RESUMO
Background: Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease with a predilection for the genitalia. Although, the association between squamous cell cancer and genital LS is well established, a link with genital melanoma has not been thoroughly explored. However, we have recently published a case series of penile melanoma where 9/11 (82%) of patients seen over a 10 year period with penile melanoma were retrospectively found to have histological and/or clinical evidence of genital LS on review. Objectives: The aim of this study was to illuminate further the relationship between vulval melanoma and genital LS by reviewing all the cases managed by our hospital and undertaking a literature review. Methods: We identified all the cases with a diagnosis of vulval melanoma over a 16-year period (2006-2022) where histology was available. The clinical notes were retrospectively reviewed, and the histological features of all cases were reassessed by two independent mutually 'blinded' histopathologists. We also performed a literature review of genital LS in patients with vulval melanoma. Results: A total of 11 patients with vulval melanoma were identified for the review. Histopathological review found evidence of genital LS in seven of them (64%). Genital LS was not documented in any of the original histology reports. Clinical notes and letters were available in nine cases. The literature review identified 12 relevant studies with a total of 18 patients. Twelve cases concerned adult women, and six concerned female children. Conclusion: The presence of genital LS in as high as 64% of our vulval melanoma cases might indicate a causative relationship between genital LS and vulval melanoma. The pathogenesis of vulval melanoma remains largely unknown. Although ultraviolet radiation is an important pathogenic factor for cutaneous melanoma, it cannot be a factor in vulval melanoma. While possible mechanisms behind this association remain unclear, it is possible that chronic inflammation from genital LS leads to melanocytic distress and increased mutagenesis.
RESUMO
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the most commonly used imaging modality to diagnose left ventricular thrombus (LVT), however, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) remains the gold standard investigation. A comparison of the diagnostic performance between two modalities is needed to inform guidelines on a diagnostic approach towards LVT. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic performance of three methods of TTE (non-contrast, contrast, and apical wall motion scoring) for the detection of LVT compared to CMR as a reference test. Studies comprising 2113 patients investigated for LVT using both TTE and CMR were included in the meta-analysis. For non-contrast TTE, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 47% [95% confidence interval (CI): 32-62%], and 98% (95% CI: 96-99%), respectively. In contrast, TTE pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 58% (95% CI: 46-69%), and 98% (95% CI: 96-99%), respectively. Apical wall motion scoring on non-contrast TTE yielded a sensitivity of 100% [95% CI: 93-100%] and a specificity of 54% (95% CI: 42-65%). The area under the curve (AUC) values from our summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) for non-contrast and contrast TTE were 0.87 and 0.86 respectively, with apical wall motion studies having the highest AUC of 0.93. Despite high specificity, routine contrast and non-contrast TTE are likely to miss a significant number of LVT, making it a suboptimal screening tool. The addition of apical wall motion scoring provides a promising method to reliably identify patients requiring further investigations for LVT, whilst excluding others from unnecessary testing.
The formation of left ventricular thrombus (LVT), a blood clot in the left pumping chamber of the heart, can lead to serious complications such as a stroke. Whilst cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the best imaging tool to detect these clots, the most used tool is a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), which visualizes the heart by placing an ultrasound on the chest. This is due to the affordability and widespread availability of TTE. Thus, it is important to know how TTE compares to CMR when it comes to detecting LVT. This study pools the results of previous research to compare the diagnostic performance of three different methods of TTE compared to CMR for detecting LVT. Non-contrast TTE.Contrast TTE: The addition of an enhancing dye is thought to improve imaging.Apical wall motion scoring: Evaluating the movement of the heart's walls using TTE. Our results show that current methods of TTE may miss half of the patients with LVT and that the use of contrast did not provide significant improvement. Interestingly, the use of apical wall motion scoring was able to accurately detect all the patients with LVT. This shows promise as a future tool to reliably exclude patients from unnecessary testing, whilst identifying those who need further investigations.