RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Limb-salvage surgery involving the utilization of endoprosthetic replacements is commonly employed following segmental bone resection for primary and secondary bone tumors. This study aimed to evaluate whether a fully porous bridging collar promotes early osseous integration in endoprosthetic replacements. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective review of all lower-limb endoprostheses utilizing a fully porous endosteal bridging collar design. We matched this cohort with a conventional extra-osteal non-porous fully hydroxyapatite-coated grooved collar cohort according to surgical indication, implant type, resection length, age, and follow-up time. At 6, 12, and 24 months post-implantation, radiographs were assessed for the number of cortices with or without osseointegration on orthogonal radiographs. Each radiograph was scored on a scale of -4 to + 4 for the number of cortices bridging the ongrowth between the bone and the collar of the prosthesis. Implant survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the mean number of osseointegrated cortices at each time point between the collar designs was compared using a paired t-test. RESULTS: Ninety patients were retrospectively identified and analyzed. After exclusion, 40 patients with porous bridging collars matched with 40 patients with conventional extra-osteal non-porous collars were included in the study (n = 80). The mean age was 63.4 years (range 16-91 years); there were 37 males and 43 females. The groups showed no difference in implant survival (P = 0.54). The mean number of cortices with radiographic ongrowth for the porous bridging collar and non-porous collar groups was 2.1 and 0.3, respectively, at 6-month (P < 0.0001), 2.4 and 0.5, respectively, at 12-month (P = 0.044), and 3.2 and -0.2, respectively, at 24-month (P = 0.18) radiological follow-up. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that fully porous bridging collars increased the number of cortices, with evidence of bone ongrowth between 6 and 24 months post-implantation. By contrast, extra-osteal collars exhibited reduced evidence of ongrowth between 6 and 24 months post-implantation. In the medium term, the use of a fully porous bridging collar may translate to a reduced incidence of aseptic loosening.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Due to minimal tissue violation in percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB), in contrast to open biopsy, the risk of tumor seeding and subsequent local recurrence (LR) along the biopsy tract remains unclear in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS). This study sought to examine the association of CNB tract resection on LR in a large STS institutional database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a retrospective review of the 116 patients who underwent CNB prior to surgery for previously untreated non-metastatic extremity STS, 36 patients who did not have CNB tracts resected (CNB-NR) were matched with 36 who had CNB tracts resected (CNB-R) for the factors that are known to affect LR. RESULTS: Two patients (6%) developed LR in the CNB-R group, whereas three patients (8%) developed LR in the CNB-NR group (P = 0.643). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no significant difference in LR-free survival between the two groups (94.3% ± 3.9 for the CNB-R group vs. 93.8% ± 4.3 for the CNB-NR group, P = 0.747). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest any influence of a CNB tract resection on LR, within the limitations of this study, is likely to be of minor clinical importance in extremity STS. Although it would be prudent to resect the CNB tract in most cases, not resecting the CNB tract is a feasible option if identification or removal of the CNB tract proves difficult.