Impact of community-level socioeconomic disparities on quality of life after burn injury: A Burn Model Systems Database study.

INTRODUCTION: Individual-level socioeconomic disparities impact burn-related incidence, severity and outcomes. However, the impact of community-level socioeconomic disparities on recovery after burn injury is poorly understood. As a result, we are not yet able to develop individual- and community-specific strategies to optimize recovery. Therefore, we aimed to characterize the association between community-level socioeconomic disparities and long-term, health-related quality of life after burn injury. METHODS: We queried the Burn Model System National Longitudinal Database for participants who were> 14 years with a zip code and who had completed a health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire (VR-12) 6 months after injury. BMS data were deterministically linked by zip code to the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), which combines seven census-derived metrics into a single indicator of economic well-being, education, housing and opportunity at the zip code level. Hierarchical linear models were used to estimate the association between community deprivation and HRQOL 6 months after burn injury, as measured by mental (MCS) and physical (PCS) component summary scores of the SF12/VR12. RESULTS: 342 participants met inclusion criteria. Participants were mostly male (n = 239, 69 %) and had a median age of 48 years (IQR 33-57 years). Median %TBSA was 10 (IQR 3-28). More than one-third of participants (n = 117, 34 %) lived in a community within the highest two distress quintiles. After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, number of trips to the operating room (OR) and pre-injury PCS, neighbourhood distress was negatively associated with 6-month PCS (ß-0.05, 95 % CI [-0.09,-0.01]). Increasing age and lower pre-injury PCS were also negatively associated with 6-month PCS. There was no observed association between neighbourhood distress and 6-month MCS after adjustment for age, participant race/ethnicity, number of trips to the OR and pre-injury MCS. Higher pre-injury MCS was associated with 6-month MCS (ß0.54, 95 % CI [-0.41,0.67]). CONCLUSIONS: Community distress is associated with lower PCS at 6 months after burn injury but no association with MCS was identified. Pre-injury HRQOL is associated with both PCS and MCS after injury. Further study of the factors underlying the relationship between community distress and physical functional recovery (e.g., access to rehabilitation services, availability of adaptations) is required to identify potential interventions.

Temperature Sensitivity After Burn Injury: A Burn Model System National Database Hot Topic.

People living with burn injury often report temperature sensitivity. However, its epidemiology and associations with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are unknown. We aimed to characterize temperature sensitivity and determine its impact on HRQOL to inform patient education after recovery from burn injury. We used the multicenter, longitudinal Burn Model System National Database to assess temperature sensitivity at 6, 12, and 24 months after burn injury. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests determined differences in patient and injury characteristics. Multivariable, multilevel generalized linear regression models determined the association of temperature sensitivity with Satisfaction with Life (SWL) scale scores and Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) physical and mental health summary component (MCS) scores. The cohort comprised 637 participants. Two thirds (66%) experienced temperature sensitivity. They had larger burns (12% TBSA, interquartile range [IQR] 4-30 vs 5% TBSA, IQR 2-15; P < .0001), required more grafting (5% TBSA, IQR 1-19 vs 2% TBSA, IQR 0-6; P < .0001), and had higher intensity of pruritus at discharge (11% severe vs 5% severe; P = .002). After adjusting for confounding variables, temperature sensitivity was strongly associated with lower SWL (odds ratio [OR] -3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.2, -1.1) and MCS (OR -4.0, 95% CI -6.9, -1.2) at 6 months. Temperature sensitivity decreased over time (43% at discharge, 4% at 24 months) and was not associated with poorer HRQOL at 12 and 24 months. Temperature sensitivity is common after burn injury and associated with worse SWL and MCS during the first year after injury. However, temperature sensitivity seems to improve and be less intrusive over time.

Impact of the affordable care act's medicaid expansion on burn outcomes and disposition.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the impact of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid Expansion on clinical outcomes and patient disposition after burn injury. We hypothesized that increased insurance coverage results in improved outcomes and higher rates of discharge to inpatient rehabilitation. METHODS: We reviewed the University of Washington Regional Burn Center registry data for patients admitted from 2011 to 2018. Patients were grouped into two categories: before (2011-2013) and after (2015-2018) Medicaid expansion; we excluded 2014 data to serve as a washout period. Outcomes assessed included length of hospital stay, patient disposition, and mortality. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models with covariates for sex, age, burn size, ethnicity ethnicity, distance from burn center, etiology of burn, and presence of inhalation injury were used to determine the impact of Medicaid expansion on outcomes. RESULTS: Rates of uninsured patients decreased while Medicaid coverage increased. Despite increased median burn size after Medicaid expansion, inpatient mortality rates did not change, but average acute care length of stay increased. More patients were discharged to rehabilitation centers. CONCLUSIONS: Our study corroborates prior findings of increased insurance coverage since Medicaid expansion. Increased insurance coverage is associated with higher rates of discharge to inpatient rehabilitation programs after burn injury.

Burn survivors' perception of recovery after injury: A Northwest Regional Burn Model System investigation.

INTRODUCTION: Previous reports suggest that many factors impact recovery from burn injury. To improve our understanding of these factors, we queried adult burn survivors using a mixed method design during the first year after injury. METHODS: An anonymous, 2-page survey was developed and administered to adult burn survivors during routine outpatient clinic follow-up visits at a regional burn center. Participants rated issues of concern and their impacts on return to pre-burn activity levels. Both quantitative and qualitative data were obtained. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze quantitative data and thematic analysis was used to identify, analyze and report patterns from open-ended responses. RESULTS: Over seven months in 2016, 187 patients completed the anonymous survey. Study participants were predominantly male, white, and non-Hispanic. Participants who had not yet returned to pre-burn function reported worse outcomes for all issues queried compared to those who had. Burn survivors from racial and ethnic minority groups reported greater difficulty with accessing medical care and information about their injury as well as higher levels of self-identified posttraumatic stress, issues related to appearance and concerns for loss of strength. Several themes and sub-themes were identified that had both negative and positive impact on early recovery. Such themes included: healing process, psychological recovery and emotional health, and community reintegration/employment. CONCLUSIONS: Several themes from responses provided insight into challenges as well as key support systems during the first year of recovery after injury. Collectively, these findings can be used to direct clinical outpatient care, patient education and psychosocial support services.

The Effects of Early Neuropathic Pain Control With Gabapentin on Long-Term Chronic Pain and Itch in Burn Patients.

Gabapentin has analgesic efficacy for neuropathic pain and is increasingly used in burn care. This study investigated the effect of a neuropathic pain control protocol, as well as early gabapentin initiation (<72 hours from injury) on total inpatient opioid use, chronic pain, and itch. This is a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients over age 14 admitted between 2006 and 2016 with burns. They compared patients who did not receive gabapentin with those who had early gabapentin initiation vs late initiation. They also compared patients who used gabapentin before initiation of a neuropathic pain protocol (February 2015) to those after. Primary outcomes were total inpatient gabapentin, morphine equivalent dose (MED), longitudinal pain and itch, as well as SF-12v2® Health Survey mental and physical component summary (MCS/PCS) at discharge, 6, 12, and 24 months postinjury. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to examine pain and itch scores. Linear regression models examined MCS and PCS between groups. Models were adjusted for age, sex, TBSA burned, area grafted, MED, and ICU stay. There was no significant difference in MED with early initiation, yet inpatient gabapentin use increased from 43.9 to 59.5 g (P < .001) with late initiation. The neuropathic pain protocol did not significantly change total gabapentin use (P = .184) in patients receiving gabapentin but decreased opioid use from 58.1 to 17.4 g MED (P = .008). Their results suggest that neither early gabapentin nor its use in a standardized neuropathic pain protocol improves long-term pain, itch, PCS, or MCS.