Pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes of low-dose nivolumab relative to conventional dose in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: Nivolumab is approved at various doses, including 3 mg/kg, 240 mg and 480 mg flat doses at various dosing intervals. The concept of low-dose immunotherapy is gaining traction in recent years. However, there is a need to better understand the pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes at lower doses. METHODS: Patients were either administered 40 mg flat dose or 3 mg/kg Q2W/Q3W, depending on affordability as per prevailing hospital practice. All patients were hospitalized on day 1 and pharmacokinetic samples were collected at 0, 0.5, 1.0, 6.0, 24.0, 72.0 h and day 14 following administration of the first dose of nivolumab. Plasma nivolumab levels were measured by ELISA. Patients were followed up for response and toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty five patients were included in the study. Fourteen received nivolumab at conventional dose (3 mg/kg), while 11 patients received low-dose (40 mg flat). The geometric means of dose normalized Cmax and AUC0-t were comparable between those who received conventional dose and low-dose of nivolumab (0.28 versus 0.23 µg/mL/mg and 0.0014 versus 0.0011 d/mL respectively). Nineteen patients were evaluable for response. ORR among patients who received conventional dose was 5/11 (45.5%) whereas it was 4/9 (44.4%) in the low-dose cohort. All 14 (100%) patients in conventional dosing group and 7/11 patients (63.64%) in low-dose group had treatment emergent adverse events. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities were observed in 4/14 patients in conventional dose group and none in low-dose group. CONCLUSION: Low-dose nivolumab leads to lower exposure in patients as compared with conventional dose, but low-dose was better tolerated, while response rates were comparable to conventional dose.

Covid Antibody Titers in Cancer Patients Following Vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 Vaccine.

Dr. Vikram GotaCovid-19 has led to significant mortality worldwide, with an increased risk in cancer patients. Vaccination provides significant protection against the infection. The study focuses on the immunogenicity and effectiveness of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in cancer patients within a real-world setting. Blood samples for measuring Covid antibody titers against the receptor binding domain were collected according to a convenient sparse sampling strategy in a real-world setting, with the days of the collection coinciding with their hospital appointment. The antibody titers between different groups were analyzed descriptively. A total of 56 patients were enrolled in the study. There was no apparent effect in antibody titers between patients with solid tumors and hematological malignancies (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 36.80 ± 41.18 vs. 52.02 ± 26.27), among patients who were undergoing chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or local therapy (mean ± SD: 42.50 ± 44.46 vs. 50.06 ± 51.39 vs. 28.70 ± 25.03), and in patients with up to 90 days and more than 90 days' interval between their last treatment and date of vaccination (mean ± SD: 38.96 ± 42.66 vs. 40.51 ± 38.65). Additionally, there were only 2/56 patients with breakthrough infection, which points out the effectiveness of this vaccine in cancer patients. The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine has activity in cancer regardless of the tumor type, type of treatment, or time from the last treatment.

Safety, immunogenecity and effectiveness of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine during the second wave of pandemic in India: a real-world study.

OBJECTIVES: This real-world study was conducted to assess the adverse effects following immunization (AEFI) and immunogenicity of ChAdO×1 nCoV-19 vaccine in terms of neutralising antibody titers and to study the effects of covariates such as age, sex, comorbidities and prior COVID status on these outcomes. Also, the effectiveness of the vaccine based on interval between the two doses was also investigated. METHODS: A total of 512 participants (M/F=274/238) aged 35(18-87) years comprising a mixed population of healthcare workers, other frontline workers and general public were enrolled between March and May 2021. Records for adverse events if any were collected telephonically by following up with participants up to 6 months post first dose and graded as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5. Blood samples for measuring antibody titers against the receptor binding domain (RBD) were collected serially using a convenient sampling strategy up to 6 months after the first dose. Data on breakthrough COVID infection was collected telephonically till December 2021. RESULTS: Incidence of local reactions was higher after first dose at 33.4 % (171/512) compared to those after second dose at 12.9 % (66/512). Commonest side effect observed was injection site pain after the first (87.1 %; 149/171) and second (87.9 %; 56/66) dose respectively. Among systemic reactions, fever was the most common manifestation followed by myalgia and headache. Female sex (p<0⸱001) and age less than 60 years (p<0⸱001) had significantly higher predilection for systemic toxicities. Age ≤60 years (p=0.024) and prior-COVID (p<0.001) were found to be significantly associated with higher antibody titers, however, no association was found between these variables and breakthrough COVID infection. Longer spacing between the doses (≥6 weeks) was found to offer better protection against breakthrough infection compared to a spacing of 4 weeks. All breakthroughs were mild-moderate in severity, not requiring hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine is apparently safe and effective against SARS-CoV-2 virus infection. Prior COVID infection and younger age group achieve higher antibody titers, but no additional protection. Delaying the second dose up to at least 6 weeks is more effective compared to shorter spacing between doses.

Effect of the Pandemic on Quality-of-Life Data Collection in Prostate Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: To understand the difficulties that happen during the quality of life (QoL) data collection in a pandemic and provide measures to overcome them. METHODS: We analyzed the recruitment and follow-up data of patients in one of our ongoing study whose aim was to collect the Adverse drug reactions and QoL (at regular intervals) in prostate cancer patients who were on docetaxel. Before the pandemic, we could enroll 31 patients in the study over four months. We analyzed the difficulties experienced by these patients and consultants in collecting QoL data during the pandemic, especially in situations with limited availability of resources and also where the patients are not technologically advanced. RESULTS: Due to the pandemic, we could not recruit a single new patient into the study. Complete QoL assessments were available in only two patients, and the disease progressed in five patients. QoL assessment was not possible in 19 of 31 enrolled patients. More than 44% of the enrolled patients had difficulty commuting to the hospital despite transport services to hospitals. Due to the risk of acquiring COVID19 infection during traveling to the hospital, follow-ups were affected. CONCLUSION: There should be increased support for novel technologies that can successfully capture and transfer patients' QoL data to the treating consultant.