Identification and characterization of biomarkers associated with endoplasmic reticulum protein processing in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Background: Cerebral ischemia (CI), ranking as the second leading global cause of death, is frequently treated by reestablishing blood flow and oxygenation. Paradoxically, this reperfusion can intensify tissue damage, leading to CI-reperfusion injury. This research sought to uncover biomarkers pertaining to protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum (PER) during CI-reperfusion injury. Methods: We utilized the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) dataset GSE163614 to discern differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and single out PER-related DEGs. The functions and pathways of these PER-related DEGs were identified via Gene Ontology (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses. Core genes were pinpointed through protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. Subsequent to this, genes with diagnostic relevance were distinguished using external validation datasets. A single-sample gene-set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was undertaken to pinpoint genes with strong associations to hypoxia and apoptosis, suggesting their potential roles as primary inducers of apoptosis in hypoxic conditions during ischemia-reperfusion injuries. Results: Our study demonstrated that PER-related genes, specifically ADCY5, CAMK2A, PLCB1, NTRK2, and DLG4, were markedly down-regulated in models, exhibiting a robust association with hypoxia and apoptosis. Conclusion: The data indicates that ADCY5, CAMK2A, PLCB1, NTRK2, and DLG4 could be pivotal genes responsible for triggering apoptosis in hypoxic environments during CI-reperfusion injury.

Edaravone combined with Shuxuening versus edaravone alone in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Shuxuening injection (SXN) is a traditional Chinese medicine used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Whether it can provide better outcomes when combined with edaravone injection (ERI) for the treatment of acute cerebral infarction is not well determined. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of ERI combined with SXN versus that of ERI alone in patients with acute cerebral infarction. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang electronic databases were searched up to July 2022. Randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of efficacy rate, neurologic impairment, inflammatory factors, and hemorheology were included. Odds ratio or standard mean difference (SMD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to present the overall estimates. The quality of the included trials was evaluated by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. RESULTS: Seventeen randomized controlled trials were included consisting of 1607 patients. Compared to ERI alone, treatment with ERI plus SXN had a greater effective rate than ER alone (odds ratio = 3.94; 95% CI: 2.85, 5.44; I2 = 0%, P < .00001), a lower National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (SMD= -1.39; 95% CI: -1.73, -1.05; I2 = 71%, P < .00001), lower neural function defect score (SMD= -0.75; 95% CI: -1.06,-0.43; I2 = 67%, P < .00001), and lower level of neuron-specific enolase (SMD= -2.10; 95% CI: -2.85, -1.35; I2 = 85%, P < .00001). ERI plus SXN treatment provided significant improvements in whole blood high shear viscosity (SMD = -0.87; 95% CI: -1.17, -0.57; I2 = 0%, P < .00001), and whole blood low shear viscosity (SMD = -1.50; 95% CI: -1.65, -1.36; I2 = 0%, P < .00001) compared to ERI alone. CONCLUSION: ERI plus SXN showed better efficacy than ERI alone for patients with acute cerebral infarction. Our study provides evidence supporting the application of ERI plus SXN for acute cerebral infarction.