RESUMO
We present three new and six published infants with overlapping features of LUMBAR syndrome (lower body hemangioma, urogenital anomalies, spinal cord malformations, bony deformities, anorectal/arterial anomalies and renal anomalies) and OEIS complex (omphalocele, exstrophy, imperforate anus, and spinal defects), also known as cloacal exstrophy. OEIS is included under the recently proposed umbrella coined recurrent constellations of embryonic malformations (RCEMs). The RCEMs represent a phenotypically overlapping spectrum of rare disorders of caudal dysgenesis with unknown cause but likely shared pathogenesis. It has recently been proposed that LUMBAR be considered an RCEM. This report of infants with combined features of OEIS and LUMBAR is the first to demonstrate an overlap between LUMBAR and another RCEM, which supports LUMBAR's inclusion within the RCEM spectrum.
Assuntos
Anormalidades Múltiplas , Anus Imperfurado , Humanos , Anus Imperfurado/genética , Anus Imperfurado/patologia , Anus Imperfurado/diagnóstico , Anormalidades Múltiplas/genética , Anormalidades Múltiplas/patologia , Anormalidades Múltiplas/diagnóstico , Feminino , Masculino , Recém-Nascido , Anormalidades Urogenitais/genética , Anormalidades Urogenitais/diagnóstico , Anormalidades Urogenitais/patologia , Hérnia Umbilical/diagnóstico , Hérnia Umbilical/patologia , Lactente , Síndrome , Cloaca/anormalidades , Cloaca/patologia , Hemangioma/patologia , Hemangioma/diagnóstico , Hemangioma/genética , Fenótipo , Coluna Vertebral/anormalidades , Coluna Vertebral/patologia , Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , EscolioseRESUMO
STUDY QUESTION: Are donor-conceived people (DCP) willing to utilize donor gametes themselves if unable to conceive spontaneously? SUMMARY ANSWER: The majority of DCP would consider or are undecided about utilizing donor gametes and those who would consider the utilization are more likely to have been told about their donor-conceived origins at a young age by a family member and have overall positive experiences as a DCP. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: DCP view their donor conception as an important part of their self-identity and many desire contact with genetically related individuals. Additionally, many believe that sperm donation should only be practiced if identifying information on the donor is provided. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a cross-sectional study using a Web-based survey that was disseminated from 6 March to 15 August 2021. A total of 528 participants completed the questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The researcher-created survey was sent to registered users of the Donor Sibling Registry (DSR) who were conceived via donor-assisted reproduction and were 18 years of age or older. The survey was optional and anonymous, and the main outcome measure was the willingness to use donated gametes if unable to spontaneously conceive. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Of the 528 participants who completed the survey, 40.2% (212/528) have or would consider using donor gametes themselves if unable to conceive spontaneously and 24.6% (130/528) were undecided. Those who had used or were undecided about the utilization were significantly younger (26 years vs. 31 years, P < 0.001) and less likely to be married (32.7% vs. 47.3%, P < 0.001) than those who would not consider using donor gametes. They were also less likely to self-identify as female (78.9% vs. 86.6%, P = 0.03) but had no difference in sexual orientation (P = 0.13). Additionally, they were more likely to have known about their donor-conceived origins for more years (18 (0-50) vs. 11 (0-61), P = 0.004), be informed by a family member (75.5% vs. 65.6%, P = 0.001) and have overall positive feelings about being conceived using a donor (93.0% vs. 52.5%, P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: A major limitation is that DSR participants may not be representative of all DCP. Additionally, analyzing the DCP who stated that they were undecided about using donor gametes into the 'would consider' group may be overestimating the openness to utilization in this group. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The findings from this study give new insight for health care workers to further counsel patients who are considering using third-party reproduction by providing reassurance that the majority of their future children would consider similar means, if needed, to achieve their family-building goals. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Funding for this study was received from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Colorado. All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Assuntos
Revelação , Sêmen , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reprodução , Doadores de TecidosRESUMO
Selinexor is a first in class selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), blocks exportin 1 (XPO1), a protein transporter, that among other actions, shuttles cargo proteins such as tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs), the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), and oncoprotein messenger RNAs (mRNAs) across the nuclear membrane to cytoplasm. By blocking XPO1, selinexor facilitates nuclear preservation and activation of TSPs, and prevents mRNA translation of the oncoproteins leading to induction of apoptosis. The therapeutic value of selinexor in combination with dexamethasone has been successfully demonstrated in treating relapsed and/or refractory myeloma (RRMM), leading to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of selinexor in combination with dexamethasone in 2019 for the treatment of adult patients with RRMM who received at least 4 prior therapies and whose disease is refractory to at least 2 proteasome inhibitors, at least 2 immunomodulatory agents, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb) - a pentarefractory myeloma. More recently, selinexor in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone was approved by the FDA in December 2020, based on the BOSTON study among RRMM patients who had received at least one prior line of therapy. With more available safety and efficacy data supporting the increased interval between dosing of selinexor (and lesser cumulative weekly dosing) and schedule, contrary to the originally approved dose of 160 mg per week, the supportive care guidelines needed to be revisited. The current manuscript summarizes the supportive care solutions with weekly dosing of selinexor and identifies the ideal potential patient for selinexor treatment.
Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Consenso , Dexametasona/farmacologia , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hidrazinas/farmacologia , Hidrazinas/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , TriazóisRESUMO
Some antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and membrane fusion-catalyzing peptides (FPs) stabilize bicontinuous inverted cubic (QII) phases. Previous authors proposed a topological rationale: since AMP-induced pores, fusion intermediates, and QII phases all have negative Gaussian curvature (NGC), peptides which produce NGC in one structure also do it in another. This assumes that peptides change the curvature energy of the lipid membranes. Here I test this with a Helfrich curvature energy model. First, experimentally, I show that lipid systems often used to study peptide NGC have NGC without peptides at higher temperatures. To determine the net effect of an AMP on NGC, the equilibrium phase behavior of the host lipids must be determined. Second, the model shows that AMPs must make large changes in the curvature energy to stabilize AMP-induced pores. Peptide-induced changes in elastic constants affect pores and QII phase differently. Changes in spontaneous curvature affect them in opposite ways. The observed correlation between QII phase stabilization and AMP activity doesn't show that AMPs act by lowering pore curvature energy. A different rationale is proposed. In theory, AMPs could simultaneously stabilize QII phase and pores by drastically changing two particular elastic constants. This could be tested by measuring AMP effects on the individual constants. I propose experiments to do that. Unlike AMPs, FPs must make only small changes in the curvature energy to catalyze fusion. It they act in this way, their fusion activity should correlate with their ability to stabilize QII phases.
Assuntos
Peptídeos Antimicrobianos , Proteínas de Fusão de Membrana , Fusão de Membrana , Lipídeos de Membrana , Peptídeos Antimicrobianos/química , Peptídeos Antimicrobianos/genética , Fenômenos Biofísicos , Metabolismo Energético/genética , Fusão de Membrana/genética , Proteínas de Fusão de Membrana/química , Proteínas de Fusão de Membrana/genética , Lipídeos de Membrana/química , Lipídeos de Membrana/genética , Lipídeos de Membrana/metabolismoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Machine learning algorithms achieve expert-level accuracy in skin lesion classification based on clinical images. However, it is not yet shown whether these algorithms could have high accuracy when embedded in a smartphone app, where image quality is lower and there is high variability in image taking scenarios by users. In the past, these applications were criticized due to lack of accuracy. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluate the accuracy of the newest version of a smartphone application (SA) for risk assessment of skin lesions. METHODS: This SA uses a machine learning algorithm to compute a risk rating. The algorithm is trained on 131 873 images taken by 31 449 users in multiple countries between January 2016 and August 2018 and rated for risk by dermatologists. To evaluate the sensitivity of the algorithm, we use 285 histopathologically validated skin cancer cases (including 138 malignant melanomas), from two previously published clinical studies (195 cases) and from the SA user database (90 cases). We calculate the specificity on a separate set from the SA user database containing 6000 clinically validated benign cases. RESULTS: The algorithm scored a 95.1% (95% CI, 91.9-97.3%) sensitivity in detecting (pre)malignant conditions (93% for malignant melanoma and 97% for keratinocyte carcinomas and precursors). This level of sensitivity was achieved with a 78.3% (95% CI, 77.2-79.3%) specificity. CONCLUSIONS: This SA provides a high sensitivity to detect skin cancer; however, there is still room for improvement in terms of specificity. Future studies are needed to assess the impact of this SA on the health systems and its users.
Assuntos
Aprendizado de Máquina , Melanoma/patologia , Aplicativos Móveis , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Smartphone , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologiaAssuntos
Autoanticorpos/metabolismo , Ativação do Complemento/efeitos dos fármacos , Complemento C5a/metabolismo , Penfigoide Bolhoso/imunologia , Tinzaparina/farmacologia , Autoanticorpos/sangue , Autoanticorpos/imunologia , Autoantígenos/imunologia , Ativação do Complemento/imunologia , Complemento C5a/imunologia , Testes de Fixação de Complemento , Distonina/imunologia , Humanos , Colágenos não Fibrilares/imunologia , Uso Off-Label , Penfigoide Bolhoso/sangue , Penfigoide Bolhoso/tratamento farmacológico , Pele/imunologia , Pele/patologia , Tinzaparina/uso terapêutico , Colágeno Tipo XVIIAssuntos
Transplante de Órgãos , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Criança , Seguimentos , Humanos , TransplantadosRESUMO
Following the publication of this article, the authors noted that the pomalidomide dose for the additional SC cohort in Fig. 1 was incorrectly listed. The correct dose for pomalidomide in the additional SC cohort should be the maximum tolerated dose of 4 mg/day, not 2 mg/day as listed in the original Fig. 1. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Assuntos
Mosaicismo , Mutação/genética , Nevo de Células Epitelioides e Fusiformes/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , Rabdomiossarcoma/genética , Neoplasias Uterinas/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperpigmentação/genética , Hiperpigmentação/patologia , Lactente , Nevo de Células Epitelioides e Fusiformes/patologia , Rabdomiossarcoma/patologia , Neoplasias Uterinas/patologiaRESUMO
This phase 1 dose-escalation study evaluated pomalidomide, bortezomib (subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV)) and low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) in lenalidomide-refractory and proteasome inhibitor-exposed relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In 21-day cycles, patients received pomalidomide (1-4 mg days 1-14), bortezomib (1-1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8 and 11 for cycles 1-8; days 1 and 8 for cycle ⩾9) and LoDEX. Primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Thirty-four patients enrolled: 12 during escalation, 10 in the MTD IV bortezomib cohort and 12 in the MTD SC bortezomib cohort. Patients received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy; 97% bortezomib exposed. With no dose-limiting toxicities, MTD was defined as the maximum planned dose: pomalidomide 4 mg, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 and LoDEX. All patients discontinued treatment by data cutoff (2 April 2015). The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (44%) and thrombocytopenia (26%), which occurred more frequently with IV than SC bortezomib. No grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy or deep vein thrombosis was reported. Overall response rate was 65%. Median duration of response was 7.4 months. Pomalidomide, bortezomib and LoDEX was well tolerated and effective in lenalidomide-refractory and bortezomib-exposed patients with RRMM.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores , Bortezomib/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Feminino , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Inibidores de Proteassoma/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Proteassoma/uso terapêutico , Retratamento , Talidomida/administração & dosagem , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Carfilzomib, a proteasome inhibitor, is approved as monotherapy and in combination with dexamethasone or lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. The approval of carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) was based on results from the randomized, phase 3 study ASPIRE (NCT01080391), which showed KRd significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs Rd (median 26.3 vs 17.6 months; hazard ratio (HR)=0.690; P=0.0001). This subgroup analysis of ASPIRE evaluated KRd vs Rd by number of previous lines of therapy and previous exposure to bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide. Treatment with KRd led to a 12-month improvement in median PFS vs Rd after first relapse (HR 0.713) and a 9-month improvement after ⩾2 previous lines of therapy (HR 0.720). Treatment with KRd led to an approximate 8-month improvement vs Rd in median PFS in bortezomib-exposed patients (HR 0.699), a 15-month improvement in thalidomide-exposed patients (HR 0.587) and a 5-month improvement in lenalidomide-exposed patients (HR 0.796). Objective response and complete response or better rates were higher with KRd vs Rd, irrespective of previous treatment. KRd had a favorable benefit-risk profile and should be considered an appropriate treatment option for patients with 1 or ⩾2 previous lines of therapy and those previously exposed to bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide.
Assuntos
Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Oligopeptídeos/administração & dosagem , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Talidomida/administração & dosagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard treatment for eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients, but many patients will relapse after ASCT and require subsequent therapy. The proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib is approved for relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). In phase 3 trials, carfilzomib-based regimens (ASPIRE, carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone; ENDEAVOR, carfilzomib-dexamethasone) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared with standard therapies for RRMM (ASPIRE: lenalidomide-dexamethasone; ENDEAVOR, bortezomib-dexamethasone). This subgroup analysis of ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR evaluated outcomes according to prior ASCT status. In total, 446 patients in ASPIRE and 538 in ENDEAVOR had prior ASCT. Median PFS was longer for carfilzomib-based regimens vs non-carfilzomib-based regimens for patients with prior ASCT (ASPIRE: 26.3 vs 17.8 months (hazard ratio (HR)=0.68); ENDEAVOR: not estimable vs 10.2 months (HR=0.61)), those with one prior line of therapy that included ASCT (ASPIRE: 29.7 vs 17.8 months (HR=0.70); ENDEAVOR: not estimable vs 11.2 months (HR=0.46)), and those without prior ASCT (ASPIRE: 26.4 vs 16.6 months (HR=0.76); ENDEAVOR: 17.7 vs 8.5 months (HR=0.43)). Overall response rates also favored the carfilzomib-based regimens. No new safety signals were detected. This analysis suggests that carfilzomib-based treatment may lead to improvement in PFS and response rates regardless of prior transplant status. Further evaluation is warranted.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Oligopeptídeos/administração & dosagem , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Recidiva , Retratamento , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Aborto Espontâneo/epidemiologia , Coartação Aórtica/etiologia , Anormalidades do Olho/etiologia , Fertilização in vitro/estatística & dados numéricos , Infertilidade Feminina/epidemiologia , Síndromes Neurocutâneas/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaAssuntos
Adalimumab , Metotrexato , Adolescente , Criança , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Psoríase , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
Leak following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is one of the most feared complications and its management can be difficult and frustrating for patients and physicians involved. Using multimodality approach and having variable options to plan management for patients presenting with leak following bariatric surgery can be advantageous for physicians. The use of endoscopic injection of EpiFix-dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane (dHACM) allograft can be a novel adjunct in facilitating healing of the leak site by iatrogenic introduction of tissue growth factors, cytokines and building connective tissue matrix.
RESUMO
In Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-ACRIN E4A03, on completion of four cycles of therapy, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients had the option of proceeding to autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (ASCT) or continuing on their assigned therapy lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Ld) or lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone (LD). This landmark analysis compared the outcome of 431 patients surviving their first four cycles of therapy pursuing early ASCT to those continuing on their assigned therapy. Survival distributions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank test. Ninety patients (21%) opted for early ASCT. The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year survival probability estimates were higher for early ASCT versus no early ASCT at 99, 93, 91, 85 and 80% versus 94, 84, 75, 65 and 57%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) in the early versus no early ASCT group was not reached (NR) versus 5.78 years. In patients <65 years of age, median OS in the early versus no early ASCT groups was NR in both, hazard ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval: (0.50, 0.25). In patients ⩾65 years of age, median OS in the early versus no early ASCT was NR versus 5.11 years. ASCT dropped out of statistical significance (P=0.080). Patients opting for ASCT after induction Ld/LD had a higher survival probability and improvement in OS regardless of dexamethasone dose density.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Terapia Combinada , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Talidomida/administração & dosagem , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AKs) are generally accepted as common precursor lesions to invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a common, in-office, field therapy modality used in the treatment of AKs. Clinical and laboratory observations have demonstrated that temperature modulation can affect PDT efficacy. OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate thermal PDT increases apoptotic cell death, and to investigate the mechanistic role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) free radicals in an in vitro human skin fibroblast model. METHODS: This study was completed using commercially available primary human skin fibroblasts treated with aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) at specific concentrations and controlled temperatures. Cell death, apoptosis and superoxide ROS levels were quantified. RESULTS: We found that thermal PDT with 0·5 mmol L(-1) ALA resulted in significant temperature-dependent increases in total apoptosis and superoxide ROS generation between 33 °C and 42 °C. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that thermal PDT significantly increases apoptotic cell death through increased generation of superoxide ROS in a temperature-dependent manner.
Assuntos
Ácido Aminolevulínico/farmacologia , Fibroblastos/efeitos dos fármacos , Temperatura Alta , Ceratose Actínica/tratamento farmacológico , Fotoquimioterapia/métodos , Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes/farmacologia , Apoptose/efeitos dos fármacos , Células Cultivadas , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Espécies Reativas de Oxigênio/metabolismo , Pele/metabolismoRESUMO
While survival times have increased over the last decade, most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) eventually relapse and become refractory to therapy. The treatment of patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM is frequently further complicated by the presence of pre-existing comorbidities that arise from an advanced disease state and of toxicities stemming from prior antimyeloma treatment. Carfilzomib and pomalidomide have recently been approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory MM. While these agents represent important additions to the available treatment options, the identification of patients who may best benefit from the use of each of therapy is still being investigated. A number of patient-related and disease-related factors may impact treatment efficacy and/or tolerability, and the clinical presentation and medical history of each patient must be carefully considered to optimize treatment. Here, we review results from carfilzomib and pomalidomide clinical trials in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM who also have baseline comorbidities or treatment-induced or disease-induced complications (including the presence of renal impairment, cardiac risk factors, peripheral neuropathy, or high-risk chromosomal abnormalities) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the two agents in these difficult-to-treat patients and to provide treatment recommendations specific to each scenario.