The resolute Onyx in TIA management (ROTIA).

BACKGROUND: First-line treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is medical management; however, interventional approaches are increasingly considered for refractory disease. The Resolute Onyx in TIA management (ROTIA) study is a post-market evaluation of the Resolute Onyx (R-Onyx) drug-eluting stent in the treatment of recurrent transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) due to refractory ICAD (off-label use). METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective case series of consecutive patients who underwent angioplasty and stenting with R-Onyx for treatment of recurrent TIAs due to refractory ICAD from October 2019 to November 2022. Included patients were ages 22-80, had a baseline modified Rankin Scale of ≤2, and had recurrent TIAs attributed to intracranial artery stenosis >70% despite maximal medical therapy. Primary outcomes of interest were peri-procedural complications (TIA, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, mortality) up to 72 h post-stenting and ischemic stroke up to 18 months post-stenting. RESULTS: Twenty patients (mean age 66.84 ± 14; 25% female; 80% Hispanic) were included. A total of 21 stents were successfully deployed with no peri-procedural complications. There were no recurrent ischemic events at 30 days post-stenting. At 18 months post-stenting, there were no ischemic events and no patient exhibited in-stent restenosis. CONCLUSION: ROTIA demonstrates the feasibility of using the Resolute Onyx drug-eluting stent for the management of TIAs due to refractory ICAD, with high technical success and low peri-procedural complications. Limitations include the retrospective and single-center nature of this study. Future prospective, multi-center, randomized trials with extended observation periods are needed.

Prognostic value of androgen receptor expression in different molecular types of breast cancer in women.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a common women's disease. Usually, oestrogen is blamed in the aetiology and correlated with the prognosis; however, androgens are recently raising concern about its role in the breast cancer treatment and prognosis. METHODS: In this study we retrieved archival paraffin blocks of breast cancer patients and stained it for androgen. Thereafter, we compared clinico-epidemiologic parameters, histopathology, neoadjuvant response and recurrence rate and pattern among patients with and without androgen receptor (AR) expression. RESULTS: In total, 119 patients fulfilled enrolment criteria; AR expression were present in 77.3% of the patients. AR expression was associated with less grade III (6.8% versus 36.4%), and less triple negative (6.2% versus 25%), but similar overall recurrence rate (25% versus 22.2%). However, distant recurrence was significantly higher in androgen positive patients (91.3% versus 33.3% of all recurrences). CONCLUSION: Androgen expression appears to be common among breast cancer, but with no clear implication in tumour aggressiveness or effect on the rate of recurrence. However, being commonly associated with distant spread may have an impact on survival of the patients.