RESUMO
ABSTRACT: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) are both conditions defined by immune system dysfunction: one hyperactive, the other hypoactive. Although uncommon, these diseases can coexist in the same individual. This review aims to assess the state of the literature on the relationship between SLE and CVID, particularly when workup for CVID should be considered in individuals with SLE and how CVID in individuals with SLE should be treated.
Assuntos
Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/complicações , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/diagnóstico , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/complicações , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/diagnósticoRESUMO
The interpretation of positive serologic findings in cancer sera remains controversial. Selected antinuclear antibodies (ANAs), such as anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (dsDNA) and anti-Smith, are highly specific for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). On the other hand, the ANA titer is sensitive but not specific for SLE and has been reported in healthy individuals, various infections, other autoimmune diseases and cancer. We report for the first time positive anti-Smith antibody in two patients without lupus in the setting of lung cancer.
RESUMO
AIM: To diagnose the clinical and histologic features that may be associated with or predictive of the need for dilation and dilation related complications; examine the safety of dilation in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). METHODS: The medical records of all patients diagnosed with EoE between January 2002 and July 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Esophageal biopsies were reexamined by an experienced pathologist to confirm the diagnosis (≥ 15 eos/hpf per current guidelines). Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients who did not receive dilation therapy and those who did. Demographics, clinical history, the use of pharmacologic therapy, endoscopic and pathology findings, and the number of biopsies and dilations carried out, if any, and their locations were recorded for each patient. The dilation group was further examined based on the interval between diagnosis and dilation, and whether or not a complication occurred. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were identified with EoE and 22 (36%) of them underwent esophageal dilations for stricture/narrowing. The peak eos/hpf was significantly higher in patients who received a dilation (P = 0.04). Four (18% of pts.) minor complications occurred: deep mucosal tear 1, and small mucosal tears 3. There were no cases of esophageal perforations. Higher peak eos/hpf counts were not associated with increased risk of complications. CONCLUSION: Esophageal dilation appears to be a safe procedure in EoE patients, carrying a low complication rate. No correlation was found between the peak of eosinophil count and complication rate. Complications can occur independently of the histologic features. The long-term outcome of EoE treatment, with or without dilation, needs to be determined.
Assuntos
Dilatação/métodos , Esofagite Eosinofílica/terapia , Estenose Esofágica/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Biópsia , Dilatação/efeitos adversos , Esofagite Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Estenose Esofágica/diagnóstico , Esofagoscopia , Feminino , Florida , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Endoscopists have long awaited advances in the equipment and techniques for cholangiopancreatoscopy. Since the turn of the millennium, endoscopists have witnessed an explosion in the development and refinement of the capabilities of cholangioscopes as they move from being almost exclusive to tertiary care academic settings to a wider range of practices. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies have tested and constructively critiqued the procedure, hoping to increase the success rate of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Many have found significant improvement upon the limitations of radiographic imaging in diagnosing diseases and achieving full clearance of biliary stones. Image quality has improved with a range of features. However, most of these still need to be studied further. The addition of balloon catheters and overtubes has improved stability and access to the biliary ducts, but comes with complications that need to be studied further. SUMMARY: Although we still have improvements to yearn for, the future looks bright. As endoscopists continue their commitment to the promise of direct visualization of the biliary trees and the complementary tools for diagnosis and treatment, we are continuing to raise quality of care for patients with complicated biliary diseases.