC patients from 2013-2017 in SEER were assessed for significant regression trends in long-term follow-up, survival, prognosis, and treatment with increasing overall digital inequity, as measured by the Digital Inequity Index (DII). The DII was calculated based on 17 census tract-level variables derived from the American Community Survey and Federal Communications Commission. Variables were categorized as infrastructure access or sociodemographic, ranked, and then averaged into a composite score. RESULTS: With increasing overall digital inequity, significant decreases in the length of long-term follow-up (p < 0.001) and survival (p < 0.001) for EC patients were observed. EC patients showed decreased odds of receiving indicated surgical resection (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-99) with increasing digital inequity. They also showed increased odds of advanced preliminary staging (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.05) and decreased odds of receiving indicated chemotherapy (OR 0.97;95% CI 0.95-99). CONCLUSIONS: Digital inequities meaningfully contribute to detrimental trends in EC patient care in the US, allowing discourse for targeted means of alleviating disparities while contextualizing national, sociodemographic trends of the impact of online access on informed care.

Large-data contextualizations of social determinant associations in pediatric head and neck cancers.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prior investigations in social determinants of health (SDoH) and their impact on pediatric head and neck cancers are limited by the narrow scope of cancer types and SDoH being studied while lacking inquiry on the interrelational contribution of varied SDoH in real-world contexts. The purpose of this review is to discuss the current research tackling these shortcomings of SDoH-based studies in head and neck cancer and to discuss means of applying these findings in prospective initiatives and implementations. RECENT FINDINGS: Through leveraging contemporary, large-data analyses measuring diverse social vulnerabilities, several studies have identified comprehensive delineations of which social disparities contribute the largest quantifiable impact on the care of head and neck cancer patients. Progressing from prior SDoH-based research of the decade, these studies contextualize the effect of social vulnerabilities and have laid the foundations to begin addressing these issues in the complex, modern-day environment of interrelatedsocial factors. SUMMARY: Social determinants of health markedly affect pediatric head and neck cancer care and prognosis in complex and surprising ways. Modern-day tools and analyses derived from large-data techniques have unveiled the quantifiable underpinnings of how SDoH impact these pathologies.

Assessment of Social Vulnerability in Pediatric Head and Neck Cancer Care and Prognosis in the United States.

Importance: Prior investigations in social determinants of health (SDoH) in pediatric head and neck cancer (HNC) have only considered a narrow scope of HNCs, SDoH, and geography while lacking inquiry into the interrelational association of SDoH with disparities in clinical pediatric HNC. Objectives: To evaluate the association of SDoH with disparities in HNC among children and adolescents and to assess which specific aspects of SDoH are most associated with disparities in dynamic and regional sociodemographic contexts. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included data about patients (aged ≤19 years) with pediatric HNC who were diagnosed from 1975 to 2017 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to October 2022. Exposures: Overall social vulnerability and its subcomponent contributions from 15 SDoH variables, grouped into socioeconomic status (SES; poverty, unemployment, income level, and high school diploma status), minority and language status (ML; minoritized racial and ethnic group and proficiency with English), household composition (HH; household members aged ≥65 and ≤17 years, disability status, single-parent status), and housing and transportation (HT; multiunit structure, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle, group quarters). These were ranked and scored across all US counties. Main Outcomes and Measures: Regression trends were performed in continuous measures of surveillance and survival period and in discrete measures of advanced staging and surgery receipt. Results: A total of 37 043 patients (20 729 [55.9%] aged 10-19 years; 18 603 [50.2%] male patients; 22 430 [60.6%] White patients) with 30 different HNCs in SEER had significant relative decreases in the surveillance period, ranging from 23.9% for malignant melanomas (mean [SD] duration, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 170 [128] months to 129 [88] months) to 41.9% for non-Hodgkin lymphomas (mean [SD] duration, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 216 [142] months vs 127 [94] months). SES followed by ML and HT vulnerabilities were associated with these overall trends per relative-difference magnitudes (eg, SES for ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors: mean [SD] duration, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 114 [113] months vs 86 [84] months; P < .001). Differences in mean survival time were observed with increasing social vulnerability, ranging from 11.3% for ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors (mean [SD] survival, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 46 [46] months to 41 [48] months; P = .43) to 61.4% for gliomas not otherwise specified (NOS) (mean [SD] survival, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 44 [84] months to 17 [28] months; P < .001), with ML vulnerability followed by SES, HH, and HT being significantly associated with decreased survival (eg, ML for gliomas NOS: mean [SD] survival, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 42 [84] months vs 19 [35] months; P < .001). Increased odds of advanced staging with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.45) and retinoblastomas (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.14-1.50) and decreased odds of surgery receipt for melanomas (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91) and rhabdomyosarcomas (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98) were associated with increasing overall social vulnerability. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with pediatric HNC, significant decreases in receipt of care and survival time were observed with increasing SDoH vulnerability.

National assessment of lymph node status indicators & predictors in pediatric head and neck rhabdomyosarcomas in the US.

OBJECTIVES: Assessing the prognostic utility of lymph node status in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) patients and identifying demographic and clinical predictors of positive lymph node status among pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of head and neck RMS in patients with and without positive lymph node metastasis. METHODS: National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients of young (0-11 years) and adolescent (12-21 years) ages with head and neck RMS and confirmed positive or negative lymph node metastasis status. Descriptive analyses, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, and multivariate logistic regressions were performed on extracted demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Among 272 head and neck RMS patients, 146 (54%) were found to have positive lymph node metastasis. Alveolar RMS (n = 147, 54%) followed by embryonal RMS (n = 74, 27%) were the most represented histology types. Positive lymph node metastasis conferred significantly decreased survivability (p < 0.001) with a median survival period of 36.42 months compared to negative lymph node metastasis with a period of 53.47 months. Older age showed markedly increased odds (OR-2.02; 95%CI 1.22-3.38) of having lymph node metastasis when controlling for sex, race, insurance status, and Charlson-Comorbidity score. Alveolar histologies showed markedly increased odds of having lymph node metastasis (OR-3.21; 95%CI 1.96-5.31); embryonal histologies showed markedly decreased odds of having lymph node metastasis (OR-0.32; 95%CI 0.18-0.56) CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the significant prognostic value of lymph node status among pediatric head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma patients while showcasing crucial demographic and pathological predictors of lymph node metastasis in said patients. Use of lymph node status in pediatric head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma will present future steps towards improving its clinical course.

Endoscopic Endonasal Treatment of a Sinonasal Vascular Neoplasm in the Postnatal Period: Case Report and Review of Literature.

OBJECTIVES: Congenital vascular lesions commonly present in the head and neck, and most are managed conservatively. Location and rapid growth, however, may necessitate surgical intervention. Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) in the pediatric population has emerged as a viable option in treating sinonasal and skull base lesions. Utilizing these techniques in newborns carries unique challenges. The objective of this report is to describe the successful use of direct intralesional embolization followed by endoscopic endonasal resection of a venous malformation in a postnatal patient. METHODS: We reviewed the case reported and reviewed the pertinent literature. RESULTS: A 6-week-old infant was found to have a large right-sided sinonasal lesion confirmed as a venous malformation. Rapid growth, impending orbital compromise, and potential long-term craniofacial abnormalities demanded the need for urgent surgical intervention. Risk of bleeding was mitigated with direct intralesional embolization. Immediately afterward, the patient underwent endoscopic endonasal resection of the lesion. EES in the very young presents multiple challenges both anatomically and behaviorally. A multidisciplinary approach lead to a successful outcome. CONCLUSION: We report a case of a 6-week-old infant, the youngest reported patient to the authors' knowledge, who successfully underwent direct intralesional embolization followed by endoscopic endonasal resection of a sinonasal vascular malformation. This report highlights the challenges of this technique in the very young and demonstrates it as a viable treatment strategy for sinonasal vascular anomalies in this population.

Screening for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Children With Sickle Cell Disease: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and sickle cell disease (SCD) represent two complex disease processes. Current guidelines recommend that children with SCD receive polysomnography (PSG) after presenting with signs or symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). Recent studies suggest a disproportionately elevated prevalence of SDB in the population of children with SCD, and traditional risk factors may not be evident within these patients. Further objective testing might be needed to screen all pediatric patients with SCD, even in the absence of overt signs or symptoms of OSA to prevent complications of both conditions. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. An eight-question OSA risk assessment screening questionnaire was presented prospectively to 100 consecutive patients with SCD in the pediatric hematology clinic regardless of complaints of SDB. RESULTS: Out of 100 patients, 51 were female. The average age, body mass index (BMI), BMI percentile, and I'M SLEEPY score of the entire cohort were 3.97 years, 15.97%, 55.4%, and 1.63%, respectively. Nineteen patients had a positive sleep apnea screening score and were referred for PSG. The average age BMI, BMI percentile, and I'M SLEEPY score for those 19 patients were 3.77%, 16.67%, 65%, and 3.95%, respectively. Ten patients completed PSG, with seven diagnosed with OSA. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates a higher incidence of SDB and OSA in children with SCD relative to the general pediatric population. Although more PSG reports and further testing is needed to determine whether the results hold, preliminary data indicate that children with SCD should at least undergo OSA screening in the office regardless of overt symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E1022-E1028, 2021.

Perioperative Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Otolaryngologic Surgery.

This article reviews the evidence regarding current perioperative pain management strategies in pediatric patients undergoing otolaryngologic surgery. Pediatric otolaryngology is a broad field with a wide variety of surgical procedures that each requires careful consideration for optimal perioperative pain management. Adequate pain control is vital to ensuring patient safety and achieving successful postoperative care, but many young children are limited in their capacity to communicate their pain experience. Current literature holds a disproportionate amount of focus on pain management for certain procedures, whereas there is a paucity of evidence-based literature informing most other procedures within the field.

Trimodal embolization of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma with intracranial extension.

OBJECTIVES/PURPOSE: 1. Understand three different techniques for embolization of juvenile nasal angiofibroma (JNA) and assess their combined efficacy. 2. Perform successful endoscopic intralesional embolization of highly vascular sinonasal neoplasms. METHODS: In this study, we present the case of a 10-year-old male patient diagnosed with juvenile nasal angiofibroma (JNA) who successfully underwent trimodal embolization and resection at a tertiary academic medical center after failed coil embolization in his home country. We examine the clinical details of the case and a review of pertinent literature. RESULTS: Preoperative embolization is common in the treatment of JNA, but there is little consensus as to the proper timeframe and techniques utilized. In our case, preoperative imaging revealed a vascular tumor with intracranial extension consistent with UPMC Stage V JNA. Diagnostic angiogram revealed significant arborization from the internal and external carotid systems. A trimodal embolization technique, utilizing transarterial, percutaneous, and direct endoscopic intralesional injection of n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate (n-BCA) was performed. A two-staged endoscopic and open resection was subsequently performed one week later with minimal blood loss. In our case, combining intralesional embolization with traditional transarterial techniques resulted in an improved operative field and a successful clinical result. CONCLUSION: Embolization of highly vascular sinonasal tumors with n-BCA is not limited to endovascular techniques, but can be safely combined with percutaneous and endoscopic intralesional embolization up to one week prior to surgical resection.