Cost-effectiveness of dietary supplement ingredients versus generic statins for LDL reduction.

Background: While statin therapy is the preferred treatment for hyperlipidemia, literature supports the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) lowering effects associated with red yeast rice, berberine, and Silybum marianum. Dietary supplements may be perceived as a more affordable alternative to prescription medication. Objective: We determined cost-effectiveness of generic pravastatin versus single-ingredient dietary supplements in relation to LDL lowering effect. Methods: Data from meta-analyses and systematic reviews was extracted to calculate pooled weighted mean LDL differences amongst generic pravastatin and single ingredient dietary supplements. The effect was then divided by average 30-day costs and compared amongst agents. Results: The greatest difference was seen in pravastatin 40 mg [MD -57.88 mg/dL (95%CI: - 64.80 to -50.96)], followed by pravastatin 10 mg [MD -41.30 mg/dL (95%CI: 63.30 to - 19.40)], red yeast rice [MD -25.39 (95%CI: -32.98 to -17.81)], berberine [MD -15.13 (95%CI: -21.78 to -8.48)], and Silybum marianum [MD -9.51 mg/dL (95%CI: -22.13 to - 0.10)]. were divided by mean difference to calculate cost per mg/dL reduction in LDL. Cost-effectiveness was greatest for pravastatin 10 mg [$0.66/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.39 to $1.13)], followed by pravastatin 40 mg [$0.74/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.66 to $0.84)], berberine [$0.81/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.56 to $1.44)], red yeast rice [$0.84/mg/dL reduction (range: $0.67 to $1.13)], and Silybum marianum [$0.88/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.38 to $82.02)]. Conclusion: Pravastatin is most cost-effective in each scenario whether or not prescription insurance is utilized.

Impact of Berberine or Berberine Combination Products on Lipoprotein, Triglyceride and Biological Safety Marker Concentrations in Patients with Hyperlipidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Monoclonal antibody Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors reduce total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoproteins (LDL), high density lipoproteins (HDL), and triglycerides (TG). We assessed the ability of berberine, a natural PCSK9 inhibitor, to reduce lipid concentrations either alone or combined with other nutraceuticals. We searched PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE from inception to September 30th, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing 8-18 wk of berberine therapy on. A total of 41 RCTs with 4,838 patients met our inclusion criteria. Berberine containing products significantly reduced TC (MD -17.42 mg/dL [95%CI: -22.91 to -11.93]), LDL (MD -14.98 mg/dL [95%CI: -20.67 to -9.28]), and TG (MD -18.67 mg/dL [95%CI: -25.82 to -11.51]) while raising HDL (MD 1.97 mg/dL [95%CI: 1.16 to 2.78]) versus control (I2 > 72% for all analyses). Products with berberine alone had less robust effects on TC (MD -12.08 mg/dL [95%CI: -21.79 to -2.37]), LDL (MD -9.26 mg/dL [95%CI: -20.31 to 1.78]), and HDL (MD 1.38 mg/dL [95%CI: -1.27 to 4.03]) but TG effects were similar (MD -17.40 mg/dL [95%CI: -32.57 to -2.23]). Berberine along with red yeast rice reduced TC (MD -19.62 mg/dL [95%CI: -28.56 to -10.68]) and LDL (MD -18.79 mg/dL [95%CI: -28.03 to -9.54]) as did combination therapy with Silybum maranium for TC (MD -31.81 mg/dL [95%CI: -59.88 to -3.73]) and LDL (MD -30.82 mg/dL [95%CI: -56.48 to -5.16]). Berberine, alone or with other nutraceuticals, can provide a modest positive impact on lipid concentrations.

The impact of psychedelics on patients with alcohol use disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Critique the available systematic review and de novo assessment of the role of psychedelics in the treatment of alcohol use disorder. METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed was completed from 1960 to 9/9/2023. We pooled randomized controlled trials comparing psychedelics to control therapy for the treatment of alcohol use disorder. RESULTS: At the first recorded follow-up, LSD [n = 3, Odds Ratio (OR) 1.99 (95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.10 to 3.61)] and any psychedelic [n = 4, OR 2.16 (95%CI: 1.26 to 3.69)] enhanced the odds of patients achieving abstinence or a substantial reduction in drinking alcohol versus placebo in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. When the inclusion criteria were relaxed to include controlled trials without double-blinding or placebo control, LSD [n = 5, OR 1.79 (95%CI: 1.36 to 2.34)] and any psychedelic therapy [n = 6, OR 1.89 (95%CI: 1.42 to 2.50)] still enhanced the odds of patients achieving abstinence or a substantial reduction in drinking alcohol. Four of 6 trials had high risk of bias and other methodological issues. One trial found an instance of suicidal ideation as well as transient increases in blood pressure that requires further exploration before the balance of benefits to harms can be determined. CONCLUSIONS: The use of psychedelics to treat alcohol use disorder is promising, but the weaknesses in the literature base preclude making definitive statements about its value. Future trials with greater methodological rigor are needed.

Lysergic acid diethylamine (LSD) and psilocybin (hallucinogenic mushrooms) are psychedelics that have been studied in patients with alcohol use disorder (chronic issue with heavy or problem drinking). When all the studies are pooled together in a meta-analysis, the odds of being able to refrain from drinking alcohol or to substantially reduce the amount of alcohol consumed was enhanced by 89%. This is a promising finding that if bore out in additional studies, especially those with higher study quality, would be a major advance in patients with alcohol use disorder. We cannot make more definitive conclusions because all the LSD studies were published between 1966 and 1970 which may not reflect contemporary practice and most of the studies had methodological weaknesses that reduce confidence in the studies to prove the benefits. It is heartening that the single psilocybin trial from 2022 was of higher methodological quality, reflected contemporary practice, and still showed positive effects.

The Impact of Ketamine for Treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses.

BACKGROUND: Ketamine has been used in anesthesia, pain management, and major depressive disorder. It has recently been studied in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of ketamine on PTSD symptomatology and depression scores. METHODS: We conducted a literature search of Medline 1960 to May 20, 2023, and found 6 randomized controlled trials that met our inclusion criteria. We extracted data on the Clinician-Administered PTSD (CAPS), PTSD Checklist (PCL), or Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating (MADRS) scales. RESULTS: The use of ketamine significantly reduced CAPS scores (n = 5, MD: -10.63 [95% CI -14.95 to -6.32]), PCL scores (n = 3, MD: -6.13 [95% CI -8.61 to -3.64]), and MADRS scores (n = 3, MD: -6.33 [95% CI -8.97 to -3.69]) at the maximal follow-up times versus control. Significant benefits were found at day 1 and weeks 1, 2, and 4 for CAPS and PCL scores as well as MADRS scores at day 1, week 1, and week 4 for ketamine versus control. The time to PTSD relapse was prolonged in the patients receiving ketamine versus control (n = 2, 15.74 days [95% CI 3.57 to 29.91 days]). More dry mouth (n = 2, OR 5.85 [95% CI 1.32 to 25.95]), dizziness (n = 2, OR 3.83 [95% CI 1.28 to 11.41]), and blurred vision (n = 2, OR 7.57 [1.00 to 57.10]) occurred with ketamine than control therapy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Ketamine modestly reduced PTSD and depression scores as early as 1 day of therapy, but the longevity of effect needs to be determined. Given similar magnitude of benefit with SSRIs and venlafaxine, ketamine would not supplant these traditional options for chronic use.

The Impact of Psychedelic Drugs on Anxiety and Depression in Advanced Cancer or other Life-threatening Disease: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Life-threatening cancer or other diseases can induce anxiety and depressive symptoms. We performed a systematic review with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials assessing patients with cancer or other life-threatening diseases using validated anxiety and depression scales. METHODS: PubMed was searched up to November 15, 2022 and citations were applied to prespecified inclusion criteria. Disease rating scales for anxiety or depression included the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (STAI Trait [STAI-T], STAI-State [STAI-S]), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (HADS-Anxiety [HADS-A]; HADS-Depression [HADS-D]), Profile of Mood States (POMS), and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D or GRID-HAM-D-17). Safety outcomes included assessments of blood pressure and heart rate. RESULTS: Five trials, predominantly in cancer patients, had data assessing anxiety and depressive symptoms. These trials found promising results for psychedelics versus placebo in several anxiety and depression scales but increases in blood pressure and heart rate also occurred. There were some concerns of risk of bias because it is difficult to truly randomize a psychedelic trial and there was a high percentage of patients in the trials who had used psychedelics in the past. There was high heterogeneity for all analyses that we could not explain. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results are promising, future trials are needed to assess the optimal psychedelic, dose, number of sessions required, and how psychedelic naïve patients would respond both psychologically and hemodynamically before this therapy can be considered for widescale clinical use.

MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy for Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

This article discusses current literature on the use of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). MDMA, the intended active ingredient in illicit Ecstasy or Molly products, is a psychedelic that causes an elevated mood, feeling of bonding, and increased energy. In MDMA-assisted psychotherapy, patients are subjected to 2 or 3 multihour sessions of therapy with a team of psychiatrists. The dosing of MDMA is used to allow the therapist to probe the underlying trauma without causing emotional distress. The use of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy treatment reduced patient's Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) scores from baseline more than control psychotherapy (-22.03; 95%CI, -38.53 to -5.52) but with high statistical heterogeneity. MDMA-assisted psychotherapy enhanced the achievement of clinically significant reductions in CAPS scores (relative risk, 3.65; 95%CI, 2.39-5.57) and CAPS score reductions sufficient to no longer meet the definition of PTSD (relative risk, 2.10; 95%CI, 1.37-3.21) with no detected statistical heterogeneity. While therapy was generally safe and well tolerated, bruxism, anxiety, jitteriness, headache, and nausea are commonly reported. While MDMA-assisted psychotherapy has been shown to be an effective therapy for patients with PTSD with a reasonable safety profile, use of unregulated MDMA or use in the absence of a strongly controlled psychotherapeutic environment has considerable risks.

Impact of Interferons and Biological Drug Inhibitors of IL-2 and IL-6 on Small-Molecule Drug Metabolism Through the Cytochrome P450 System.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the impact of interferons and interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-6 inhibitors on cytochrome P450 (CYP) drug metabolism in human subjects. DATA SOURCES: PubMed search from 1980 to March 31, 2021, limited to human subjects and English language via search strategy: (biological drug names) [AND] (cytochrome [OR] CYP metabolism). STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Narrative review of human studies assessing biological drugs in select classes that affect CYP drug metabolism. DATA SYNTHESIS: Exogenous interferons suppress CYP1A2 (theophylline, caffeine, antipyrone) clearance by 20% to 49% in patients; have minimal impact on CYP3A4 (midazolam and dapsone), CYP2C9 (tolbutamide), or CYP2C19 (mephenytoin) metabolism; and increase CYP2D6 (debrisoquine, dextromethorphan) metabolism. Biological IL-2 inhibitors (basiliximab, daclizumab) have no effect on metabolism via CYP1A2 (caffeine), CYP2C9 (s-warfarin), CYP2C19 (omeprazole), CYP2D6 (dextromethorphan), and CYP3A4 (midazolam, tacrolimus) but may enhance CYP3A4 (cyclosporin) metabolism over time. IL-6 inhibitors (sirukumab, tocilizumab, sarilumab) significantly enhance metabolism via CYP2C9 (s-warfarin), CYP2C19 (omeprazole), and CYP3A4 (simvastatin, midazolam) and reduce metabolism via CYP1A2 (caffeine). RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Patients using interferons, IL-2, or IL-6 blocking drugs at steady state with CYP substrates could have altered drug metabolism and experience adverse events. With interferons and biological anti-inflammatory drugs, some isoenzymes will be inhibited, whereas others will be enhanced, and the magnitude of the effect can sometimes be significant. In clinical practice, clinicians may consider these metabolic changes as an additive effect to a patient's entire disease and medication profile when determining risk/benefit of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Interferon therapy or inflammatory suppression via IL-2 or IL-6 can alter steady-state concentrations of CYP-metabolized small-molecule drugs.