Local reference and achievable dose levels for vascular and enterostomy access procedures in pediatric interventional radiology.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of radiation quantities delivered in routine practice is an essential responsibility of a pediatric interventional radiology department. OBJECTIVE: To review radiation indices in frequently performed vascular and enterostomy access procedures at a quaternary pediatric hospital to formulate dosimetric reference levels and achievable levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patient demographics, procedure information and quantitative dose metrics over a 2-year period was performed. Dosimetric details for common procedures (central line insertions, gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy insertions and maintenance) were evaluated, correlated with demographic data and stratified across five weight groups (0-5 kg, 5-15 kg, 15-30 kg, 30-50 kg, 50-80 kg). Achievable (50th percentile) and reference (75th percentile) levels with confidence intervals were established for each procedure. RESULTS: Within the evaluation period, 3,165 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Five were classified as device insertions (peripherally inserted central catheter, n=1,145; port-a-catheter, n=321; central venous line, n=285; gastrostomy-tube [G-tube], n=262, and gastrojejunostomy-tube [GJ-tube], n=66), and two were classified as maintenance procedures (G-tube, n=358, and GJ-tube, n=728, checks, exchanges and reinsertions). Representative reference and achievable levels were calculated for each procedure category and weight group. CONCLUSION: This work highlights the creation of local reference and achievable levels for common pediatric interventional procedures. These data establish a dosimetric reference to understand the quantity of radiation routinely applied, allowing for improved relative radiation risk assessment and enriched communication to interventionalists, health care providers, parents and patients.

Cone-beam computed tomography-assisted percutaneous gastrostomy tube insertion in children with challenging anatomy.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy tube insertion is a common procedure in children. An approach using ultrasound and fluoroscopy may not be feasible in patients with challenging anatomy; therefore, advanced techniques or other imaging modalities may be required. OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience using cone-beam computed tomography (CT)-assisted percutaneous gastrostomy insertion in pediatric patients with challenging anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed in children who underwent cone-beam CT-assisted percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy between January 2015 and July 2019. Indications, technique, outcomes, complications, and radiation dose (reference-point air kerma, air kerma area product) were assessed through chart and imaging review. Descriptive statistics only were used. RESULTS: Twenty-seven procedures were attempted in 26 patients. Reasons for utilizing cone-beam CT guidance were high-positioned stomach (n = 10), interposing bowel loops and liver (n = 19), omphalocele (n = 1), severe scoliosis (n = 1), and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (n = 1). Technical success was 85% (23/27). Mean procedure time was 96 min (range 50-131 min). No safe access route into the stomach was encountered in four patients; three were referred for surgical gastrostomy and one had a successful re-attempt. Radiation dose data was obtained from 19 procedures (17 successful) with a total dose in successful procedures ranging from 8.1 to 63.6 mGy (average 26.2 mGy, median 24.9 mGy). The number of cone-beam CT acquisitions per procedure ranged from 1 to 4. Major complication frequency was 11% (3/27) (bleeding, peritonitis, and aspiration pneumonia); minor complication frequency was 3.7% (1/27). CONCLUSION: This study shows that cone-beam CT guidance can be useful for assisting percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy in children with challenging anatomy.

Clinical evaluation of reconstruction and acquisition time for pediatric 18F-FDG brain PET using digital PET/CT.

BACKGROUND: 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) plays an important role in the diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of childhood epilepsy. The selection of appropriate acquisition and reconstruction parameters, however, can be challenging with the introduction of advanced hardware and software functionalities. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the diagnostic performance of a block-sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) tool and reduced effective counts in brain PET/CT for pediatric epilepsy patients on a digital silicon photomultiplier system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 400 sets of brain PET/CT images from 25 pediatric patients (0.5-16 years old) in this retrospective study. Patient images were reconstructed with conventional iterative techniques or BSREM with varied penalization factor (ß), at varied acquisition time (45 s, 90 s, 180 s, 300 s) to simulate reduced count density. Two pediatric nuclear medicine physicians reviewed images in random order - blinded to patient, reconstruction method and imaging time - and scored technical quality (noise, spatial resolution, artifacts), clinical quality (image quality of the cortex, basal ganglia and thalamus) and overall diagnostic satisfaction on a 5-point scale. RESULTS: Reconstruction with BSREM improved quality and clinical scores across all count levels, with the greatest benefits in low-count conditions. Image quality scores were greatest at 300-s acquisition times with ß=500 (overall; noise; artifacts; image quality of the cortex, basal ganglia and thalamus) or ß=200 (spatial resolution). No statistically significant difference in the highest graded reconstruction was observed between imaging at 180 s and 300 s with an appropriately implemented penalization factor (ß=350-500), indicating that a reduction in dose or acquisition time is feasible without reduction in diagnostic satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Clinical evaluation of pediatric 18F-FDG brain PET image quality was shown to be diagnostic at reductions of count density by 40% using BSREM with a penalization factor of ß=350-500. This can be accomplished while maintaining confidence of achieving a diagnostic-quality image.

Dosimetric Feasibility of Cone-Beam CT in Pediatric Image-Guided Retrograde Gastrostomy Tube Insertions.

PURPOSE: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in interventional radiology allows volumetric imaging with open patient access. This work aimed to assess radiation dose metrics of CBCT in simulated image-guided retrograde gastrostomy (IGRG) tube insertions in pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms and to compare them to measured radiation dose metrics obtained using fluoroscopy during clinical IGRG tube insertions in children. METHODS: Radiation dose indices obtained from radiation dose structured reports of fluoroscopic IGRG tube insertions were retrospectively evaluated in a consecutive cohort of 30 children. Dose indices were fractionated into 3 clinical stages for each procedure (planning, insertion, and confirmation). These 3 stages in 30 patients (3 × 30 = 90 patient stages) were compared to dose indices measured from 4 CBCT acquisition protocols acquired in pediatric phantoms. RESULTS: The mean proportion of radiation dose during planning, insertion, and confirmation was 35%, 38% and 27%, with mean reference-point air kerma (range) measured to be 1.0 (0.02-6.0) mGy, 0.9 (0.03-4.1) mGy, and 0.7 (0.04-3.7) mGy, respectively. Cone-beam computed tomography dose varied greatly depending on technical parameters and protocol selection, ranging from 0.7 to 39.3 mGy. In 19% of patient stages, the most dose-sparing CBCT protocol evaluated on phantoms delivered less radiation than the radiation dose indices recorded from patient's fluoroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: From a dosimetric perspective, radiation delivered in CBCT can vary widely, yet can be appreciably low. With appropriate CBCT protocol selection, the radiation dose delivered may be sufficiently low to warrant consideration for use, if clinically needed during difficult IGRG tube insertions, and satisfy the interventionalist's benefit-risk assessment.

Investigating the limit of detectability of a positron emission mammography device: a phantom study.

PURPOSE: A new positron emission mammography (PEM) device (PEM Flex Solo II, Naviscan Inc., San Diego, CA) has recently been introduced and its performance characteristics have been documented. However, no systematic assessment of its limit of detectability has been evaluated. The aim of this work is to investigate the limit of detectability of this new PEM system using a novel, customized breast phantom. METHODS: Two sets of F-18 infused gelatin breast phantoms of varying thicknesses (2, 4, 6, and 8 cm) were constructed with and without (blank) small, shell-less contrast objects (2 mm thick disks) of varying diameters (3-14.5 mm) [volumes: 0.15-3.3 cc] and activity concentration to background ratio (ACR) (2.7-58). For the phantom set with contrast objects, the disks were placed centrally inside the phantoms and both phantom sets were imaged for a period of 10 min on the PEM device. In addition, scans for the 2 and 6 cm phantoms were repeated at different times (0, 90, and 150 min) post phantom construction to evaluate the impact of total activity concentration (count density) on lesion detectability. Each object from each phantom scan was then segmented and placed randomly in a corresponding blank phantom image. The resulting individual images were presented blindly to seven physician observers (two nuclear medicine and five breast imaging radiologists) and scored in a binary fashion (1-correctly identified object, 0-incorrect). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of lesion detectability were calculated and plots of sensitivity versus ACR and lesion diameters for different phantom thicknesses and count density were generated. RESULTS: The overall (mean) detection sensitivity across all variables was 0.68 (95% CI: [0.64, 0.72]) with a corresponding specificity of 0.93 [0.87, 0.98], and diagnostic accuracy of 0.72 [0.70, 0.75]. The smallest detectable object varied strongly as a function of ACR, as sensitivity ranged from 0.36 [0.29, 0.44] for the smallest lesion size (3 mm) to 0.80 [0.75, 0.84] for the largest (14.5 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The detectability performance of this PEM system demonstrated its ability to resolve small objects with low activity concentration ratios which may assist in the identification of early stage breast cancer. The results of this investigation can be used to correlate lesion detectability with tumor size, ACR, count rate, and breast thickness.

Development of a high-performance dual-energy chest imaging system: initial investigation of diagnostic performance.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a newly developed dual-energy (DE) chest radiographic system in comparison to digital radiographic (DR) imaging in the detection and characterization of lung nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An experimental prototype was developed for high-performance DE chest imaging, with total dose equivalent to a single posterior-anterior DR image. Projections at low and high peak kilovoltage were used to decompose DE soft tissue and bone images. A cohort of 55 patients (31 men, 24 women; mean age, 65.6 years) was drawn from an ongoing trial involving patients referred for percutaneous computed tomography-guided biopsy of suspicious lung nodules. DE and DR images were acquired of each patient prior to biopsy. Image quality was assessed by means of human observer tests involving five radiologists independently rating the detection and characterization of lung nodules on a nine-point scale. Results were analyzed in terms of the fraction of cases at or above a given rating, and statistical significance was evaluated using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. Performance was analyzed for all cases pooled as well as by stratification of nodule size, density, lung region, and chest thickness. RESULTS: The studies demonstrated a significant performance advantage for DE imaging compared to DR imaging (P < .001) in the detection and characterization of lung nodules. DE imaging improved the detection of both small and large nodules and exhibited the most significant improvement in regions of the upper lobes, where overlying anatomic noise (ribs and clavicles) are believed to reduce nodule conspicuity on DR imaging. CONCLUSIONS: DE imaging outperformed DR imaging overall, particularly in the detection of small, solid nodules. DE imaging also performed better in regions dominated by anatomic noise, such as the lung apices. The potential for improved nodule detection and characterization at radiation doses equivalent to DR imaging is encouraging and could augment the broader use of DE imaging. Future studies will extend the initial cohort and rating scale tests to a larger cohort evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic analysis and will evaluate DE imaging in comparison and as an adjuvant to low-dose computed tomography.