Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi ; 109(1): 7-13, 2018.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30662055

RESUMO

(Objectives) Recently, partial nephrectomy has been recommended for patients with T1 renal cell carcinoma to preserve renal function. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the factors that affect renal function after laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy using cold or warm ischemia. (Patients and methods) We reviewed 105 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy between March 2006 and July 2016. Patients who had a single kidney were excluded. Thirty-nine patients were managed with cold ischemia, and 66 were managed with warm ischemia. Renal function was assessed using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) categories of the stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD). (Results) In the cold and warm ischemia groups, the duration of ischemia was significantly correlated with deterioration of the eGFR at 12 months postoperatively, but the duration of ischemia was not significantly correlated with exacerbation of the GFR categories for the stage of CKD in multivariate analyses. (Conclusions) These results suggest that the ischemia time may not have an impact on prognosis. However, due to the lack of deaths from renal carcinoma or cardiovascular events postoperatively in this study, the influence of each factor on overall survival or cardiovascular events could not be evaluated. More investigations are necessary to discern the acceptable level of deterioration and the corresponding clinical implications for postoperative eGFR.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/fisiopatologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Neoplasias Renais/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Isquemia Quente/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Isquemia Fria/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Isquemia Quente/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Int J Urol ; 19(9): 855-60, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22574713

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between cancer location, resection margins and oncological outcome in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. METHODS: A total of 505 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1993 and 2009 were included in this analysis. Cancer location, resection margins and pathological factors were assessed based on the 2010 General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Studies on Prostate Cancer. Biochemical recurrence was defined as prostate-specific antigen >0.2 ng/mL. RESULTS: Positive resection margins were found in 38.4% of all cases, in 30.3% of pT2 cases and in 57.7% of pT3 cases. The cancer was distributed evenly among the apex-anterior, apex-posterior and middle lesions, which each accounted for approximately 30% of the whole lesion in the main tumor. A higher rate of positive resection margins (47.6%) was found in the apex-anterior lesions. In minor tumors, most cancer was located in the middle lesion and accounted for approximately 60% of the lesion. However, positive resection margins were detected significantly more frequently in the apex-anterior lesion of minor tumors. The 5-year and 10-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rates were 36.2% and 32.0%, respectively, in patients with a positive resection margin, and 82.7% and 77.4%, respectively, in those with a negative resection margin. Cancer location was an independent risk factor for biochemical recurrence and a positive resection margin. Recurrence-free survival was lower in pT2 cases with a positive resection margin compared with pT3 cases with a negative resection margin. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer location and occurrence of positive resection margins can have negative effects on recurrence-free survival. Thus, it is of utmost importance to avoid positive resection margins during radical prostatectomy.


Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/sangue , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/etiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/sangue , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Int J Urol ; 18(12): 813-9, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21995507

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine quality of life (QOL) for 3 years after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) or permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) and to determine differences between the two procedures. METHODS: In all 107 patients who underwent RRP and 91 who received PPB between October 2005 and July 2007 were included in this study. QOL surveys were performed using the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), the Medical Outcome Study 8-items short form health survey and the expanded prostate cancer index composite at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 36 months after treatment. RESULTS: At 3 years, all parameters for general QOL and almost all for disease-specific QOL were similar to those at 12 months. Urinary continence after RRP slightly improved from 12 months to 3 years, but it was still significantly worse than that after PPB. Scores for urinary irritation or obstruction and for bowel function and bother at 3 years were similar between the two groups. Sexual function and bother did not change between 12 months and 3 years in either group. Sexual function at 3 years after RRP was worse than that after PPB. Recovery from urinary incontinence and sexual function after RRP with nerve sparing were similar to those after PPB. Urinary incontinence at 3 years correlated with the treatment method and patients' age, whereas urinary irritation/obstruction and urinary bother correlated with the pre-treatment IPSS. CONCLUSION: QOL assessment represents an important issue in prostate cancer management. Our findings are likely to be of aid in the development of a treatment plan for prostate cancer patients.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Doenças Urológicas/etiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/etiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia
4.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 41(4): 571-6, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21233105

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the rate of Gleason pattern 5 and the influence of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on oncological outcomes. METHODS: Four hundred sixty-six patients underwent a radical prostatectomy between 1993 and 2008. Each surgical specimen was reviewed and assessed for the tumor diameter, Gleason score (which was based on the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference criteria) and the percentage of Gleason pattern 5. RESULTS: The median patient age was 68.0 years old and the median prostate-specific antigen level was 9.28 ng/ml. A tertiary Gleason pattern 5 was present in 24.2% of patients with a Gleason score of <9; in 12.2% of patients with a Gleason score of 3 + 4 and in 45.9% of patients with a Gleason score of 4 + 3. A multivariate analysis showed that a tertiary Gleason pattern 5 was not independently associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival among patients in the Gleason score of 7 and 8 pN0 groups. One hundred eighty-seven patients had any rate of Gleason pattern 5 and significantly worse pathological factors, compared with patients who did not have this pattern. A multivariate analysis of all patients showed that the surgical margin, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen level and pathological stage were all independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. However, the rate of Gleason pattern 5 was not an independent factor. CONCLUSIONS: Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 was not a significant predictive factor for biochemical recurrence. The rate of Gleason pattern 5 was associated with adverse pathological factors.


Assuntos
Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Idoso , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/imunologia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA