Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
DNA Repair (Amst) ; 89: 102828, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32143127

RESUMO

Four repair pathways process DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Among these pathways the homologous recombination repair (HRR) subpathway of gene conversion (GC) affords error-free processing, but functions only in S- and G2-phases of the cell cycle. Classical non-homologous end-joining (c-NHEJ) operates throughout the cell cycle, but causes small deletions and translocations. Similar deficiencies in exaggerated form, combined with reduced efficiency, are associated with alternative end-joining (alt-EJ). Finally, single-strand annealing (SSA) causes large deletions and possibly translocations. Thus, processing of a DSB by any pathway, except GC, poses significant risks to the genome, making the mechanisms navigating pathway-engagement critical to genome stability. Logically, the cell ought to attempt engagement of the pathway ensuring preservation of the genome, while accommodating necessities generated by the types of DSBs induced. Thereby, inception of DNA end-resection will be key determinant for GC, SSA and alt-EJ engagement. We reported that during G2-phase, where all pathways are active, GC engages in the processing of almost 50 % of DSBs, at low DSB-loads in the genome, and that this contribution rapidly drops to nearly zero with increasing DSB-loads. At the transition between these two extremes, SSA and alt-EJ compensate, but at extremely high DSB-loads resection-dependent pathways are suppressed and c-NHEJ remains mainly active. We inquired whether in this processing framework all DSBs have similar fates. Here, we analyze in G2-phase the processing of a subset of DSBs defined by their ability to break chromosomes. Our results reveal an absolute requirement for GC in the processing of chromatid breaks at doses in the range of 1 Gy. Defects in c-NHEJ delay significantly the inception of processing by GC, but leave processing kinetics unchanged. These results delineate the essential role of GC in chromatid break repair before mitosis and classify DSBs that underpin this breakage as the exclusive substrate of GC.


Assuntos
Quebras de DNA de Cadeia Dupla , Reparo do DNA por Junção de Extremidades , DNA/efeitos da radiação , Fase G2 , Conversão Gênica , Radiação Ionizante , Animais , Quebra Cromossômica , Cricetulus/genética , DNA/metabolismo , Células HCT116 , Humanos , Reparo de DNA por Recombinação
2.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 48(4): 1905-1924, 2020 02 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31832684

RESUMO

In vertebrates, genomic DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are removed by non-homologous end-joining processes: classical non-homologous end-joining (c-NHEJ) and alternative end-joining (alt-EJ); or by homology-dependent processes: gene-conversion (GC) and single-strand annealing (SSA). Surprisingly, these repair pathways are not real alternative options restoring genome integrity with equal efficiency, but show instead striking differences in speed, accuracy and cell-cycle-phase dependence. As a consequence, engagement of one pathway may be associated with processing-risks for the genome absent from another pathway. Characterization of engagement-parameters and their consequences is, therefore, essential for understanding effects on the genome of DSB-inducing agents, such as ionizing-radiation (IR). Here, by addressing pathway selection in G2-phase, we discover regulatory confinements in GC with consequences for SSA- and c-NHEJ-engagement. We show pronounced suppression of GC with increasing DSB-load that is not due to RAD51 availability and which is delimited but not defined by 53BP1 and RAD52. Strikingly, at low DSB-loads, GC repairs ∼50% of DSBs, whereas at high DSB-loads its contribution is undetectable. Notably, with increasing DSB-load and the associated suppression of GC, SSA gains ground, while alt-EJ is suppressed. These observations explain earlier, apparently contradictory results and advance our understanding of logic and mechanisms underpinning the wiring between DSB repair pathways.


Assuntos
Conversão Gênica/genética , Rad51 Recombinase/genética , Proteína Rad52 de Recombinação e Reparo de DNA/genética , Proteína 1 de Ligação à Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/genética , Células A549 , Animais , Quebras de DNA de Cadeia Dupla/efeitos da radiação , Reparo do DNA por Junção de Extremidades/genética , Reparo do DNA/genética , Regulação da Expressão Gênica/efeitos da radiação , Humanos , Radiação Ionizante
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA