ARTERIAL HYPEROXIA AND MORTALITY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING VENOARTERIAL EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION.

ABSTRACT: Background: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) can easily lead to supranormal oxygenation. The impact of hyperoxygenation beyond the early VA-ECMO support phase is unexplored. We sought to investigate its association with short- and long-term mortality. Methods: A total of 10,615 arterial blood gases of 179 patients undergoing VA-ECMO between 2013 and 2018 in our cardiosurgical tertiary center were analyzed for partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and its association with in-hospital, 90-day, and 1-year mortality. Patients were stratified into terciles (T) based on PaO2. Results: The median systemic PaO2 during VA-ECMO was 122 mm Hg (Q1-Q3, 111-158 mm Hg) and was significantly higher in 90-day nonsurvivors versus survivors (134 mm Hg [Q1-Q3, 114-175 mm Hg] vs. 114 mm Hg [Q1-Q3, 109-136 mm Hg]; P < 0.001). The incidence of mortality increased at all time points tested after VA-ECMO implantation along with the increasing terciles of PaO2. The lowest mortality rates were noted for patients with median PaO2 values of <115 mm Hg (T1), whereas patients with median PaO2 values of >144 mm Hg (T3) had the highest mortality rates. Bonferroni multiple testing analysis found the T3 of PaO2 to be a predictor of decreased 90-day survival in comparison with T1 (P < 0.001) and T2 (P = 0.002). Multivariable Cox regression analyses for in-hospital, 90-day, and 1-year mortality showed a significant association of the T3 compared with the T2 and the T1 of PaO2 to mortality across all endpoints. Conclusion: Hyperoxygenation during VA-ECMO might be associated with increased all-cause mortality. The results of our study further document the known toxicity of hyperoxygenation in general critical care patients and mark the need to focus specifically on VA-ECMO patients.

Troponin T and Survival following Cardiac Surgery in Patients Supported with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Post-Cardiotomy Shock.

BACKGROUND: While troponin is an established biomarker of cardiac injury, its prognostic significance in post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock patients supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (PCCS-VA-ECMO) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the correlation between early post-operative troponin T levels and both short-term and long-term mortality outcomes in this cohort. METHODS: We evaluated 1457 troponin T measurements from 102 PCCS-VA-ECMO patients treated from 2013 to 2018 at a specialized cardio-surgical and transplantation center. Emphasis was placed on troponin concentrations at 24-48 h post-surgery, post-VA-ECMO implantation, and peak troponin levels in relation to VA-ECMO weaning, as well as 90-day and one-year mortality. RESULTS: No significant association was observed between troponin T levels post-VA-ECMO implantation and 90-day mortality (median: 1338 ng/L for overall, 1529 ng/L for survivors vs. 1294 ng/L for non-survivors; p = 0.146) or between peak troponin levels and 90-day mortality (median: 3583 ng/L for overall, 3337 ng/L for survivors vs. 3666 ng/L for non-survivors; p = 0.709). Comprehensive multivariate models showed no correlation between troponin levels and various mortality endpoints. Notably, age, procedure urgency, type, LVEF pre-surgery, Euroscore II, prior cardiac arrest, and VA-ECMO duration were not linked with troponin release. Hemodiafiltration emerged as the strongest mortality risk factor [HR 2.4]. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated early Troponin T release and peak troponin T were not associated, while organ complications were linked with VA-ECMO weaning or short- and long-term prognosis. The results underscore the multi-organ implications of PCCS in determining survival.

Current applications and outcomes of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation based on 6 years of experience: risk factors for in­hospital mortality.

INTRODUCTION: Data regarding venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) as a temporary circulatory support in cardiogenic shock (CS) for Central Europe are scarce. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to disclose indications, in-hospital, and long-term (1-year) mortality along with risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study is a retrospective investigation of patients who underwent VA ECMO for CS at a cardiosurgical tertiary center, from January 2013 to June 2018. A broad spectrum of pre- and postimplantation factors was tested using univariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median (interquartile range) duration of support was 207 (91­339) hours, with no significant disparity among hospital survivors and nonsurvivors (P = 0.09). A total of 40.4% of patients died during ECMO support, while the joined in-hospital and 6-month mortality progressed to 65.2%, and 1-year mortality to 67.2%; 9% underwent a subsequent heart transplantation. Main adverse events were bleeding (76%), infection (56%), neurologic injury (15%), and limb ischemia (15%). Multiorgan failure was the most decisive risk factor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 4.45; P <⁠0.001). Patients with postcardiotomy CS had a significantly lower out-of-hospital survival rate than the nonsurgical group (32.3% vs 45%; log-rank P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: The study showed survival benefit, despite frequent complications. The protocol focusing on proper candidate selection and timing can positively impact patient survival. Additional risk reduction can be achieved with a further increase of the team experience with ECMO.

Results of open heart surgery in Jehovah's Witness patients. Single centre experience.

AIM: Evaluation the results in patients from the religious community of Jehovah's Witness (JW) undergoing open heart surgery at our institution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between September 2011 and March 2015, 21 patients with a religious background of the JW church underwent open heart surgery at our institution performed by the same surgical team. Mean age was 68.43 ±8.93 years. There were 13 (61.9%) female patients. Recombinant human erythropoietin was administered to every patient with a hemoglobin value < 12.0 g/dl. Nine patients undergoing isolated coronary artery revascularization were operated on without cardiopulmonary bypass. Seven patients underwent combined surgery and 5 patients underwent aortic valve replacement via ministernotomy. The mean follow-up time was 16.45 ±11.09 months (range: 1.67-44.3 months). RESULTS: Mean baseline hematocrit serum level was 40.15 ±3.34% (range: 34.5-46.1%). Perioperatively the hematocrit serum levels decreased to the mean level of 29.89 ±4.31% (range: 21.4-36.3%). The mean hematocrit value at discharge was 30.85 ±3.59% (range: 23.5-38.4%). One death was observed in the perioperative period. Five (24%) patients suffered from sternum wound infection requiring vacuum-assisted therapy. During the follow-up period 1 patient died due to a non-cardiac related cause. CONCLUSIONS: After careful preoperative preparation the results of open heart surgery in JW were very good, including combined procedures. The decrease of hematocrit serum levels significantly characterizing the postoperative period was highly acceptable in this series. Nevertheless, the number of sternum wound infections was a limiting factor for prompt postoperative recovery.

Pulsatile-flow mechanical circulatory support (MCS) as a bridge to transplantation or recovery. Single-centre experience with the POLCAS system in 2014.

INTRODUCTION: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is a recognised method of treatment for patients with end-stage chronic or acute heart failure. The POLCAS pulsatile-flow system has been used in our institution for 15 years. Currently, it is being widely replaced by continuous-flow mechanical circulatory support equipment of the second and third generations (HeartMateII, HeartWare). The MCS presented in this study is associated with a significant risk of complications and its use is increasingly considered controversial. The aim of the study was an evaluation of the results of treatment utilising the POLCAS MCS system at our institution in 2014. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The POLCAS system was implanted in 12 patients aged 16-63 years (42 ± 17 years) during a period of 12 months (from January to December, 2014). Full-blown cardiogenic shock was observed in all patients before MCS implantation. Four of the analysed patients (33%) required prior circulatory support with other devices: IABP (n = 2) or ECMO (n = 2). Episodes of cardiac arrest were reported in three patients; three other patients experienced serious arrhythmias, which accelerated the decision to implant MCS. The presented data was retrospectively obtained from the CliniNET system of the Institute of Cardiology. OpenOffice Calc spreadsheet was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Average MCS time was 41 days ± 25 (from 15 to 91 days). Survival until transplantation or explantation was 91.67%. The most frequent complications following the therapy were: cardiac tamponade or bleeding requiring an intervention - 25% (n = 3), renal failure requiring dialysis - 25% (n = 3), ischaemic stroke associated with the MCS - 16.6% (n = 2), bacteraemia - 16.6% (n = 2), and wound infection - 8% (n = 1). No malfunctions of the MCS system were reported. Early survival in patients who completed the MCS therapy, defined as discharge, amounted to 63.6% (n = 7). CONCLUSIONS: The POLCAS heart assist system is an effective method of treatment as a bridge to transplantation or recovery in patients with end-stage heart failure. Early survival after the treatment remains at a satisfactory level. The main problem is the large number of complications related to the therapy.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: a series of cases.

BACKGROUND: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) has been considered a relative contraindication for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Due to more oval shape of the BAV annulus compared to tricuspid aortic valve, the procedure has been discouraged because of an increased risk of stent assembly displacement, uneven expansion, post-procedure paravalvular leakage, stent valve distortion, or other malfunction after implantation. For the same reasons patients with BAV have been excluded from the majority of clinical TAVI trials. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAVI in patients with BAV stenosis. METHODS: We analysed a group of 104 patients admitted to our institution for TAVI between January 2009 and May 2012. During pre-procedure evaluation, transthoracic and transoesophageal (TEE) echocardiography as well as angio-computed tomography (CT) scan were performed to assess aortic valve anatomy and morphology. Appropriate measurements and detailed analyses of imaging data have been accomplished to select optimal access site, prosthesis size as well as to plan the procedure. BAVs were recorded in seven patients (6.7%; mean age 77.7 years). These patients presented with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with a mean aortic valve area of 0.55 cm² (0.46-0.7 cm²) as measured in TEE. All of the patients had been disqualified from surgical valve replacement due to high surgical risk with a mean logistic Euroscore of 19.9%. All of them successfully underwent TAVI using CoreValve (n = 5) or Sapien (n = 2) valves. Follow-up was completed at 30 days, and six and 12 months after the procedure. RESULTS: During follow-up one patient developed an elliptic distortion of the aortic prosthesis in CT, although it did not result in significant malfunctioning of the implant. One patient died of infective endocarditis 30 days after the procedure. Survivors at 30-day follow-up had mild to moderate aortic insufficiency, and it did not deteriorate after six months. At one year follow-up six out of seven patients remained alive. They achieved significant functional improvement by New York Heart Association class compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI may constitute an alternative treatment option for high-risk patients with BAV, resulting in a low periprocedural mortality rate, and good 30-day, six-month, and one-year outcomes.

Does contrast agent injection during trans-catheter aortic valve implantation negatively affect kidney function?

BACKGROUND: Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has recently emerged as an alternative to conventional surgery in high-risk surgical patients with haemodynamically significant aortic valve stenosis. However, patients referred for TAVI are usually elderly individuals (> 80 years) who frequently also suffer from renal impairment. Trans-catheter valve therapies require extensive use of contrast injections with a risk of nephrotoxicity. AIM: To evaluate post-TAVI renal function and to determine whether the exposure to contrast injections might cause reduced kidney function and contrast-induced nephropathy. METHODS: From January 2009 to September 2010, TAVI was performed in 39 patients (26 women and 13 men). The mean age of the patients was 81.43 ± 7.39 years, and the mean volume of contrast material administered was 187.95 ± 91.34 mL. Serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR, acc. to the MDRD formula) were estimated in all patients prior to and 1, 2, and 5-8 days after TAVI. RESULTS: Two female patients died on postoperative day 1. Other patients did not show clinically significant reduction in renal function following the procedure (mean creatinine concentration 104.46 vs 99.77 vs 94.56 vs 93.64 mmol/L, NS and mean GFR 52.37 vs 56.63 vs 60.18 vs 61.34 mL/min/1.73 m², NS). CONCLUSIONS: 1. The TAVI procedure, which includes contrast injection does not seem to cause a clinically significant decrease of renal function. 2. None of our elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis, multiple co-morbidities, and pre- TAVI renal compromise developed contrast-induced nephropathy.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using transfemoral/transsubclavian or transapical approach: 30-day follow-up of the initial 30 patients.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a new method for the treatment of aortic stenosis (AS). AIM: To evaluate early results of TAVI using transfemoral/transsubclavian approach (TFA/TSA) or transapical approach (TAA) in patients with severe AS and high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement. METHODS: Between January 2009 and May 2010, 30 high-risk patients underwent TAVI. The primary treatment option was TFA, and TAA was used if contraindications to TFA were present; one patient underwent the procedure using TSA. Reasons for selecting TAA were as follows: small diameter (<7 mm) and/or severe calcification of the iliofemoral arteries, peripheral atherosclerosis, "porcelain" aorta and a horizontal course of the ascending aorta. Edwards-Sapien or CoreValve devices were used in all cases, and procedures were performed without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass in a cardiac catheterisation laboratory. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 82.46 ± 5.79 years, mean NYHA class was 3.23 ± 0.41, and predicted mean surgical mortality using logistic Euroscore was 29.18 ± 16.9% (22.72 ± 12.07% in the TFA/TSA group vs 34.6 ± 15.4% in the TAA group; p = 0.031). Eleven patients were treated using TAA. The valve was implanted successfully in 96% of patients. Inhospital mortality was 3.3%. Mean 30-day mortality was 6.6% in the entire cohort, 0% in the TFA/TSA group and 18% in the TAA group. There were no cases of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI), cardiogenic shock, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, or need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. One patient died suddenly three weeks after the procedure; except for this case, there were no major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE: MI, cerebrovascular accident, re-do procedure) at 30-day follow-up. The TAVI was associated with a significant reduction in the mean maximal aortic gradient in both groups (from 99.6 ± 22.07 mm Hg to 21.83 ± 9.38 mm Hg post-procedure and to 23.25 ± 9.22 mm Hg at 30-day follow up), with no cases of severe aortic valve regurgitation. The NYHA class at 30 days improved from 3.23 ± 0.41 to 1.72 ± 0.52 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate lower 30-day complication rate and mortality in the TFA/TSA group. The availability of several techniques of valve implantation in the group of non-surgical patients with severe AS potentially broadens the patient population with indications for this treatment.

Over 10 years with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator - a long term follow-up of 60 patients.

BACKGROUND: Transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) have been implanted in Poland since 1995. As the method spreads it is important to consider its long-term benefits and disadvantages. AIM: To assess survival, efficacy and complication rate in ICD patients, who received the device more than ten years earlier. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 60 ICD patients implanted between 1995-1999. RESULTS: There were 42 (70%) males, mean age 50.6 ± 16.4 years. In 59 patients ICD was implanted for sudden cardiac death (SCD) secondary prevention. Thirty eight patients (34 M, 63.3%) had coronary artery disease (CAD). The CAD was diagnosed in 89.5% of males and 10.5% of females (p〈 0.0001). Mean follow-up time was 75.4 ± 34.7 months. During this time 22 patients died (37%, 19 M, 3 F). Three deaths were SCD. Mean one-year mortality was 6.7%. Deaths were more frequent among males: 45.2% vs 16.7%, p〈 0.005. In CAD mortality was higher than in non-CAD patients (50% vs 13.6%, p〈 0.005). Appropriate ICD discharges in the ventricular fibrillation (VF) zone occurred in 35 (58%) patients, and in ventricular tachycardia (VT) zone - in 26 (43%) patients. Mean intervention rate per year was 3.7 for VF and 0.6 for VT. Complications occurred in 27 (45%) patients and 5 (8%) of them had no ICD intervention during follow-up. In 5 patients more than one complication was diagnosed. There were inappropriate discharges in 15 (25%) patients, 11 (18%) had electrical storm, and ICD-related infections were noted in 3 (5%) patients. During the perioperative period, lead revisions were done in 4 patients; in 3 with discharges induced by T-wave oversensing and in one with lead dislocation. Four cases of lead failure occurred during follow-up, requiring new lead implantation. In 4 patients, electrical storm (3 patients) and supraventricular tachycardia with ICD discharges (1 patient) were treated with radiofrequency ablation. Only 10 (17%) patients did not demonstrate any ICD interventions or ICD-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: 1. ICD interventions caused by malignant ventricular arrhythmias occurred in 75% patients with the device implanted more than 10 years earlier. 2. Almost a half of the analysed population suffered from complications and side effects related to implanted ICD and they were present in 8% of subjects without ICD intervention. Neither ICD interventions nor device-related adverse events were recorded in 17% of patients.