Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 5(12): 1239-46, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23257372

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the 1-year survival of patients diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and transferred via pre-hospital triage strategy for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with those transferred via inter-hospital transfer within a large suburban region in Canada. BACKGROUND: Primary angioplasty is the preferred therapy for STEMI if it is done within 90 min of door-to-balloon time by an experienced team in a high-volume center. METHODS: Patients identified to have STEMI on the ambulances equipped with electrocardiography bypassed the local hospitals and were sent directly to the PCI center, whereas other patients that were picked up by ambulances without electrocardiographic equipment were transported to the local hospitals where the diagnosis of STEMI was made and were re-routed to the PCI center. Patient demographic data, clinical presentation, procedural data, in-hospital course, and vital statistics were prospectively recorded in a provincial cardiac registry. RESULTS: A total of 167 patients were brought into the PCI center via pre-hospital triage strategy, and 427 patients were brought in via inter-hospital transfer during a 2-year study period. Baseline demographic data, infarct location, cardiovascular history, and hemodynamic status were similar between the 2 groups. When compared with the inter-hospital transfer group, a significantly higher proportion of pre-hospital triaged patients achieved the 90-min door-to-balloon time benchmark (80.4% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001) and post-procedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade 3 after the emergency procedure (97.6% vs. 91.4%, p = 0.02). In addition, the pre-hospital triage strategy was associated with a significantly lower 30-day (5.4% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.006) and 1-year (6.6% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.019) mortality. Pre-hospital triage was an independent predictor for survival at 1 year (hazard ratio: 0.37, 95% confidence interval: 0.18 to 0.75, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital triage strategy was associated with improved survival rate in patients undergoing primary PCI in a regional STEMI program.


Assuntos
Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/cirurgia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Triagem , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Transferência de Pacientes , Estudos Prospectivos , Programas Médicos Regionais , Taxa de Sobrevida , Triagem/métodos , Estados Unidos
2.
Can J Cardiol ; 27(5): 664.e1-8, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21803534

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presents challenges in a large geographic area for achieving treatment time targets and creates demands on the PCI centre resources. OBJECTIVE: We compare the in-hospital mortality rate of patients presenting with STEMI and referred for PCI from 11 transfer hospitals with those presenting to the cardiac centre in a regional STEMI program with a selective repatriation strategy. METHODS: Between June 1, 2003, and June 30, 2007, clinical and procedural data of all STEMI patients who were referred to the catheterization laboratory were prospectively collected. Patients who sustained prolonged cardiac arrest were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 1154 patients from regional hospitals and 325 patients initially presenting to the PCI centre were referred for acute intervention. There was no significant in-hospital mortality difference between the 2 groups (3.7% vs 4.0%, respectively; P = 0.87). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that advanced age, female gender, multivessel coronary disease, history of hypertension, low ejection fraction, increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and thrombolytic pretreatment, but not transfer status, were independent predictors for mortality. Among the 1154 transfer patients, 937 patients (81.2%) returned immediately post procedure and had a lower mortality rate than the remaining 217 patients (18.2%) who required admission to the PCI centre following cardiac catheterization (1.9% vs 11.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A regional system of STEMI care based on rapid patient transfer to a PCI centre and repatriation was feasible and safe.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Transferência de Pacientes , Idoso , Eletrocardiografia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 74(3): 377-85, 2009 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19681116

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To construct a calculator to assess the risk of 30-day mortality following PCI. BACKGROUND: Predictors of 30-day mortality are commonly used to aid management decisions for cardiac surgical patients. There is a need for an equivalent risk-score for 30-day mortality for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as many patients are suitable for both procedures. METHODS: The British Columbia Cardiac Registry (BCCR) is a population-based registry that collects information on all PCI procedures performed in British Columbia (BC). We used data from the BCCR to identify risk factors for mortality in PCI patients and construct a calculator that predicts 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Patients (total n = 32,899) were divided into a training set (n = 26,350, PCI between 2000 and 2004) and validation set (n = 6,549, PCI in 2005). Univariate predictors of mortality were identified. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed on the training set to develop a statistical model for prediction of 30-day mortality. This model was tested in the validation set. Variables that were objective and available before PCI were included in the final risk score calculator. The 30-day mortality for the overall population was 1.5% (n = 500). Area under the ROC curve was 90.2% for the training set and 91.1% for the validation set indicating that the model also performed well in this group. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a large, contemporary cohort of patients undergoing PCI with complete follow-up for 30-day mortality. A robust, validated model of 30-day mortality after PCI was used to construct a risk calculator, the BC-PCI risk score, which can be accessed at www.bcpci.org.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Idoso , Colúmbia Britânica/epidemiologia , Angiografia Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Vigilância da População , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Sistema de Registros , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Função Ventricular Esquerda
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA