Advanced practice providers and children's hospital-based pediatric otolarynology practices.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced practice providers (APPs), including nurse practitioners and physician assistants, have been deployed in children's hospital-based academic pediatric otolaryngology practices for many years. However, this relationship in terms of prevalence, roles, financial consequences and satisfaction has not been examined. The objective of this study is to explore how APPs impact healthcare delivery in this setting. METHODS: Pediatric otolaryngology chiefs of all academic children's hospitals in the US were electronically surveyed about the ways APPs intersected clinically and financially in their respective practice. RESULTS: A total of 29 of 36 children's hospital-based pediatric otolaryngology practices completed the survey, of which 26 practices (90%) utilized APP. There were large variances within the APP practice cohort in faculty size (mean/median/range = 9.4/8.5/3-29); annual patient visits (mean/median = 18,373/17,600); number of practice site (mean/median/range = 4.3/4/2-9) and number of outpatient APP (mean/median/range = 6.3/5/1-30). No factors (faculty size, annual visits and number of practice sites) differentiated between the APP and non-APP practices. Among APP practices, significant correlation (p<.00001) was observed between size of APP cohort to faculty size and annual visits. 69% of the practices did not differentiate job functions of nurse practitioners and physician assistants. 85% of the practices utilized APPs in all practice sites and 19% utilized APPs in the operating room. 77% of APPs billed independently and 46% had on-site supervision. The most prevalent APP salary bracket based on 0-5, 6-10 and > 11 years of tenure were $76-100K (65%), $100-150K (77%) and $100-150K (86%), respectively. In 46% of the practices, APPs were able to generate enough revenue to cover more than 75% of their salary and 23% of practices generated a profit. 81% of the chiefs ranked the effectiveness of APPs as high (4 and 5) on a 5-point Likert scale. DISCUSSION: The majority of academic pediatric otolaryngology practices employed APPs. Despite the diversity seen in practice complexity, APP functionality and financial impact, most found the APP model to be beneficial in improving patient care, patient access and faculty productivity.

A phenotypic assessment tool for craniofacial microsomia.

BACKGROUND: Craniofacial microsomia is one of the most common conditions treated by craniofacial teams. However, research regarding the cause of this condition or the surgical outcomes of treatment is scant. This is attributable to the lack of diagnostic criteria and the wide phenotypic spectrum. Standardized description of the craniofacial malformations associated with craniofacial microsomia is a necessary first step for multicenter, interdisciplinary research into this complex condition. METHODS: The authors used the previously published pictorial Orbit, Mandible, Ear, Nerve, and Soft tissue-Plus classification scheme to assign a phenotypic severity score to patients with craniofacial microsomia treated at the Craniofacial Center at Seattle Children's Hospital. The authors modified the tool based on feedback from multidisciplinary focus groups. The authors also developed a standardized photographic protocol to facilitate assessment of patients using two-dimensional images. RESULTS: Feedback from focus groups was synthesized to create a phenotypic assessment tool for craniofacial microsomia based on the pictorial Orbit, Mandible, Ear, Nerve, and Soft tissue-Plus classification system. This tool allows for more comprehensive description of the phenotype of craniofacial microsomia and is found to be effective for clinical use within a multidisciplinary craniofacial team. In addition, the photographic protocol for patients with craniofacial microsomia allows for classification from a two-dimensional photographic database, thereby facilitating research using archived photographs. CONCLUSIONS: The phenotypic assessment tool for craniofacial microsomia protocol provides a simple and standardized method for practitioners and researchers to classify patients with craniofacial microsomia. We anticipate that this tool can be used in multicenter investigational studies to evaluate the cause of this condition, its natural history, and comparative effectiveness research.