Dental age estimation: A comparative study of convolutional neural network and Demirjian's method.

The aim of this study is to compare a technique using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with the Demirjian's method for chronological age estimation of living individuals based on tooth age from panoramic radiographs. This research used 5898 panoramic X-ray images collected for diagnostic from pediatric patients aged 4-17 who sought treatment at Antalya Oral and Dental Health Hospital between 2015 and 2020. The Demirjian's method's grading was executed by researchers who possessed appropriate training and experience. In the CNN method, various CNN architectures including Alexnet, VGG16, ResNet152, DenseNet201, InceptionV3, Xception, NASNetLarge, InceptionResNetV2, and MobieNetV2 have been evaluated. Densenet201 exhibited the lowest MAE value of 0.73 years, emphasizing its superior accuracy in age estimation compared to other architectures. In most age categories, the predicted age closely matches the actual age. The most inconsistent results are observed at ages 12 and 13. The results highlight correspondence between the age predicted by CNN and the Demirjian's approach. In conclusion, the results show that the CNN method is adequate to be an alternative to the Demirjian's age estimation method. We suggest that convolutional neural network can effectively optimize the accuracy of age estimation and can be faster than traditional methods, eliminating the need for additional learning from experts.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided and conventional arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint.

Arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) can be done either conventionally or under ultrasonographic guidance, and we have compared the effectiveness of the two techniques. Twenty patients who required arthrocentesis of the TMJ were randomly assigned to ultrasonographically guided (US-guided) and conservative arthrocentesis (n=10 in each group). The number of relocations of the first and second punctures, pain experienced during each procedure measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and the duration of the procedure were the main outcome variables. The pain score compared with the maximal interincisal mouth opening measured preoperatively, immediately after operation, at 1 week, and 1 and 3 months, were secondary outcome variables. No patient in either group developed a complication, and there was no significant difference between the two groups, except that US-guided arthrocentesis took significantly longer than the conventional technique (p=0.000). US-guided arthrocentesis of the TMJ was no more successful than the conventional technique, and took longer. Further studies with more patients are required to validate these findings.