The introduction of clozapine at the Nathan Kline Institute in New York and its long-term consequences.

Nathan S. Kline was a pioneer in psychopharmacology in the United States (US). In 1952, Kline started a research unit at Rockland State Hospital, New York. Kline brought clozapine from Switzerland since it was not yet available in the US. At Rockland State Hospital, George Simpson had conducted antipsychotic trials and had developed scales to assess movement disorders. In 1974, Simpson published the first US clozapine trial. In 1978, he published on 1) the effect of clozapine on tardive dyskinesia and 2) high plasma clozapine concentrations in two patients with seizures. His experience of clozapine withdrawal symptoms in his first 2 trials led in the future to more articles in this area. In Philadelphia, Simpson designed a double-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) with 3 doses (100, 300 and 600 mg/day) which was published in 1999. From the 50 patients started on the RCT, 47 provided repeated plasma clozapine concentrations every other week of the RCT. This rich database of plasma clozapine concentrations under controlled conditions has contributed to many of the advances in clozapine pharmacokinetics in the last 5 years including: 1) obesity can be associated with clozapine poor metabolism (PM) status, 2) a clozapine ultrarapid metabolizer (UM) with a minimum therapeutic dose of 1591 mg/day, 3) a case of clozapine intoxication dropped from the RCT due to pneumonia, 4) cases of increased plasma concentrations during clozapine-induced fever, 5) the possibility that African-Americans may need higher clozapine doses than those of European ancestry, and 6) three indices of non-adherence.

Gene Expression in Patient-Derived Neural Progenitors Implicates WNT5A Signaling in the Etiology of Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies of schizophrenia have demonstrated that variations in noncoding regions are responsible for most of the common variation heritability of the disease. It is hypothesized that these risk variants alter gene expression. Therefore, studying alterations in gene expression in schizophrenia may provide a direct approach to understanding the etiology of the disease. In this study we use cultured neural progenitor cells derived from olfactory neuroepithelium (CNON cells) as a genetically unaltered cellular model to elucidate the neurodevelopmental aspects of schizophrenia. METHODS: We performed a gene expression study using RNA sequencing of CNON cells from 111 control subjects and 144 individuals with schizophrenia. Differentially expressed genes were identified with DESeq2 software, using covariates to correct for sex, age, library batches, and 1 surrogate variable component. RESULTS: A total of 80 genes were differentially expressed (false discovery rate < 10%), showing enrichment in cell migration, cell adhesion, developmental process, synapse assembly, cell proliferation, and related Gene Ontology categories. Cadherin and Wnt signaling pathways were positive in overrepresentation test, and, in addition, many genes were specifically involved in WNT5A signaling. The differentially expressed genes were modestly, but significantly, enriched in the genes overlapping single nucleotide polymorphisms with genome-wide significant association from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium genome-wide association study of schizophrenia. We also found substantial overlap with genes associated with other psychiatric disorders or brain development, enrichment in the same Gene Ontology categories as genes with mutations de novo in schizophrenia, and studies of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural progenitor cells. CONCLUSIONS: CNON cells are a good model of the neurodevelopmental aspects of schizophrenia and can be used to elucidate the etiology of the disorder.

Long-term improvement in efficacy and safety after switching to ziprasidone in stable outpatients with schizophrenia.

INTRODUCTION: The long-term efficacy and tolerability of treatment with ziprasidone following a switch from prior antipsychotics was evaluated in outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in three open-label, flexible-dose, 1-year extension studies. METHODS: These studies enrolled completers of 6-week trials in which subjects were switched to ziprasidone from conventional antipsychotics, olanzapine, or risperidone. Identical study designs and the small number of patients entering the extensions supported pooling of the data. RESULTS: Of 185 pooled subjects entering the extension studies, 72 completed 58 weeks of treatment. Median treatment duration was 34.6 weeks; median dose was 120 mg/day at endpoint. The intent-to-treat population showed significant improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores (-4.3 [P< or =.01]), PANSS negative scores (-2.4 [P< or =.0001]), and Clinical Global Impression of severity score (-0.3 [P< or =.001]). Completers showed significant improvement in mean PANSS total scores (-10.2 [P<.0001]), PANSS positive scores (-2.7 [P< .0001]), PANSS negative scores (-2.7 [P< .001]), and Clinical Global Impression of severity scores (-0.6 [P< .0001]). CONCLUSION: Ziprasidone was well tolerated, and patients demonstrated significant improvement in metabolic parameters and in all movement disorder assessments. Insomnia and somnolence were the only adverse events with an incidence >10% in pooled subjects. No subject had a corrected QT interval > or =500 msec.

Paliperidone extended-release tablets in schizophrenia patients previously treated with risperidone.

To assess the effect of paliperidone extended-release (ER) tablets in patients with acute symptoms who had previously received risperidone. Data for this post-hoc analysis were pooled from three 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in patients treated with paliperidone ER 3-12 mg/day or placebo. Patients had to have received risperidone for > or =4 weeks within 2 weeks of study entry. Assessments were done using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale, Personal and Social Performance scale, the Simpson-Angus Scale , and adverse event (AE) reports. Altogether, 198 patients (paliperidone ER, n=142; placebo, n=56) met the established criteria. Mean (SD) duration of prior risperidone treatment and dose were 418.8 (572.8) days and 4.4 (2.5) mg/day for paliperidone ER and 527.0 (805.3) days and 4.1 (2.5) mg/day for placebo. Study completion rates were 61.3% for paliperidone ER versus 42.9% for placebo. At endpoint, paliperidone ER showed significant improvement versus placebo (P<0.05) in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity, and Personal and Social Performance scores. Mean baseline Simpson-Angus Scale scores were low, with no significant changes at endpoint in either group. AEs > or =10% with paliperidone ER versus placebo were headache (16.2 vs. 16.1%), insomnia (14.1 vs. 16.1%), and agitation (8.5 vs. 10.7%). AE-related discontinuations were 2.1% with paliperidone ER and 5.4% with placebo. In patients who had received risperidone previously but remained sufficiently symptomatic for enrollment, paliperidone ER was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing symptoms and producing functional gains.

Weight gain during a double-blind multidosage clozapine study.

Possible variables associated with weight gain during clozapine treatment include dosing, treatment duration, baseline body mass index (BMI), sex, and plasma norclozapine concentrations. Weight gains during a double-blind, randomized clozapine study using 100-, 300-, and 600-mg/d doses were analyzed. It was hypothesized that weight gain was associated with baseline BMI, clozapine dosing, and demographic factors. The possible contribution of plasma clozapine and norclozapine concentrations was explored. Fifty treatment-refractory schizophrenia patients were randomized to 100-, 300-, or 600-mg/d doses of clozapine for a 16-week, double-blind treatment in a research ward. Nonresponsive patients went onto a second and/or a third 16-week, double-blind treatment at the other doses. Weights of patients were measured every week. During the first clozapine treatment, weight gain varied across 3 baseline BMI categories (normal-weight patients [4.1 kg, P < 0.001], overweight patients [2.6 kg, P = 0.05], and obese patients [0.36 kg, not significant]) and according to dosing (600 mg/d [4.4 kg], 300 mg/d [2.6 kg], and 100 mg/d [1.3 kg]). Sex had no effect after controlling for baseline BMI and dose, but the African-American race had a strong significant effect despite the small number of African Americans (n = 6). At the end of the first clozapine treatment, plasma norclozapine concentration was not significantly correlated with weight gain in the total sample (r = 0.16, P = 0.32, n = 43), but seems to be strongly correlated in nonsmokers. Despite its limitations, this study indicates that baseline BMI, dosing, and, possibly, the African-American race may be major determinants of clozapine-induced weight gain.

Maintenance therapy with once-monthly administration of long-acting injectable risperidone in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: a pilot study of an extended dosing interval.

BACKGROUND: Several clinical studies have established the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of long-acting risperidone administered once every 2 weeks in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. This report evaluates preliminary efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic data for a novel (once-monthly) administration of long-acting injectable risperidone 50 mg in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHODS: Clinically stable patients participated in a 1-year, open-label, single-arm, multicenter pilot study. During the 4-week lead-in phase, patients received long-acting risperidone 50 mg injections every 2 weeks, with 2 weeks of oral risperidone supplementation. Injections of long-acting risperidone 50 mg every 4 weeks followed for up to 48 weeks, without oral supplementation. The primary endpoint was relapse; other assessments included PANSS, CGI-S, adverse event reports, and determination of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone plasma concentrations. RESULTS: Twelve patients in the intent-to-treat population (n = 67) met relapse criteria (17.9%). Relapse risk at 1 year was estimated as 22.4%. Non-statistically significant improvements in symptoms (PANSS) and clinical status (CGI-S) at endpoint were observed. The most common adverse events included schizophrenia aggravated not otherwise specified (19.5%), anxiety (16.1%), insomnia (16.1%), and headache (11.5%). There were no unexpected safety and tolerability findings. Mean plasma concentrations for risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone were generally stable during the study. CONCLUSION: Once-monthly dosing of long-acting risperidone was well tolerated, associated with a relatively low relapse rate (similar to that reported with other antipsychotics), and maintained the clinically stable baseline status of most patients. Although the results suggest that some symptomatically stable patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder might be safely managed with long-acting risperidone 50 mg once monthly, these findings alone do not identify which patients will have a sufficient therapeutic benefit nor do they quantify comparative effects of standard and altered dosing. Study limitations (the open-label pilot study design, small sample size, and lack of a concurrent biweekly treatment arm) prevent broad interpretations and extrapolations of results. Controlled studies would be required to support a recommendation for alternative dosing regimens.

Review of antipsychotics in children and adolescents.

The use of antipsychotics in children and adolescents in the clinical setting is increasing. This article reviews 77 clinical trials published in the last 10 years, investigating their efficacy, effectiveness, safety and pharmacokinetic data in paediatric populations. The diagnostic categories in which the antipsychotics are commonly used (schizophrenia, pervasive developmental disorders, Tourette's disorder, mental retardation/subaverage intelligence, mood disorders and disruptive behaviour disorders) were used in order to review the evidence and effectiveness. All randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials from the past decade are also summarised. This review refers to recent relevant practice parameters, guidelines and reviews throughout the text. Consistent with previous reviews, it is concluded that the recent trend of increased use of antipsychotics in children and adolescents is not adequately supported by evidence. Specific suggestions have been provided on how to incorporate the existing evidence base into clinical decision making. The review ends with the authors' opinion on the clinical and research implications for the field and future directions.

A 1-year double-blind study of 2 doses of long-acting risperidone in stable patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of 2 doses of long-acting risperidone injection in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHOD: This 52-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, international study included clinically stable outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV criteria). Settings included physicians' offices and clinics. Patients received a fixed dose of long-acting risperidone (25 or 50 mg) every 2 weeks. Primary outcome was time to relapse, defined as either re-hospitalization or other exacerbation criteria. Other assessments included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale, and functional and quality-of-life measures. Safety was assessed via treatment-emergent adverse events, laboratory tests, and movement disorder rating scales. Data were collected from December 2002 to September 2004. RESULTS: A total of 324 patients were randomized to 25 mg (N = 163) or 50 mg (N = 161) of long-acting risperidone. Time to relapse was comparable (p = .131) for both groups. Projected median time to relapse was 161.8 weeks (95% CI = 103.0 to 254.2) with 25 mg and 259.0 weeks (95% CI = 153.6 to 436.8) with 50 mg. One-year incidences of relapse were 21.6% (N = 35) and 14.9% (N = 24), respectively (p = .059). Psychiatric hospitalization was the reason for relapse for 16 (10%) in the 25-mg group and 10 (6%) in the 50-mg group. Patients experienced statistically significant but modest improvements at endpoint in most measures (i.e., psychotic symptoms, functioning, movement disorder severity) with both doses, with no significant between-group differences. CONCLUSION: In this 1-year study, long-acting risperidone was associated with low relapse and rehospitalization rates, indicating that doses of 25 to 50 mg are appropriate for long-term treatment in schizophrenia.

Atypical antipsychotics and the burden of disease.

The atypical antipsychotics are defined by improved tolerability in comparison with conventional antipsychotics. Specifically, the atypicals are substantially less likely to cause troubling extrapyramidal symptoms and prolactin elevation. This reduction in adverse effects (AEs) is attributed to their short duration of occupancy at dopamine-2 receptors in the central nervous system and a high degree of activity at serotonin receptors of various subtypes. The main AEs associated with the atypicals are weight gain and metabolic effects, including disturbances in glucose metabolism and a risk of induced diabetes. However, the atypicals are not interchangeable: the risk of incurring these effects is high with clozapine and olanzapine, moderate with risperidone and quetiapine (but perhaps increasing at higher doses), and minimal with ziprasidone and aripiprazole. The atypicals have proved useful as monotherapy in treating schizophrenia and in combination with other psychoactive agents in treating bipolar disorder. Because of their improved tolerability, the atypicals offer the prospect of improved compliance and reduced risk of relapse, thus decreasing costs by the need for less hospitalization.

Six-month, blinded, multicenter continuation study of ziprasidone versus olanzapine in schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: The authors' goal was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of 6 months' treatment with flexible-dose ziprasidone and olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHOD: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity scores were obtained for 126 responders to a 6-week acute study of olanzapine and ziprasidone during a blinded 6-month continuation study and optional extension study. RESULTS: Comparable improvements in BPRS and CGI severity scores were seen with both drugs. Olanzapine produced significant increases from acute-study baseline values in weight and body mass index and within-group increases in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and fasting insulin. Between-group differences were not significant for lipids and insulin. Mean QTc values at endpoint were 407.1 msec (baseline mean=406.0 msec) and 394.4 msec (baseline mean=399.7 msec) for ziprasidone and olanzapine, respectively. No patient had a QTc interval > or =500 msec. CONCLUSIONS: Ziprasidone and olanzapine had comparable long-term efficacy; olanzapine was associated with significant weight gain and metabolic alterations.

Does clozapine decrease smoking?

McEvoy et al.'s study in 1999, which used cotinine levels but had limited power, suggested that clozapine treatment may be associated with a mild smoking decrease (particularly when plasma clozapine levels are > 150 ng/ml). Some naturalistic studies also suggest that clozapine treatment may be associated with a mild smoking decrease. The present study included 38 schizophrenic daily smokers from a double-blind clozapine trial. Five analyses were tested for significant decreases in plasma cotinine levels from a haloperidol baseline to: (1) the end of clozapine trials regarding clozapine doses (100, 300 or 600 mg/day), (2) the end of the clozapine trial where the highest plasma clozapine level was achieved, (3) the end of the clozapine trial where a clozapine level in the 150-450 ng/ml range was achieved, (4) the end of the first clozapine trial regardless of clozapine dose, and (5) the end of the last clozapine trial in the study. The first and straightforward analysis by dose showed no clozapine effects on smoking. The second and the third analyses (an attempt to mimic the design by McEvoy et al. [McEvoy, J.P., Freudenreich, O., Wilson, W.H., 1999. Smoking and therapeutic response to clozapine in patients with schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiat. 46, 125-129.]) also indicated that there was not a significant effect of clozapine on smoking. The fourth and five analyses were also negative. None of the five analyses in our clozapine trial demonstrated that clozapine had major effects on smoking. This study cannot rule out that in some subjects, clozapine treatment may be associated with a small decrease in smoking. New prospective longitudinal studies using repeated cotinine and clozapine levels are needed to explore whether clozapine may reduce smoking in some patients.

An 8-week open-label trial of a 6-day course of mifepristone for the treatment of psychotic depression.

OBJECTIVE: Several investigations suggest that mifepristone leads to the rapid amelioration of psychotic depression. However, these studies were of short duration (1 week or less) and included subjects who were taking other psychotropic medications. The goals of this study were to extend these findings by conducting an 8-week trial of mifepristone for subjects with psychotic depression who were taking no concomitant psychiatric medications. METHOD: Twenty subjects with a DSM-IV major depressive episode with psychotic features (for convenience we use the term psychotic depression) taking no psychotropic medications were given a 6-day course of mifepristone and followed as inpatients for a total of 8 weeks. Nonblinded ratings using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI) were performed at baseline and at the end of weeks 1, 4, and 8. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) was also administered at baseline and after weeks 4 and 8. Subjects were recruited between February 2003 and December 2003. RESULTS: Significant improvements in HAM-D and CGI scores were shown after 1 week and between weeks 1 and 4 but not between weeks 4 and 8. BPRS scores improved significantly after week 4, while the improvement in BPRS scores between weeks 4 and 8 was of borderline significance. CONCLUSION: Mifepristone appears to be a useful intervention for psychotic depression, leading to significant improvements even after a 1-week course of administration. Issues related to its optimal dosing and to prediction of response are discussed, as are the implications of lack of a placebo group and the use of nonblinded ratings in the present study.

Plasma clozapine concentration coefficients of variation in a long-term study.

Kurz et al. conducted the first study of the intra-individual variability of clozapine plasma concentrations but did not take into account the effect of smoking and co-medication. As patients were receiving varying doses, Kurz et al. standardized plasma levels by using a plasma level/dose/kg ratio. In 15 patients, the mean coefficient of variation (CV) was 53% (S.D. = 21). In this new study, plasma clozapine and norclozapine concentrations were measured every 2 weeks in 47 patients randomized to 100, 300, or 600 mg/day for 16-week double-blind clozapine trials under controlled conditions (stable smoking, limited co-medication and absence of caffeinated beverages). For 100, 300 and 600 mg/day, the respective mean CVs for plasma clozapine concentrations were 23% (S.D. = 14), 19% (S.D.= 11) and 18% (S.D. = 8). For the combined concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine, the respective mean CVs were 20% (S.D. = 13), 16% (S.D. = 9) and 15% (S.D. = 7). Under 100 mg/day, the mean CV for clozapine concentrations was significantly higher for heavy smokers than non-heavy smokers (32%, S.D. = 3 vs. 19%, S.D. = 8) (p = 0.03). Studies of CVs in other environments are needed. Clozapine CVs may be important in order to understand the importance of variations around the therapeutic range and to interpret drug interactions above the usual noise of measuring plasma concentrations.

Haloperidol half-life after chronic dosing.

In normal subjects after a single oral dose, haloperidol half-life has been reported to range 14.5-36.7 hours (or up to 1.5 days). After chronic administration, half-lives of up to 21 days have been reported. The objective of this study was to evaluate specific factors that might account for differences in haloperidol half-life in patients taking haloperidol chronically, including gender, age, weight, race, CYP2D6 and CYP3A5 genotypes, comedication, and smoking.Thirty-one patients were administered haloperidol for 4 weeks followed by a 1-week washout before administration of clozapine. Haloperidol plasma levels were measured weekly for at least 2 months after discontinuation. The geometric mean for haloperidol half-life and detectable levels duration were 3.9 and 13.8 days, respectively. Within 31 subjects, 58% (18/31) had half-lives <3 days (1.2-2.3 days) and 42% (13/31) had half-lives > or =3 days. Two of 3 patients with half-lives longer than 30 days (720 hours) and levels detectable >2 months had received haloperidol decanoate. Five patients who received haloperidol decanoate in the prior year were excluded from a comparison between patients with long haloperidol half-lives (> or =3 days, n = 10) and patients with short half-lives (<3 days, n = 16). The only significant difference between the two groups was that African-Americans (n = 4) were all found to have a long haloperidol half-life (P = 0.014). CYP3A5 genotype did not appear to influence haloperidol half-life but the two CYP2D6 poor metabolizer had half-lives > or =3 days. This study suggests that haloperidol half-life following repeated drug administration is substantially more prolonged than what has been observed after acute haloperidol administration.

Randomized, controlled, double-blind multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone and olanzapine in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Limited randomized, controlled trial data exist on possible differences between atypical antipsychotics in efficacy, overall tolerability, and important indices of health status. The authors compared the efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone and olanzapine in the treatment of acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHOD: In this 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-design, flexible-dose trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive ziprasidone (N=136) or olanzapine (N=133). Primary efficacy measures were improvement in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity scale scores; secondary measures were scores on the CGI improvement scale, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia. Tolerability assessments included fasting lipid profiles, fasting glucose and insulin measurements, electrocardiography, and monitoring of vital signs and body weight. RESULTS: The overall mean daily doses were 129.9 mg (SD=27.3) for ziprasidone and 11.3 mg (SD=2.8) for olanzapine. Both antipsychotics were efficacious in improving symptoms and global illness severity. The two treatment groups did not differ significantly in primary or secondary efficacy measures at endpoint or in by-visit analysis. Both agents were well tolerated. Body weight, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol significantly increased with olanzapine but not with ziprasidone; all between-group comparisons of these variables were significant and favored ziprasidone. Olanzapine, but not ziprasidone, was associated with significant increases in fasting insulin level. No patient in either group exhibited a corrected QT interval >/=500 msec. CONCLUSIONS: During 6 weeks' treatment, ziprasidone and olanzapine demonstrated comparable antipsychotic efficacy. Differences favoring ziprasidone were observed in metabolic parameters.

Possible individual and gender differences in the small increases in plasma prolactin levels seen during clozapine treatment.

In vitro, animal studies and acute short-term clinical studies suggest clozapine releases prolactin but the effect is much smaller than that of typical antipsychotics. Repeated early morning trough measures of plasma clozapine and prolactin levels on each subject were studied during the course of a double-blind dose-response clozapine study. After a 4-week 10 mg/day haloperidol trial and a one-week washout, treatment- refractory schizophrenics were successively randomized to 100, 300,or 600 mg/day of clozapine for a 16- week treatment. The statistical analyses included 35 subjects (19 females and 16 males). The within-subject correlation of prolactin levels was 0.32 with clozapine levels and 0.75 with haloperidol levels. An increment of 100 ng/ml in clozapine level yielded an average increment of 0.45 ng/ml of prolactin levels in females and of 0.15 ng/ml in males. An increment of 1 ng/ml in haloperidol level yielded an average increment of 2.6 ng/ml of prolactin levels in females and of 1.5 ng/ml in males. At least one fourth of patients demonstrated a significant and strong (r > 0.6) correlation between clozapine and prolactin levels. This study suggests that clozapine has effects on prolactin levels but effects are small and may be more evident in some individuals, particularly females.