Mobocertinib in Patients with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MOON): An International Real-World Safety and Efficacy Analysis.

EGFR exon 20 (EGFR Ex20) insertion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are insensitive to traditional EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Mobocertinib is the only approved TKI specifically designed to target EGFR Ex20. We performed an international, real-world safety and efficacy analysis on patients with EGFR Ex20-positive NSCLC enrolled in a mobocertinib early access program. We explored the mechanisms of resistance by analyzing postprogression biopsies, as well as cross-resistance to amivantamab. Data from 86 patients with a median age of 67 years and a median of two prior lines of treatment were analyzed. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 95% of patients. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were reported in 38% of patients and included diarrhea (22%) and rash (8%). In 17% of patients, therapy was permanently discontinued, and two patients died due to TRAEs. Women were seven times more likely to discontinue treatment than men. In the overall cohort, the objective response rate to mobocertinib was 34% (95% CI, 24-45). The response rate in treatment-naïve patients was 27% (95% CI, 8-58). The median progression-free and overall survival was 5 months (95% CI, 3.5-6.5) and 12 months (95% CI, 6.8-17.2), respectively. The intracranial response rate was limited (13%), and one-third of disease progression cases involved the brain. Mobocertinib also showed antitumor activity following EGFR Ex20-specific therapy and vice versa. Potential mechanisms of resistance to mobocertinib included amplifications in MET, PIK3CA, and NRAS. Mobocertinib demonstrated meaningful efficacy in a real-world setting but was associated with considerable gastrointestinal and cutaneous toxicity.

Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation and Their Effect on Outcomes of Immunotherapy in Southwest Finland: A Retrospective, Real-World Cohort Study.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved survival in several cancer types. Still, most patients develop disease progression during or after treatment. We evaluated the reasons for treatment discontinuation and their effect on treatment outcomes in adult patients with advanced cancer with ICI in the first or later treatment lines in Southwest Finland between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2021. Baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes were retrospectively obtained from the electronic medical records. There were 317 patients with 15 different cancer types, most commonly non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and kidney cancer, treated with ICI outside clinical trials. During follow-up, 94% of the patients had discontinued treatment. A total of 62% was due to disease progression, 17% due to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), 12% after achieving disease control or radiological response, and 9% due to poor performance status. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.4 months and the median overall survival (mOS) was 20.3 months in the whole cohort. Longer mPFS and mOS were observed in patients who discontinued ICI due to irAEs (24.3 and 49.2 months) and after disease control (49.7 months and not reached). In total, 46% of the patients who discontinued ICI after irAEs or disease control remained alive and progression-free during follow-up.

Feasibility and User Experience of Digital Patient Monitoring for Real-World Patients With Lung or Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Digital patient monitoring (DPM) tools can facilitate early symptom management for patients with cancer through systematic symptom reporting; however, low adherence can be a challenge. We assessed patient/healthcare professional (HCP) use of DPM in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced/metastatic lung cancer or HER2-positive breast cancer received locally approved/reimbursed drugs alongside DPM, with elements tailored by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, on the Kaiku Health DPM platform. Patient access to the DPM tool was through their own devices (eg, laptops, PCs, smartphones, or tablets), via either a browser or an app on Apple iOS or Android devices. Coprimary endpoints were patient DPM tool adoption (positive threshold: 60%) and week 1-6 adherence to weekly symptom reporting (positive threshold: 70%). Secondary endpoints included experience and clinical impact. RESULTS: At data cutoff (June 9, 2022), adoption was 85% and adherence was 76%. Customer satisfaction and effort scores for patients were 76% and 82%, respectively, and 83% and 79% for HCPs. Patients spent approximately 10 minutes using the DPM tool and completed approximately 1.0 symptom questionnaires per week (completion time 1-4 minutes). HCPs spent approximately 1-3 minutes a week using the tool per patient. Median time to HCP review for alerted versus non-alerted symptom questionnaires was 19.6 versus 21.5 hours. Most patients and HCPs felt that the DPM tool covered/mostly covered symptoms experienced (71% and 75%), was educational (65% and 92%), and improved patient-HCP conversations (70% and 83%) and cancer care (51% and 71%). CONCLUSION: The DPM tool demonstrated positive adoption, adherence, and user experience for patients with lung/breast cancer, suggesting that DPM tools may benefit clinical cancer care.

Trends in cost of treatment of lung cancer patients in 2014-2019 in Finland - a descriptive register study.

AIM: The aim of this descriptive study is to analyze the cost for the treatment of NSCLC and SCLC patients (2014-2019) in Finland. The primary objective is to understand recent (2014-2019) cost developments. METHODS: The study is retrospective and based on hospital register data. The study population consists of NSCLC and SCLC patients diagnosed in four out of the five Finnish university hospitals. The final sample included 4047 NSCLC patients and 766 SCLC patients. RESULTS: Cost of the treatment in lung cancer is increasing. Both the average cost of the first 12 months as well as the first 24 months after diagnosis increases over time. For patients diagnosed in 2014, the average cost of the first 24 months was 19,000 €and for those diagnosed in 2015 22,000 €. The annual increase in the nominal 24-month costs was 10.4% for NSCLC and 7.3% for SCLC patients. CONCLUSION: The average cost per patient has increased annually for both NSCLC and SCLC. Possible explanations to the cost increase are increased medicine costs (especially in NSCLC), and the increased percentage of patients being actively treated.

Antibiotic Treatment is an Independent Poor Risk Factor in NSCLC But Not in Melanoma Patients Who had Received Anti-PD-1/L1 Monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic treatment may reduce the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy by disrupting gut microbiome. We aimed to study the association of antibiotics and survival outcomes in advanced cutaneous melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 222 melanoma and 199 NSCLC patients had received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy in 5 Finnish hospitals between January 2014 and December 2020. Clinical characteristics, antibiotic and corticosteroid treatment, and survival outcomes were retrospectively collected from hospital and national medical records. RESULTS: There were 32% of melanoma and 31% of NSCLC patients who had received antibiotic treatment (ABT) 3 months before to 1 month after the first anti-PD-1/L1 antibody infusion. In survival analyses, early antibiotic treatment was associated with inferior overall survival (OS) (ABT 19.2 [17.6-43.7] vs. no ABT 35.6 [29.3-NA] months, P = .033) but not with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) (ABT 5.8 [3.0-12.6] vs. no ABT 10.2 [7.7-15.3] months, P = .3) in melanoma patients and with inferior OS (ABT 8.6 [6.4-12.3] vs. no ABT 18.5 [15.1-21.6] months, P < .001) and PFS (ABT 2.8 [2.1-4.5] vs. no ABT 5.6 [4.4-8.0] months, P = .0081) in NSCLC patients. In multivariable analyses, ABT was not an independent risk-factor for inferior OS and PFS in melanoma but was associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.12 [1.37-3.28]) and PFS (HR 1.65 [1.10-2.47]) in NSCLC after adjusted for other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Early ABT was an independent poor risk factor in NSCLC patients who had received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy but not in melanoma patients. The weight of ABT as a poor risk factor might depend on other prognostic factors in different cancers.

Trends in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in Finland 2014-2019.

INTRODUCTION: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the Western world. However, emerging treatment options and more patients directed to active treatments might improve the outcomes. Here, we retrospectively studied the patient characteristics and treatment practices for NSCLC in Finland 2014-2019 with a special focus on changes in trends over time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The cohort consisted of patients diagnosed with NSCLC in Finland 2014-2018. Cancer treatments for the patients were followed until the end of 2019. The data, both structured and unstructured, were collected from electronic medical records of four university hospitals in Finland. RESULTS: Of the study population (n = 4047), 65% had adenocarcinoma and 29% squamous cell carcinoma. The share of patients who had not received any active treatment (except palliative radiotherapy) decreased from 32% to 18% between 2014-18. The percentage of patients receiving surgery increased slightly from 22.7% to 24% and for patients receiving chemotherapy or immuno-oncological (IO) treatments from 29% to 41.2% and from 0.8% to 8%, respectively between, 2014-18. However, the time of treatment for patients receiving systemic cancer treatments did not change during the same time period. DISCUSSION: The current study suggests a trend in NSCLC towards more active treatment approaches in 2014-18.

Symptom Assessment for Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Scheduled for Chemotherapy.

AIM: This study assessed the symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and examined the symptom-associated characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The symptoms of 122 patients with NSCLC scheduled for chemotherapy before starting treatment were surveyed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). RESULTS: The most prevalent symptoms were coughing (EORTC score 41.7), dyspnea (33.9), fatigue (31.9), insomnia (30.3) and pain (21.8). The mean EORTC score for global QoL was 56.9 (SD=23.5). Physical, cognitive and emotional functioning, insomnia, diarrhea, and dyspnea had a significant influence on the HRQOL (p<0.05). ESAS assessment correlated with these results and thus was an easy-to-use tool for symptom assessment (correlation coefficient range=0.546-0.865, p<0.0001 for all symptoms). CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced NSCLC suffer from multiple symptoms influencing HRQOL. ESAS provides a symptom assessment tool that is as reliable as but simpler to use than the EORTC questionnaire.

Opioids in pain management of mesothelioma and lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer and mesothelioma are malignant tumors with generally dismal prognosis and therefore palliative pain treatment constitutes a challenge for the clinician. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of pain treatment with opioids among mesothelioma and lung cancer patients treated for palliation and assess factors which confound to optimal treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A sub-cohort of 373 lung cancer and 22 mesothelioma patients was identified in multi-center European Pharmacogenetic Opioid Study (EPOS) cohort. A nested case-control (1:4) setting was designed to estimate the pain and other covariates distinguishing 22 mesothelioma- (= cases) and 88 lung cancer patients (controls), analyzed using univariate- and multivariate conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression models. RESULTS: The mean total daily dose of opioids varied from 30.0 to 960.0 mg (mean 275, median 160 mg, SD 293) in mesothelioma, and from 10 to 5072 mg (mean 414, median 175, SD 788) in lung cancer patients (p = 0.420). In both groups, pain was mostly experienced as moderate and severe and it was frequently accompanied by depression, poor sleep, anxiety and fatigue. Four mesothelioma patients (18%) and seven lung cancer patients (10%) experienced complete pain relief with opioids by self-assessment. Assessments of pain severity by the patients and their physicians deviated significantly in mesothelioma (p = 0.039 McNemar test), as well as in lung cancer (p = 0.0001). In conditional logistic regression, no significant differences were found in distribution of pain covariates between lung cancer and mesothelioma patients. CONCLUSION: Pain perception by the patients was associated frequently with other symptoms and complete pain control with opioids was achieved only with minority of patients both with mesothelioma and advanced lung cancer. Adequate pain control requires continuous monitoring and tailoring the dose to patient's individual needs and tolerance, recognition of accompanying symptoms such as depression and poor sleep, and their management.