Successful Management of a Neglected Talonavicular Joint Dislocation Using Corrective Osteotomy and Subtalar Fixation: A Case Report.

The complete loss of articular relationships between the talus and navicular bone is known as talonavicular joint (TNJ) dislocation. Medial dislocation of the TNJ is more common than lateral dislocation. Lateral dislocation is usually associated with a fracture of the calcaneocuboid joint. Surgeons encounter difficulties when treating these dislocations. It occurs following high-energy trauma and is managed with immediate closed reduction of the joint and immobilization, but some complicated cases require open reduction and fixation to achieve alignment, strength, and function. This case report describes a six-month-old neglected case of TNJ dislocation managed with corrective osteotomy and subtalar fixation. Fusion of the talonavicular and talocalcaneal joints was performed. This procedure had a satisfactory outcome, as the patient was completely relieved of pain.

Tibiotalocalcaneal Nail: A Novel Tool in the Management of Old Neglected Ankle Dislocation With Deformity.

Ankle dislocations, particularly those that are old and neglected, pose significant challenges in orthopedic management due to the development of arthritic changes and surgical difficulties of reduction. The optimal treatment often involves stabilization and realignment to ensure proper healing. The closed reduction is rarely achieved in old neglected dislocations. Open reduction with internal or external fixation is the treatment for old neglected dislocations. Ankle and subtalar arthrodesis ensure painless plantigrade foot. The case report describes a case of an 8-month-old unreduced ankle dislocation with equinus deformity managed with ankle and subtalar arthrodesis using tibiotalocalcaneal nail. The equinus deformity was corrected and painless stable ankle joint was achieved.

Recovery of Muscular Strength Following Total Hip Replacement: A Narrative Review.

This narrative review analyzes muscle strength recovery following total hip replacement (THR) and looks at various factors affecting postoperative muscle function restoration. The review synthesizes evidence from various studies regarding the timing and degree of muscular strength recovery, different rehabilitation protocols, and patient-specific variables such as age, preoperative physical condition, and comorbidities, among others. Overall, it appears that THR is associated with improved hip function and quality of life, but this usually takes a long time due to individualized physical therapy interventions. In addition, postoperative rehabilitation has been found not to exist without any personal factors involved such as age or gender whereby for instance senior citizens have no alternative but to go for THR surgery, making their lower limbs weaker than those who are younger. Based on the findings in this review on muscle recovery after THR surgeries, one may conclude that this endeavor should begin as early as possible and include regular resistance training programs with performance-focused functional training after surgery. In addition, more longitudinal studies should be conducted regarding post-surgical outcomes comparing other traditional medical practices.

Comparative Review of Postoperative Analgesic Use After Total Hip Replacement: Opioids Versus Non-opioids.

Total hip replacement (THR) is a common surgical procedure aimed at alleviating pain and improving function in patients with hip joint pathology. Effective postoperative pain management is crucial for patient recovery, satisfaction, and overall outcomes. This narrative review examines the comparative efficacy, safety, and implications of using opioids versus non-opioid analgesics in managing postoperative pain following THR. Opioids, while effective for severe pain, pose significant risks such as addiction, tolerance, and adverse effects. Non-opioid analgesics, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, and regional anesthesia techniques, offer alternatives with potentially fewer side effects. This review synthesizes current evidence from clinical trials, observational studies, and expert guidelines to provide a comprehensive understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of each analgesic approach. The goal is to inform clinical decision-making and optimize pain management strategies for THR patients, balancing efficacy and safety.

Resolving the KgA1c paradox in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Excess body weight is a leading cause of metabolic complications such as hypertension and dyslipidemia in T2DM patients. Available antihyperglycemic agents have minimal or no impact on these complications and a majority are known to trigger weight gain, thereby exerting a paradoxical effect on overall metabolic status. This review introduces the concept of 'KgA1c paradox' and underscores the significance of resolving this paradox for comprehensive T2DM management. It provides a therapeutic rationale for inclusion of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the T2DM treatment algorithm as these agents have demonstrated favorable glycemic effects along with reduction in body weight.

Analysis of TP53 polymorphisms in North Indian sporadic esophageal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the relationship of five TP53 polymorphisms (p.P47S, p.R72P, PIN3 ins16bp, p.R213R and r.13494g>a) with the esophageal cancer (EC) risk in North Indians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Genotyping of p.P47S, p.R72P, PIN3 ins16bp, p.R213R and r.13494g>a polymorphisms of TP53 in 136 sporadic EC patients and 136 controls using polymerase chain reaction and PCR-RFLP. RESULTS: The frequencies of genotype RR, RP and PP of p.R72P polymorphism were 16.91 vs 26.47%, 58.82 vs 49.27% and 24.27 vs 24.27% among patients and controls respectively. We observed significantly increased frequency of RP genotype in cases as compared to controls (OR=1.87, 95% CI, 1.01-3.46, p=0.05). The frequencies of genotype A1A1, A1A2 and A2A2 of PIN3 ins16bp polymorphism were 69.12 vs 70.59%, 27.20 vs 25% and 3.68 vs 4.41% among patients and controls. There was no significant difference among genotype and allele distribution between patients and controls. The frequencies of genotype GG, GA and AA of r.13494g>a polymorphism were 62.50 vs 64.70%, 34.56 vs 30.15% and 2.94 vs 5.15% among patients and controls respectively. No significant difference between genotype and allele frequency was observed in the patients and controls. For p.P47S and p.R213R polymorphisms, all the cases and controls had homozygous wild type genotype. The RP-A1A1-GG genotype combination shows significant risk for EC (OR=2.01, 95%CI: 1.01-3.99, p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among the five TP53 polymorphisms investigated, only p.R72P polymorphism may contributes to EC susceptibility.

PCNL - a comparative study in nonoperated and in previously operated (open nephrolithotomy/pyelolithotomy) patients - a single-surgeon experience

PURPOSE: Re-procedure in patients with history of open stone surgery is usually challenging due to the alteration in the retroperitoneal anatomy. The aim of this study was to determine the possible impact of open renal surgery on the efficacy and morbidity of subsequent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2009 until September 2010, 120 patients underwent PCNL. Of these, 20 patients were excluded (tubeless or bilateral simultaneous PCNL). Of the remaining 100, 55 primary patients were categorized as Group 1 and the remaining (previous open nephrolithotomy) as Group 2. Standard preoperative evaluation was carried out prior to intervention, Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v. 11 with the chi-square test, independent samples t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test. A p-value < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. RESULTS: Both groups were similar in demographic profile and stone burden. Attempts to access the PCS was less in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (1.2 + 1 2 vs 3 + 1.3 respectively) and this was statistically significant (p < 0.04). However, the mean operative time between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.44). Blood transfusion rate was comparable in the two groups (p = 0.24). One patient in Group 2 developed hemothorax following a supra-11th puncture. Remaining complications were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with past history of renal stone surgery may need more attempts to access the pelvicaliceal system and have difficulty in tract dilation secondary to retroperitoneal scarring. But overall morbidity and efficacy is same in both groups.

PCNL--A comparative study in nonoperated and in previously operated (open nephrolithotomy/pyelolithotomy) patients--a single-surgeon experience.

PURPOSE: Re-procedure in patients with history of open stone surgery is usually challenging due to the alteration in the retroperitoneal anatomy. The aim of this study was to determine the possible impact of open renal surgery on the efficacy and morbidity of subsequent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2009 until September 2010, 120 patients underwent PCNL. Of these, 20 patients were excluded (tubeless or bilateral simultaneous PCNL). Of the remaining 100, 55 primary patients were categorized as Group 1 and the remaining (previous open nephrolithotomy) as Group 2. Standard preoperative evaluation was carried out prior to intervention, Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v. 11 with the chi-square test, independent samples t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test. A p-value < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. RESULTS: Both groups were similar in demographic profile and stone burden. Attempts to access the PCS was less in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (1.2 + 1 2 vs. 3 + 1.3 respectively) and this was statistically significant (p < 0.04). However, the mean operative time between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.44). Blood transfusion rate was comparable in the two groups (p = 0.24). One patient in Group 2 developed hemothorax following a supra-11th puncture. Remaining complications were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with past history of renal stone surgery may need more attempts to access the pelvicaliceal system and have difficulty in tract dilation secondary to retroperitoneal scarring. But overall morbidity and efficacy is same in both groups.