Pre-existing Interstitial Lung Abnormalities and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis in Solid Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated efficacy over previous cytotoxic chemotherapies in clinical trials among various tumors. Despite their favorable outcomes, they are associated with a unique set of toxicities termed as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Among the toxicities, ICI-related pneumonitis has poor outcomes with little understanding of its risk factors. This retrospective study aimed to investigate whether pre-existing interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) is a potential risk factor for ICI-related pneumonitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer, malignant melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and gastric cancer, who was administered either nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab between September 2014 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Information on baseline characteristics, computed tomography findings before administration of ICIs, clinical outcomes, and irAEs were collected from their medical records. Pre-existing ILA was categorized based on previous studies. RESULTS: Two-hundred-nine patients with a median age of 68 years were included and 23 (11.0%) developed ICI-related pneumonitis. While smoking history and ICI agents were associated with ICI-related pneumonitis (P = .005 and .044, respectively), the categories of ILA were not associated with ICI-related pneumonitis (P = .428). None of the features of lung abnormalities were also associated with ICI-related pneumonitis. Multivariate logistic analysis indicated that smoking history was the only significant predictor of ICI-related pneumonitis (P = .028). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study did not demonstrate statistically significant association between pre-existing ILA and ICI-related pneumonitis, nor an association between radiologic features of ILA and ICI-related pneumonitis. Smoking history was independently associated with ICI-related pneumonitis. Further research is warranted for further understanding of the risk factors of ICI-related pneumonitis.

Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan and Nivolumab as Third- or Later-Line Treatment for HER2-Positive Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: Determination of optimal treatment strategies for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in randomized trials is necessary despite difficulties in direct comparison between trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and nivolumab as third or later-line treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-institution, retrospective study aimed to describe the real-world efficacy and safety of T-DXd and nivolumab as ≥ third line treatments for HER2-positive AGC between March 2016 and May 2022. Overall, 58 patients (median age, 64 years; 69% male) were eligible for the study (T-DXd group, n=20; nivolumab group, n=38). RESULTS: Most patients exhibited a HER2 3+ status (72%) and presented metastatic disease at diagnosis (66%). The response rates of 41 patients with measurable lesions in the T-DXd and nivolumab groups were 50% and 15%, respectively. The T-DXd and nivolumab groups had a median progression-free survival of 4.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3, 7.0) and 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.5, 3.5), median overall survival (OS) of 10.8 months (95% CI, 6.9, 23.8) and 11.7 months (95% CI, 7.6, 17.1), and grade 3 or greater adverse event rates of 50% and 2%, respectively. Overall, 64% patients received subsequent treatment. Among 23 patients who received both regimens, the T-DXd-nivolumab and nivolumab-T-DXd groups had a median OS of 14.0 months (95% CI, 5.0, not reached) and 19.3 months (95% CI, 9.5, 25.1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: T-DXd and nivolumab showed distinct efficacy and toxicity profiles as ≥ third line treatments for HER2-positive AGC. Considering the distinct features of each regimen, they may help clinicians personalize optimal treatment approaches for these patients.

Current Strategy to Treat Immunogenic Gastrointestinal Cancers: Perspectives for a New Era.

Since pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody, showed a dramatic response to immunogenic cancers with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and/or deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) in the pilot clinical trial KEYNOTE-016, subsequent studies have confirmed durable responses of anti-PD-1 inhibitors for MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors. As immunotherapy is described as a "game changer," the therapeutic landscape for MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors including gastrointestinal cancers has changed considerably in the last decade. An MSI/MMR status has been established as the predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint blockades, playing an indispensable role in the clinical practice of patients with MSI-H/dMMR tumors. Immunotherapy is also now investigated for locally advanced MSI-H/dMMR gastrointestinal cancers. Despite this great success, a few populations with MSI-H/dMMR gastrointestinal cancers do not respond to immunotherapy, possibly due to the existence of intrinsic or acquired resistance mechanisms. Clarifying the underlying mechanisms of resistance remains a future task, whereas attempts to overcome resistance and improve the efficacy of immunotherapy are currently ongoing. Herein, we review recent clinical trials with special attention to MSI-H/dMMR gastrointestinal cancers together with basic/translational findings, which provide their rationale, and discuss perspectives for the further therapeutic development of treatment in this field.

Treatment efficacy of ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy in patients with alpha-fetoprotein producing gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-Fetoprotein Producing Gastric Cancer (AFPGC) is an aggressive subgroup of gastric cancer. Recently ramucirumab has shown survival benefits in hepatocellular carcinoma, but only in those with higher Alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP) levels. However, the efficacy of ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy in AFPGC remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 352 patients who received ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy between June 2015 and December 2019. AFPGC was defined when serum AFP levels were elevated at diagnosis and correlated with the disease state during treatment. Non-AFPGC was defined when serum AFP levels were normal at diagnosis. RESULTS: Among the 352 patients, 28 patients were defined as AFPGC and 246 patients were defined as non-AFPGC. AFPGC was characterized by high frequency of liver metastasis and low frequency of peritoneal metastasis compared to non-AFPGC. Ramucirumab containing chemotherapy showed higher response rates in AFPGC (39.1% vs 24.8%, p = 0.198) and disease control rates (86.9% vs 61.5%, p = 0.028) than those of non-AFPGC, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (95%CI 3.9-7.1) in AFPGC and 4.0 months (95%CI 3.6-4.6) in non-AFPGC (HR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.61-1.36, p = 0.66), and median overall survival (OS) was 10.7 months (95% CI 7.4-20.8) in AFPGC and 9.2 months (95% CI 8.1-10.4) in non-AFPGC (HR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.48-1.08, p = 0.11), respectively. In multivariate analysis, AFPGC was not a negative prognostic factor both for PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Ramucirumab containing chemotherapy showed higher response and comparable survival in AFPGC compared to those of non-AFPGC. Considering the generally poor prognosis of AFPGC, ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy might be a promising treatment option in AFPGC.

Pattern of disease progression during third-line or later chemotherapy with nivolumab associated with poor prognosis in advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Accelerated tumor growth during immunotherapy in pre-existing measurable lesions, hyperprogressive disease (HPD), has been reported. However, progression of non-measurable lesions and new lesions are frequently observed in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). METHODS: This retrospective study involved AGC patients at 24 Japanese institutions who had measurable lesions and received nivolumab after ≥ 2 lines of chemotherapy. HPD was defined as a ≥ two-fold increase in the tumor growth rate of measurable lesions. The pattern of disease progression was classified according to new lesions in different organs and ascites appeared/increase of ascites. RESULTS: Of 245 patients, 147 (60.0%) showed progressive disease (PD) as the best response and 41 (16.7%) showed HPD during nivolumab monotherapy. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between patients with HPD and those with PD other than HPD (median OS 5.0 vs 4.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-1.5; p = 1.0). Fifty-three patients developed new lesions in different organs and 58 had appearance/increase of ascites; these patients showed shorter OS than those without each of these features (median OS 3.3 vs 7.1 months, HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7, p = 0.0031 for new lesions, and 3.0 vs 7.8 months, HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.8-3.8, p < 0.0001 for ascites). Thirty-one patients who had both features showed the worst prognosis (median OS 2.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: New lesions in different organs and appearance/increase of ascites, rather than the original definition of HPD, are the patterns of disease progression associated with poor prognosis in AGC patients receiving nivolumab whose best response was PD.

KRAS mutation as a predictor of insufficient trastuzumab efficacy and poor prognosis in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Although RAS and PIK3CA mutations have been associated with resistance to anti-EGFR antibody in colorectal cancer or trastuzumab in breast cancer, their implications for trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains unclear. We aimed to assess the relationship between trastuzumab efficacy and mutation status in the HER family signaling pathway. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated patients with HER2-positive AGC who received first-line trastuzumab-containing chemotherapy between March 2011 and November 2015. Multiplex genotyping, including KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF, was then performed using the Luminex Assay, after which KRAS amplification was measured using quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Thereafter, the association between genetic alterations and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: KRAS mutation (MT) was detected in 6 of 77 patients (7.8%), whereas KRAS amplification was found in 15 of 67 patients (22%). No mutations in NRAS, PIK3CA, or BRAF were identified. The KRAS MT group showed significantly worse response rates (16.7% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.016), progression-free survival [median, 4.8 vs. 11.6 months; hazard ratio (HR), 3.95; 95% CI, 1.60-9.76; P = 0.0029], and overall survival (11.5 vs. 23.6 months; HR, 3.80; 95% CI, 1.56-9.28; P = 0.033) compared to the KRAS wild-type group. KRAS amplification had no effect on clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: KRAS mutation was an independent prognostic factor for poor survival and might predict insufficient trastuzumab efficacy, whereas KRAS amplification showed no prognostic significance during trastuzumab treatment. Further investigations are warranted to confirm the predictive value of KRAS status in HER2-positive AGC.

WJOG13219G: The Efficacy and Safety of FOLFOXIRI or Doublet plus Anti-VEGF Therapy in Previously Untreated BRAFV600E Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Registry-Based Study (BRACELET Study).

BACKGROUND: The real-world survival benefit of FOLFOXIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) plus anti-VEGF therapy (Triplet) over doublet chemotherapy (Doublet) remains controversial in patients with BRAFV600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: WJOG13219G was a multicenter, retrospective, registry-based study of patients with BRAFV600E mutant mCRC who received first-line triplet or doublet chemotherapy from January 2014 to December 2019 in Japan. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for patient background. RESULTS: The analysis included 79 and 91 patients in the Triplet and Doublet groups, respectively. The Triplet group was significantly younger and had better performance status. No statistical difference was noted in progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.60-1.13; P = .22) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.62-1.25; P = .48) between both groups. IPTW analysis also showed no difference between the 2 groups in PFS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.69-1.08; P = .20) and OS (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73-1.20; P = .59). The Triplet and Doublet groups had an objective response rate of 53% and 41%, respectively (P = .10). At least one grade 3 or 4 adverse event was seen in 51 (65%) and 43 (47%) patients in the Triplet and Doublet groups, respectively, with the incidence of neutropenia being significantly higher in the former. CONCLUSION: Triplet therapy had no survival benefit versus doublet therapy in the overall and IPTW cohorts or specific subgroups for real-world patients with BRAFV600E mutant mCRC.

Clinical Usefulness of Postoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Patients with Colorectal Cancer with Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer with liver metastasis (CLM) has high postoperative recurrence rates; therefore, optimizing perioperative treatment is imperative. Postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) can aid in detecting minimal residual disease in colon cancer following curative resection. This study aimed to identify the potential role of serum CEA following liver resection in patients with CLM. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research from 2004 to 2018 and enrolled patients with CLM who underwent complete resection of primary tumors and CLM. Associations between perioperative CEA levels and characteristics of recurrence were investigated. RESULTS: Recurrence was detected during a median follow-up period of 90.1 months in 343 (54.2%) out of 633 analyzed patients. Patients in the postoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml group had a significantly higher recurrence rate (75.7% versus 50.0%, p < 0.01) and shorter time until recurrence (4.4 versus 36.9 months, p < 0.01) than those in the postoperative CEA level ≤ 5 ng/ml group. Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml was an independent predictor, with hazard ratios of 2.77 (p < 0.01) for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 3.18 (p < 0.01) for overall survival (OS). Additionally, RFS was significantly shorter among patients in the postoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml group who did not have normalized CEA levels following adjuvant chemotherapy than among those in the normalized CEA group. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative and post-adjuvant chemotherapy CEA levels in the CEA level > 5 ng/ml group may be predictors of RFS and OS.

Clinical Progress in Inoperable or Recurrent Advanced Gastric Cancer Treatment from 1004 Single Institute Experiences Between 2007 and 2018.

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, several successful clinical trials provided new therapeutic agents approved for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study evaluated whether these practice-changing results actually altered the clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of treatment-naive AGC patients who received combination chemotherapy of fluoropyrimidine and platinum between 2007 and 2018 and divided them into three groups: Groups A (2007-10), B (2011-14), and C (2015-2018), respectively. We compared the clinicopathological features, treatment details, and clinical outcomes among the three groups. RESULTS: In total, 1004 consecutive patients were enrolled (A; n = 254, B; n = 300, and C; n = 450). The number of patients with poor performance status, older age, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma, and primary tumor increased during the study period. All groups had similar median overall survival (OS); ~16 months) without any statistical difference but steady prolongation of survival was observed in the adjusted with imbalance prognostic factors among groups (B/A; hazard ratio, HR 0.82, 95% C.I 0.68-0.98, C/A; HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.86); OS of HER2-positive AGC patients was clearly improved (HER2-positive vs HER2-negative in Group B, HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.60-1.06; Group C, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.90) but that of diffuse-type AGC patients remained dismal. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing availability of chemotherapy options potentially contributed to improved survival of AGC patients, but expanded chemotherapeutic indications made the survival benefit inconspicuous in the whole population. Future therapeutic development for the AGC subset not adequately receiving benefit from previous clinical trials is warranted.

[Position of the Japanese Subgroup Data from Global Trial in Advanced Gastric Cancer].

Global studies have been planned to achieve early approval of the new agent especially in cancer chemotherapy. On the other hand, it is important to consider the difference in efficacy among each region. As medical approval in Japan means reimbursement of medical cost, new drug is required to show its effectiveness in the medical situation in Japan, and the Japanese subgroup data is important. Especially in the gastric cancer field, where there is a large difference in survival time and surgical outcome between Japan and outside Japan need to consider Japanese domestic data. But characteristic of Japanese subgroup is the number of target patients is small, high censored case due to longer survival and the background factors are not even. So the interpretation of the data requires caution because of these robustness.

Correlation between circulating tumor DNA and carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a biomarker with potential to reflect comprehensive genomic information and overcome intratumor heterogeneity. In contrast, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a conventional tumor marker for predicting recurrence, survival, and chemotherapeutic efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the relationship between them remains unclear. Here, the relationship between plasma ctDNA and CEA levels was evaluated to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of their clinical use. METHODS: A total of 110 patients with mCRC underwent chemotherapy were enrolled. Amplicon-based plasma genomic profiling of 14 genes that are commonly mutated in CRC by next-generation sequencing was compared to the CEA level and tumor diameter using Spearman's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The overall concordance rate between the ctDNA and CEA levels was 75.5% (83/110). The correlation coefficient between the ctDNA and CEA levels was lower in the group of patients without liver and lymph node metastases (r = 0.18, p = 0.44) than in the group of patients with liver metastasis (r = 0.48, p < 0.0001). Although the correlation coefficients between tumor diameter and both ctDNA and CEA levels were high in the group of patients with liver metastasis, only the CEA correlation coefficient was maintained in the group of patients without liver and lymph node metastases (r = 0.53, p = 0.01). The characteristics that influenced discordance were liver metastasis and the sum of tumor diameter. CONCLUSIONS: The status of ctDNA and CEA may not be consistent in patients with mCRC without liver metastasis or with a low tumor volume; both results should be considered when deciding a treatment strategy.

Concordance analysis of microsatellite instability status between polymerase chain reaction based testing and next generation sequencing for solid tumors.

Various malignancies exhibit high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). The MSI-IVD kit, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method, was the first tumor-agnostic companion diagnostic to detect MSI status in MSI-H solid tumors. Recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS), which can also detect MSI-H/dMMR, has been made clinically available; however, its real-world concordance with PCR-based testing of MSI-H/dMMR remains to be investigated. The co-primary end points included the positive and negative predictive values of MSI-H/dMMR. A retrospective analysis of 80 patients who had undergone both MSI testing and NGS between July 2015 and March 2021 was conducted. Five patients were confirmed to have MSI-H in both examinations. Among the 75 patients diagnosed as microsatellite stable (MSS) by PCR-based testing, one with pancreatic cancer was diagnosed as having MSI-H after NGS. One patient with pancreatic cancer was diagnosed as having MSS in both tests was found to have a mutation in MLH1 by NGS, which was confirmed as dMMR by IHC staining. NGS had positive and negative predictive values of 100% (5/5) and 98.7% (74/75), respectively, for MSI-H. The concordance between NGS and PCR-based testing was 98.8% (79/80). Thus, NGS can be useful for evaluating MSI/MMR status in clinical practice and can be an important alternative method for detecting MSI-H/dMMR in the future.

[A Practical Approach to the Management of Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer during the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019(COVID-19)Pandemic-What Can Medical Oncologists Do?]

The SARS-CoV-2 was first identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Since then, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has drastically changed the healthcare system, including cancer treatments worldwide. Since March 2020 in Japan, cancer patients faced a crisis; they suffered from delays or restrictions in cancer treatment during the initial outbreak. At present, we can perform cancer treatment as usual. Most of the treatments depend on continuous infection control by cancer patients and their families. However, the need to recognize cancer treatment management during the COVID-19 pandemic is crucial. Cancer treatment practice, purpose, risk factors, and the evidence during clinical trials should be comprehensively evaluated and adapted for each patient. Moreover, there is a need to discuss care planning between healthcare professionals, patients, and their families in advance. The COVID-19 vaccine could be essential for cancer patients. In this article, we review cancer treatment points for implementing whole-person care, including advanced care planning for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Clinical Impact of Primary Tumor Location and RAS, BRAF V600E, and PIK3CA Mutations on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Efficacy as Third-line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Primary tumor location and RAS and BRAF V600E mutations are predictors of the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. However, there are limited reports on their effects on the outcomes of third-line chemotherapy with EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of KRAS exon 2 wild type (WT) mCRC patients treated with EGFR inhibitor monotherapy or EGFR inhibitor plus irinotecan as third-line chemotherapy. The association between primary tumor location, RAS (KRAS exon 3, 4 or NRAS), BRAF V600E, and PIK3CA mutational status, and treatment outcome was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were included in this study. In multivariate analysis, RAS (p=0.004) and BRAF mutations (p=0.00008) were independent factors for shorter PFS. Poor performance status (p=0.01) and BRAF mutation (p=0.00002) were independent factors for shorter OS, whereas primary tumor location and PIK3CA mutation did not influence survival. CONCLUSION: Additional analysis of RAS and BRAF mutations could contribute to the selection of patients who are likely to benefit from third-line EGFR inhibitors, regardless of primary tumor location.

Analysis of risk factors for immune-related adverse events in various solid tumors using real-world data.

The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. The authors conducted a retrospective study in which patients with malignant melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, gastric cancer or renal cell carcinoma who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies were included. Of 247 patients, 118 developed a total of 182 irAEs. In the multivariate Fine-Gray regression analysis, serum albumin level ≥3.6 g/dl (hazard ratio: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.10-2.39; p = 0.015) and history of Type I hypersensitivity reactions (hazard ratio: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.02-2.14; p = 0.037) were significantly associated with the development of irAEs. High serum albumin levels and history of Type I hypersensitivity reactions are risk factors for irAEs.

The Entire Intestinal Tract Surveillance Using Capsule Endoscopy after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Administration: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the proven efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) against various types of malignancies, they have been found to induce immune-related adverse events, such as enterocolitis; however, the clinical features of ICI-induced enterocolitis remain to be sufficiently elucidated, which is significant, considering the importance of early detection in the appropriate management and treatment of ICI-induced enterocolitis. Therefore, the current study aimed to determine the utility of capsule endoscopy as a screening tool for ICI-induced enterocolitis. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, observational study was conducted on patients with malignancy who received any ICI between April 2016 and July 2020 at Keio University Hospital. Next, second-generation capsule endoscopy (CCE-2) was performed on day 60 after ICI initiation to explore the entire gastrointestinal tract. RESULTS: Among the 30 patients enrolled herein, 23 underwent CCE-2. Accordingly, a total of 23 findings were observed in 14 (60.8%) patients at any portion of the gastrointestinal tract (7 patients in the colon, 4 patients in the small intestine, 2 patients in both the colon and the small intestine, and 1 patient in the stomach). After capsule endoscopy, 2 patients (8.7%) developed ICI-induced enterocolitis: both had significantly higher Capsule Scoring of Ulcerative Colitis than those who had not developed ICI-induced enterocolitis (p = 0.0455). No adverse events related to CCE-2 were observed. CONCLUSIONS: CCE-2 might be a safe and useful entire intestinal tract screening method for the early detection of ICI-induced enterocolitis in patients with malignancies.

Ulcerative colitis exacerbation after the onset of immune checkpoint inhibitor related colitis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) have been reported to be effective in various carcinomas. They excessively activate the immune system, resulting in frequent immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Colitis induced by ICPI is one of the most common and is known as immune-mediated colitis (IMC). Although IMC and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are similar in many respects, there are very few reports of IMC in patients with preexisting IBD such as ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Whether preexisting IBD is concerned with the development of the colitis is not well known. Here, we reported the case who developed severe ulcerative colitis which started from IMC. It is an important case to follow the time course of the colitis developed. Our conclusion indicated that frequent colonoscopy was important for the management of IMC in a patient who has suffered chronic inflammatory disease, such as UC.

Multiple Immune-Related Adverse Events and Anti-Tumor Efficacy: Real-World Data on Various Solid Tumors.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for various types of cancer; however, they cause a broad spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The association between the development of irAEs and the clinical benefit remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the association of irAEs and the treatment efficacy in real-world practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on patients with recurrent or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, malignant melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, or gastric cancer who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab) at the Keio University Hospital between September 2014 and January 2019. We recorded treatment-related AEs from medical records and graded them using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. We performed an overall survival (OS) analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model and the shared frailty model. RESULTS: Of 212 patients eligible for this study, 108 experienced irAEs and 42 developed multiple irAEs. The median OS was significantly longer in the irAEs than in the no-irAE group (28.1 months vs 12.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.73; P = 0.0004). Moreover, the OS of patients with multiple irAEs was significantly longer than that of patients with a single irAE (42.3 months vs 18.8 months; HR, 0.473; 95% CI, 0.346-0.647; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our single-center retrospective study revealed a significant tendency associating the development of multiple irAEs with favorable prognoses.