[Parenchymal complications of the transplanted kidney: the role of color-Doppler imaging]. / Le complicanze parenchimali del rene trapiantato: il ruolo dell'eco-color-Doppler.

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease, given the better quality of life of transplanted patients when compared to patients on maintenance dialysis. In spite of surgical improvements and new immunosuppressive regimens, part of the transplanted grafts still develop chronic dysfunction. Ultrasonography, both in B-mode and with Doppler ultrasound, is an important diagnostic tool in case of clinical conditions which might impair kidney function. Even though ultrasonography is considered fundamental in the diagnosis of vascular and surgical complications of the transplanted kidney, its role is not fully understood in case of parenchymal complications of the graft. The specificity of Doppler ultrasound is low both in case of acute complications such as acute tubular necrosis, drug toxicity and acute rejection, and in case of chronic conditions such as chronic allograft nephropathy. Single determinations of resistance indices present low diagnostic accuracy, which is higher in case of successive measurements performed during the follow-up of the graft. Modern techniques including tissue pulsatility index, maximal fractional area and contrast-enhanced ultrasound increase the diagnostic power of ultrasonography in case of parenchymal complications of the transplanted kidney.

Diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in kidney transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic imaging of acute pyelonephritis (APN) in renal transplanted patients is an important clinical issue. While conventional ultrasonography (US) has a limited diagnostic role, contrast-enhanced computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represent the gold standard diagnostic tests. However, nephrotoxicity of either iodinated or paramagnetic contrast medium limits their use, especially in patients with kidney disease. Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) may detect poorly perfused parenchymal renal areas, a useful feature in the diagnosis of APN. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of CEUS in APN compared with MRI as the reference test. METHODS: From a pool of 389 kidney transplant patients, we prospectively recruited 56 patients with clinical suspicion of APN of the transplanted kidney. They underwent both CEUS and MRI, performed in a blinded manner by two different operators. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, and K statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-seven out of 56 patients (66.1%) resulted positive for APN with the reference test, gadolinium-enhanced MRI. Thirty-five out of these 37 patients showed positive results for APN with CEUS, and 19 patients showed negative results for APN with both MRI and CEUS: sensitivity 95% (CI 82-99), specificity 100% (CI 83-100), accuracy 96% (CI 88-99), positive predictive value 100% (CI 90-100), negative predictive value 90% (CI 71-97) and K statistics 0.92 (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest, for the first time, the feasibility of CEUS, a low-cost and low-risk diagnostic procedure, in the diagnosis of APN in kidney transplant patients.

Molecular epidemiology of a hepatitis C virus outbreak in a hemodialysis unit in Italy.

Hemodialysis patients are at increased risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The aim of this study was to investigate a HCV outbreak in a hemodialysis unit using epidemiological and molecular methods. Between April 2003 and October 2003, anti-HCV seronconversion was detected in four patients attending the unit. These cases were added to 10 patients already anti-HCV positive upon admission in the unit. All 14 anti-HCV patients were tested for HCV RNA and HCV genotype. NS5B and HVR1/ E2 genomic regions were amplified and sequenced in all HCV RNA positive patients and phylogenetic analysis was performed. Furthermore, clinical-epidemiological records obtained from all patients were examined. All four patients newly infected harbored genotype 2c. Genotype 2c was also detected in 2 of 10 patients already anti-HCV positive upon admission. Phylogenetic analysis showed that all newly HCV infected patients harbored very closely related viral isolates that clustered together with the 2c isolate found in one of the two 2c chronic infected patients. All HCV-2c infected patients had no other risk factors except hemodialysis. Three of four newly HCV-2c infected patients and the one HCV-2c chronically infected involved in the outbreak received dialysis on the same day and same shift but used different machines. The remaining HCV-2c newly infected patient and one of the above cited three received dialysis on the same day during different shifts but used the same machine. The outbreak was probably due to breaks of infection control procedures although a related-machine transmission cannot be excluded in one of the cases.