Impact of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves on dynamic hyperinflation: Results from the PIERCE study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Dynamic hyperinflation (DH) is a major marker of exertional dyspnoea in severe emphysema. We hypothesized that bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using endobronchial valves (EBVs) decreases DH. METHODS: In this prospective bi-centre study from both Toulouse and Limoges Hospitals, we assessed DH during an incremental cycle ergometry before and 3 months after EBVs treatment. The primary objective was to observe the change in inspiratory capacity (IC) at isotime. Target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) and changes in residual volume (RV), forced expiratory volume in one-second (FEV1 ), mMRC, 6 minutes walking distance (6MWD), BODE and other dynamic measures like tele-expiratory volume (EELV) were also analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included, of whom thirty-eight presented DH. IC and EELV at isotime significantly improved (+214 mL, p = 0.004; -713 mL, p Ë‚ 0.001, respectively). Mean changes were +177 mL for FEV1 (+19%, p < 0.001), -600 mL for RV (p < 0.0001), +33 m for 6MWD (p < 0.0001), respectively. Patients who responded on RV (>430 mL decrease) and FEV1 (>12% gain) had better improvements compared to non-responders (+368 mL vs. +2 mL; +398 mL vs. -40 mL IC isotime, respectively). On the opposite, in patients who responded on DH (>200 mL IC isotime increase), changes in TLV (-1216 mL vs. -576 mL), FEV1 (+261 mL vs. +101 mL), FVC (+496 mL vs. +128 mL) and RV (-805 mL vs. -418 mL) were greater compared to non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: DH decreases after EBVs treatment, and this improvement is correlated with static changes.

Clinical management of molecular alterations identified by high throughput sequencing in patients with advanced solid tumors in treatment failure: Real-world data from a French hospital.

Background: In the context of personalized medicine, screening patients to identify targetable molecular alterations is essential for therapeutic decisions such as inclusion in clinical trials, early access to therapies, or compassionate treatment. The objective of this study was to determine the real-world impact of routine incorporation of FoundationOne analysis in cancers with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options, or in those progressing after at least one course of standard therapy. Methods: A FoundationOneCDx panel for solid tumor or liquid biopsy samples was offered to 204 eligible patients. Results: Samples from 150 patients were processed for genomic testing, with a data acquisition success rate of 93%. The analysis identified 2419 gene alterations, with a median of 11 alterations per tumor (range, 0-86). The most common or likely pathogenic variants were on TP53, TERT, PI3KCA, CDKN2A/B, KRAS, CCDN1, FGF19, FGF3, and SMAD4. The median tumor mutation burden was three mutations/Mb (range, 0-117) in 143 patients with available data. Of 150 patients with known or likely pathogenic actionable alterations, 13 (8.6%) received matched targeted therapy. Sixty-nine patients underwent Molecular Tumor Board, which resulted in recommendations in 60 cases. Treatment with genotype-directed therapy had no impact on overall survival (13 months vs. 14 months; p = 0.95; hazard ratio = 1.04 (95% confidence interval, 0.48-2.26)]. Conclusions: This study highlights that an organized center with a Multidisciplinary Molecular Tumor Board and an NGS screening system can obtain satisfactory results comparable with those of large centers for including patients in clinical trials.

Impact of KRAS G12C mutation in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: Few data are available on the impact of KRAS mutation in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treated with immunotherapy. This analysis assessed the impact of KRAS mutation on the efficiency of first-line pembrolizumab immunotherapy in aNSCLC patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50 %. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the ESCKEYP study, a retrospective, national, multicenter study which included consecutively all metastatic NSCLC patients who initiated first-line treatment with pembrolizumab monotherapy from May 2017 (date of pembrolizumab availability in this indication in France) to November 22, 2019 (pembrolizumab-chemotherapy combination approval). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the start of pembrolizumab treatment by the Kaplan-Meier method. Tumor response and PFS were assessed locally. RESULTS: Among the 681 non-squamous aNSCLC PD-L1 ≥ 50 % patients treated with pembrolizumab in the first line, 227 (33.0 %) had a KRAS mutation (KRAS G12C, 12.5 %; KRAS non-G12C, 20.5 %). Except among non-smokers (KRAS G12C, 0 %; KRAS non-G12C, 2.9 %; no KRAS mutation, 9.2 %), patients presented no differences in terms of sex, age, number and sites of metastatic disease at diagnosis, use of corticosteroids, use of antibiotics, and for biological factors between wild-type KRAS, KRAS G12C and non-KRAS G12C groups. Median (95 % CI) PFS in months were 7.0 (3.7-14) for KRAS G12C, 4.8 (3.4-6.7) for KRAS non-G12C and 8.5 (7.3-10.6) for wild-type KRAS genotypes (p = 0.23). Median OS were 18.4 (12.6-NR), 20.6 (11.4-NR) and 27.1 (18.7-34.2) months, respectively (p = 0.57). CONCLUSION: No difference in efficacy was observed in non-squamous aNSCLC patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab immunotherapy whether they presented a KRAS G12C, non KRAS G12C or wild-type KRAS genotype.

Bilateral endobronchial valves treatment for severe emphysema.

Bilateral endobronchial valves treatment can lead to additional significant benefits in patients who respond to the first procedure and have a clear target lobe on both lungs but increases the rate of complications https://bit.ly/3J0mZ8h.

Two-Stage Bronchoscopic Endobronchial Valve Treatment Can Lead to Progressive Lung Volume Reduction and May Decrease Pneumothorax Risk.

Background: Since successful development of endobronchial valves (EBV) as treatment for severe emphysema, its main complication, pneumothorax, remains an important concern. Objective: We hypothesized that a two-step EBV implantation, during two distinct iterative procedures could lead to a more progressive target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) and thus ipsilateral lobe re-expansion, resulting in a significant decrease in the pneumothorax rate. Methods: This retrospective bi-center study carried out by Limoges and Toulouse University Hospitals included patients following the inclusion criteria established by the BLVR expert panel. All patients were treated by two distinct procedures: first, EBVs were placed in all but the most proximal segment or sub-segment. The remaining segment was treated subsequently. All patients had a complete evaluation before treatment, and 3 months after the second procedure. Results: Out of 58 patients included, only 4 pneumothoraxes (7%) occurred during the study. The other complications were pneumonia and severe COPD exacerbation (8.6% and 13.7% of patients, respectively). Significant improvement was found for FEV1 (+19.6 ± 25%), RV (-468 ± 960mL), 6MWD (30 ± 85m), BODE Index (-1.4 ± 1.8 point) and TLVR (50.6 ± 35.1%). Significant TLVR (MCID) was obtained in 74.1% of patients (43/58). Conclusion: This new approach using EBV could reduce the incidence of pneumothorax without increasing other complication rates. Clinical and physiological outcomes are similar to those reported in studies using the conventional single-step treatment.