Diagnosis and management of hidradenitis suppurativa: a review for the emergency clinician.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a complex, chronic skin disease characterised by painful inflammatory nodules, abscesses, dermal tunnels, sinus tracts and fistulae with a predilection for intertriginous skin. HS carries a substantial disease burden due to its prevalence, associated comorbidities and quality of life impacts and is associated with high healthcare resource utilisation. Clarity regarding the prevalence and pathogenesis of HS has led to improved therapies and more patients seeking care in both outpatient and acute care settings, including the emergency department. Emergency medicine providers play a critical role in HS diagnosis, management of acute flares and connection of HS patients with long-term dermatologic care, which can in turn help manage utilisation of acute care resources.

Improvements to emergency department length of stay and user satisfaction after implementation of an integrated consult order.

Objective: Subspecialty consultation in the emergency department (ED) is a vital, albeit time consuming, part of modern medicine. Traditional consultation requires manual paging to initiate communication. Although consult orders through the electronic health record (EHR) may help, they do not facilitate 2-way communication. However, the impact of combining these systems within the EHR is unknown. We estimated the effect of implementing an integrated paging system on ED workflow efficiency and user attitudes. Methods: We integrated a messaging system into order entry at our tertiary care academic ED, such that placing a consult order simultaneously paged the consultant. We measured ED workflow efficiency metrics (length of stay [LOS], consult initiation time) and MD/nurse practitioner (NP)/physician assistant (PA) attitudes (perceived mis-pages, efficiency, and workflow preference) 3 months before and 6 months after the implementation. Results: Six months after implementation, there was 25% use of the new workflow. During the pre-implementation phase, the median time to consult initiation and ED LOS were 150 and 621 minutes, respectively. Implementation of the order was associated with a 15-minute reduction in median time to consult initiation (P < 0.001), and a 52-minute reduction in median ED LOS (P < 0.001). ED MDs/NPs/PAs perceived a reduction in the rate of mis-pages, improved efficiency, and overall preferred the new workflow. Conclusions: We consolidated steps in the ED consult workflow using an integrated consult order, which improved user satisfaction, and reduced consult initiation time and ED LOS for patients requiring a consult at an urban tertiary care ED.

Performance of a bedside C-reactive protein test in the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia in adults with acute cough.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a rapid, bedside whole blood C-reactive protein test as a diagnostic test for pneumonia in adults. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive adults who presented with acute cough (duration < or =3 weeks). A fingerstick blood specimen for C-reactive protein level was obtained. Patients also provided information about demographic characteristics and symptoms. Physical examination findings, diagnoses, and treatments were abstracted from the medical record; illness duration and subsequent office visits were determined with follow-up telephone calls. A clinical prediction rule for pneumonia was calculated for each patient and compared with C-reactive protein levels. RESULTS: Twenty (12%) of the 168 patients in the study had radiographic evidence of pneumonia. Median C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher for patients with pneumonia than in the remaining patients (60 mg/L vs. 9 mg/L, P <0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for C-reactive protein level as a predictor of pneumonia was 0.83. C-reactive protein level and the clinical prediction rule were independently associated with pneumonia, yielding a combined area under the ROC curve of 0.93. C-reactive protein level was not associated with hospitalization or resolution of symptoms. CONCLUSION: C-reactive protein levels could be a valuable addition to clinical prediction rules for pneumonia. A C-reactive protein level > or =100 mg/L might be a useful indication for chest radiography or empiric antibiotic therapy when the diagnosis of pneumonia is in doubt.