Characterizing the Residual SCFE Deformity: Utility of the 45-degree Dunn View.

BACKGROUND: After treatment with in situ stabilization, slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) patients have variable degrees of deformity that can contribute to femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). To evaluate the severity of residual deformity most physicians currently use biplanar radiographs of an anteroposterior pelvis which profiles the lateral head-neck deformity and a frog lateral view which profiles the anterior head-neck deformity. However, the assessment of FAI morphology commonly relies on the 45-degree Dunn view to profile the anterolateral head-neck junction where FAI deformity is maximal. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the magnitude of residual SCFE deformity detected on the frog lateral radiograph to the 45-degree Dunn radiograph. METHODS: A retrospective review of radiographic images of 50 hips (47 patients) diagnosed with SCFE at a single academic institution from 2014 to 2018 was performed. The group included 25 hips evaluated postoperatively after fixation (Group 1) and 25 hips presenting with residual symptomatic SCFE deformity after previous pinning (Group 2). The alpha angle was assessed on both the 45-degree Dunn and frog lateral views for comparison. The modified Southwick slip angle was assessed on the frog lateral view only as a measure of SCFE severity. RESULTS: The Dunn view showed the maximal residual SCFE deformity as measured by the alpha angle in 88% (44/50) of cases. Overall, the mean alpha angle (70.7 degree vs. 60.1 degree, P <0.001) was significantly larger on the Dunn view as compared with frog lateral. Subgroup analysis showed a larger alpha angle on Dunn view compared with frog lateral in both immediate postoperative and residual SCFE deformities as well: Group 1 (69.5 degree vs. 60.9 degree, P <0.001) and Group 2 (71.9 degree vs. 59.3 degree, P <0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with SCFE, the maximal residual deformity of the proximal femur can typically be seen on the 45-degree Dunn view, rather than on the frog lateral view. Our findings suggest the 45-degree Dunn view may be beneficial part of the postoperative assessment of SCFEs to quantify the true maximal deformity present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Patients With Symptomatic Sequelae of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Have Advanced Cartilage Wear at the Time of Surgical Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a common hip problem in children. The resulting deformity can cause impingement similar to cam-type idiopathic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Although there are similarities between FAI and SCFE, deformity patterns, severity, and time of onset of symptoms varies, which may impact management. The purpose of this study was to describe patterns of articular cartilage damage in patients undergoing surgical hip dislocation for sequelae of SCFE in comparison to patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery for primary FAI. METHODS: Patients were identified who underwent surgical treatment for hip pain due to primary FAI (cam type) or sequelae of SCFE. Clinical data and radiographic measurements were recorded. Cartilage was assessed intraoperatively. Severity was classified using the modified Beck classification, while location was classified into 6 sectors. Statistical analysis was performed to test for differences in demographic and radiographic characteristics between the SCFE and FAI patients. χ2 or Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate trends in patterns of acetabular and femoral cartilage wear between SCFE and FAI groups. RESULTS: The SCFE group had 28 hips compared with 304 in the FAI group. SCFE patients were younger (19 vs. 32, P<0.001), had higher body mass index (30±5.9 vs. 24±4.8, P<0.001), and were more often male (61% vs. 27%, P<0.001). Deformity severity based on α-angle was higher in the SCFE group [AP 74 vs. 55 (P=0.001) and Dunn 72 vs. 58 (P<0.001)]. There were no significant differences with regards to lateral center edge angle, anterior center edge angle, or Tonnis angle. In both groups the most common locations for cartilage lesions in both groups were the anterior peripheral and superolateral peripheral regions with fewer but more widely distributed femoral head lesions. The SCFE group had higher rates of femoral head and superolateral central cartilage lesions compared with the FAI group. There was no statistical difference between high-grade femoral or acetabular cartilage lesions between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SCFE were younger at the time of surgery and presented with more severe deformity based on radiographic α-angle compared to patients with FAI. Our results suggest higher prevalence of femoral head lesions and more diffuse cartilage injury in patients with SCFE. This study can be used to support early surgical intervention in patients with symptomatic sequelae of SCFE due to risk of premature joint damage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-prognostic study.