Mismatch Between Residual Mitral Regurgitation and Left Atrial Pressure Predicts Prognosis After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism and impact of mismatch between residual mitral regurgitation (MR) and postprocedural left atrial pressure (LAP) after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER), which may adversely affect clinical outcome, is of great interest. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the effect of hemodynamic mismatch after TEER on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure due to severe MR and investigate the predictive factors for the mismatch using a prospective multicenter registry. METHODS: We categorized 1,477 patients into optimal (residual MR grade ≤1 and postprocedural LAP ≤15 mm Hg), mismatched (residual MR grade >1 or postprocedural LAP >15 mm Hg), and poor (residual MR grade >1 and postprocedural LAP >15 mm Hg) groups and examined their prognosis. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. RESULTS: There were 927 (62.7%), 459 (31.1%), and 91 (6.2%) patients categorized into optimal, mismatched, and poor groups, respectively. Cox regression analysis, referenced to the optimal group, revealed that the mismatched and poor groups exhibited a higher risk for the primary endpoint (HR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.28-1.88; and HR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.38-2.74, respectively). Six risk factors were identified as predictors of hemodynamic mismatch after TEER: body mass index, baseline left atrial volume index, atrial fibrillation, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion value, preprocedural mean left atrial pressure, and postprocedural mean mitral valve pressure gradient. CONCLUSIONS: Post-TEER hemodynamic mismatch between residual MR and postprocedural LAP was associated with a poor prognosis. Six readily accessible perioperative parameters predict the hemodynamic mismatch. (OCEAN-Mitral registry; UMIN000023653).

Addition of Ezetimibe to Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy Is Associated With a Lower Incidence of Heart Failure in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether intensive lipid-lowering therapy with pitavastatin and ezetimibe lowers the incidence of heart failure (HF) events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the HIJ-PROPER study, 1,734 patients with ACS were randomly assigned to either pitavastatin plus ezetimibe therapy (n=864) or pitavastatin monotherapy (n=857). We examined the incidence of HF between these 2 groups over a 3.9-year period after ACS. The primary endpoint of the study was hospitalization for HF. The mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels during the follow-up period were 65.1 mg/dL in the pitavastatin plus ezetimibe group and 84.6 mg/dL in the pitavastatin monotherapy group. The incidence of HF hospitalization was significantly lower in the pitavastatin plus ezetimibe group than in the pitavastatin monotherapy group (19 [2.2%] vs. 40 [4.7%] patients; hazard ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.81; P<0.005). This trend was consistent after multivariable analysis using multiple models. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive lipid-lowering therapy with pitavastatin and ezetimibe is associated with a lower incidence of hospitalization for HF in patients with ACS.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Affect Activated Clotting Time During and Bleeding Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Inappropriately high activated clotting time (ACT) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with an increased risk of bleeding events. However, whether the prescription of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) affects ACT kinetics during heparin use and adverse clinical events in patients who underwent PCI remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the relations between ACT changes during and adverse clinical events after PCI in patients who were prescribed DOAC. This observational study included 246 patients who underwent PCI at the 2 cardiovascular centers who were not receiving warfarin and whose ACT was recorded immediately before and 30 minutes after injection of unfractionated heparin. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to DOAC prescription at the time of the index PCI: DOAC users (n = 31) and nonusers (n = 215). Any bleeding and systemic thromboembolic events were investigated until 30 days after PCI. The average age of this population was 70.5 years, and 66.3% were male. Average ACT was significantly higher in DOAC users than nonusers both before and 30 minutes after unfractionated heparin induction (157.2 ± 30.1 vs 131.8 ± 25.1 seconds, p <0.001; 371.1 ± 122.2 vs 308.3 ± 82.2 seconds, p <0.001; respectively). The incidence of systemic thromboembolism after PCI was low and comparable between the 2 groups (0% vs 3.7%, p = 0.60). However, the rate of any bleeding event was significantly higher in DOAC users than in nonusers (16.1% vs 4.7%, p = 0.028). Patients receiving DOAC have higher ACT during PCI and higher incidence of bleeding events than those not receiving DOAC.

Prognostic Impact of Statins on Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease With Elevated C-Reactive Protein Levels.

This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic influence of statins in relation to the degree of inflammation at the time of endovascular therapy (EVT) for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). This observational study included patients with PAD who underwent EVT, including 285 statin users and 275 statin non-users. They were assigned into four groups depending on C-reactive protein (CRP) level at the time of EVT: low CRP (<0.1 mg/dL), intermediate-low CRP (0.1-0.3 mg/dL), intermediate-high CRP (0.3-1.0 mg/dL), and high CRP (>1.0 mg/dL). A composite of death and major amputation as the primary endpoint was compared between statin users and non-users in each CRP category. Overall, statin users showed a lower event rate than non-users (log-rank, p=0.02). However, the event rates did not differ significantly between statin users and non-users in the low, intermediate-low, and intermediate-high CRP categories. In the high CRP category, statin users showed a lower event rate than non-users (p=0.002). In this population, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that statin use was independently associated with the primary endpoint (hazard ratio: 0.28 [95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.55]). Statins may exert favorable prognostic effects in PAD patients with highly elevated CRP levels, but not in those with low-to-moderate CRP levels.

Assessment of thromboembolism risk in COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular disease risk factors: Analysis of a Japanese Nationwide Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVDRF) have been reported to develop coagulation abnormalities frequently. However, there are limitations in conventional predictive models for the occurrence of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 and CVDRF. METHODS: Among data on 1518 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 registered with CLAVIS-COVID, a Japanese nationwide cohort study, 693 patients with CVDRF were subjected to least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis; a method of shrinking coefficients for reducing variance and minimizing bias to increase predictive accuracy. LASSO analysis was performed to identify risk factors for systemic thromboembolic events; occurrence of arterial and venous thromboembolism during the index hospitalization as the primary endpoint. RESULTS: LASSO analysis identified a prior systemic thromboembolism, male sex, hypoxygenemia requiring invasive mechanical ventilation support, C-reactive protein levels and D-dimer levels at admission, and congestion on chest X-ray at admission as potential risk factors for the primary endpoint. The developed risk model consisting of these risk factors showed good discriminative performance (AUC-ROC: 0.83, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.90), which was significantly better than that shown by D-dimer (AUC-ROC: 0.70, 95 % CI: 0.60-0.80) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, systemic embolic events were independently associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 3.29; 95 % CI: 1.31-8.00). CONCLUSIONS: Six parameters readily available at the time of admission were identified as risk factors for thromboembolic events, and these may be capable of stratifying the risk of in-hospital thromboembolic events, which are associated with in-hospital mortality, in patients with COVID-19 and CVDRF.

Prognostic Impact of Early Induction of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation in High-Risk Patients With Acute Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) counterpulsation provides potent supports on hemodynamic status of patients with cardiogenic shock. However, only limited numbers of patients with acute heart failure (AHF) under collapsed hemodynamic status received such benefit of IABP. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the timing of IABP induction on clinical prognosis in AHF patients at very high risk. METHODS: Of 404 consecutive AHF patients, 57 patients both with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% and systolic blood pressure on admission <100 mmHg were ultimately enrolled in this observational study. They were divided into 3 groups depending on IABP use; Early-IABP group (induction at ≤3 days after admission, n = 17), Late-IABP group (>3 days, n = 15) and No-IABP group (n = 25). The primary endpoint was a composite of in-hospital cardiovascular (CV) death and ventricular assisted device implantation. RESULTS: This high-risk population was typically mid-age (60 years-old), 61% male, and 75% with chronic kidney disease, and its average LVEF was 24.7%. Clinical profiles on admission were comparable among 3 subgroups, except prehospital prescription rate of loop diuretics. During hospital stay, intravenous inotropes were significantly more frequently administered in the Late-IABP group than other 2 groups. The primary endpoint was developed in 17.6% of patients in the Early-IABP group, which was significantly lower than that in the Late-IABP group (53.3%, p = 0.034) and was comparable to the No-IABP group (40.0%, p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Early induction of IABP is one of the therapeutic options for improvement of in-hospital prognosis in AHF patients at very high risk.

Recurrent pericardial effusion with pericardial amyloid deposition: a case report and literature review.

Pericardial amyloidosis is a rare cause of pericardial effusion. Here, we report a case of recurrent pericardial effusion because of pericardial amyloid deposition. The patient was a man in his 40s admitted for pulmonary embolism. During hospitalization, arterial fibrillation and cardiac tamponade were observed, and an initial pericardial puncture was performed. Thereafter, pericardial puncture was repeated nine times over the next two years. Cytological examination of the pericardial effusion suggested malignant mesothelioma. Afterward, pericardial fenestration and partial resection were performed. Intraoperatively, a thickened pericardium and hemorrhagic pericardial effusion were noted. Histologically, the surface of the pericardium was covered by an eosinophilic amorphous material. Congo red and DYLON stains, electron microscopy, and immunohistochemical findings revealed localized amyloidosis composed of an immunoglobulin lambda light chain. Although the patient did not receive further treatment for 5 years postoperatively, his renal and cardiac functions remained within normal limits. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with localized amyloidosis. So far, hemorrhagic pericardial effusion has been reported in few cases with systemic amyloidosis. Because localized immunoglobulin light-chain-derived (AL) amyloidosis may progress to systemic disease (although it is a very rare occurrence), long-term follow-up is necessary to detect recurrence or progression to a systemic form.

Pilot Cohort Study Assessing the Efficacy of Endovascular Revascularization in the Restoration of Peripheral Sensory Disturbance in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Sensory disturbance (SD) is a common consequence of peripheral nerve damage associated with diabetes and severe ischemia. Progression of SD places patients at high risk for lower extremity ulcers and amputations. SD has been thought to be progressive and irreversible, and possibly caused by microvascular dysfunction. The aim of this study was to determine whether endovascular revascularization (EVR) induces quantifiable changes in SD in chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients with neuropathy.Methods and Results:In all, 36 legs from 28 chronic CLI patients who underwent elective EVR were prospectively enrolled in this study (64% with diabetes and 54% on maintenance hemodialysis). The current perception threshold (CPT), an established diagnostic parameter for SD, was measured before and 3 months after EVR. Of the target lesions, 11%, 47%, and 81% were in the aortoiliac, femoropopliteal, and below-the-knee arteries, respectively, and 58% were totally occluded. Overall CPT in the target foot had improved significantly 3 months after EVR (from 53 to 30 µA; P=0.010); however, EVR did not change CPT in the non-target foot (from 44 to 33 µA; P=0.33). Patients with improved SD after EVR had a significantly higher 180-day survival rate (94% vs. 63%; P=0.040). CONCLUSIONS: EVR improved CPT in target limbs of patients with CLI, and may be a promising option to improve SD associated with peripheral ischemic sensory neuropathy.