Low-Intensity Statin Plus Ezetimibe Versus Moderate-Intensity Statin for Primary Prevention: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study in Asian Population.

BACKGROUND: While moderate-intensity statin therapy is recommended for primary prevention, statins may not be utilized at a recommended intensity due to dose-dependent adverse events, especially in an Asian population. However, evidence supporting the use of low-intensity statins in primary prevention is limited. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare clinical outcomes between a low-intensity statin plus ezetimibe and a moderate-intensity statin for primary prevention. METHODS: This population-based retrospective cohort study used the Korean nationwide claims database (2002-2019). We included adults without atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases who received moderate-intensity statins or low-intensity statins plus ezetimibe. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. The safety outcomes were liver and muscle injuries and new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM). We used standardized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: In the sIPTW model, 1717 and 36 683 patients used a low-intensity statin plus ezetimibe and a moderate-intensity statin, respectively. In the PSM model, each group included 1687 patients. Compared with moderate-intensity statin use, low-intensity statin plus ezetimibe use showed similar risks of the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.81-1.12 in sIPTW and HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.87-1.56 in PSM model). Low-intensity statin plus ezetimibe use was associated with decreased risks of liver and muscle injuries (subHR [sHR] = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74-0.96 and sHR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.77-0.97 in sIPTW; sHR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72, 0.96 and sHR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.72-0.94 in PSM model, respectively). For new-onset DM and hospitalization of liver and muscle injuries, no difference was observed. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Low-intensity statin plus ezetimibe may be an alternative to moderate-intensity statin for primary prevention. Our findings provide evidence on safety and efficacy of statin therapy in Asian population.

Development and validation of a medication-based risk prediction model for acute kidney injury in older outpatients.

BACKGROUND: Older adults are at an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), particularly in community settings, often due to medications. Effective prevention hinges on identifying high-risk patients, yet existing models for predicting AKI risk in older outpatients are scarce, particularly those incorporating medication variables. We aimed to develop an AKI risk prediction model that included medication-related variables for older outpatients. METHODS: We constructed a cohort of 2,272,257 outpatients aged ≥65 years using a national claims database. This cohort was split into a development (70%) and validation (30%) groups. Our primary goal was to identify newly diagnosed AKI within one month of cohort entry in an outpatient context. We screened 170 variables and developed a risk prediction model using logistic regression. RESULTS: The final model integrated 12 variables: 2 demographic, 4 comorbid, and 6 medication-related. It showed good performance with acceptable calibration. In the validation cohort, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value was 0.720 (95% confidence interval, 0.692-0.748). Sensitivity and specificity were 69.9% and 61.9%, respectively. Notably, the model identified high-risk patients as having a 27-fold increased AKI risk compared with low-risk individuals. CONCLUSION: We have developed a new AKI risk prediction model for older outpatients, incorporating critical medication-related variables with good discrimination. This tool may be useful in identifying and targeting patients who may require interventions to prevent AKI in an outpatient setting.

Intracoronary antithrombotic therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STEMI: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of intracoronary (IC) antithrombotic therapy, which may best prevent the no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), remains unclear. Therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of different IC antithrombotic agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared IC fibrinolytic agents (recombinant tissue plasminogen activators [rtPAs] and non-rtPAs) or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (small molecules and monoclonal antibodies) with placebo by searching the relevant studies published before September 21, 2022. Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. RESULTS: Twenty-five RCTs with 4546 patients were included. Non-rtPAs and small molecules were significantly more effective in achieving thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow than placebo (odds ratio [OR] 2.28, 95 % credible intervals [CrI] 1.24-4.13; OR 2.06, 95 % CrI 1.17-3.46). Moreover, these agents' efficacy was observed in other microcirculation-related outcomes, including TIMI myocardial perfusion grade 3, complete ST-segment resolution, and corrected TIMI frame counts. Within 6 months, small molecules were associated with both an improved left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 3.90, 95 % CrI 0.48-7.46) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) reduction (OR 0.36, 95 % CrI 0.20-0.61). Non-rtPAs demonstrated a reduced MACE incidence within 6 months (OR 0.51, 95 % CrI 0.31-0.81). The results were consistent in the subgroup with a total ischemic time > 6 h. No significant differences in mortality or bleeding events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: IC non-rtPAs and small molecules may be effective for adjunctive therapy to PCI, particularly in patients with longer ischemia periods.

Intracoronary versus intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STEMI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary (IC) administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) has been studied as an adjunctive therapy to improve outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IC administration of GPIs compared with those of intravenous (IV) administration in patients with STEMI. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases for relevant studies published before September 21, 2022. In total, 22 randomized controlled trials involving 7,699 patients were included. RESULTS: The proportions of patients achieving thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 3 flow, myocardial blush grade 2/3, and complete ST-segment resolution were significantly higher in the IC group than in the IV group. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.37-0.80) and heart failure (RR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.91) within 1 month were significantly lower in the IC group than in the IV group; however, after 6 months, no difference was observed in MACE risk. Additionally, the risks of death and bleeding did not differ between the two routes of administration. CONCLUSIONS: When considering adjunctive GPI administration for patients with STEMI, the IC route may offer greater benefits than the IV route in terms of myocardial reperfusion and reduced occurrence of MACE and heart failure within 1 month. Nonetheless, when making decisions for IC administration of GPIs, the absence of a benefit for bleeding risk and difficulty accessing the administration route should be considered.

Clinical outcomes and predictors of a gap in direct-acting oral anticoagulant therapy in the elderly: A time-varying analysis of a nationwide cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: As direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have short half-lives of around 12 h, even a short gap in DOAC therapy may diminish anticoagulation effects, increasing risks of adverse clinical outcomes. We aimed to evaluate clinical consequences of a gap in DOAC therapy with atrial fibrillation (AF) and to identify its potential predictors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included DOAC users aged over 65 years with AF from the 2018 Korean nationwide claims database. We defined a gap in DOAC therapy as no claim for a DOAC one or more days after the due date of a refill prescription. We used a time-varying-analysis method. The primary outcome was a composite of death and thrombotic events including ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack or systemic embolism. Potential predictors of a gap included sociodemographic and clinical factors. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Among 11,042 DOAC users, 4857 (44.0 %) patients had at least one gap. Standard national health insurance, non-metropolitan locations of medical institutions, history of liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, or dementia, and use of diuretics or non-oral agents were associated with increased risks of a gap. In contrast, history of hypertension, ischemic heart disease, or dyslipidemia were associated with a decreased risk of a gap. A short gap in DOAC therapy was significantly associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome compared to no gap (hazard ratio 4.04, 95 % confidence interval 2.95-5.52). The predictors could be utilized to identify at-risk patients to provide additional support to prevent a gap.

The differential risk of severe hyponatraemia based on the use patterns of hyponatraemia-inducing medications in older adults.

BACKGROUND: the identification and minimization of hyponatraemia-inducing medication (HIM) usage is among the effective strategies for preventing hyponatraemia. However, the differential risk of severe hyponatraemia is unknown. OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the differential risk of severe hyponatraemia associated with newly started and concurrently used HIMs in older people. DESIGN AND SETTING: a case-control study using national claims databases. METHODS: we identified patients aged >65 years with severe hyponatraemia as those hospitalised with a primary diagnosis of hyponatraemia or who had received tolvaptan or 3% NaCl. A 1:20 matched control with the same visit date was constructed. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the association of newly started or concurrently used HIMs comprising 11 medication/classes with severe hyponatraemia after covariate adjustment. RESULTS: among 47,766,420 older patients, we identified 9,218 with severe hyponatraemia. After adjusting for covariates, all HIM classes were found to be significantly associated with severe hyponatraemia. Compared with persistently used HIMs, newly started HIMs increased the likelihood of severe hyponatraemia for eight classes of HIMs, with the highest increase being observed for desmopressin (adjusted odds ratio: 3.82, 95% confidence interval: 3.01-4.85). Concurrent use increased the risk of severe hyponatraemia compared to that with individually administered HIMs: thiazide-desmopressin (4.86, 3.90-6.07), medications causing the syndrome of inappropriate anti-diuretic hormone secretion (SIADH)-desmopressin (2.65, 2.25-3.11), medications causing SIADH-thiazides (1.87, 1.75-1.98) and combination among medications causing SIADH (1.36, 1.28-1.45). CONCLUSIONS: in older adults, newly started and concurrently used HIMs increased the risk of severe hyponatraemia compared with persistently and singly used HIMs.

Derivation and validation of a risk prediction score for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related serious gastrointestinal complications in the elderly.

AIMS: Few studies have quantified the impact of risk factors on GI complications in elderly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction score for severe GI complications to identify high-risk elderly patients using NSAID. METHODS: We used the following two Korean claims datasets: customized data with an enrolment period 2016-2017 for model development, and the sample data in 2019 for external validation. We conducted a nested case-control study for model development and validation. NSAID users were identified as the elderly (≥65 years) who received NSAIDs for more than 30 days. Serious GI complications were defined as hospitalizations or emergency department visits, with a main diagnosis of GI bleeding or perforation. We applied the logistic least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model for variable selection and model fitting. RESULTS: We identified 8176 cases and 81 760 controls with a 1:10 matched follow-up period in the derivation cohort. In the external validation cohort, we identified 372 cases from 254 551 patients. The risk predictors were high-dose NSAIDs, nonselective NSAID, complicated GI ulcer history, male sex, concomitant gastroprotective agents, relevant co-medications, severe renal disease and cirrhosis. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.81) in the external validation dataset. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction model may be a useful tool for reducing the risk of serious GI complications by identifying high-risk elderly patients.

Evaluation of standard versus reduced dose apixaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe renal disease (ESRD-VTE).

BACKGROUND: There are no clear dosing recommendations when using apixaban for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment in patients with severe or end-stage renal disease; clinical trials excluded patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) <25 mL/min or on dialysis. This study compares bleeding rates in patients with severe or end-stage renal disease taking standard versus reduced dose apixaban for VTE treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records between January 1, 2013, and August 31, 2021. This study included patients 18 years or older who had severe or end-stage renal disease when prescribed apixaban for VTE treatment. Severe or end-stage renal disease was defined as at least one of the following: CrCl <25 mL/min, SCr >2.5 mg/dL, CKD stage 4 or 5, or on dialysis. The primary endpoint was rate of clinically relevant bleeding within six months of starting apixaban. Secondary endpoints were VTE recurrence within six months of starting apixaban, time to clinically relevant bleed, and time to VTE recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 203 patients were included in the final analysis (n = 125 on 5 mg; n = 78 on 2.5 mg). Clinically relevant bleeding rate was significantly higher in the standard dose group (14.4 % vs 3.8 %, p = 0.02). Rates of VTE recurrence appear similar (6.4 % vs 7.7 %, p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: A reduced dose of apixaban may be considered when treating VTE in patients with severe or end-stage renal disease.

Risk of major adverse events associated with gabapentinoid and opioid combination therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The use of opioid-gabapentinoid combinations has increased, raising several safety concerns. However, meta-analysis studies focusing on this issue are limited. Objective: To evaluate the risk of central nervous system (CNS) depression, gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events, and mortality of combination therapy compared with those of opioid therapy and to explore the differences in the results according to study design and indications. Methods: Relevant studies were selected (published before 30 January 2022) by searching the MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases. The pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the outcomes were estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed according to study characteristics. Quality assessment was conducted using the Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias in non-RCTs tool for non-randomized trials. Results: Adverse events were reported in 26 RCTs and 7 non-RCTs, and mortality was reported in 10 non-RCTs. Compared to opioid therapy, dizziness, cognitive dysfunction, and respiratory depression in combination therapy significantly increased in non-RCTs (OR 3.26, 95% CI 1.82-5.85; OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.51-6.50; OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.31-2.24, respectively), and a similar trend for dizziness and cognitive dysfunction was also identified in the RCT analysis, although the difference was not significant. Combination therapy for cancer pain was associated with the highest risk of sedation in subgroup analysis. Combination therapy significantly decreased the risk of GI adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, and constipation. The mortality risk associated with combination therapy was higher than that associated with opioid therapy (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.26-6.05). Conclusion: Opioid-gabapentinoid combination therapy could be associated with an increased risk of CNS depression and mortality, despite tolerable GI adverse events. These data suggest that combination therapy requires close monitoring of CNS depression, especially in cancer patients. Caution is needed in interpreting the clinical meanings owing to the lack of risk difference in respiratory depression in the RCT-only analysis and the absence of RCT or prospective studies investigating mortality.

Development of a curriculum integrating biostatistics and study design with core sciences in an organ system block.

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this study were to develop and evaluate a curriculum that integrated biostatistics and research design content with core sciences content within a pharmacy course. METHODS: An inquiry curriculum was developed in 2019 and included lectures on biostatistics and research design with small group discussions of clinical research papers directly related to the core sciences content. Students' perceptions and pass rates between students who did (2019 cohort) and did not (2018 cohort) undergo the curriculum were compared. Test scores taken approximately one year after completion of each cohort's course were also compared. RESULTS: Of 127 students in the 2019 cohort, 120 (94%) responded. Over 90% agreed or strongly agreed that inquiry and core sciences contents were integrated well. The 2019 cohort had a significantly higher pass rate than the 2018 cohort on two of three assessment questions evaluated: one multiple choice question (P = .037) and one short answer question (P = .013). After adjustments for baseline characteristics, retention study volunteers from the 2019 cohort had a significantly higher percent test score than those from the 2018 cohort (parameter estimate = 8.48%; P = .026). CONCLUSIONS: An inquiry curriculum consisting of select biostatistics and research design topics can be integrated with a core sciences curriculum in a large integrated pharmacy course. Inclusion of this content increased student academic performance and retention of knowledge and skills.

Should multiple-choice questions get the SAQ? Development of a short-answer question writing rubric.

INTRODUCTION: Short-answer questions (SAQs) are often used to assess pharmacy student competency. However, the literature lacks guidance on SAQ development strategies, resulting in varying practices between SAQ writers. Understanding student and faculty perceptions of what constitutes a high-quality SAQ can identify best practices for SAQ development. METHODS: We surveyed second-year pharmacy students at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) to assess their perceptions of SAQs. Likert-type data were descriptively analyzed, and open-ended responses were analyzed using thematic analysis; we used these results to draft an initial SAQ checklist. We then conducted focus groups of UCSF pharmacy faculty to explore their experiences writing SAQs. Transcripts were analyzed using the survey codebook and de novo codes to generate themes. We used the focus group findings to finalize the checklist. RESULTS: Seventy-five students (82%) completed the survey. Students identified "structure" (organizing into sections/lists) and "content" (clearly delineating student's task) as two ways to improve SAQ quality. Eight faculty participated in focus groups of two to three participants each. Faculty expanded on these previous themes and also identified a new theme, "process." This included peer review of SAQs as well as the iterative process involved in writing the SAQ, model answer, and grading rubric. CONCLUSIONS: Content, structure, and process were the three areas identified for the improvement of SAQ quality at our institution. A checklist outlining best practices in these areas may be best implemented and adopted within the SAQ peer-review process.

Impact of Preventive Strategies on Gastrointestinal Complications in Elderly Patients on Concomitant Use of Oral Anticoagulants and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite growing evidence showing an increased risk of concomitant use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and anticoagulants, few studies have investigated whether proton pump inhibitors can prevent gastrointestinal (GI) complications in patients receiving both NSAIDs and anticoagulants. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the risk of serious GI complications and the impact of GI preventive strategies on the concomitant use of NSAIDs and anticoagulants. METHODS: Our nationwide cohort study using Korea's claims data included elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) who started anticoagulants and NSAIDs from 2016 to 2017. The outcome was serious GI complications defined as hospitalization or emergency department visits with GI bleeding or perforation. A Cox regression analysis was performed using time-dependent variables and propensity score matching. RESULTS: In total, 92,379 patients were identified. Compared with non-prophylaxis, proton pump inhibitors and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors were associated with a 64% [adjusted hazard ratio, 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.25-0.53)] and 74% [adjusted hazard ratio, 0.26 (95% confidence interval 0.19-0.36)] lower risk of serious GI complications, respectively. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor use was not different from the use of non-selective NSAIDs with proton pump inhibitors for the prevention of serious GI complications. H2-receptor antagonists did not reduce the risk of serious GI complications compared with non-prophylaxis during concomitant non-selective NSAID and anticoagulant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Proton pump inhibitors or cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors used as GI preventive strategies did not completely eliminate but lowered the risk of serious GI complications among elderly patients receiving both NSAIDs and anticoagulants.

Comparing the Sensitivities of Measures of Adherence to Antihypertensive Drugs Using Korean National Health Insurance Claims Data.

PURPOSE: Numerous studies have utilized various forms of adherence measures. However, methods for measuring adherence are inconsistent. Moreover, few studies are available that have compared sensitivities of the effects of several criteria on medication adherence. This study aims to compare measures of adherence using varied analytical decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included three measures for adherence: proportion of days covered with one or more medications (PDCwith≥1), duration weighted mean PDC (PDCwm), and daily polypharmacy possession ratio (DPPR). We compared the sensitivities of the measures by changing parameters in the Korean nationwide claims database. First, we used PDCwith≥1 as our base model. Then, we divided an adherence measure algorithm into three categories: (1) definition of data cleaning, (2) inclusion criteria and observation period, and (3) calculation methods of medication adherence. The categories included eight decision nodes that incorporated 25 alternative options. Finally, we assessed the medication adherence for the base-case with commonly used values and then varied to measure with each alternative option. RESULTS: The base-case included 14,288 beneficiaries with antihypertensives. Among eight decisions, both handling an end-date-of-study and overlaps had the strongest impacts on measuring PDCwith≥1, PDCwm, and DPPR, with small differences in sample size. Instead of the estimates of adherence from PDCwm, those of PDCwith≥1 and DPPR were similar. Furthermore, a tendency toward a higher medication adherence was observed with a smaller study population. CONCLUSION: The decisions regarding identifying an end-date-of-study and overlaps showed meaningful impacts of all three measures including PDCwith≥1, PDCwm, and DPPR on measuring medication adherence.

Combining Antidepressants with ß-Blockers: Evidence of a Clinically Significant CYP2D6 Drug Interaction.

BACKGROUND: The ß-blockers and antidepressants are two of the most commonly prescribed drug classes in the United States. Several antidepressants are potent inhibitors of cytochrome P450 2D6 liver enzymes (CYP2D6) and can increase the plasma concentrations of certain ß-blockers when administered concomitantly, potentially leading to serious medical consequences such as hypotension, bradycardia, and falls. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this investigation was to determine whether initiating an antidepressant in patients receiving ß-blockers increased the risk of hemodynamic adverse events. Our primary outcome was time to hospital admissions or emergency department (ED) visits for an International Classification of Diseases-9 diagnosis suggestive of excessive ß-blockade. METHODS: We conducted a survival analysis for adults continuously enrolled in the California Medicaid system (Medi-Cal) between 2004 and 2012. Eligible patients were required to be receiving ß-blocker medications that are primarily CYP2D6 substrates (e.g., metoprolol, propranolol, or carvedilol). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed for patients who concurrently received antidepressants with ß-blockers. An additional multivariable analysis analyzed the association of this combination upon hospitalizations or ED visits for all causes. RESULTS: A total of 21,292 beneficiaries met the inclusion criteria, and 4.3% of patients required hospitalization or ED visits within 30 days of co-medication. In multivariable analysis, patients receiving antidepressants with moderate to strong CYP2D6 inhibitory potential (fluoxetine, paroxetine, duloxetine, or bupropion) had a greater risk for hospitalization or ED visits for hemodynamic events than those initiated on antidepressants with weak CYP2D6 inhibition for 30 days or less when each was compared with patients receiving no antidepressants (hazard ratio [HR] 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.81; p=0.04 vs HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.82-1.88; p=0.30). Other demographic variables associated with increased morbidity included advanced age, male sex, higher ß-blocker doses, and African American race or Hispanic ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this analysis suggest that initiation of certain antidepressants was associated with an increased risk for serious medical sequelae among patients concurrently receiving ß-blockers. Greater risk was observed with antidepressants that potently inhibit the CYP2D6 enzyme, implying that increased morbidity may be mediated by a metabolic drug interaction.

A Mobile Learning Module to Support Interprofessional Knowledge Construction in the Health Professions.

Objective. To develop and evaluate a mobile learning module to support knowledge construction between medical and pharmacy students through structured dialogue prompts. Methods. Rheumatologists and pharmacists collaboratively developed a two-week, case-based, asynchronous interprofessional learning module that was delivered via a mobile app and focused on collaborative medication management of a complex case involving a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. The clinical case evolved over three phases: diagnosis, initial treatment, and medication-related complications. Dialogue prompts were incorporated in each phase as a mechanism to support knowledge construction among learners. Pharmacy and medical student pairs were randomized to receive either high guidance or low guidance prompts for collaborative learning. The student pairs worked together, asynchronously, online, to develop three collaborative care plans. The evaluation of the learning module to support knowledge construction included: analysis of text-based dialogue coded for knowledge construction phases; the accuracy and completeness of the three collaborative care plans; and quantitative and qualitative participant feedback. Results. Sixteen pairs of medical and pharmacy students (n=32) participated. Pairs who received high guidance engaged in all phases of knowledge construction more often than pairs who received low guidance. Guidance phase did not differentially impact collaborative care plan scores. Ninety-eight percent of students agreed or strongly agreed that the module improved their clinical reasoning, interprofessional communication, and knowledge of systemic lupus erythematosus. Conclusion. The knowledge construction framework can guide the design and evaluation of educational interventions such as a mobile learning module to support knowledge construction among health professionals.

A novel online platform promotes asynchronous class preparation and thought transparency.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Engaging all learners with self-directed class preparation materials can be challenging. The purpose of this study is to assess student perceptions of a novel app and web-based program, Practice Improvement using Virtual Online Training (PIVOT) as a preparatory tool in a pharmacy therapeutics course. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: PIVOT was designed to encourage self-directed information gathering, group collaboration, and problem-solving prior to classes. Students accessed PIVOT to obtain patient information and provide responses to questions. A semi-structured large group case discussion, facilitated by the instructor, followed the preparatory assignment. All students were invited to participate in pre-/post-activity online surveys to evaluate their experiences. FINDINGS: One hundred and ten students (92.4%) completed both surveys. Students identified viewing/comparing answers with classmates (73%), enforcing preparation (51%), and asynchronous preparation (51%) as useful aspects of PIVOT. Working with a group (42%) and organizing patient information (32%) were selected as negative aspects of PIVOT. More than half of students preferred not to use PIVOT for class preparation, but 41% of students would like to see PIVOT integrated in their therapeutics courses. SUMMARY: Integrating PIVOT into a pharmacy therapeutics course resulted in mixed student perceptions. Several helpful aspects of this platform were identified and a majority suggested drawbacks that are also common features of actual pharmacy practice. Implementing PIVOT in a different learning context may improve student perceptions.

The association of angiotensin receptor blocker-based combination therapy with persistence and adherence in newly treated, uncomplicated hypertensive patients.

PURPOSE: We compared treatment adherence and persistence during treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)-based single pill combination (SPC) and free equivalent combination (FEC) and between SPCs of an ARB with a thiazide diuretic (TD) and an ARB with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) as initial treatment in uncomplicated hypertensive patients who received pre-packaged medications from the pharmacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Uncomplicated hypertensive patients who started combination treatment consisting of ARB and either TD or CCB were identified from a Korean national claims database. We used propensity score matching to construct two pairs of cohorts: SPC and FEC cohorts (20,175 patients per cohort) and SPC cohorts of ARB + TD and ARB + CCB (45,253 patients per cohort). We compared adherence measured via the medication possession ratio as well as overall 1-year and initial treatment persistence. RESULTS: Compared with the FEC cohort, the SPC cohort had significantly higher medication adherence (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.25-1.37), overall persistence (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.28-1.38), and initial treatment persistence (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.56-1.64). Neither the rate of medication adherence nor the rate of treatment persistence differed significantly between the ARB + TD and ARB + CCB cohorts. However, the ARB + CCB cohort had a significantly higher rate of initial treatment persistence than did the ARB + TD cohort (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.10-1.14). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that, compared with FEC therapy, initiating an ARB-based SPC therapy may increase adherence and persistence in patients with uncomplicated hypertension who also receive pre-packaged medication from the pharmacy. Although using an ARB + CCB SPC may improve initial treatment persistence, it does not increase adherence or overall persistence when compared with an ARB + TD SPC.

A Practical First Step Using Needs Assessment and a Survey Approach to Implementing a Clinical Pharmacogenomics Consult Service.

INTRODUCTION: Genetic-guided selection of non-oncologic medications is not commonly practiced in general, and at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Health, specifically. Understanding the unique position of clinicians with respect to clinical pharmacogenetics (PG) at a specific institution or practice is fundamental for implementing a successful PG consult service. OBJECTIVES: To assess clinicians' current practices, needs, and interests with respect to clinical PG at UCSF Health, a large tertiary academic medical center. METHODS: A list of 42 target medications with clinical PG recommendations was complied. Clinical specialties that routinely used the target medications were identified. A 12-question survey focused on practice of PG for target medications was developed. Pharmacists and physicians were surveyed anonymously in several clinical specialties. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 396 clinicians surveyed, 76 physicians and 59 pharmacists participated, resulting in 27% and 50% average response rates, respectively. The current use of PG in clinical practice for physicians and pharmacists was 29% and 32%, respectively, however this number varied across clinical specialties from 0% to 80%. Of clinicians whom reported they do not currently apply PG, 63% of physicians and 54% of pharmacists expressed interest in integrating PG. However, the level of interest varied from 20% to 100% across specialties. Of the respondents, 64% of physicians and 56% of pharmacists elected to provide contact information to investigators to further discuss their interest related to clinical PG. CONCLUSIONS: While PG is not uniformly practiced at UCSF Health, there is considerable interest in utilizing PG by the respondents. Our approach was successful at identifying clinicians and services interested in PG for specific drug-gene pairs. This work has set a foundation for next steps to advance PG integration at UCSF Health. Clinicians can adopt our approach as preliminary work to build a clinical PG program at their institutions.

Integration of a Community Pharmacy Simulation Program into a Therapeutics Course.

Objective. To demonstrate the feasibility of integrating the computer simulation, MyDispense, into a therapeutics course and to measure its effects on student perception and learning. Methods. We conducted a prospective study with an experimental phase and an implementation phase. In the first phase, students were randomized to complete a therapeutics case using MyDispense or traditional paper methods in class. In the second phase, all students completed two therapeutic cases using MyDispense in class with the option to complete four additional outside-of-class cases using MyDispense. Students completed pre- and post-tests in class and three surveys. Results. In the experimental phase, mean test scores increased from pre- to post-test for both MyDispense and traditional paper groups, but the difference between the groups was not statistically significant. Students in the traditional paper group reported statistically significant gains in confidence compared to the MyDispense group. In the implementation phase, mean test scores again increased, however, student perception of the use of MyDispense for therapeutics was negative. Completing the optional outside-of-class cases, however, was positively and significantly correlated with the midterm and final examination scores. Conclusion. Implementation of MyDispense in therapeutics may be feasible and has positive effects (eg, correlation with exam scores, capacity for immediate feedback, and potential for effective self-study). With short-term use and in the absence of assessment methods that also require seeking information from patients, students prefer to learn via traditional paper cases.

Length of hospitalization and mortality for bleeding during treatment with warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban.

BACKGROUND: Different outcomes among patients hospitalized for bleeding after starting anticoagulation could influence choice of anticoagulant. We compared length of hospitalization, proportion of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions, ICU length of stay, and 30- and 90-day mortality for adults with atrial fibrillation hospitalized for bleeding after starting warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban. METHODS: An US commercial database of 38 million members from 1 November 2010 to 31 March 2014 was used to examine adults with atrial fibrillation hospitalized for bleeding after starting warfarin (2,446), dabigatran (442), or rivaroxaban (256). Outcomes included difference in mean total length of hospitalization, proportion of ICU admissions, mean length of ICU stay, and all-cause 30- and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Warfarin users were older and had more comorbidities. Multivariable regression modeling with propensity score weighting showed warfarin users were hospitalized 2.0 days longer (95% CI 1.8-2.3; p < 0.001) than dabigatran users and 2.6 days longer (95% CI 2.4-2.9; p < 0.001) than rivaroxaban users. Dabigatran users were hospitalized 0.6 days longer (95% CI 0.2-1.0; p = 0.001) than rivaroxaban users. There were no differences in the proportion of ICU admissions. Among ICU admissions, warfarin users stayed 3.0 days (95% CI 1.9-3.9; p < 0.001) longer than dabigatran users and 2.4 days longer (95% CI 0.9-3.7; p = 0.003) than rivaroxaban users. There was no difference in ICU stay between dabigatran and rivaroxaban users. There were no differences in 30- and 90-day all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban and dabigatran were associated with shorter hospitalizations; however, there were no differences in 30- and 90-day mortality. These findings suggest bleeding associated with the newer agents is not more dangerous than bleeding associated with warfarin.