Trends in electrocardiographic and cardiovascular manifestations of patients hospitalised with COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a low incidence of cardiovascular complications was reported in Singapore. Little was known about the trend of cardiovascular complications as the pandemic progressed. In this study, we examined the evolving trends in electrocardiographic and cardiovascular manifestations in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. METHODS: We examined the first 1781 consecutive hospitalised patients with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19. We divided the population based on whether they had abnormal heart rate (HR) or electrocardiography (ECG) or normal HR and ECG, comparing the baseline characteristics and outcomes. Cardiovascular complications were defined as acute myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, myocarditis and mortality. RESULTS: The 253 (14.2%) patients who had abnormal HR/ECG at presentation were more likely to be symptomatic. Sinus tachycardia was commonly observed. Troponin I levels (97.0 ± 482.9 vs. 19.7 ± 68.4 ng/L, P = 0.047) and C-reactive protein levels (20.1 ± 50.7 vs. 13.9 ± 24.1 µmol/L, P = 0.003) were significantly higher among those with abnormal HR/ECGs, with a higher prevalence of myocarditis (2.0% vs. 0.5%, P = 0.019), pulmonary embolism (2.0% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.008) and acute myocardial infarction (1.2% vs. 0.1%, P = 0.023). After adjusting for age and comorbidities, abnormal HR/ECG (adjusted odds ratio 4.41, 95% confidence interval 2.21-8.77; P < 0.001) remained independently associated with adverse cardiovascular complications. Over time, there was a trend towards a higher proportion of hospitalised patients with cardiovascular complications. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular complications appear to be increasing in proportion over time among hospitalised patients with COVID-19. A baseline ECG and HR measurement may be helpful for predicting these complications.

Inflammatory phenotypes may be more important than age and comorbidities in predicting clinical outcomes in hospitalised patients with COVID-19.

Objectives: In critically ill patients with COVID-19, distinct hyperinflammatory and hypoinflammatory phenotypes have been described, with different outcomes and responses to therapy. We investigated if similar phenotypes exist in non-severe illness. Methods: Consecutive patients with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmed SARS-CoV-2 were examined. Baseline demographics and laboratory investigations were tabulated, including serum C-reactive protein. Patients were divided into those who were hyperinflammatory (defined as C-reactive protein >17 mg/l) or hypoinflammatory. Adverse outcomes, defined as requiring oxygenation, intensive care, or death, were recorded during the hospital stay. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared. Results: Of the 1781 patients examined, 276 (15.5%) had a hyperinflammatory phenotype. They were older (51.8 ± 17.2 vs 40.3 ± 13.8 years, P <0.001), had a lower PCR cycle threshold (PCR cycle threshold value 19.3 ± 6.3 vs 22.7 ± 15.4, P = 0.025) at presentation, and more medical comorbidities. The hyperinflammatory phenotype was independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes, even after adjusting for age, medical history and viral load on multivariable analyses (adjusted odds ratio 5.78, 95% confidence interval 2.86-11.63). Conclusion: Even in non-severe COVID-19, there are distinct hyper- and hypoinflammatory phenotypes, with the hyperinflammatory phenotype strongly associated with adverse clinical outcomes, that could be distinguished with a simple biomarker.

Continued demographic shifts in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 from migrant workers to a vulnerable and more elderly local population at risk of severe disease.

OBJECTIVES: In the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore, the vast majority of infected persons were migrant workers living in dormitories who had few medical comorbidities. In 2021, with the Delta and Omicron waves, this shifted to the more vulnerable, elderly population within the local community. We examined evolving trends among the hospitalised cases of COVID-19. METHODS: All patients with polymerase chain reaction-positive SARS-CoV-2 admitted from February 2020 to October 2021 were included and subsequently stratified by their year of admission (2020 or 2021). We compared the baseline clinical characteristics, clinical course, and outcomes. RESULTS: A majority of cases were seen in 2020 (n = 1359), compared with 2021 (n = 422), due to the large outbreaks in migrant worker dormitories. Nevertheless, the greater proportion of locally transmitted cases outside of dormitories in 2021 (78.7% vs 12.3%) meant a significantly older population with more medical comorbidities had COVID-19. This led to an observably higher proportion of patients with severe disease presenting with raised inflammatory markers, need for therapeutics, supplemental oxygenation, and higher mortality. CONCLUSION: Changing demographics and the characteristics of the exposed populations are associated with distinct differences in clinical presentation and outcomes. Older age remained consistently associated with adverse outcomes.

Risk Factors for Mortality in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Infections following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation can require surgical device removal and often results in significant cost, morbidity, and potentially mortality. We aimed to systemically review the literature and identify risk factors associated with mortality following CIED infection. METHODS: Electronic searches (up to June 2021) were performed on PubMed and Scopus. Twelve studies (10 retrospective, 2 prospective cohort studies) were included for analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted with the restricted maximum likelihood method, with mortality as the outcome. The overall mortality was 13.7% (438/1398) following CIED infection. RESULTS: On meta-analysis, the male sex (OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.57-1.01, I2 = 2.2%) appeared to have lower odds for mortality, while diabetes mellitus appeared to be associated with higher mortality (OR 1.47, 95%CI 0.67-3.26, I2 = 81.4%), although these trends did not reach statistical significance. Staphylococcus aureus as the causative organism (OR 2.71, 95%CI 1.76-4.19, I2 = 0.0%), presence of heart failure (OR 1.92, 95%CI 1.42-4.19, I2 = 0.0%) and embolic phenomena (OR 4.00, 95%CI 1.67-9.56, I2 = 69.8%) were associated with higher mortality. Surgical removal of CIED was associated with lower mortality compared with conservative management with antibiotics alone (OR 0.22, 95%CI 0.09-0.50, I2 = 62.8%). CONCLUSION: We identified important risk factors associated with mortality in CIED infections, including Staphyloccocus aureus as the causative organism, and the presence of complications, such as heart failure and embolic phenomena. Surgery, where possible, was associated with better outcomes.

Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics associated with the development of infective endocarditis in patients with significant mitral stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) confers significant mortality and morbidity in patients with underlying mitral stenosis (MS), with both diseased native valves and after valvular procedures. PURPOSE: We examined the clinical and echocardiographic parameters in association with the development of IE on patients with significant MS. METHODS: A total of 478 consecutive patients with index echocardiographic diagnosis of significant mitral stenosis (mitral valve area <1.5 cm2 ) were included. Patients were grouped into those with or without IE on at least 5 years of follow-up. Baseline clinical, echocardiographic profile and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: IE was observed in 4.4% (n = 21) of the cohort. These patients were younger (45.3 ± 14.6 vs. 53.2 ± 15.5 years, p = 0.022) at the time of MS diagnosis. NT-proBNP was higher in patients who developed IE (13529 ± 12230 vs. 4381 ± 5875 pg/ml, p < 0.001), with larger left atrial diameter (54.4 ± 10.1 vs. 49.9 ± 9.5 mm, p = 0.040) and elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP, 62.3 ± 17.2 vs. 47.2 ± 16.5 mmHg, p = 0.026). There was no significant difference in terms of MS severity, other concomitant valvulopathies, or etiology (rheumatic or degenerative) of MS. Patients who smoked had higher incidence of IE (33.3% vs. 14.2%, log-rank 7.27, p = 0.007). After adjusting for age, valve procedure and PASP, patients who smoked remained at elevated risk of IE (adjusted hazards ratio 2.99, 95% confidence interval 1.18-7.56, p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: IE occurs in a proportion of patients with MS. Smoking, younger age of diagnosis of MS as well as dilated left atria with elevated PASP may be associated with an elevated risk of this complication.